Are there ANY on the Right who still believe Iraq was involved in 9/11?

[Zona]

This is one of the dumbest questions I've seen here. Bush told the world back in 01 that Iraq had nothing to do with the attacks. But Don't tell the Bush haters and the Anti war idiots. They won't believe it anyway.

Cheney: I never linked Iraq with 9/11. Oh really?
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJiNtpIpD6k]YouTube - Cheney: I never linked Iraq with 9/11. Oh really?[/ame]

By the way, what did Bush do to retailiate the most horrible attack on U.S. Soil ever? There is no way he did nothing, right?

We all know we went to Iraq for WMD's. We go th......oh wait. We didnt get them, they didnt exist.

He was told over and over there was no WMD's but off we go to war, directly after 9/11 to a country that had nothing to do with it.

I hated him for that.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Many on the right continue to deflect the question. Why? Because they cannot post any significant effort by the government to set the record very officially and very publicly straight for quite awhile that Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11.

No one can offer any relevant evidence to offset the very real fact.

So, right wing. Three words: get over it. You losers.

Straight up LIE. BUSH STATED REPEATEDLY that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Cheney did also. Go ahead RETARD provide us one link to them saying they thought Iraq had anything to do with 9/11. Come on we keep asking for you LIARS to provide evidence and you resort to this shit. MORE lies. Bush and Cheney BOTH publicly and for the record STATED Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. More than once. In the Paper and on the TV.

Now fucking lying asshole provide us with a link to them claiming Iraq was involved in 9/11. Provide us with a link claiming we invaded Iraq because of 9/11. We have provided you with numerous links over the last 6 years showing just the opposite. AND you LIARS keep on making the claims. Dishonest piece of SHIT.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I repeat:

WHAT DID BUSH DO TO RETAILATE FOR THE WORSE ATTACK ON AMERICAN SOIL?

You continue to avoid the question, deflecting some irrelevant factoid.
Please show who in the administration said that Iraq was responsible for 9/11 and this was the justification for the war.
We have already seen one article that shows the exact opposite.
Either supply such evidence (and if "99% of the American people" believed it evidence should be easy to come by) or admit that the statement is a canard and the whole thing a strawman.

well, I tell you what...I was still in when 9/11 happened. All we kept saying was, its pay back time.

When we were flying marines over we kept saying its pay back time. WE THOUGHT WE WERE FIGHTING THE PERSON WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR 9./11.....somehow.

There you go.

Now, ans. this, what did Bush do about that horrible attack on American soil? The worse in history here.

COMMENT ON THIS SPECIFICALLY PLEASE.

Strawman indeed.

He invaded Afghanistan and drove OBL in to hiding in caves and out of communication with his world wide networks, stuck sending tapes to the press in hopes of keeping in the news. Hell he is probably dead and been dead for several years. Further Bush ordered the military to kill his operatives in Afghanistan and later in Iraq after they were found there. He ordered attacks on the leadership of OBL in Pakistan as well and finally got the Pakistanis to wage war on the Taliban as well.

But then this is all general basic knowledge available to any person with the ability to read and access TV or the Internet.

The question now is what is Obama gonna do? Vacillate until it is to late to do anything in Afghanistan all the while leaving those troops already there swinging in the wind? All with the support and help of rejects like you and the left?

 

[eots]

You continue to avoid the question, deflecting some irrelevant factoid.
Please show who in the administration said that Iraq was responsible for 9/11 and this was the justification for the war.
We have already seen one article that shows the exact opposite.
Either supply such evidence (and if "99% of the American people" believed it evidence should be easy to come by) or admit that the statement is a canard and the whole thing a strawman.

well, I tell you what...I was still in when 9/11 happened. All we kept saying was, its pay back time.

When we were flying marines over we kept saying its pay back time. WE THOUGHT WE WERE FIGHTING THE PERSON WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR 9./11.....somehow.

There you go.

Now, ans. this, what did Bush do about that horrible attack on American soil? The worse in history here.

COMMENT ON THIS SPECIFICALLY PLEASE.

Strawman indeed.

He invaded Afghanistan and drove OBL in to hiding in caves and out of communication with his world wide networks, stuck sending tapes to the press in hopes of keeping in the news. Hell he is probably dead and been dead for several years. Further Bush ordered the military to kill his operatives in Afghanistan and later in Iraq after they were found there. He ordered attacks on the leadership of OBL in Pakistan as well and finally got the Pakistanis to wage war on the Taliban as well.

But then this is all general basic knowledge available to any person with the ability to read and access TV or the Internet.

The question now is what is Obama gonna do? Vacillate until it is to late to do anything in Afghanistan all the while leaving those troops already there swinging in the wind? All with the support and help of rejects like you and the left?

oh bullshit they let OBLgo because he works for them and then made up a story of WMDs
and used the mind statre created by 9/11 to dupe people into supporting invading another country and excuting their leader in a mock trial....

 

[kyzr]

oh bullshit they let OBLgo because he works for them and then made up a story of WMDs
and used the mind statre created by 9/11 to dupe people into supporting invading another country and excuting their leader in a mock trial....

WHY?? What possible reasons would anyone do what you suggest?

A few facts to consider:
1) the Iraqis tried and then hung Saddam who murdered about 300,000
2) why would the UN approve the actions against Saddam if they believed he didn't have WMD, and didn't gas the Kurds?
3) why would over 40 nations participate in the regime change if it wasn't warranted?

 

[Zona]

You continue to avoid the question, deflecting some irrelevant factoid.
Please show who in the administration said that Iraq was responsible for 9/11 and this was the justification for the war.
We have already seen one article that shows the exact opposite.
Either supply such evidence (and if "99% of the American people" believed it evidence should be easy to come by) or admit that the statement is a canard and the whole thing a strawman.

well, I tell you what...I was still in when 9/11 happened. All we kept saying was, its pay back time.

When we were flying marines over we kept saying its pay back time. WE THOUGHT WE WERE FIGHTING THE PERSON WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR 9./11.....somehow.

There you go.

Now, ans. this, what did Bush do about that horrible attack on American soil? The worse in history here.

COMMENT ON THIS SPECIFICALLY PLEASE.

Strawman indeed.

He invaded Afghanistan and drove OBL in to hiding in caves and out of communication with his world wide networks, stuck sending tapes to the press in hopes of keeping in the news. Hell he is probably dead and been dead for several years. Further Bush ordered the military to kill his operatives in Afghanistan and later in Iraq after they were found there. He ordered attacks on the leadership of OBL in Pakistan as well and finally got the Pakistanis to wage war on the Taliban as well.

But then this is all general basic knowledge available to any person with the ability to read and access TV or the Internet.

The question now is what is Obama gonna do? Vacillate until it is to late to do anything in Afghanistan all the while leaving those troops already there swinging in the wind? All with the support and help of rejects like you and the left?

So it had nothing to do with WMD's? Oh and what was up with that "Mission accomplished" sign? LOL

The important question that you righty's keep dodging....what did he do in retaliation to the worse attack on American soil? Exactly, WHAT DID HE DO "GUNNY"..

 

[HUGGY]

well, I tell you what...I was still in when 9/11 happened. All we kept saying was, its pay back time.

When we were flying marines over we kept saying its pay back time. WE THOUGHT WE WERE FIGHTING THE PERSON WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR 9./11.....somehow.

There you go.

Now, ans. this, what did Bush do about that horrible attack on American soil? The worse in history here.

COMMENT ON THIS SPECIFICALLY PLEASE.

Strawman indeed.

He invaded Afghanistan and drove OBL in to hiding in caves and out of communication with his world wide networks, stuck sending tapes to the press in hopes of keeping in the news. Hell he is probably dead and been dead for several years. Further Bush ordered the military to kill his operatives in Afghanistan and later in Iraq after they were found there. He ordered attacks on the leadership of OBL in Pakistan as well and finally got the Pakistanis to wage war on the Taliban as well.

But then this is all general basic knowledge available to any person with the ability to read and access TV or the Internet.

The question now is what is Obama gonna do? Vacillate until it is to late to do anything in Afghanistan all the while leaving those troops already there swinging in the wind? All with the support and help of rejects like you and the left?

So it had nothing to do with WMD's? Oh and what was up with that "Mission accomplished" sign? LOL

The important question that you righty's keep dodging....what did he do in retaliation to the worse attack on American soil? Exactly, WHAT DID HE DO "GUNNY"..

These neo cons are lying sacks of liquid shit..dispute this you traitorous fucks!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZTLmOoPzjs&feature=PlayList&p=048B5AF3E4C3DEA2&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=6]YouTube - Colin Powell Saying He Was Misled Before UN Speech on WMDs[/ame]

 

[The Rabbi]

well, I tell you what...I was still in when 9/11 happened. All we kept saying was, its pay back time.

When we were flying marines over we kept saying its pay back time. WE THOUGHT WE WERE FIGHTING THE PERSON WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR 9./11.....somehow.

There you go.

Now, ans. this, what did Bush do about that horrible attack on American soil? The worse in history here.

COMMENT ON THIS SPECIFICALLY PLEASE.

Strawman indeed.

He invaded Afghanistan and drove OBL in to hiding in caves and out of communication with his world wide networks, stuck sending tapes to the press in hopes of keeping in the news. Hell he is probably dead and been dead for several years. Further Bush ordered the military to kill his operatives in Afghanistan and later in Iraq after they were found there. He ordered attacks on the leadership of OBL in Pakistan as well and finally got the Pakistanis to wage war on the Taliban as well.

But then this is all general basic knowledge available to any person with the ability to read and access TV or the Internet.

The question now is what is Obama gonna do? Vacillate until it is to late to do anything in Afghanistan all the while leaving those troops already there swinging in the wind? All with the support and help of rejects like you and the left?

So it had nothing to do with WMD's? Oh and what was up with that "Mission accomplished" sign? LOL

The important question that you righty's keep dodging....what did he do in retaliation to the worse attack on American soil? Exactly, WHAT DID HE DO "GUNNY"..

He didnt do anything in retaliation. We don't do things to retaliate. We do things to fix the problem. And Bush did just that.
Stop propping up those straw men.

 

[kyzr]

Oh and what was up with that "Mission accomplished" sign?

An aircraft carrier has a "mission accomplished" sign on their ship as they head back home, and the left has no clue what it means. <hint: it means that the ship's mission was accomplished> Tell me what you think the "mission accomplished" sign on that ship really means.

The important question that you righty's keep dodging....what did he do in retaliation to the worse attack on American soil? Exactly, WHAT DID HE DO "GUNNY"..

Gunny can answer for himself, but IMHO he removed the Taliban from power in AFG, booted AQ out of AFG into the caves in Waziristan, where the Paks need to dig them out. He also removed a vicious dictator, who supported terrorism financially, from power and saved Iraqis from living under a brutal regime who started several wars. In fact he created a new democracy in the ME, hopefully one with good relations with the US. In case you forgot, Saddam was very slick, he bought-off most of the UN, including France and Russia.

What did Omama do? Send Hillary to nag the ME into submission?

 

[rdean]

oh bullshit they let OBLgo because he works for them and then made up a story of WMDs
and used the mind statre created by 9/11 to dupe people into supporting invading another country and excuting their leader in a mock trial....

WHY?? What possible reasons would anyone do what you suggest?

A few facts to consider:
1) the Iraqis tried and then hung Saddam who murdered about 300,000
2) why would the UN approve the actions against Saddam if they believed he didn't have WMD, and didn't gas the Kurds?
3) why would over 40 nations participate in the regime change if it wasn't warranted?

Well Bubba, you might want to consider a few more "FACTS".

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/11/world/middleeast/11casualties.html?_r=2&oref=slogin

BAGHDAD, Oct. 10 — A team of American and Iraqi public health researchers has estimated that 600,000 civilians have died in violence across Iraq since the 2003 American invasion, the highest estimate ever for the toll of the war here.

Multinational Force - Iraq - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a hoot. The total deployment was estimated to about 297,000 troops, 250,000 of that from the US. Some countries sent dozens. How many would have had their "handouts" cut off if they didn't send "someone"?

Iceland two, Moldova, wow, 24.

And the US paid for virtually EVERYTHING.

 

[The Rabbi]

oh bullshit they let OBLgo because he works for them and then made up a story of WMDs
and used the mind statre created by 9/11 to dupe people into supporting invading another country and excuting their leader in a mock trial....

WHY?? What possible reasons would anyone do what you suggest?

A few facts to consider:
1) the Iraqis tried and then hung Saddam who murdered about 300,000
2) why would the UN approve the actions against Saddam if they believed he didn't have WMD, and didn't gas the Kurds?
3) why would over 40 nations participate in the regime change if it wasn't warranted?

Well Bubba, you might want to consider a few more "FACTS".

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/11/world/middleeast/11casualties.html?_r=2&oref=slogin

BAGHDAD, Oct. 10 — A team of American and Iraqi public health researchers has estimated that 600,000 civilians have died in violence across Iraq since the 2003 American invasion, the highest estimate ever for the toll of the war here.

Multinational Force - Iraq - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a hoot. The total deployment was estimated to about 297,000 troops, 250,000 of that from the US. Some countries sent dozens. How many would have had their "handouts" cut off if they didn't send "someone"?

Iceland two, Moldova, wow, 24.

And the US paid for virtually EVERYTHING.

The Iraqi body count is a scream to read about. What is it? Exactly how many Iraqis were killed?
Was it 102,000? Iraq Body Count
Was it 655,000? Study Claims Iraq's 'Excess' Death Toll Has Reached 655,000 - washingtonpost.com
Was it more than 1M? ORB - Opinion Business Research - Newsroom

Now this is a country with an estimated population of 28M. So a million people is a pretty big percentage.
The answer is first no one knows. And second it is a political football thrown around to beat the US over the head and not much more.

 

[kyzr]

oh bullshit they let OBLgo because he works for them and then made up a story of WMDs
and used the mind statre created by 9/11 to dupe people into supporting invading another country and excuting their leader in a mock trial....

WHY?? What possible reasons would anyone do what you suggest?

A few facts to consider:
1) the Iraqis tried and then hung Saddam who murdered about 300,000
2) why would the UN approve the actions against Saddam if they believed he didn't have WMD, and didn't gas the Kurds?
3) why would over 40 nations participate in the regime change if it wasn't warranted?

Well Bubba, you might want to consider a few more "FACTS".

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/11/world/middleeast/11casualties.html?_r=2&oref=slogin

BAGHDAD, Oct. 10 — A team of American and Iraqi public health researchers has estimated that 600,000 civilians have died in violence across Iraq since the 2003 American invasion, the highest estimate ever for the toll of the war here.

As the Rabbi said, your numbers are bogus. Besides, Saddam killed ~300,000, mostly Shia so there are scores to settle. I would have let them have their civil war and then worked with the winner. but thats me. Your point is pointless, the ME is a mess, they are always killing each other, its not news. Its the way they choose to live.

Multinational Force - Iraq - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a hoot. The total deployment was estimated to about 297,000 troops, 250,000 of that from the US. Some countries sent dozens. How many would have had their "handouts" cut off if they didn't send "someone"? Iceland two, Moldova, wow, 24.
And the US paid for virtually EVERYTHING.

You missed the point. The UN sanctioned the regime change, and at least 40 nations participated. What part of "the UN sanctioned the regime change" don't you understand?

 

[rdean]

WHY?? What possible reasons would anyone do what you suggest?

A few facts to consider:
1) the Iraqis tried and then hung Saddam who murdered about 300,000
2) why would the UN approve the actions against Saddam if they believed he didn't have WMD, and didn't gas the Kurds?
3) why would over 40 nations participate in the regime change if it wasn't warranted?

Well Bubba, you might want to consider a few more "FACTS".

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/11/world/middleeast/11casualties.html?_r=2&oref=slogin

BAGHDAD, Oct. 10 &#8212; A team of American and Iraqi public health researchers has estimated that 600,000 civilians have died in violence across Iraq since the 2003 American invasion, the highest estimate ever for the toll of the war here.

Multinational Force - Iraq - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a hoot. The total deployment was estimated to about 297,000 troops, 250,000 of that from the US. Some countries sent dozens. How many would have had their "handouts" cut off if they didn't send "someone"?

Iceland two, Moldova, wow, 24.

And the US paid for virtually EVERYTHING.

The Iraqi body count is a scream to read about. What is it? Exactly how many Iraqis were killed?
Was it 102,000? Iraq Body Count
Was it 655,000? Study Claims Iraq's 'Excess' Death Toll Has Reached 655,000 - washingtonpost.com
Was it more than 1M? ORB - Opinion Business Research - Newsroom

Now this is a country with an estimated population of 28M. So a million people is a pretty big percentage.
The answer is first no one knows. And second it is a political football thrown around to beat the US over the head and not much more.

It's definitely something to scream about.

Take a look at the Christian population. Before the "war" it was estimated to be between 1.2 to 1.4 million. Now it's estimated to be less than 500,000. Many even put it at less than 400,000. Many escaped and are living in neighboring countries. Being refugees, they can't legally work. So if you can't legally work, how do you survive?

beg
whore
steal
work illegally

We helped them improve their lives. We did that. Why aren't they allowed to come here? Ask the Republicans.

You watch. In a year, their plight will be blamed on Obama when the Republicans think they can distance themselves from what they did to other Christians.

Considering what was done to the Christians with Republican support, the big numbers don't surprise me.

So what happened to the ones that didn't escape?

 

[The Rabbi]

I never realized liberals were so concerned with the rights of Christians. Why all the sudden interest?
Of course it is a canard. There is no truth to the assertion and it is made simply to make the US look like bad guys. Yeah, everyone had it so much better under Saddam. He even made the trains run on time!

 

[rdean]

WHY?? What possible reasons would anyone do what you suggest?

A few facts to consider:
1) the Iraqis tried and then hung Saddam who murdered about 300,000
2) why would the UN approve the actions against Saddam if they believed he didn't have WMD, and didn't gas the Kurds?
3) why would over 40 nations participate in the regime change if it wasn't warranted?

As the Rabbi said, your numbers are bogus. Besides, Saddam killed ~300,000, mostly Shia so there are scores to settle. I would have let them have their civil war and then worked with the winner. but thats me. Your point is pointless, the ME is a mess, they are always killing each other, its not news. Its the way they choose to live.

Multinational Force - Iraq - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a hoot. The total deployment was estimated to about 297,000 troops, 250,000 of that from the US. Some countries sent dozens. How many would have had their "handouts" cut off if they didn't send "someone"? Iceland two, Moldova, wow, 24.
And the US paid for virtually EVERYTHING.

You missed the point. The UN sanctioned the regime change, and at least 40 nations participated. What part of "the UN sanctioned the regime change" don't you understand?

No, you missed the point. They were coerced into participating otherwise, the US would have cut off their "funding".

 

[The Rabbi]

Is there a decision in politics that is not made under some kind of coercion? No, obviously not.

 

[rdean]

I never realized liberals were so concerned with the rights of Christians. Why all the sudden interest?
Of course it is a canard. There is no truth to the assertion and it is made simply to make the US look like bad guys. Yeah, everyone had it so much better under Saddam. He even made the trains run on time!

Sure they had it bad under Saddam, but they had it worse under us.

Besides, I think of Middle Eastern Christians as the real Christians. The ones here are fake. Do you really think Middle Eastern Christians believe Jesus looked like this:

 

[rdean]

Is there a decision in politics that is not made under some kind of coercion? No, obviously not.

Tell me you are not saying that bribes make invasion OK.

There were worse in the world than Saddam. Why didn't the Republicans go after one of them? Never could get a good answer there.

 

[The Rabbi]

Is there a decision in politics that is not made under some kind of coercion? No, obviously not.

Tell me you are not saying that bribes make invasion OK.

There were worse in the world than Saddam. Why didn't the Republicans go after one of them? Never could get a good answer there.

No, you never got an answer that would confirm your world view of the Iraqi invasion as wrong. There are plenty of good answers there.
What made the invasion OK was the backing of the UN along with the repeated violations of the peace treaty and the development of WMD in violation of that treaty. Couple that with an environment that demands getting tough with regimes that enable and encourage terrorism and the invasion was the result.
And "the Republicans" didn't go after Saddam. The Congress voted to authorize it, including many Democrats.

 

[kyzr]

As the Rabbi said, your numbers are bogus. Besides, Saddam killed ~300,000, mostly Shia so there are scores to settle. I would have let them have their civil war and then worked with the winner. but thats me. Your point is pointless, the ME is a mess, they are always killing each other, its not news. Its the way they choose to live.

You missed the point. The UN sanctioned the regime change, and at least 40 nations participated. What part of "the UN sanctioned the regime change" don't you understand?

No, you missed the point. They were coerced into participating otherwise, the US would have cut off their "funding".

Prove it. Otherwise you lose the debate.