Bank pay control, UNBELIEVABLE

[bodecea]

Jesus, Willow, you get dumber by the day. The government can call in its loans at any time.

seems that way, thuggery, most people who loan money make a contract with those who loan it, all stipulations are put forth at the time the money is loaned. But not this regime. they play ball differently than decent people do.

The banks can call in their loans, too.

Oh no! The banks lend money WITH NO STRINGS ATTACHED! Now prove me wrong!

 

[WillowTree]

Jesus, Willow, you get dumber by the day. The government can call in its loans at any time.

seems that way, thuggery, most people who loan money make a contract with those who loan it, all stipulations are put forth at the time the money is loaned. But not this regime. they play ball differently than decent people do.

The Feds ALWAYS play that way. Thus the 55 mph restrictions on states BECAUSE they took federal highway money (before Obama). Thus the 21 yr old drinking age because the states take federal money (before Obama). Thus the Federal Dept of Education telling schools what to do because they take Title 1 and Reduced/Free Lunch money (before Obama).

You aren't this stupid really, are you?

I guess I are if you say so bodeck.

 

[bodecea]

Wrinkled Skeeve (Willow Tree) really DOES appear to be getting dumber as she gets older.

Must be the Alzheimer's.

Indeed. She makes a statement that there were no stings attached in post #9, and now she tries to get out of proving her statement. What BS.

prove that there were strings attached? go ahead I dare ya.

I accept your concession. Thank you for proving me right about the bank loans...........and about you.

 

[bodecea]

seems that way, thuggery, most people who loan money make a contract with those who loan it, all stipulations are put forth at the time the money is loaned. But not this regime. they play ball differently than decent people do.

The Feds ALWAYS play that way. Thus the 55 mph restrictions on states BECAUSE they took federal highway money (before Obama). Thus the 21 yr old drinking age because the states take federal money (before Obama). Thus the Federal Dept of Education telling schools what to do because they take Title 1 and Reduced/Free Lunch money (before Obama).

You aren't this stupid really, are you?

I guess I are if you say so bodeck.

Well, considering that you can't even correctly spell names right in front of you.....I would think so.

 

[Contumacious]

Fed proposes to police bank pay for 1st time - Yahoo! News

By what authority does the Federal Government think it has to dictate pay to private institutions? Someone provide me with a link to the clause in the Constitution that permits this.

This crap is unbelievable. And the left will all harp how it is just the right thing to do.

Nonsense. Of course it does.

Constitution of the welfare/warfare state of 1935

Article 69

Congress shall have the power to dictate pay to private institutions.

Karl Marx

Founding Father

 

[WillowTree]

Indeed. She makes a statement that there were no stings attached in post #9, and now she tries to get out of proving her statement. What BS.

prove that there were strings attached? go ahead I dare ya.

I accept your concession. Thank you for proving me right about the bank loans...........and about you.

I accept you complete failure in proving that there were strings attached. Therefore there weren't any.

 

[ABikerSailor]

The "strings" in question would be the contract stipulations that they had to follow in order to obtain the money.

 

[WillowTree]

The "strings" in question would be the contract stipulations that they had to follow in order to obtain the money.

so what were they? and who signed on?

 

[Article 15]

Good for us!

When they repay us back the money they owe us then they can return to paying their executives whatever they please.

 

[Article 15]

And frankly I don't give a rats ass whether the strings were attached or not.

 

[saveliberty]

I am conflicted on this whole subject. It seems incredibly socialist to me when pay is dictated to private firms. On the other hand, the money whores opened themselves up when they accepted the bailout. WillowTree is right in the sense there were no strings legally attached. In reality, you give a say to those that pay the bills. That was the slippery slope of socialism here in the first place.

Continued poor decision making on the part of bank executives probably will win the day.

 

[ABikerSailor]

The "strings" in question would be the contract stipulations that they had to follow in order to obtain the money.

so what were they? and who signed on?

WTF Wrinkled Skeeve? Did you overdose on stupid pills today?

The "they" in question were the CEO's who went begging for bailout money.

Who "signed on"? The people that needed the money, they signed the loan contracts.

You really are going full blown retard, ain't ya?

 

[WillowTree]

The "strings" in question would be the contract stipulations that they had to follow in order to obtain the money.

so what were they? and who signed on?

WTF Wrinkled Skeeve? Did you overdose on stupid pills today?

The "they" in question were the CEO's who went begging for bailout money.

Who "signed on"? The people that needed the money, they signed the loan contracts.

You really are going full blown retard, ain't ya?

Hey PIG what did the contracts say?

 

[WillowTree]

Good for us!

When they repay us back the money they owe us then they can return to paying their executives whatever they please.

except these assholes aren't just talking about banks who took bailout money!

 

[WillowTree]

And frankly I don't give a rats ass whether the strings were attached or not.

no surprise here. You don't believe in contracts either. Whoopie!

 

[bodecea]

so what were they? and who signed on?

WTF Wrinkled Skeeve? Did you overdose on stupid pills today?

The "they" in question were the CEO's who went begging for bailout money.

Who "signed on"? The people that needed the money, they signed the loan contracts.

You really are going full blown retard, ain't ya?

Hey PIG what did the contracts say?

YOU tell us. You started off in post #9 assuring us that there were NO STRINGS ATTACHED.

But, we know you want to dodge any responsibility for your own initial statements. And I can totally understand that.

 

[Mr Natural]

so what were they? and who signed on?

WTF Wrinkled Skeeve? Did you overdose on stupid pills today?

The "they" in question were the CEO's who went begging for bailout money.

Who "signed on"? The people that needed the money, they signed the loan contracts.

You really are going full blown retard, ain't ya?

Hey PIG what did the contracts say?

Essentially they said that by accepting this money you are now a wholly owned subsidiary of the U.S. government.

 

[Avatar4321]

Unbelievable? I believe it. This administration does nothing but over reach

 

[WillowTree]

WTF Wrinkled Skeeve? Did you overdose on stupid pills today?

The "they" in question were the CEO's who went begging for bailout money.

Who "signed on"? The people that needed the money, they signed the loan contracts.

You really are going full blown retard, ain't ya?

Hey PIG what did the contracts say?

YOU tell us. You started off in post #9 assuring us that there were NO STRINGS ATTACHED.

But, we know you want to dodge any responsibility for your own initial statements. And I can totally understand that.

and you said I was wrong so I am confident you can prove me wrong by producing the contracts. Am I right?

 

[WillowTree]

WTF Wrinkled Skeeve? Did you overdose on stupid pills today?

The "they" in question were the CEO's who went begging for bailout money.

Who "signed on"? The people that needed the money, they signed the loan contracts.

You really are going full blown retard, ain't ya?

Hey PIG what did the contracts say?

Essentially they said that by accepting this money you are now a wholly owned subsidiary of the U.S. government.

poor suckers, they didn't know the asshole regime they were dealing with did they?