Anyone who believes that separation of church and government was a part of the intent of the Constitution needs to look at history. There were several states that had State religions at the ratification of the first amendment. Congress was not allowed to make a law, the states made sure there was no confusion to that point. There was an official religion until 1830's (Mass or NY I think).
The only real argument between separating government and religion is under the incorporation theory of the 14th Amendment. Again it just doesn't hold water. It was upheld by the SCOTUS but it is a pretty weak version of connect the dots.
The separation of church and government (at any level) is a myth. So long as a level of government does not prevent you from practicing religion or respect the establishment of (go look up what that phrase means, its actually interesting) then there is no issue. It is another example of disregarding the original intent of ratification.
Mike
The only real argument between separating government and religion is under the incorporation theory of the 14th Amendment. Again it just doesn't hold water. It was upheld by the SCOTUS but it is a pretty weak version of connect the dots.
The separation of church and government (at any level) is a myth. So long as a level of government does not prevent you from practicing religion or respect the establishment of (go look up what that phrase means, its actually interesting) then there is no issue. It is another example of disregarding the original intent of ratification.
Mike