Bachmann signs The Family Lead pledge

[Si modo]

The truth is a "weapon against people"? What did I say that was "against" gays and lesbians?

Please direct us to the 'truth' you posted.

All we see is a bitter dyke.

That Michelle Bachmman's very enthusiastic husband is just one toe tap away from pulling a Larry Craig.

Now again, where is the alleged "bitterness" you see?

Funny how you get your undies in a twist over my statements and get all indignant about your gay relative...but have no problem using pejoratives for gays and lesbians.

Oh the irony...

So, you are complimenting her husband by saying he is gay, right?

Bitter dyke.

 

[Stephanie]

and this is the work of thinkprogess. they are there to SMEAR, makeup, twist stupid shit like this. they have no honor. they were discredited years ago. yet here they are.

They were discredited...really? When did this happen? I understand that you conservatives don't like ThinkProgress...after all, they practice that forgotten art of journalism that Fox never even knew existed. Like Media Matters, they actually source their material and provide links to the original.
The wording of this nasty, homophobic, islamaphobic pledge is a bit hinky, but one can certainly come to the conclusion that they want to ban pornography.

What does the following statement mean to you?

I vow to do so through my:

[...]Protection of women[...]from [...]all forms of pornography.

How do you "protect women from pornography"?

crack me up. If you don't know about the SCANDEL thinkprogress was involved in, that is not my problem. People SHOULD NOT take thinkprogess or mediamatters SERIOUS. they are nothing but HATEFUL PROGAGANDA.

 

[High_Gravity]

There goes Casey Anthony's future.

Not necessarily, even if porn were to go away in the US she could just go overseas and do it.

 

[Seawytch]

and this is the work of thinkprogess. they are there to SMEAR, makeup, twist stupid shit like this. they have no honor. they were discredited years ago. yet here they are.

They were discredited...really? When did this happen? I understand that you conservatives don't like ThinkProgress...after all, they practice that forgotten art of journalism that Fox never even knew existed. Like Media Matters, they actually source their material and provide links to the original.

The wording of this nasty, homophobic, islamaphobic pledge is a bit hinky, but one can certainly come to the conclusion that they want to ban pornography.

What does the following statement mean to you?

I vow to do so through my:

[...]Protection of women[...]from [...]all forms of pornography.

How do you "protect women from pornography"?

It's a personal pledge.

You do as you wish personally. She will do as she wishes personally.


Idiot.

A pledge to do a lot of personal morality based legislating...if you actually read it.

Douchenozzle.

 

[jillian]

and this is the work of thinkprogess. they are there to SMEAR, makeup, twist stupid shit like this. they have no honor. they were discredited years ago. yet here they are.

They were discredited...really? When did this happen? I understand that you conservatives don't like ThinkProgress...after all, they practice that forgotten art of journalism that Fox never even knew existed. Like Media Matters, they actually source their material and provide links to the original.

The wording of this nasty, homophobic, islamaphobic pledge is a bit hinky, but one can certainly come to the conclusion that they want to ban pornography.

What does the following statement mean to you?

I vow to do so through my:

[...]Protection of women[...]from [...]all forms of pornography.

How do you "protect women from pornography"?

It's a personal pledge.

You do as you wish personally. She will do as she wishes personally.


Idiot.

well, it's not a "personal" pledge when you're talking about interfering with the 1st amendment and equal protection clauses.

and yes, stephanie's an idiot. but she gets to exercise her 1st amendment right to spew stupidity to her heart's content.

 

[Wry Catcher]

BREAKING: Bachmann pledges to ban pornography | ThinkProgress

BREAKING: BACHMANN PLEDGES TO BAN PORNOGRAPHY | Tonight, Michele Bachmann became the first presidential candidate to sign a pledge created by THE FAMiLY LEADER, an influential social-conservative group in Iowa. By signing the pledge Bachmann “vows” to “uphold the institution of marriage as only between one man and one woman” by committing herself to 14 specifics steps. The ninth step calls for the banning of “all forms” of pornography. The pledge also states that homosexuality is both a choice and a health risk. You can read all the details of the pledge here.

And it says that homosexuality is both a choice and a health risk.

"Small government Conservatism" at it's finest.

Whinging again?

Funny thing. I read the pledge she supposedly signed, it does not say anything about homosexuality that is not absolutely true. It points out that not a single peer reviewed study has ever proven that homosexuality is not a choice, or that it cannot be resisted.

As for banning pornography, it doesn't say that either. What it calls for is humanely protecting children, and women, from sexual slavery, human trafficking, being seduced into promiscuity, and all forms of pornography and prostitution. I don't agree with all of that, but the last time I looked all of that was already illegal. Do you have an objection to eliminating child pornography and prostitution for some reason?

As for the Sharia law thing, what that calls for, and I quote, is "Rejection of Sharia Islam and all other anti-woman, anti-human rights forms of totalitarian control."

I really do not understand why people who claim they support women's rights support Sharia Islam in the first place, but you are certainly proving how stupid it is to do so. Maybe if you actually read the stuff the trash you do read talks about you would learn that the stuff you trad is trash.

Do you understand demoagoguery?

 

[Seawytch]

Please direct us to the 'truth' you posted.

All we see is a bitter dyke.

That Michelle Bachmman's very enthusiastic husband is just one toe tap away from pulling a Larry Craig.

Now again, where is the alleged "bitterness" you see?

Funny how you get your undies in a twist over my statements and get all indignant about your gay relative...but have no problem using pejoratives for gays and lesbians.

Oh the irony...

So, you are complimenting her husband by saying he is gay, right?

Bitter dyke.

I think it's a compliment...HE wouldn't. And Michelle "I've been trapped in a bathroom by marauding lesbians" Bachmman would be apoplectic.

 

[Seawytch]

and this is the work of thinkprogess. they are there to SMEAR, makeup, twist stupid shit like this. they have no honor. they were discredited years ago. yet here they are.

They were discredited...really? When did this happen? I understand that you conservatives don't like ThinkProgress...after all, they practice that forgotten art of journalism that Fox never even knew existed. Like Media Matters, they actually source their material and provide links to the original.
The wording of this nasty, homophobic, islamaphobic pledge is a bit hinky, but one can certainly come to the conclusion that they want to ban pornography.

What does the following statement mean to you?

I vow to do so through my:

[...]Protection of women[...]from [...]all forms of pornography.

How do you "protect women from pornography"?

crack me up. If you don't know about the SCANDEL thinkprogress was involved in, that is not my problem. People SHOULD NOT take thinkprogess or mediamatters SERIOUS. they are nothing but HATEFUL PROGAGANDA.

Ah, so you got nothing...thanks for clarifying.

 

[dilloduck]

She's a politician and they are always looking for angles that will get them votes. She figures that announcing to the world that she will protect women and children from evil sex will get her votes. Don't bother trying to read any deeper. It's a waste of time.

 

[Stephanie]

They were discredited...really? When did this happen? I understand that you conservatives don't like ThinkProgress...after all, they practice that forgotten art of journalism that Fox never even knew existed. Like Media Matters, they actually source their material and provide links to the original.

The wording of this nasty, homophobic, islamaphobic pledge is a bit hinky, but one can certainly come to the conclusion that they want to ban pornography.

What does the following statement mean to you?

I vow to do so through my:

[...]Protection of women[...]from [...]all forms of pornography.

How do you "protect women from pornography"?

It's a personal pledge.

You do as you wish personally. She will do as she wishes personally.


Idiot.

well, it's not a "personal" pledge when you're talking about interfering with the 1st amendment and equal protection clauses.

and yes, stephanie's an idiot. but she gets to exercise her 1st amendment right to spew stupidity to her heart's content.

sheesh jilly, after all these years you get more bitter by the day. I'm sorry you must miserable and come through looking like a witch.

 

[Si modo]

That Michelle Bachmman's very enthusiastic husband is just one toe tap away from pulling a Larry Craig.

Now again, where is the alleged "bitterness" you see?

Funny how you get your undies in a twist over my statements and get all indignant about your gay relative...but have no problem using pejoratives for gays and lesbians.

Oh the irony...

So, you are complimenting her husband by saying he is gay, right?

Bitter dyke.

I think it's a compliment...HE wouldn't. And Michelle "I've been trapped in a bathroom by marauding lesbians" Bachmman would be apoplectic.

So, you WERE complimenting Bachmann and her husband.




Yup, I predicted the lie.

Bitter dyke.

 

[Stephanie]

They were discredited...really? When did this happen? I understand that you conservatives don't like ThinkProgress...after all, they practice that forgotten art of journalism that Fox never even knew existed. Like Media Matters, they actually source their material and provide links to the original.
The wording of this nasty, homophobic, islamaphobic pledge is a bit hinky, but one can certainly come to the conclusion that they want to ban pornography.

What does the following statement mean to you?

I vow to do so through my:

[...]Protection of women[...]from [...]all forms of pornography.

How do you "protect women from pornography"?

crack me up. If you don't know about the SCANDEL thinkprogress was involved in, that is not my problem. People SHOULD NOT take thinkprogess or mediamatters SERIOUS. they are nothing but HATEFUL PROGAGANDA.

Ah, so you got nothing...thanks for clarifying.

you supposedly know it all. GO LOOK IT UP

 

[Si modo]

They were discredited...really? When did this happen? I understand that you conservatives don't like ThinkProgress...after all, they practice that forgotten art of journalism that Fox never even knew existed. Like Media Matters, they actually source their material and provide links to the original.

The wording of this nasty, homophobic, islamaphobic pledge is a bit hinky, but one can certainly come to the conclusion that they want to ban pornography.

What does the following statement mean to you?

I vow to do so through my:

[...]Protection of women[...]from [...]all forms of pornography.

How do you "protect women from pornography"?

It's a personal pledge.

You do as you wish personally. She will do as she wishes personally.


Idiot.

well, it's not a "personal" pledge when you're talking about interfering with the 1st amendment and equal protection clauses.

and yes, stephanie's an idiot. but she gets to exercise her 1st amendment right to spew stupidity to her heart's content.

Sorry, you can't read. It was a personal pledge.

I mean, if you think that applies to one's personal opinions expressed in a personal, then that's good to know. Apparently, some folks have the idea of the First is that everyone must think as they do.

It doesn't work that way, no matter how bitter the dyke is.

 

[Jarhead]

So, you are complimenting her husband by saying he is gay, right?

Bitter dyke.

I think it's a compliment...HE wouldn't. And Michelle "I've been trapped in a bathroom by marauding lesbians" Bachmman would be apoplectic.

So, you WERE complimenting Bachmann and her husband.




Yup, I predicted the lie.

Bitter dyke.

You may see her as bitter...and that is fine and your perogative. She may be bitter...and that too is fine and her perogative..
But why must you define her with a term that is deemed as deragatory?
It gets us nowhere.

 

[jillian]

It's a personal pledge.

You do as you wish personally. She will do as she wishes personally.


Idiot.

well, it's not a "personal" pledge when you're talking about interfering with the 1st amendment and equal protection clauses.

and yes, stephanie's an idiot. but she gets to exercise her 1st amendment right to spew stupidity to her heart's content.

Sorry, you can't read. It was a personal pledge.

I mean, if you think that applies to one's personal opinions expressed in a personal, then that's good to know. Apparently, some folks have the idea of the First is that everyone must think as they do.

It doesn't work that way, no matter how bitter the dyke is.

are you having a bad morning, Si?

i have no problem reading. but you're being a bit disingenuous saying it's a "personal" pledge. it's a" personal" pledge to violate the court's decisions on the 1st amendment and to infringe on people's equal protection under the law.

as far as her comments on homosexuality being "choice", she has the right to be as stupid as she wishes.

now, would you be as understanding if the "personal" pledge were to ban guns in this country? or would you say she wanted to violate your constitutional rights, was trying to take away our guns "like they did in nazi germany" and point out the decision in the heller case?

i'm thinking you'd have done the latter.

as for seawytch, i'm afraid that whether someone is a lesbian or not really isn't much concern to me. and if you want to talk about "angry", i'd look more at steffie's lunatic posts. but there ya go.

got to run for a bit... will look back later.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So Democrat Bronx Borough President voted against Gay Marriage because it violates his Catholic Faith, does that make him a "hater" too?

 

[Stephanie]

well, it's not a "personal" pledge when you're talking about interfering with the 1st amendment and equal protection clauses.

and yes, stephanie's an idiot. but she gets to exercise her 1st amendment right to spew stupidity to her heart's content.

Sorry, you can't read. It was a personal pledge.

I mean, if you think that applies to one's personal opinions expressed in a personal, then that's good to know. Apparently, some folks have the idea of the First is that everyone must think as they do.

It doesn't work that way, no matter how bitter the dyke is.

are you having a bad morning, Si?

i have no problem reading. but you're being a bit disingenuous saying it's a "personal" pledge. it's a" personal" pledge to violate the court's decisions on the 1st amendment and to infringe on people's equal protection under the law.

as far as her comments on homosexuality being "choice", she has the right to be as stupid as she wishes.

now, would you be as understanding if the "personal" pledge were to ban guns in this country? or would you say she wanted to violate your constitutional rights, was trying to take away our guns "like they did in nazi germany" and point out the decision in the heller case?

i'm thinking you'd have done the latter.

as for seawytch, i'm afraid that whether someone is a lesbian or not really isn't much concern to me. and if you want to talk about "angry", i'd look more at steffie's lunatic posts. but there ya go.

got to run for a bit... will look back later.

LOL, you got a thing for me today my dear friend Jilly. No problem, I'm used to it.

 

[Newby]

well, it's not a "personal" pledge when you're talking about interfering with the 1st amendment and equal protection clauses.

and yes, stephanie's an idiot. but she gets to exercise her 1st amendment right to spew stupidity to her heart's content.

Sorry, you can't read. It was a personal pledge.

I mean, if you think that applies to one's personal opinions expressed in a personal, then that's good to know. Apparently, some folks have the idea of the First is that everyone must think as they do.

It doesn't work that way, no matter how bitter the dyke is.

are you having a bad morning, Si?

i have no problem reading. but you're being a bit disingenuous saying it's a "personal" pledge. it's a" personal" pledge to violate the court's decisions on the 1st amendment and to infringe on people's equal protection under the law.
as far as her comments on homosexuality being "choice", she has the right to be as stupid as she wishes.

now, would you be as understanding if the "personal" pledge were to ban guns in this country? or would you say she wanted to violate your constitutional rights, was trying to take away our guns "like they did in nazi germany" and point out the decision in the heller case?

i'm thinking you'd have done the latter.

as for seawytch, i'm afraid that whether someone is a lesbian or not really isn't much concern to me. and if you want to talk about "angry", i'd look more at steffie's lunatic posts. but there ya go.

got to run for a bit... will look back later.

The whole damn op is disingenuous since that's not what the pledge said at all to begin with. Go read the damn thing. Sheesh.

 

[Si modo]

well, it's not a "personal" pledge when you're talking about interfering with the 1st amendment and equal protection clauses.

and yes, stephanie's an idiot. but she gets to exercise her 1st amendment right to spew stupidity to her heart's content.

Sorry, you can't read. It was a personal pledge.

I mean, if you think that applies to one's personal opinions expressed in a personal, then that's good to know. Apparently, some folks have the idea of the First is that everyone must think as they do.

It doesn't work that way, no matter how bitter the dyke is.

are you having a bad morning, Si?

i have no problem reading. but you're being a bit disingenuous saying it's a "personal" pledge. it's a" personal" pledge to violate the court's decisions on the 1st amendment and to infringe on people's equal protection under the law.

as far as her comments on homosexuality being "choice", she has the right to be as stupid as she wishes.

now, would you be as understanding if the "personal" pledge were to ban guns in this country? or would you say she wanted to violate your constitutional rights, was trying to take away our guns "like they did in nazi germany" and point out the decision in the heller case?

i'm thinking you'd have done the latter.

as for seawytch, i'm afraid that whether someone is a lesbian or not really isn't much concern to me. and if you want to talk about "angry", i'd look more at steffie's lunatic posts. but there ya go.

got to run for a bit... will look back later.

I'm having a great morning, thank you.

You need to read the actual personal pledge and not someone's interpretation of it.

 

[mudwhistle]

This thread hasn't been moved yet???

Wow, gossup needs to be treated as such, not allowed to languish in faux credibility.