Bachmann signs The Family Lead pledge

[Robert]

Holy shit how horrible!!! OMG an candidate who won't sign on to Porno its the end of the fucking world I tell ya!

 

[mudwhistle]

I don't think these candidates should be signing these vows or these petitions, but after reading the thing, it's clear the OP was meant to mislead us on it's intent.

 

[Stephanie]

I don't think these candidates should be signing these vows or these petitions, but after reading the thing, it's clear the OP was meant to mislead us on it's intent.

That's thinkprogress for you. A Soros funded website.

 

[Seawytch]

The Pledge...

Guess Newtie will never sign it. The first "commandment" on the pledge is Fidelity to your spouse.

 

[Robert]

The Pledge...

Guess Newtie will never sign it. The first "commandment" on the pledge is Fidelity to your spouse.

One thing for sure no candidate on the left will sign it I mean my god no porno? what the hell are they thinking

 

[Si modo]

BREAKING: Bachmann pledges to ban pornography | ThinkProgress

BREAKING: BACHMANN PLEDGES TO BAN PORNOGRAPHY | Tonight, Michele Bachmann became the first presidential candidate to sign a pledge created by THE FAMiLY LEADER, an influential social-conservative group in Iowa. By signing the pledge Bachmann “vows” to “uphold the institution of marriage as only between one man and one woman” by committing herself to 14 specifics steps. The ninth step calls for the banning of “all forms” of pornography. The pledge also states that homosexuality is both a choice and a health risk. You can read all the details of the pledge here.

And it says that homosexuality is both a choice and a health risk.

"Small government Conservatism" at it's finest.

More of your typical idiotic parroting without checking the original source.

Damn, you are intellectually lazy. That hasn't changed one bit.

 

[Seawytch]

I don't think these candidates should be signing these vows or these petitions, but after reading the thing, it's clear the OP was meant to mislead us on it's intent.

Oh? And just what IS the intent of "the Pledge" in your estimation?

I see a lot of homophobia in it...not surprising that Bachmman, whose husband is gay as a three dollar bill, would sign it. Michelle Bachmman must live in constant fear of that phone call...


"ma'am, we've arrested your husband in a public restroom"

 

[High_Gravity]

Whats banning porn going to do? anyone with a video camera or cell phone can make their own porn, all it will do is drive this industry right into the arms of the underworld, very stupid fucking decision. If you don't like porn, don't watch it, its simple.

 

[Seawytch]

The Pledge...

Guess Newtie will never sign it. The first "commandment" on the pledge is Fidelity to your spouse.

One thing for sure no candidate on the left will sign it I mean my god no porno? what the hell are they thinking

Um...the left an no pornography? Wanna try that one again, Skippy?

Porn in the US. Conservatives are the Biggest Consumers.

 

[Stephanie]

I don't think these candidates should be signing these vows or these petitions, but after reading the thing, it's clear the OP was meant to mislead us on it's intent.

Oh? And just what IS the intent of "the Pledge" in your estimation?

I see a lot of homophobia in it...not surprising that Bachmman, whose husband is gay as a three dollar bill, would sign it. Michelle Bachmman must live in constant fear of that phone call...


"ma'am, we've arrested your husband in a public restroom"

wow, nasty and you liberals are as always, so tolerant.

 

[Newby]

Whats banning porn going to do? anyone with a video camera or cell phone can make their own porn, all it will do is drive this industry right into the arms of the underworld, very stupid fucking decision. If you don't like porn, don't watch it, its simple.

She didn't sign a pledge to ban pornography, the op was misleading. Read the link and what others have posted about it to this point.

 

[Si modo]

I don't think these candidates should be signing these vows or these petitions, but after reading the thing, it's clear the OP was meant to mislead us on it's intent.

Oh? And just what IS the intent of "the Pledge" in your estimation?

I see a lot of homophobia in it...not surprising that Bachmman, whose husband is gay as a three dollar bill, would sign it. Michelle Bachmman must live in constant fear of that phone call...


"ma'am, we've arrested your husband in a public restroom"

What is your problem? Really, what is the source of your absolute bitterness?

 

[Stephanie]

Liberals say they are FOR homosexuals, but then they turn around and USE THEM as a weapon AGAINST PEOPLE.

Now you can understand why a LOT of people feel the way they do.

 

[Si modo]

Liberals say they are FOR homosexuals, but then they turn around and USE THEM as a weapon AGAINST PEOPLE.

Now you can understand why a LOT of people feel the way they do.

Right. My brother was gay and the implication that being gay is bad really pisses me off. And, it comes from a dyke. The irony.

 

[Robert]

The Pledge...

Guess Newtie will never sign it. The first "commandment" on the pledge is Fidelity to your spouse.

One thing for sure no candidate on the left will sign it I mean my god no porno? what the hell are they thinking

Um...the left an no pornography? Wanna try that one again, Skippy?

Porn in the US. Conservatives are the Biggest Consumers.

Alright then I guess you're fine with having no Porno and would be willing to sign the pledge or demand that your elected representative sign the pledge then? Right...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

BREAKING: Bachmann pledges to ban pornography | ThinkProgress

BREAKING: BACHMANN PLEDGES TO BAN PORNOGRAPHY | Tonight, Michele Bachmann became the first presidential candidate to sign a pledge created by THE FAMiLY LEADER, an influential social-conservative group in Iowa. By signing the pledge Bachmann “vows” to “uphold the institution of marriage as only between one man and one woman” by committing herself to 14 specifics steps. The ninth step calls for the banning of “all forms” of pornography. The pledge also states that homosexuality is both a choice and a health risk. You can read all the details of the pledge here.

And it says that homosexuality is both a choice and a health risk.

"Small government Conservatism" at it's finest.

Whinging again?

Funny thing. I read the pledge she supposedly signed, it does not say anything about homosexuality that is not absolutely true. It points out that not a single peer reviewed study has ever proven that homosexuality is not a choice, or that it cannot be resisted.

As for banning pornography, it doesn't say that either. What it calls for is humanely protecting children, and women, from sexual slavery, human trafficking, being seduced into promiscuity, and all forms of pornography and prostitution. I don't agree with all of that, but the last time I looked all of that was already illegal. Do you have an objection to eliminating child pornography and prostitution for some reason?

As for the Sharia law thing, what that calls for, and I quote, is "Rejection of Sharia Islam and all other anti-woman, anti-human rights forms of totalitarian control."

I really do not understand why people who claim they support women's rights support Sharia Islam in the first place, but you are certainly proving how stupid it is to do so. Maybe if you actually read the stuff the trash you do read talks about you would learn that the stuff you trad is trash.

Modbert is either a total lying fuck, or is just repeated stupid stuff he read elsewhere having never looked at the article he attached, there's no other explanation

 

[Si modo]

BREAKING: Bachmann pledges to ban pornography | ThinkProgress

And it says that homosexuality is both a choice and a health risk.

"Small government Conservatism" at it's finest.

Whinging again?

Funny thing. I read the pledge she supposedly signed, it does not say anything about homosexuality that is not absolutely true. It points out that not a single peer reviewed study has ever proven that homosexuality is not a choice, or that it cannot be resisted.

As for banning pornography, it doesn't say that either. What it calls for is humanely protecting children, and women, from sexual slavery, human trafficking, being seduced into promiscuity, and all forms of pornography and prostitution. I don't agree with all of that, but the last time I looked all of that was already illegal. Do you have an objection to eliminating child pornography and prostitution for some reason?

As for the Sharia law thing, what that calls for, and I quote, is "Rejection of Sharia Islam and all other anti-woman, anti-human rights forms of totalitarian control."

I really do not understand why people who claim they support women's rights support Sharia Islam in the first place, but you are certainly proving how stupid it is to do so. Maybe if you actually read the stuff the trash you do read talks about you would learn that the stuff you trad is trash.

Modbert is either a total lying fuck, or is just repeated stupid stuff he read elsewhere having never looked at the article he attached, there's no other explanation

Doggie's a good parrot. He doesn't think for himself. Never has.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

BREAKING: Bachmann pledges to ban pornography | ThinkProgress

BREAKING: BACHMANN PLEDGES TO BAN PORNOGRAPHY | Tonight, Michele Bachmann became the first presidential candidate to sign a pledge created by THE FAMiLY LEADER, an influential social-conservative group in Iowa. By signing the pledge Bachmann “vows” to “uphold the institution of marriage as only between one man and one woman” by committing herself to 14 specifics steps. The ninth step calls for the banning of “all forms” of pornography. The pledge also states that homosexuality is both a choice and a health risk. You can read all the details of the pledge here.

And it says that homosexuality is both a choice and a health risk.

"Small government Conservatism" at it's finest.

You're either a fucking liar or a moron who didn't bother to read the linked article.

Which is it?

 

[Stephanie]

BREAKING: Bachmann pledges to ban pornography | ThinkProgress

And it says that homosexuality is both a choice and a health risk.

"Small government Conservatism" at it's finest.

Whinging again?

Funny thing. I read the pledge she supposedly signed, it does not say anything about homosexuality that is not absolutely true. It points out that not a single peer reviewed study has ever proven that homosexuality is not a choice, or that it cannot be resisted.

As for banning pornography, it doesn't say that either. What it calls for is humanely protecting children, and women, from sexual slavery, human trafficking, being seduced into promiscuity, and all forms of pornography and prostitution. I don't agree with all of that, but the last time I looked all of that was already illegal. Do you have an objection to eliminating child pornography and prostitution for some reason?

As for the Sharia law thing, what that calls for, and I quote, is "Rejection of Sharia Islam and all other anti-woman, anti-human rights forms of totalitarian control."

I really do not understand why people who claim they support women's rights support Sharia Islam in the first place, but you are certainly proving how stupid it is to do so. Maybe if you actually read the stuff the trash you do read talks about you would learn that the stuff you trad is trash.

Modbert is either a total lying fuck, or is just repeated stupid stuff he read elsewhere having never looked at the article he attached, there's no other explanation

Both apply.
and this is the work of thinkprogess. they are there to SMEAR, makeup, twist stupid shit like this. they have no honor. they were discredited years ago. yet here they are.

 

[Newby]

Whinging again?

Funny thing. I read the pledge she supposedly signed, it does not say anything about homosexuality that is not absolutely true. It points out that not a single peer reviewed study has ever proven that homosexuality is not a choice, or that it cannot be resisted.

As for banning pornography, it doesn't say that either. What it calls for is humanely protecting children, and women, from sexual slavery, human trafficking, being seduced into promiscuity, and all forms of pornography and prostitution. I don't agree with all of that, but the last time I looked all of that was already illegal. Do you have an objection to eliminating child pornography and prostitution for some reason?

As for the Sharia law thing, what that calls for, and I quote, is "Rejection of Sharia Islam and all other anti-woman, anti-human rights forms of totalitarian control."

I really do not understand why people who claim they support women's rights support Sharia Islam in the first place, but you are certainly proving how stupid it is to do so. Maybe if you actually read the stuff the trash you do read talks about you would learn that the stuff you trad is trash.

Modbert is either a total lying fuck, or is just repeated stupid stuff he read elsewhere having never looked at the article he attached, there's no other explanation

Both apply.
and this is the work of thinkprogess. they are there to SMEAR, makeup, twist stupid shit like this. they have no honor. they were discredited years ago. yet here they are.

As long as there are people out there such as Modbert that will lap it up, believe it for themselves, and then repeat it, they'll keep doing it. Free labor to spread their propaganda, what more could they ask for?