April 5th 2016: Coldest April day in history!!!

These are people that live close to the forests and see them drying out, and becoming vulnerable to vast bug kills. These are people that have seen the winters getting shorter every decade, and the summers hotter. These are people that now have seen their jobs and homes go up in smoke as a result of the warming weather that has created the conditions for vast forest fires. These are people that have heard lying shits like you state for years that nothing is happening.

At some point, there is going to be a political cost to the fact that the lying 'Conservatives' in both the US and Canada have told any lie in order to convince these people that nothing is happening.
You think if it was not for conservatives, these fires never would of happened.

Wow, now it is the fault of conservatives, that there are fires in Canada. I say Liberal Renewable Energy Global Warming nuts are the new NAZI-KKK-Gulag party.
 
No, asshole, 'Conservatives' are not to blame for the fact we did not realize the serious consequences of the GHGs that we were putting into the atmosphere until the '60's. They are to blame for the lies they have told since then to prevent anything being done to reduce the output of GHGs. And willfully ignorant fools like you are their sheep.
 
No, asshole, 'Conservatives' are not to blame for the fact we did not realize the serious consequences of the GHGs that we were putting into the atmosphere until the '60's. They are to blame for the lies they have told since then to prevent anything being done to reduce the output of GHGs. And willfully ignorant fools like you are their sheep.
So you think it is the Conservatives fault this fire started, that is very moronic Old Crock. Old Crock.

Old Crock, increasing the use of heavy industry to build solar panels and wind turbines is now responsible for massive amounts of CO2 being released into the atmosphere. If you are placing blame, Crock, you are destroying the world attempting to save it.
 
Fucking bottom line is that all you assholes can point are a few individual days that are colder than usual, where the record is showing whole months that are breaking records all over the world. What do those unusually cold days show? Wider and wilder swings in the weather with an overall warming. Plain and simple.

From Dr. Roy Spencer


UAH_LT_1979_thru_April_2016_v6-550x318.png


UAH V6 Global Temperature Update for April, 2016: +0.71 deg. C « Roy Spencer, PhD

Hmmmm it is interesting this one little weather station shows nothing of your "official" global graph

Why is that, New york state under a big dome or something?


ITHACACORNELLUNIV_NY_ColdestDailyMinimumTemperature_Apr_Apr_1896_2016-768x344.png
 
No, asshole, 'Conservatives' are not to blame for the fact we did not realize the serious consequences of the GHGs that we were putting into the atmosphere until the '60's. They are to blame for the lies they have told since then to prevent anything being done to reduce the output of GHGs. And willfully ignorant fools like you are their sheep.

WHAT A RETARD..

How many time must you be told this is natural cyclical variation and man putting out small fires before they have a chance to burn off the floor fuels. This results in a fire that you can not put out when all those fuels become dry from a natural cycle.

The only ignorant fool is you and your pushing of lies and deceptions in an effort to push your political agenda.. Now be a good little troll and fuck off..

Even the Forestry / fire manager calls you a liar...

The boreal forest is a fire-dependant ecosystem. The spruce trees, pine trees, they like to burn,” Bernie Schmitte, forestry manager in Fort McMurray, explained.

“They have to burn to regenerate themselves, and those species have adapted themselves to fire. Their cones have adapted so they open up after the fire has left, and the trees have adapted in that once they’re old and need to be replaced, they’re available to fire so they burn.”

Source
 
No, asshole, 'Conservatives' are not to blame for the fact we did not realize the serious consequences of the GHGs that we were putting into the atmosphere until the '60's. They are to blame for the lies they have told since then to prevent anything being done to reduce the output of GHGs. And willfully ignorant fools like you are their sheep.
So you think it is the Conservatives fault this fire started, that is very moronic Old Crock. Old Crock.

Old Crock, increasing the use of heavy industry to build solar panels and wind turbines is now responsible for massive amounts of CO2 being released into the atmosphere. If you are placing blame, Crock, you are destroying the world attempting to save it.
Old Fraud has his head rectally impacted.. Its the only plausible reason to spread the lies and deceptions he is..

His ignorance of science is clearly seen in his posts of deceptions and deflections.
 
Tell that to the people in Fort MacMurray, Canada. To the people in Wenatchee, Washington, and several other small towns that were nearly overran by fires last summer. The the people and ranchers in Eastern Oregon and Idaho that saw hundreds of square miles of forest and grazing land burned over, and some small towns that only heroics on the part of the firefighters saved.


What a load of shit this is............total crock.

Huge wildfires have been happening for billions of years.............fucking duh........and the biggest ones happened back in the 1800's..............the global warming nutters just never want you to know about these types of facts >>>>

WGBH American Experience . The Big Burn | PBS


These people are emotional hemophiliacs.....:eek-52::eek-52::eek-52:....always have been...............always will be. Confounded by life every day!!!:uhh:
 
PS......"extreme weather" has been proven to be an alarmist myth >>

It is widely promulgated and believed that human-caused global warming comes with increases in both the intensity and frequency of extreme weather events. A survey of official weather sites and the scientific literature provides strong evidence that the first half of the 20th century had more extreme weather than the second half, when anthropogenic global warming is claimed to have been mainly responsible for observed climate change. The disconnect between real-world historical data on the 100 years’ time scale and the current predictions provides a real conundrum when any engineer tries to make a professional assessment of the real future value of any infrastructure project which aims to mitigate or adapt to climate change. What is the appropriate basis on which to make judgements when theory and data are in such disagreement?


'Extreme Weather Events': Another Alarmist Myth





WHO'S NOT WINNING??:eusa_dance::eusa_dance::eusa_dance::eusa_dance::eusa_dance:
 
PS.....and just to be clear.........skeptics are hardly the "sheep". Skeptics are winning huge in 2016...........because the public has never bought the alarmist BS and in recent years, their interest in global warming is about as keen as watching re-runs of "The Rat Patrol":coffee::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:
 
what we do know, is most of the world is suffering record low temperatures, while the scientists cherry pick data to come up with "adjusted mean averaged rms record high" based on 2 years of recent satellite data.

science has become a joke, reduced to nothing more than a housewife looking outside to check the temperature.
Averages temps are based on variable radicals of climate and weather systems.....
gee, I would have thought it was based on temperature readings around the globe averaged out. Why do they need to take all the climate, weather or anything else into consideration? WTF.
 
Fucking bottom line is that all you assholes can point are a few individual days that are colder than usual, where the record is showing whole months that are breaking records all over the world. What do those unusually cold days show? Wider and wilder swings in the weather with an overall warming. Plain and simple.

From Dr. Roy Spencer


UAH_LT_1979_thru_April_2016_v6-550x318.png


UAH V6 Global Temperature Update for April, 2016: +0.71 deg. C « Roy Spencer, PhD
to which there is no actual proof of. Still today.
 
Hardly does a radical need a jacket......unless it was Jimmy Dean...
Jimmy Dean is a breakfast sausage, James Dean needed a lesson in driving, radicals need straitjackets.[/QUOTE]
Jimmy Dean sang songs and then found his breakfast sausage would fill his belly daily.
 
what we do know, is most of the world is suffering record low temperatures, while the scientists cherry pick data to come up with "adjusted mean averaged rms record high" based on 2 years of recent satellite data.

science has become a joke, reduced to nothing more than a housewife looking outside to check the temperature.
Averages temps are based on variable radicals of climate and weather systems.....
gee, I would have thought it was based on temperature readings around the globe averaged out. Why do they need to take all the climate, weather or anything else into consideration? WTF.
Because weather is a radical element , not a simplified moderate machine..
 
No, asshole, 'Conservatives' are not to blame for the fact we did not realize the serious consequences of the GHGs that we were putting into the atmosphere until the '60's. They are to blame for the lies they have told since then to prevent anything being done to reduce the output of GHGs. And willfully ignorant fools like you are their sheep.
to which there is no issue. So what is the issue with GHGs? Please explain.
 
what we do know, is most of the world is suffering record low temperatures, while the scientists cherry pick data to come up with "adjusted mean averaged rms record high" based on 2 years of recent satellite data.

science has become a joke, reduced to nothing more than a housewife looking outside to check the temperature.
Averages temps are based on variable radicals of climate and weather systems.....
gee, I would have thought it was based on temperature readings around the globe averaged out. Why do they need to take all the climate, weather or anything else into consideration? WTF.
Because weather is a radical element , not a simplified moderate machine..
no, weather is not measured, temperatures are measured, the thermometer couldn't careless if it was raining or sunny. A thermometer reads temps.
 
what we do know, is most of the world is suffering record low temperatures, while the scientists cherry pick data to come up with "adjusted mean averaged rms record high" based on 2 years of recent satellite data.

science has become a joke, reduced to nothing more than a housewife looking outside to check the temperature.
Averages temps are based on variable radicals of climate and weather systems.....
gee, I would have thought it was based on temperature readings around the globe averaged out. Why do they need to take all the climate, weather or anything else into consideration? WTF.
Because weather is a radical element , not a simplified moderate machine..
no, weather is not measured, temperatures are measured, the thermometer couldn't careless if it was raining or sunny. A thermometer reads temps.
weather affects temperature so it must be measured..
 

Forum List

Back
Top