AP: Obama is still more Popular than Bush after Katrina!

Thats why you get tax cuts, but if your compoany is good people will always want to go to you for their needs. It has already been proven that when you have more tax cuts you also have more revenue. Because people will be employed and will spend their money. But when you increase taxes you lose money.

Yes...yes

The tired old tinkle down theory....in practice, those tax cuts go to move business overseas to generate more profit

Where have you been the last nine years?

If your going to give blame for company's going overseas blame Clinton for NAFTA.

Where have you been for thelast 25 years? Reaganoics worked.

History proved that the Reagan tinkle down economics was a disaster. Reagan initiated one of the largest transfers of personal wealth in over 100 years. His policies lead to unprecidented wealth for the top 10% of wage earners while the middle class lost real wages and saw massive increased in the costs of homes, energy, education and healthcare
 
Yes...yes

The tired old tinkle down theory....in practice, those tax cuts go to move business overseas to generate more profit

Where have you been the last nine years?

If your going to give blame for company's going overseas blame Clinton for NAFTA.

Where have you been for thelast 25 years? Reaganoics worked.

History proved that the Reagan tinkle down economics was a disaster. Reagan initiated one of the largest transfers of personal wealth in over 100 years. His policies lead to unprecidented wealth for the top 10% of wage earners while the middle class lost real wages and saw massive increased in the costs of homes, energy, education and healthcare

I don't need your version of history to tell me you are lying. I was alive in the 80's I know better I was raised middle class father was a factory worker and mother worked in a hosiery mill. I was a young working adult I know the facts.
 
AP News : LimaOhio.com

Even so, the catastrophe appears not to have taken a toll on how Americans view the president overall. Obama's approval rating remained steady in the poll and he is more popular than President George W. Bush was two months after the hurricane.

I couldn't quite hear that, AP... Get Obama's Cock out of your Mouth and say it again... :lol:

Bush alone took the hit in public perceptions. In the spill, much anger is steered at BP, and the poll suggests Americans do not feel quite the sense of shame that afflicted them in the 2005 hurricane aftermath.

^Gee... I wonder if Coverage by the AP and it's Children has played a Role?... :doubt:

:)

peace...

Your doing a great job brownie.
 
If your going to give blame for company's going overseas blame Clinton for NAFTA.

Where have you been for thelast 25 years? Reaganoics worked.

History proved that the Reagan tinkle down economics was a disaster. Reagan initiated one of the largest transfers of personal wealth in over 100 years. His policies lead to unprecidented wealth for the top 10% of wage earners while the middle class lost real wages and saw massive increased in the costs of homes, energy, education and healthcare

I don't need your version of history to tell me you are lying. I was alive in the 80's I know better I was raised middle class father was a factory worker and mother worked in a hosiery mill. I was a young working adult I know the facts.

So you are saying the trickle down dumb ass theory worked? (Pssst, here is a hint, it was a huge failure)
 
History proved that the Reagan tinkle down economics was a disaster. Reagan initiated one of the largest transfers of personal wealth in over 100 years. His policies lead to unprecidented wealth for the top 10% of wage earners while the middle class lost real wages and saw massive increased in the costs of homes, energy, education and healthcare

I don't need your version of history to tell me you are lying. I was alive in the 80's I know better I was raised middle class father was a factory worker and mother worked in a hosiery mill. I was a young working adult I know the facts.

So you are saying the trickle down dumb ass theory worked? (Pssst, here is a hint, it was a huge failure)
If it was such a failure why is the news media always comparing obama with reagan? Why does obama always make reference to Reagan? Why was the econmy booming back in the mid 80's. It was way better then what Carter did. And many are comparing obama to carter.
 
AP News : LimaOhio.com

Even so, the catastrophe appears not to have taken a toll on how Americans view the president overall. Obama's approval rating remained steady in the poll and he is more popular than President George W. Bush was two months after the hurricane.

I couldn't quite hear that, AP... Get Obama's Cock out of your Mouth and say it again... :lol:

Bush alone took the hit in public perceptions. In the spill, much anger is steered at BP, and the poll suggests Americans do not feel quite the sense of shame that afflicted them in the 2005 hurricane aftermath.

^Gee... I wonder if Coverage by the AP and it's Children has played a Role?... :doubt:

:)

peace...

no... the AP has been repeating every lunatic thing the people with ODS have been saying. But Bush stared dumbly and said 'you're doing a hell of a job, brownie'... obama has done a lot, if not everything.

perhaps people are smarter than you imagine?
 
AP News : LimaOhio.com

Even so, the catastrophe appears not to have taken a toll on how Americans view the president overall. Obama's approval rating remained steady in the poll and he is more popular than President George W. Bush was two months after the hurricane.

I couldn't quite hear that, AP... Get Obama's Cock out of your Mouth and say it again... :lol:

Bush alone took the hit in public perceptions. In the spill, much anger is steered at BP, and the poll suggests Americans do not feel quite the sense of shame that afflicted them in the 2005 hurricane aftermath.

^Gee... I wonder if Coverage by the AP and it's Children has played a Role?... :doubt:

:)

peace...

no... the AP has been repeating every lunatic thing the people with ODS have been saying. But Bush stared dumbly and said 'you're doing a hell of a job, brownie'... obama has done a lot, if not everything.

perhaps people are smarter than you imagine?


People could be pretty god damned stupid and still be smarter than I imagine; but they aren't.
 
I don't need your version of history to tell me you are lying. I was alive in the 80's I know better I was raised middle class father was a factory worker and mother worked in a hosiery mill. I was a young working adult I know the facts.

So you are saying the trickle down dumb ass theory worked? (Pssst, here is a hint, it was a huge failure)
If it was such a failure why is the news media always comparing obama with reagan? Why does obama always make reference to Reagan? Why was the econmy booming back in the mid 80's. It was way better then what Carter did. And many are comparing obama to carter.

Which is it?

Is Obama another Reagan or another Carter?

Tinkle down never worked. Even David Stockman admitted it
 
I don't need your version of history to tell me you are lying. I was alive in the 80's I know better I was raised middle class father was a factory worker and mother worked in a hosiery mill. I was a young working adult I know the facts.

So you are saying the trickle down dumb ass theory worked? (Pssst, here is a hint, it was a huge failure)
If it was such a failure why is the news media always comparing obama with reagan? Why does obama always make reference to Reagan? Why was the econmy booming back in the mid 80's. It was way better then what Carter did. And many are comparing obama to carter.
I will ask my question again since you seem to have missed it ...

So tickle down worked?
 
So you are saying the trickle down dumb ass theory worked? (Pssst, here is a hint, it was a huge failure)
If it was such a failure why is the news media always comparing obama with reagan? Why does obama always make reference to Reagan? Why was the econmy booming back in the mid 80's. It was way better then what Carter did. And many are comparing obama to carter.
I will ask my question again since you seem to have missed it ...

So tickle down worked?

damn how do you manage to get up out of bed and breath at the same time? I answered THAT QUESTION TWICE. Once to you and in my first reply before you commented.
 
In the 1980’s Ronald Reagan ushered in a new era in American economics as he cut the top tax bracket from 70% down to 50% and then down again to 28%. In order to get support for doing this from the people, and also from politicians, a very crafty set of lies were produced. As David Stockman, then Reagan’s budget director, put it: giving small tax cuts across the board to all brackets was simply a “Trojan Horse” that was used to get approval for the huge top tax bracket cuts. “Trickle-Down” was a term used by Republicans that meant giving tax cuts to the rich. Stockman explains that:

"It's kind of hard to sell 'trickle down,' so the supply-side formula was the only way to get a tax policy that was really 'trickle down.' Supply-side is 'trickle-down' theory."

"Yes, Stockman conceded, when one stripped away the new rhetoric emphasizing across-the-board cuts, the supply-side theory was really new clothes for the unpopular doctrine of the old Republican orthodoxy."

"…the Reagan coalition prevailed again in the House and Congress passed the tax-cut legislation with a final frenzy of trading and bargaining. Again, Stockman was not exhilarated by the victory. On the contrary, it seemed to leave a bad taste in his mouth, as though the democratic process had finally succeeded in shocking him by its intensity and its greed. Once again, Stockman participated in the trading -- special tax concessions for oil -- lease holders and real-estate tax shelters, and generous loopholes that virtually eliminated the corporate income tax. Stockman sat in the room and saw it happen."

"'Do you realize the greed that came to the forefront?' Stockman asked with wonder. 'The hogs were really feeding. The greed level, the level of opportunism, just got out of control.'"

The Education of David Stockman 1981:
 
So you are saying the trickle down dumb ass theory worked? (Pssst, here is a hint, it was a huge failure)
If it was such a failure why is the news media always comparing obama with reagan? Why does obama always make reference to Reagan? Why was the econmy booming back in the mid 80's. It was way better then what Carter did. And many are comparing obama to carter.

Which is it?

Is Obama another Reagan or another Carter?

Tinkle down never worked. Even David Stockman admitted it
He's Carter two but the media would like to play him as Reagan reborn.
 
In the 1980’s Ronald Reagan ushered in a new era in American economics as he cut the top tax bracket from 70% down to 50% and then down again to 28%. In order to get support for doing this from the people, and also from politicians, a very crafty set of lies were produced. As David Stockman, then Reagan’s budget director, put it: giving small tax cuts across the board to all brackets was simply a “Trojan Horse” that was used to get approval for the huge top tax bracket cuts. “Trickle-Down” was a term used by Republicans that meant giving tax cuts to the rich. Stockman explains that:

"It's kind of hard to sell 'trickle down,' so the supply-side formula was the only way to get a tax policy that was really 'trickle down.' Supply-side is 'trickle-down' theory."

"Yes, Stockman conceded, when one stripped away the new rhetoric emphasizing across-the-board cuts, the supply-side theory was really new clothes for the unpopular doctrine of the old Republican orthodoxy."

"…the Reagan coalition prevailed again in the House and Congress passed the tax-cut legislation with a final frenzy of trading and bargaining. Again, Stockman was not exhilarated by the victory. On the contrary, it seemed to leave a bad taste in his mouth, as though the democratic process had finally succeeded in shocking him by its intensity and its greed. Once again, Stockman participated in the trading -- special tax concessions for oil -- lease holders and real-estate tax shelters, and generous loopholes that virtually eliminated the corporate income tax. Stockman sat in the room and saw it happen."

"'Do you realize the greed that came to the forefront?' Stockman asked with wonder. 'The hogs were really feeding. The greed level, the level of opportunism, just got out of control.'"

The Education of David Stockman 1981:

This post is worthless without a link.
 
bush is gone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ummmmmmmmm.....

As long as the damage he inflicted on the country and the world as a whole is still with us, Bush is not gone

Somebody asked Pelosi the other day, when will dems stop blaming Bush? and she said pretty much what you just wrote - when the problems he created are gone.

Which is not a bad answer politically, cuz it allows dems to lay everything at Bush's feet indefinitely. Being utterly, wholly and completely full of shit, they will.

A better question is, when will the electorate hold BO accountable? So far, the gulf problem hasn't hurt him. Neither did Obamacare. Dude can ride a bubble, can't he?

Rasmussen haters, take note, please, of today's report:

The president will deliver an Oval Office address to the nation as many in the chattering class suggest that the oil spill has hurt public perceptions of Obama. However, the numbers have remained constant for months and the Gulf oil spill has not yet had any impact on the president’s overall approval rating.

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Rasmussen Reports
 
bush is gone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ummmmmmmmm.....

As long as the damage he inflicted on the country and the world as a whole is still with us, Bush is not gone

Somebody asked Pelosi the other day, when will dems stop blaming Bush? and she said pretty much what you just wrote - when the problems he created are gone.

Which is not a bad answer politically, cuz it allows dems to lay everything at Bush's feet indefinitely. Being utterly, wholly and completely full of shit, they will.

A better question is, when will the electorate hold BO accountable? So far, the gulf problem hasn't hurt him. Neither did Obamacare. Dude can ride a bubble, can't he?

Rasmussen haters, take note, please, of today's report:

The president will deliver an Oval Office address to the nation as many in the chattering class suggest that the oil spill has hurt public perceptions of Obama. However, the numbers have remained constant for months and the Gulf oil spill has not yet had any impact on the president’s overall approval rating.

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Rasmussen Reports

People still blame Hoover for the Great Depression..

Bush gave us:

1. Two wars, one of which he lied to create a sense of immediate urgency

2. The largest economic collapse since the great depression

3. Torture and a denial of basic human rights

The stink of Bush will remain with us for another generation.....and yes we will continue to blame him
 
Ummmmmmmmm.....

As long as the damage he inflicted on the country and the world as a whole is still with us, Bush is not gone

Somebody asked Pelosi the other day, when will dems stop blaming Bush? and she said pretty much what you just wrote - when the problems he created are gone.

Which is not a bad answer politically, cuz it allows dems to lay everything at Bush's feet indefinitely. Being utterly, wholly and completely full of shit, they will.

A better question is, when will the electorate hold BO accountable? So far, the gulf problem hasn't hurt him. Neither did Obamacare. Dude can ride a bubble, can't he?

Rasmussen haters, take note, please, of today's report:

The president will deliver an Oval Office address to the nation as many in the chattering class suggest that the oil spill has hurt public perceptions of Obama. However, the numbers have remained constant for months and the Gulf oil spill has not yet had any impact on the president’s overall approval rating.

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Rasmussen Reports

People still blame Hoover for the Great Depression..

Bush gave us:

1. Two wars, one of which he lied to create a sense of immediate urgency

2. The largest economic collapse since the great depression

3. Torture and a denial of basic human rights

The stink of Bush will remain with us for another generation.....and yes we will continue to blame him

Bush gave us two wars?
Clinton on Iraq:
"In the next century, the community of nations may see more and more the very kind of threat Iraq poses now -- a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction ready to use them or provide them to terrorists, drug traffickers or organized criminals who travel the world among us unnoticed.

If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow by the knowledge that they can act with impunity, even in the face of a clear message from the United Nations Security Council and clear evidence of a weapons of mass destruction program."

President Clinton
Address to Joint Chiefs of Staff and Pentagon staff
February 17, 1998

"Heavy as they are, the costs of action must be weighed against the price of inaction. If Saddam defies the world and we fail to respond, we will face a far greater threat in the future. Saddam will strike again at his neighbors; he will make war on his own people. And mark my words, he will develop weapons of mass destruction. He will deploy them, and he will use them."

President Clinton
National Address from the Oval Office
December 16, 1998
Transcript: President Clinton explains Iraq strike - December 16, 1998

"His regime threatens the safety of his people, the stability of his region, and the security of all the rest of us.

What if he fails to comply, and we fail to act, or we take some ambiguous third route which gives him yet more opportunities to develop this program of weapons of mass destruction and continue to press for the release of the sanctions and continue to ignore the solemn commitments that he made?

Well, he will conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction.

And some day, some way, I guarantee you, he'll use the arsenal."

President Clinton
Address to Joint Chiefs of Staff and Pentagon staff
February 17, 1998
Text Of Clinton Statement On Iraq - February 17, 1998

CNN: How did Hussein intend to use the weapon, once it was completed?

HAMZA: Saddam has a whole range of weapons of mass destruction, nuclear, biological and chemical. According to German intelligence estimates, we expect him to have three nuclear weapons by 2005. So, the window will close by 2005, and we expect him then to be a lot more aggressive with his neighbors and encouraging terrorism, and using biological weapons. Now he's using them through surrogates like al Qaeda, but we expect he'll use them more aggressively then.

Dr. Khidhir Hamza, former Iraqi Nuclear Scientist for 20 years
Interviewed on CNN
October 22, 2001
CNN.com - Khidhir Hamza: Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi weapons program - October 22, 2001

Ten years after the Gulf War and Saddam is still there and still continues to stockpile weapons of mass destruction. Now there are suggestions he is working with al Qaeda, which means the very terrorists who attacked the United States last September may now have access to chemical and biological weapons."

James P. Rubin, President Clinton's State Department spokesman
In a PBS documentary titled "Saddam's Ultimate Solution"
July 11, 2002
Saddam’s Ultimate Solution ~ Introduction | Wide Angle

He created the largest economic collaspe? No the democrats did that because they did not want to regulate their two pet projects Freddy and Fanny

Waterboarding is not torture. Using it saved lives.
 
Last edited:
Obama will never enjoy the popularity of George Bush

In the post 9-11 months, Bush enjoyed unprecidented support both within the US and around the world. By taking that good will and using it to impose simplistic, unilateral decisions in an attempt to create a Bush doctrine in the Islamic world........Bush managed to turn the whole world against the US and drive his own popularity down to 26%

And the honest truth is if quite a few Americans weren't looking forward to a whole bunch of freebies at the expense of other people, Obama's numbers would be MUCH lower than they are now.

Please, I need a list of these freebies. They must not be handing them out in my neighborhood.
 
Thats why you get tax cuts, but if your compoany is good people will always want to go to you for their needs. It has already been proven that when you have more tax cuts you also have more revenue. Because people will be employed and will spend their money. But when you increase taxes you lose money.

Yes...yes

The tired old tinkle down theory....in practice, those tax cuts go to move business overseas to generate more profit

Where have you been the last nine years?

If your going to give blame for company's going overseas blame Clinton for NAFTA.

Where have you been for thelast 25 years? Reaganoics worked.

Do you know what NAFTA stands for? Over which seas did the jobs go?
 
Yes...yes

The tired old tinkle down theory....in practice, those tax cuts go to move business overseas to generate more profit

Where have you been the last nine years?

If your going to give blame for company's going overseas blame Clinton for NAFTA.

Where have you been for thelast 25 years? Reaganoics worked.

Do you know what NAFTA stands for? Over which seas did the jobs go?

We both no he's talking about sending manufacturing job to mexico. Maybe I should have said send jobs to other country's
 
Last edited:
Somebody asked Pelosi the other day, when will dems stop blaming Bush? and she said pretty much what you just wrote - when the problems he created are gone.

Which is not a bad answer politically, cuz it allows dems to lay everything at Bush's feet indefinitely. Being utterly, wholly and completely full of shit, they will.

A better question is, when will the electorate hold BO accountable? So far, the gulf problem hasn't hurt him. Neither did Obamacare. Dude can ride a bubble, can't he?

Rasmussen haters, take note, please, of today's report:

The president will deliver an Oval Office address to the nation as many in the chattering class suggest that the oil spill has hurt public perceptions of Obama. However, the numbers have remained constant for months and the Gulf oil spill has not yet had any impact on the president’s overall approval rating.

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Rasmussen Reports

People still blame Hoover for the Great Depression..

Bush gave us:

1. Two wars, one of which he lied to create a sense of immediate urgency

2. The largest economic collapse since the great depression

3. Torture and a denial of basic human rights

The stink of Bush will remain with us for another generation.....and yes we will continue to blame him

Bush gave us two wars?
Clinton on Iraq:
"In the next century, the community of nations may see more and more the very kind of threat Iraq poses now -- a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction ready to use them or provide them to terrorists, drug traffickers or organized criminals who travel the world among us unnoticed.

If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow by the knowledge that they can act with impunity, even in the face of a clear message from the United Nations Security Council and clear evidence of a weapons of mass destruction program."

President Clinton
Address to Joint Chiefs of Staff and Pentagon staff
February 17, 1998

"Heavy as they are, the costs of action must be weighed against the price of inaction. If Saddam defies the world and we fail to respond, we will face a far greater threat in the future. Saddam will strike again at his neighbors; he will make war on his own people. And mark my words, he will develop weapons of mass destruction. He will deploy them, and he will use them."

President Clinton
National Address from the Oval Office
December 16, 1998
Transcript: President Clinton explains Iraq strike - December 16, 1998

"His regime threatens the safety of his people, the stability of his region, and the security of all the rest of us.

What if he fails to comply, and we fail to act, or we take some ambiguous third route which gives him yet more opportunities to develop this program of weapons of mass destruction and continue to press for the release of the sanctions and continue to ignore the solemn commitments that he made?

Well, he will conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction.

And some day, some way, I guarantee you, he'll use the arsenal."

President Clinton
Address to Joint Chiefs of Staff and Pentagon staff
February 17, 1998
Text Of Clinton Statement On Iraq - February 17, 1998

CNN: How did Hussein intend to use the weapon, once it was completed?

HAMZA: Saddam has a whole range of weapons of mass destruction, nuclear, biological and chemical. According to German intelligence estimates, we expect him to have three nuclear weapons by 2005. So, the window will close by 2005, and we expect him then to be a lot more aggressive with his neighbors and encouraging terrorism, and using biological weapons. Now he's using them through surrogates like al Qaeda, but we expect he'll use them more aggressively then.

Dr. Khidhir Hamza, former Iraqi Nuclear Scientist for 20 years
Interviewed on CNN
October 22, 2001
CNN.com - Khidhir Hamza: Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi weapons program - October 22, 2001

Ten years after the Gulf War and Saddam is still there and still continues to stockpile weapons of mass destruction. Now there are suggestions he is working with al Qaeda, which means the very terrorists who attacked the United States last September may now have access to chemical and biological weapons."

James P. Rubin, President Clinton's State Department spokesman
In a PBS documentary titled "Saddam's Ultimate Solution"
July 11, 2002
Saddam’s Ultimate Solution ~ Introduction | Wide Angle

He created the largest economic collaspe? No the democrats did that because they did not want to regulate their two pet projects Freddy and Fanny

Waterboarding is not torture. Using it saved lives.

I don't see Clinton advocating invasion in any of those quotes....did you leave that part out?


Waterboarding is not torture. Using it saved lives

Do we have a volunteer??? Its always easier for the person doing the torturing to claim it is not torture....ask the victims
 

Forum List

Back
Top