Antifa Explained

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Roman salute - Wikipedia

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I have no pity for people who support "Tolerance" and "Apathy" in reaction to "Hostility attacks upon them"

So you approve of Antifa.

I support Polish Fascists.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I don't know how you figure this.

Collectivist governments limit the power of Capitalists, and support Worker's rights.

Actually looks like any government can lead to strong Inequality of class.... The U.S.A is also an example of this....

..
...
......I'd argue that Collectivist Totalitarian regimes first target the "Competitors" and "People who stand out"

That a Collectivist Totalitarian regime would actually by default eliminate the previous elite, first.... Because they are people who both stand out, and who are the biggest competitors.

..
.... Fascists are better than Communists for this.... Why do you think the elite have brainwashed everyone to be Anti-Fascist?

Okay?

Maybe because most Neo-Fascists would go after people like George Soros, the Rothschild's, the Rockerfellers, the Media, Hollywod, the Bush's, the Clinton's, and all the other elite scumbag Globalists?

That all Fascists are the antithesis of Globalism.... That they do support Nation first Autarky the opposite of Globalism.

They don't support workers Rights. They dictate to the worker what he can eat, where he works, what he will do and when, where he will live, and most importantly he is expected to die for the country. That's why the Soviet Union lost 25 million in WWII. The Germans lost 4.5 million in WWII, the Japanese lost 4 million in WWII. The USA lost 350,000. The British Commonwealth lost 400,000 in the war. Why the huge disparity? Because the capitalistic country's VALUE their people.

When a socialist country go's to war the individual soldier is a cog in a wheel. The Soviet Union famously cleared minefields by having their soldiers link arms and march through them. At least the Germans didn't do that, but that is the basic mentality of a socialist, vs a capitalist country. Capitalist country's value life, and socialist country's don't.

I was talking more about the Fascists... I am a Fascist after-all... Not a Communist.



Thoughtcrime: Hitler: A Side We Never See

Hitler's tremendous social achievement in putting Germany's six million unemployed back to work is seldom acknowledged today. Although it was much more than a transitory achievement, "democratic" historians routinely dismiss it in just a few lines. Since 1945, not a single objective scholarly study has been devoted to this highly significant, indeed unprecedented, historical phenomenon.

Similarly neglected is the body of sweeping reforms that dramatically changed the condition of the worker in Germany. Factories were transformed from gloomy caverns to spacious and healthy work centers, with natural lighting, surrounded by gardens and playing fields. Hundreds of thousands of attractive houses were built for working class families. A policy of several weeks of paid vacation was introduced, along with week and holiday trips by land and sea. A wide-ranging program of physical and cultural education for young workers was established, with the world's best system of technical training. The Third Reich's social security and workers' health insurance system was the world's most modern and complete.

This remarkable record of social achievement is routinely hushed up today because it is embarrasses those who uphold the orthodox view of the Third Reich. Otherwise, readers might begin to think that perhaps Hitler was the greatest social builder of the twentieth century.

Because Hitler's program of social reform was a crucially important - indeed, essential -- part of his life work, a realization of this fact might induce people to view Hitler with new eyes. Not surprisingly, therefore, all this is passed over in silence. Most historians insist on treating Hitler and the Third Reich simplistically, as part of a Manichaean morality play of good versus evil.

Nevertheless, restoring work and bread to millions of unemployed who had been living in misery for years; restructuring industrial life; conceiving and establishing an organization for the effective defense and betterment of the nation's millions of wage earners; creating a new bureaucracy and judicial system that guaranteed the civic rights of each member of the national community, while simultaneously holding each person to his or her responsibilities as a German citizen: this organic body of reforms was part of a single, comprehensive plan, which Hitler had conceived and worked out years earlier.

Generous loans, amortizable in ten years, were granted to newly married couples so they could buy their own homes. At the birth of each child, a fourth of the debt was cancelled. Four children, at the normal rate of a new arrival every two and a half years, sufficed to cancel the entire loan debt.

Equally effective social measures were taken in behalf of farmers, who had the lowest incomes. In 1933 alone 17,611 new farm houses were built, each of them surrounded by a parcel of land one thousand square meters in size. Within three years, Hitler would build 91,000 such farmhouses. The rental for such dwellings could not legally exceed a modest share of the farmer's income. This unprecedented endowment of land and housing was only one feature of a revolution that soon dramatically improved the living standards of the Reich's rural population.

Under Hitler, every factory employee had the legal right to paid vacation. Previously, paid vacations had not normally exceed four or five days, and nearly half of the younger workers had no vacation time at all. If anything, Hitler favored younger workers; the youngest workers received more generous vacations. This was humane and made sense: a young person has more need of rest and fresh air to develop his maturing strength and vigor. Thus, they enjoyed a full 18 days of paid vacation per year

Hitler introduced the standard forty-hour work week in Europe. As for overtime work, it was now compensated, as nowhere else in the continent at the time, at an increased pay rate. And with the eight-hour work day now the norm, overtime work became more readily available.

In another innovation, work breaks were made longer: two hours each day, allowing greater opportunity for workers to relax, and to make use of the playing fields that large industries were now required to provide.

Whereas a worker's right to job security had been virtually non-existent, now an employee could no longer be dismissed at the sole discretion of the employer. Hitler saw to it that workers' rights were spelled out and enforced. Henceforth, an employer had to give four weeks notice before firing an employee, who then had up to two months to appeal the dismissal. Dismissals could also be annulled by the "Courts of Social Honor" (Ehrengerichte).

Oh yeah, hitler was great. Right up until he decided the German People weren't worthy of him and decided that they should all die with him. He was also trying to instill a volksgemeinschaft, which he failed to do, but don't forget the BDM who were supposed to mate with their counterparts in the HJ to breed a new race of supermen, and then of course there was the little issue of the concentration camps, but hey, what's a little mass murder so long as the workers get their paid vacation.

The idea of Death camps are actually a Capitalist British invention.

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902
Due to the fact that Black People were detained in separate camps, the issue of Black Concentration Camps is dealt with in another chronology.

Boer women, children and men unfit for service were herded together in concentration camps by the British forces during Anglo-Boer War 2 (1899-1902). The first two of these camps (refugee camps) were established to house the families of burghers who had surrendered voluntarily, but very soon, with families of combatant burgers driven forcibly into camps established all over the country, the camps ceased to be refugee camps and became concentration camps. The abhorrent conditions in these camps caused the death of 4 177 women, 22 074 children under sixteen and 1 676 men, mainly those too old to be on commando, notwithstanding the efforts of an English lady, Emily Hobhouse, who tried her best to make the British authorities aware of the plight of especially the women and children in the camps.

Unspoken Story of Indian Holocaust: UK Remains Silent About Its Atrocities

The analyst pointed out that during the 1877 famine in India, the only acquire to get some food was to work in the British labor camps. Within those camps, starving Indians received only 16 ounces of rice per day — less than the Jewish inmates of Buchenwald, the Nazi concentration camp of the Second World War.



One would say that India had faced famines even before the British colonial rule. However, "in the past 2000 years of Indian history, there were very few famine deaths because the Indian rulers ensured the well-being of the people through emergency food supplies and field kitchens," the journalist underscored.

However, the idea of the camps wasn't to commit mass murder as it was under the soviets, and the fascists. Your claim about the deaths from the US and Great Britain are laughable. They have no basis in reality. Yes, capitalism can be very bad when allowed to run amock. However, as it ultimately needs the people to buy its products it has a vested interest in not killing them. The same is not true of communism or fascism. Both of which are responsible for a conservative 200 million deaths. And that's of their OWN people. That doesn't include the foreign nationals they have killed in their wars of aggression.

Fruits of Capitalism.... White percentage cut down in % by 3X in 110 years.... From 27% to 9% according to this.... Give it another 110 years, and the same patterns, and Whites cut down by 3X... Then Whites would be 1% of the World in 2170.

 

[Marion Morrison]

let's not let the message of anti fascism get lost over the actions of a minor fringe who resort to violent tactics...

violent tactics exist on the fringe of most every political agenda, so this fad of knee jerk attacks and blind demonization of "ANTIFA" is reverberated propaganda peddled by dishonest parrots.

the vast majority of Americans are non violent peaceful "ANTIFA"

by definition, that is a simple fact.

Umm, no. The vast majority of Americans are regular people with jobs and support free speech for all.


A thing that is far removed from Antifa.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I don't know how you figure this.

Collectivist governments limit the power of Capitalists, and support Worker's rights.

Actually looks like any government can lead to strong Inequality of class.... The U.S.A is also an example of this....

..
...
......I'd argue that Collectivist Totalitarian regimes first target the "Competitors" and "People who stand out"

That a Collectivist Totalitarian regime would actually by default eliminate the previous elite, first.... Because they are people who both stand out, and who are the biggest competitors.

..
.... Fascists are better than Communists for this.... Why do you think the elite have brainwashed everyone to be Anti-Fascist?

Okay?

Maybe because most Neo-Fascists would go after people like George Soros, the Rothschild's, the Rockerfellers, the Media, Hollywod, the Bush's, the Clinton's, and all the other elite scumbag Globalists?

That all Fascists are the antithesis of Globalism.... That they do support Nation first Autarky the opposite of Globalism.

They don't support workers Rights. They dictate to the worker what he can eat, where he works, what he will do and when, where he will live, and most importantly he is expected to die for the country. That's why the Soviet Union lost 25 million in WWII. The Germans lost 4.5 million in WWII, the Japanese lost 4 million in WWII. The USA lost 350,000. The British Commonwealth lost 400,000 in the war. Why the huge disparity? Because the capitalistic country's VALUE their people.

When a socialist country go's to war the individual soldier is a cog in a wheel. The Soviet Union famously cleared minefields by having their soldiers link arms and march through them. At least the Germans didn't do that, but that is the basic mentality of a socialist, vs a capitalist country. Capitalist country's value life, and socialist country's don't.

I was talking more about the Fascists... I am a Fascist after-all... Not a Communist.



Thoughtcrime: Hitler: A Side We Never See

Hitler's tremendous social achievement in putting Germany's six million unemployed back to work is seldom acknowledged today. Although it was much more than a transitory achievement, "democratic" historians routinely dismiss it in just a few lines. Since 1945, not a single objective scholarly study has been devoted to this highly significant, indeed unprecedented, historical phenomenon.

Similarly neglected is the body of sweeping reforms that dramatically changed the condition of the worker in Germany. Factories were transformed from gloomy caverns to spacious and healthy work centers, with natural lighting, surrounded by gardens and playing fields. Hundreds of thousands of attractive houses were built for working class families. A policy of several weeks of paid vacation was introduced, along with week and holiday trips by land and sea. A wide-ranging program of physical and cultural education for young workers was established, with the world's best system of technical training. The Third Reich's social security and workers' health insurance system was the world's most modern and complete.

This remarkable record of social achievement is routinely hushed up today because it is embarrasses those who uphold the orthodox view of the Third Reich. Otherwise, readers might begin to think that perhaps Hitler was the greatest social builder of the twentieth century.

Because Hitler's program of social reform was a crucially important - indeed, essential -- part of his life work, a realization of this fact might induce people to view Hitler with new eyes. Not surprisingly, therefore, all this is passed over in silence. Most historians insist on treating Hitler and the Third Reich simplistically, as part of a Manichaean morality play of good versus evil.

Nevertheless, restoring work and bread to millions of unemployed who had been living in misery for years; restructuring industrial life; conceiving and establishing an organization for the effective defense and betterment of the nation's millions of wage earners; creating a new bureaucracy and judicial system that guaranteed the civic rights of each member of the national community, while simultaneously holding each person to his or her responsibilities as a German citizen: this organic body of reforms was part of a single, comprehensive plan, which Hitler had conceived and worked out years earlier.

Generous loans, amortizable in ten years, were granted to newly married couples so they could buy their own homes. At the birth of each child, a fourth of the debt was cancelled. Four children, at the normal rate of a new arrival every two and a half years, sufficed to cancel the entire loan debt.

Equally effective social measures were taken in behalf of farmers, who had the lowest incomes. In 1933 alone 17,611 new farm houses were built, each of them surrounded by a parcel of land one thousand square meters in size. Within three years, Hitler would build 91,000 such farmhouses. The rental for such dwellings could not legally exceed a modest share of the farmer's income. This unprecedented endowment of land and housing was only one feature of a revolution that soon dramatically improved the living standards of the Reich's rural population.

Under Hitler, every factory employee had the legal right to paid vacation. Previously, paid vacations had not normally exceed four or five days, and nearly half of the younger workers had no vacation time at all. If anything, Hitler favored younger workers; the youngest workers received more generous vacations. This was humane and made sense: a young person has more need of rest and fresh air to develop his maturing strength and vigor. Thus, they enjoyed a full 18 days of paid vacation per year

Hitler introduced the standard forty-hour work week in Europe. As for overtime work, it was now compensated, as nowhere else in the continent at the time, at an increased pay rate. And with the eight-hour work day now the norm, overtime work became more readily available.

In another innovation, work breaks were made longer: two hours each day, allowing greater opportunity for workers to relax, and to make use of the playing fields that large industries were now required to provide.

Whereas a worker's right to job security had been virtually non-existent, now an employee could no longer be dismissed at the sole discretion of the employer. Hitler saw to it that workers' rights were spelled out and enforced. Henceforth, an employer had to give four weeks notice before firing an employee, who then had up to two months to appeal the dismissal. Dismissals could also be annulled by the "Courts of Social Honor" (Ehrengerichte).

Oh yeah, hitler was great. Right up until he decided the German People weren't worthy of him and decided that they should all die with him. He was also trying to instill a volksgemeinschaft, which he failed to do, but don't forget the BDM who were supposed to mate with their counterparts in the HJ to breed a new race of supermen, and then of course there was the little issue of the concentration camps, but hey, what's a little mass murder so long as the workers get their paid vacation.

The idea of Death camps are actually a Capitalist British invention.

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902
Due to the fact that Black People were detained in separate camps, the issue of Black Concentration Camps is dealt with in another chronology.

Boer women, children and men unfit for service were herded together in concentration camps by the British forces during Anglo-Boer War 2 (1899-1902). The first two of these camps (refugee camps) were established to house the families of burghers who had surrendered voluntarily, but very soon, with families of combatant burgers driven forcibly into camps established all over the country, the camps ceased to be refugee camps and became concentration camps. The abhorrent conditions in these camps caused the death of 4 177 women, 22 074 children under sixteen and 1 676 men, mainly those too old to be on commando, notwithstanding the efforts of an English lady, Emily Hobhouse, who tried her best to make the British authorities aware of the plight of especially the women and children in the camps.

Unspoken Story of Indian Holocaust: UK Remains Silent About Its Atrocities

The analyst pointed out that during the 1877 famine in India, the only acquire to get some food was to work in the British labor camps. Within those camps, starving Indians received only 16 ounces of rice per day — less than the Jewish inmates of Buchenwald, the Nazi concentration camp of the Second World War.



One would say that India had faced famines even before the British colonial rule. However, "in the past 2000 years of Indian history, there were very few famine deaths because the Indian rulers ensured the well-being of the people through emergency food supplies and field kitchens," the journalist underscored.

However, the idea of the camps wasn't to commit mass murder as it was under the soviets, and the fascists. Your claim about the deaths from the US and Great Britain are laughable. They have no basis in reality. Yes, capitalism can be very bad when allowed to run amock. However, as it ultimately needs the people to buy its products it has a vested interest in not killing them. The same is not true of communism or fascism. Both of which are responsible for a conservative 200 million deaths. And that's of their OWN people. That doesn't include the foreign nationals they have killed in their wars of aggression.

Poland like other Soviet countries has seen a major decline in population growth since turning Capitalist.... This is actually the pattern for all White Capitalist countries.

It seems in some ways Capitalism is inferior to Communism... Not that I'm a Communist... I'm anti-Communist, and anti-Capitalist.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I have no pity for people who support "Tolerance" and "Apathy" in reaction to "Hostility attacks upon them"

So you approve of Antifa.

It's funny you seem to think that modern ANTIFA are an act of self defense... On the contrary likely 9 out of 10 times they're provocateur's showing up at any Right Wing, Nationalist, or Fascist event to somehow taunt them.

In 2011 i n Warsaw.... ANTIFA showed up to protest. .. Polish Independence day... Including ANTIFA from Germany.

This caused a massive riot.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

ANTIFA Punk rock vs Fascist Punk rock.

Which has better lyrics, which is more deep, touching, feeling, and which is more masculine?... I think the answer is obvious.

Fascist Punk rock



Anti-Fascist Punk rock.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Part 2
Antifa vs Fascist punk rock (Same bands)

Which has more soul, and is more creative?

Fascist punk rock.



ANTIFA punk rock.



Who do you think sounds like they'd whoop better in a fist-fight?

Who sounds more like a Homosexual?

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Fascist Black Metal.... Even much more soul, heart, creativity, and talent.

I think it's just another Liberal lie to say that we Fascists are soulless, un-creative, monsters.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Antifa rock, and metal mostly sound like shrieking Gays with no talent.

 

[featherlite]

Difference is antifa the British soldiers were the actual oppressive military forces.
People just defending white culture by free speech at rallies are not the same as actual soldiers.

This comes across as "misdirected"
like trying to target the "black thugs who are ACTUALLY killing people or cops"
by verbally and physically attacking or protesting "black people speaking out at rallies" but not actually doing the attacks.

Also I forgot to list in my response,
what are you doing or not doing about terrorist attacks, rapes
and selling people into slavery that people are doing other than Whites.
What about Mexican cartels who are committing mass violence and genocide,
what about jihadist terrorists who have taken over govts and terrorized civilians for power.

Are you equally against all men/power tyrants who are oppressing innocent
workers and minorities for military and govt controls?

Otherwise it seems "convenient" to blame and target and protest
civilized white men blaming them for the problems you are trying to use them to symbolize.
But avoiding confronting any really dangerous oppressors because that isn't
convenient or safe. So it looks chicken and cheap, just going for easy targets
but overlooking really gross threats to human rights as in terrorist and trafficking rings.

Isn't this just for convenience?

British soldiers were (are) servants to the crown. White supremacists are tools to distract us from the real issues.

So how does responding to them and further drawing attention to this "distraction"
help to solve any of the real issues this is distracting from antifa

White supremacists will lead this nation to civil war -- again. We can stop them before that happens.

uhh ok lol...but what does the public see? You really think anyone takes these backwoods "Nazi" protesters seriously? People witness 2 violent groups and say thanks but no thanks.
You'd do better to call it a locked up power structure that will go to any lengths to keep things continuing in their favor.

"You really think anyone takes these backwoods "Nazi" protesters seriously?"

Serious enough to end up with that man-child Trump for 3 more years.

The average American doesnt support anything Nazi, what they support is a president who they think has their best interest as a top priority.
Plus the alternative to the 2 party BSers is too vague and might end up worse.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

British soldiers were (are) servants to the crown. White supremacists are tools to distract us from the real issues.

So how does responding to them and further drawing attention to this "distraction"
help to solve any of the real issues this is distracting from antifa

White supremacists will lead this nation to civil war -- again. We can stop them before that happens.

uhh ok lol...but what does the public see? You really think anyone takes these backwoods "Nazi" protesters seriously? People witness 2 violent groups and say thanks but no thanks.
You'd do better to call it a locked up power structure that will go to any lengths to keep things continuing in their favor.

"You really think anyone takes these backwoods "Nazi" protesters seriously?"

Serious enough to end up with that man-child Trump for 3 more years.

The average American doesnt support anything Nazi, what they support is a president who they think has their best interest as a top priority.
Plus the alternative to the 2 party BSers is too vague and might end up worse.

Rock Against Communism has produced better music bands than ANTIFA.

How come?

Poland alone has probably produced better music with Rock Against Communism than the whole of ANTIFA could.

 

[featherlite]

Those are creepy as hell. First one has a good melody though.

 

[buckeye45_73]

If you read the Anti-Fascist Handbook, there will be no doubt that Antifa is the modern day version of the Sons of Liberty.

Wrong, you don't even know what the Sons of Liberty were.

Why don't you tell the class, bucky

Well antifa are not fighting for private property rights nor are they fighting taxation from a far away government and not allowing them representation.....

 

[antifa]

I have no pity for people who support "Tolerance" and "Apathy" in reaction to "Hostility attacks upon them"

So you approve of Antifa.

I support Polish Fascists.

You'll grow out of it when your balls drop. Right now you are still a punk-ass kid.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Yep, I love lording it over people. I take particular pleasure in abusing small dogs and kittens too!

Some people have something to say and some become mods.

Fortunately for you I'm both! Got a puppy I can kick?

You came here accusing me of being a fascist without knowing the difference between fascist and anti-fascist, so let me help you out.

characteristics of fascism
pro dictatorship and anti-democracy
pro military, pro police
pro imperialist foreign policy
pro state, nationalist, xenophobic
pro toxic masculinity
racist, anti-semitic

characteristics of anti-fascism
pro peaceful foreign policy
pro community, pro worker rights
pro feminist and anti-racist

What I specifically referred to was that the actions of antifart are the same as the Brown Shirts of hitler. Feel free to show me where I am wrong. You trotting out your cute little manifesto, while amusing, doesn't address my observation. Furthermore, fascist, socialist, and communist are all the same. They are all collectivist idealogies that advocate for a strong central government, and no power in the hands of the people.

So, your little manifesto merely shows that you are a statist, which shows that you are a FASCIST!

It's called government types 101.

The fact that you think fascist, socialist, and communist are all the same, proves you are talking out your ass. There is no debating someone as misinformed by propaganda like you. Go high five the deplorables, they are as illogical as you.

I can prove you are wrong anytime you think you are capable of rational debate.

They are the same, Marx said socialism was the first step to communism (utopian socialism), toss in fascism and monarchy, and they are all pretty much the same thing.....rule by one person with an aristocracy supporting them and ruling millions of peasants

I mean is there much difference in the structure of govts led by Stalin, Hitler or King Henry VIII?

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I have no pity for people who support "Tolerance" and "Apathy" in reaction to "Hostility attacks upon them"

So you approve of Antifa.

I support Polish Fascists.

You'll grow out of it when your balls drop. Right now you are still a punk-ass kid.

Those are creepy as hell. First one has a good melody though.

Typical Liberal music.

Nothing, no feeling, nor talent.

Degeneracy only.

 

[antifa]

If you read the Anti-Fascist Handbook, there will be no doubt that Antifa is the modern day version of the Sons of Liberty.

Wrong, you don't even know what the Sons of Liberty were.

Why don't you tell the class, bucky

Well antifa are not fighting for private property rights nor are they fighting taxation from a far away government and not allowing them representation.....

There are plenty of other people to fight neo-feudalism. Antifa is focused on getting rid of the British (fascist) soldiers first.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

If you read the Anti-Fascist Handbook, there will be no doubt that Antifa is the modern day version of the Sons of Liberty.

Wrong, you don't even know what the Sons of Liberty were.

Why don't you tell the class, bucky

Well antifa are not fighting for private property rights nor are they fighting taxation from a far away government and not allowing them representation.....

There are plenty of other people to fight neo-feudalism. Antifa is focused on getting rid of the British (fascist) soldiers first.

British are a hopeless cause... Perhaps the biggest bunch of Sub-Human idiots Europe has ever seen.

Your ANTIFA runs Britain.

 

[antifa]

I have no pity for people who support "Tolerance" and "Apathy" in reaction to "Hostility attacks upon them"

So you approve of Antifa.

It's funny you seem to think that modern ANTIFA are an act of self defense... On the contrary likely 9 out of 10 times they're provocateur's showing up at any Right Wing, Nationalist, or Fascist event to somehow taunt them.

In 2011 i n Warsaw.... ANTIFA showed up to protest. .. Polish Independence day... Including ANTIFA from Germany.

This caused a massive riot.

You are not the only one with rights, snowflake. If you don't like a confrontation, stay in your safespace.

 

[buckeye45_73]

If you read the Anti-Fascist Handbook, there will be no doubt that Antifa is the modern day version of the Sons of Liberty.

Wrong, you don't even know what the Sons of Liberty were.

Why don't you tell the class, bucky

Well antifa are not fighting for private property rights nor are they fighting taxation from a far away government and not allowing them representation.....

There are plenty of other people to fight neo-feudalism. Antifa is focused on getting rid of the British (fascist) soldiers first.

Then why are they in our country? did we have some redcoats stashed away?

but that's my point socialism is neo feudalism......

capitalism and liberal democracy are the exact opposite.