Another Good Month On The Jobs Front...unemployment Drops To 5.9%

[Faun]

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

And it does not prove your far left comments..

Just shows you lied to suit your far left agenda..

According to the BLS website, there were 111,634,000 Americans employed in the private sector at the start of George W. Bush's first term, in January 2001. Eight years later, in January 2009, there were 110,961,000 Americans employed in the private sector. So the United States lost 673,000 private-sector jobs on Bush's watch.

Nancy Pelosi says more private sector jobs created in 2010 than in eight years under Bush PolitiFact

HERE IS THE LINK, PUT IN 2001, LOL

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Here is the meter from your link:

LOL it's cute how you think you get to judge.

Says the far left Hack!

That's all ya got, huh? Sad.

 

[Kosh]

And it does not prove your far left comments..

Just shows you lied to suit your far left agenda..

According to the BLS website, there were 111,634,000 Americans employed in the private sector at the start of George W. Bush's first term, in January 2001. Eight years later, in January 2009, there were 110,961,000 Americans employed in the private sector. So the United States lost 673,000 private-sector jobs on Bush's watch.

Nancy Pelosi says more private sector jobs created in 2010 than in eight years under Bush PolitiFact

HERE IS THE LINK, PUT IN 2001, LOL

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Here is the meter from your link:

LOL it's cute how you think you get to judge.

Says the far left Hack!

That's all ya got, huh? Sad.

Well since you were just proven to be a far left hack and liar with your link, you would think the far left hack that tries to pretnd they are not would acknowledge that they were wrong and correct their comments..

 

[Dad2three]

And yet, ir seems the liar is you since I was able to produce a link confirming what I said. You, on the other hand .....

Once again the far left produces a link and thinks it backs up their comments..

So there are no records before 1948?

I know of none which produced statistics on "private sector" data. If you know of such, this is your opportunity to prove me wrong.

And the far left mantra comes into play..

Post bunk and prove me wrong..

So FDR was president in 1948 (which is when the data in the link starts) FDR was elected in 1933, so please show how your link proves your comments..

You're insane. FDR was not president in 1948. My claim remains intact.

No it does not! Even your own link does not support your claims as Herbert Hoover served in 1929–1933, which is not supported by your link..

Also when one does the actual math provided by your link..

George W. Bush

2001–2005

132,466

132,553

-13

-0.002%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

George W. Bush

2005–2009

132,553

133,631

+1,129

+0.21%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Once again proving your comments are wrong and your link did nothing to support your far left hack claims..

WOW, THINK YOU WOULDN'T GET CALLED OUT ON YOUR LIE?

PRIVATE sector jobs

Jan 2001 111,859,000

Jan 2009 111,397,000


THAT'S A LOSS OF 673,000+ PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS BUBBA, LOL

Yes, Dubya like ALL GOPers, grew Gov't jobs and spending. Shocking I know

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

 

[Dad2three]

According to the BLS website, there were 111,634,000 Americans employed in the private sector at the start of George W. Bush's first term, in January 2001. Eight years later, in January 2009, there were 110,961,000 Americans employed in the private sector. So the United States lost 673,000 private-sector jobs on Bush's watch.

Nancy Pelosi says more private sector jobs created in 2010 than in eight years under Bush PolitiFact

HERE IS THE LINK, PUT IN 2001, LOL

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Here is the meter from your link:

LOL it's cute how you think you get to judge.

Says the far left Hack!

That's all ya got, huh? Sad.

Well since you were just proven to be a far left hack and liar with your link, you would think the far left hack that tries to pretnd they are not would acknowledge that they were wrong and correct their comments..

Says the KKKlown saying a half lie is worse, he conflates PRIVATE sector jobs which was the posit, with ALL jobs, of course Dubya grew the gov't jobs by nearly 2,000,000

LOL

 

[Kosh]

[

Once again the far left produces a link and thinks it backs up their comments..

So there are no records before 1948?

I know of none which produced statistics on "private sector" data. If you know of such, this is your opportunity to prove me wrong.

And the far left mantra comes into play..

Post bunk and prove me wrong..

So FDR was president in 1948 (which is when the data in the link starts) FDR was elected in 1933, so please show how your link proves your comments..

You're insane. FDR was not president in 1948. My claim remains intact.

No it does not! Even your own link does not support your claims as Herbert Hoover served in 1929–1933, which is not supported by your link..

Also when one does the actual math provided by your link..

George W. Bush

2001–2005

132,466

132,553

-13

-0.002%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

George W. Bush

2005–2009

132,553

133,631

+1,129

+0.21%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Once again proving your comments are wrong and your link did nothing to support your far left hack claims..

WOW, THINK YOU WOULDN'T GET CALLED OUT ON YOUR LIE?

PRIVATE sector jobs

Jan 2001 111,859,000

Jan 2009 111,397,000


THAT'S A LOSS OF 673,000+ PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS BUBBA, LOL

Yes, Dubya like ALL GOPers, grew Gov't jobs and spending. Shocking I know

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

And once again your link does not prove what you posted since it starts in 2004..

 

[Faun]

And yet, ir seems the liar is you since I was able to produce a link confirming what I said. You, on the other hand .....

Once again the far left produces a link and thinks it backs up their comments..

So there are no records before 1948?

I know of none which produced statistics on "private sector" data. If you know of such, this is your opportunity to prove me wrong.

And the far left mantra comes into play..

Post bunk and prove me wrong..

So FDR was president in 1948 (which is when the data in the link starts) FDR was elected in 1933, so please show how your link proves your comments..

You're insane. FDR was not president in 1948. My claim remains intact.

No it does not! Even your own link does not support your claims as Herbert Hoover served in 1929–1933, which is not supported by your link..

Also when one does the actual math provided by your link..

George W. Bush

2001–2005

132,466

132,553

-13

-0.002%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

George W. Bush

2005–2009

132,553

133,631

+1,129

+0.21%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Once again proving your comments are wrong and your link did nothing to support your far left hack claims..

You lying rightie, those numbers do not come from the link I posted. Here are the private sector numbers under Bush:

1/2001: 111,859,000
1/2009: 111,397,000

A decrease of 462,000 jobs.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

 

[Faun]

According to the BLS website, there were 111,634,000 Americans employed in the private sector at the start of George W. Bush's first term, in January 2001. Eight years later, in January 2009, there were 110,961,000 Americans employed in the private sector. So the United States lost 673,000 private-sector jobs on Bush's watch.

Nancy Pelosi says more private sector jobs created in 2010 than in eight years under Bush PolitiFact

HERE IS THE LINK, PUT IN 2001, LOL

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

Here is the meter from your link:

LOL it's cute how you think you get to judge.

Says the far left Hack!

That's all ya got, huh? Sad.

Well since you were just proven to be a far left hack and liar with your link, you would think the far left hack that tries to pretnd they are not would acknowledge that they were wrong and correct their comments..

Spits the idiot who thinks FDR was president in 1948 and that total jobs is private sector jobs.

 

[Kosh]

Here is the meter from your link:

LOL it's cute how you think you get to judge.

Says the far left Hack!

That's all ya got, huh? Sad.

Well since you were just proven to be a far left hack and liar with your link, you would think the far left hack that tries to pretnd they are not would acknowledge that they were wrong and correct their comments..

Says the KKKlown saying a half lie is worse, he conflates PRIVATE sector jobs which was the posit, with ALL jobs, of course Dubya grew the gov't jobs by nearly 2,000,000

LOL

And once the racist far left comes out shows their true colors..

Despite all this the link does not prove what was posted...

 

[Kosh]

Once again the far left produces a link and thinks it backs up their comments..

So there are no records before 1948?

I know of none which produced statistics on "private sector" data. If you know of such, this is your opportunity to prove me wrong.

And the far left mantra comes into play..

Post bunk and prove me wrong..

So FDR was president in 1948 (which is when the data in the link starts) FDR was elected in 1933, so please show how your link proves your comments..

You're insane. FDR was not president in 1948. My claim remains intact.

No it does not! Even your own link does not support your claims as Herbert Hoover served in 1929–1933, which is not supported by your link..

Also when one does the actual math provided by your link..

George W. Bush

2001–2005

132,466

132,553

-13

-0.002%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

George W. Bush

2005–2009

132,553

133,631

+1,129

+0.21%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Once again proving your comments are wrong and your link did nothing to support your far left hack claims..

You lying rightie, those numbers do not come from the link I posted. Here are the private sector numbers under Bush:

1/2001: 111,859,000
1/2009: 111,397,000

A decrease of 462,000 jobs.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

And still does not prove your earlier comments..

You are a liar!

 

[Kosh]

Here is the meter from your link:

LOL it's cute how you think you get to judge.

Says the far left Hack!

That's all ya got, huh? Sad.

Well since you were just proven to be a far left hack and liar with your link, you would think the far left hack that tries to pretnd they are not would acknowledge that they were wrong and correct their comments..

Spits the idiot who thinks FDR was president in 1948 and that total jobs is private sector jobs.

And still can not prove their original comments..

 

[Dad2three]

[

I know of none which produced statistics on "private sector" data. If you know of such, this is your opportunity to prove me wrong.

And the far left mantra comes into play..

Post bunk and prove me wrong..

So FDR was president in 1948 (which is when the data in the link starts) FDR was elected in 1933, so please show how your link proves your comments..

You're insane. FDR was not president in 1948. My claim remains intact.

No it does not! Even your own link does not support your claims as Herbert Hoover served in 1929–1933, which is not supported by your link..

Also when one does the actual math provided by your link..

George W. Bush

2001–2005

132,466

132,553

-13

-0.002%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

George W. Bush

2005–2009

132,553

133,631

+1,129

+0.21%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Once again proving your comments are wrong and your link did nothing to support your far left hack claims..

WOW, THINK YOU WOULDN'T GET CALLED OUT ON YOUR LIE?

PRIVATE sector jobs

Jan 2001 111,859,000

Jan 2009 111,397,000


THAT'S A LOSS OF 673,000+ PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS BUBBA, LOL

Yes, Dubya like ALL GOPers, grew Gov't jobs and spending. Shocking I know

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

And once again your link does not prove what you posted since it starts in 2004..

\

HOW FUKKKING HARD IS IT TO PUT IN 2001 AND THEN HIT GO? LOL

Oh right you're a conservative. Try it Buba

 

[Faun]

[

I know of none which produced statistics on "private sector" data. If you know of such, this is your opportunity to prove me wrong.

And the far left mantra comes into play..

Post bunk and prove me wrong..

So FDR was president in 1948 (which is when the data in the link starts) FDR was elected in 1933, so please show how your link proves your comments..

You're insane. FDR was not president in 1948. My claim remains intact.

No it does not! Even your own link does not support your claims as Herbert Hoover served in 1929–1933, which is not supported by your link..

Also when one does the actual math provided by your link..

George W. Bush

2001–2005

132,466

132,553

-13

-0.002%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

George W. Bush

2005–2009

132,553

133,631

+1,129

+0.21%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Once again proving your comments are wrong and your link did nothing to support your far left hack claims..

WOW, THINK YOU WOULDN'T GET CALLED OUT ON YOUR LIE?

PRIVATE sector jobs

Jan 2001 111,859,000

Jan 2009 111,397,000


THAT'S A LOSS OF 673,000+ PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS BUBBA, LOL

Yes, Dubya like ALL GOPers, grew Gov't jobs and spending. Shocking I know

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

And once again your link does not prove what you posted since it starts in 2004..

Oh, look, here's the link going back to 2001....

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

sad you have to lie.

 

[Kosh]

[

And the far left mantra comes into play..

Post bunk and prove me wrong..

So FDR was president in 1948 (which is when the data in the link starts) FDR was elected in 1933, so please show how your link proves your comments..

You're insane. FDR was not president in 1948. My claim remains intact.

No it does not! Even your own link does not support your claims as Herbert Hoover served in 1929–1933, which is not supported by your link..

Also when one does the actual math provided by your link..

George W. Bush

2001–2005

132,466

132,553

-13

-0.002%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

George W. Bush

2005–2009

132,553

133,631

+1,129

+0.21%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Once again proving your comments are wrong and your link did nothing to support your far left hack claims..

WOW, THINK YOU WOULDN'T GET CALLED OUT ON YOUR LIE?

PRIVATE sector jobs

Jan 2001 111,859,000

Jan 2009 111,397,000


THAT'S A LOSS OF 673,000+ PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS BUBBA, LOL

Yes, Dubya like ALL GOPers, grew Gov't jobs and spending. Shocking I know

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

And once again your link does not prove what you posted since it starts in 2004..

\

HOW FUKKKING HARD IS IT TO PUT IN 2001 AND THEN HIT GO? LOL

Oh right you're a conservative. Try it Buba

The irony of the comments being made by the far left..

 

[Kosh]

[

And the far left mantra comes into play..

Post bunk and prove me wrong..

So FDR was president in 1948 (which is when the data in the link starts) FDR was elected in 1933, so please show how your link proves your comments..

You're insane. FDR was not president in 1948. My claim remains intact.

No it does not! Even your own link does not support your claims as Herbert Hoover served in 1929–1933, which is not supported by your link..

Also when one does the actual math provided by your link..

George W. Bush

2001–2005

132,466

132,553

-13

-0.002%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

George W. Bush

2005–2009

132,553

133,631

+1,129

+0.21%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Once again proving your comments are wrong and your link did nothing to support your far left hack claims..

WOW, THINK YOU WOULDN'T GET CALLED OUT ON YOUR LIE?

PRIVATE sector jobs

Jan 2001 111,859,000

Jan 2009 111,397,000


THAT'S A LOSS OF 673,000+ PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS BUBBA, LOL

Yes, Dubya like ALL GOPers, grew Gov't jobs and spending. Shocking I know

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

And once again your link does not prove what you posted since it starts in 2004..

Oh, look, here's the link going back to 2001....

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

sad you have to lie.

Says the one that can not prove their original comments that started all this.

I have just proven that you posted a lie, as you should have been able to easily prove your comments.

You are liar and a far left hack..

 

[Faun]

[

And the far left mantra comes into play..

Post bunk and prove me wrong..

So FDR was president in 1948 (which is when the data in the link starts) FDR was elected in 1933, so please show how your link proves your comments..

You're insane. FDR was not president in 1948. My claim remains intact.

No it does not! Even your own link does not support your claims as Herbert Hoover served in 1929–1933, which is not supported by your link..

Also when one does the actual math provided by your link..

George W. Bush

2001–2005

132,466

132,553

-13

-0.002%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

George W. Bush

2005–2009

132,553

133,631

+1,129

+0.21%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Once again proving your comments are wrong and your link did nothing to support your far left hack claims..

WOW, THINK YOU WOULDN'T GET CALLED OUT ON YOUR LIE?

PRIVATE sector jobs

Jan 2001 111,859,000

Jan 2009 111,397,000


THAT'S A LOSS OF 673,000+ PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS BUBBA, LOL

Yes, Dubya like ALL GOPers, grew Gov't jobs and spending. Shocking I know

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

And once again your link does not prove what you posted since it starts in 2004..

\

HOW FUKKKING HARD IS IT TO PUT IN 2001 AND THEN HIT GO? LOL

Oh right you're a conservative. Try it Buba

LMAO

 

[Kosh]

[

You're insane. FDR was not president in 1948. My claim remains intact.

No it does not! Even your own link does not support your claims as Herbert Hoover served in 1929–1933, which is not supported by your link..

Also when one does the actual math provided by your link..

George W. Bush

2001–2005

132,466

132,553

-13

-0.002%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

George W. Bush

2005–2009

132,553

133,631

+1,129

+0.21%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Once again proving your comments are wrong and your link did nothing to support your far left hack claims..

WOW, THINK YOU WOULDN'T GET CALLED OUT ON YOUR LIE?

PRIVATE sector jobs

Jan 2001 111,859,000

Jan 2009 111,397,000


THAT'S A LOSS OF 673,000+ PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS BUBBA, LOL

Yes, Dubya like ALL GOPers, grew Gov't jobs and spending. Shocking I know

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

And once again your link does not prove what you posted since it starts in 2004..

\

HOW FUKKKING HARD IS IT TO PUT IN 2001 AND THEN HIT GO? LOL

Oh right you're a conservative. Try it Buba

LMAO

And the far left hack (along with another far left hack) is still unable to prove their original comments..

Thus proving my original comments about you being a far left Hack and a Liar.

Of course the far left a so easy to lead down this path as they can easily show what they want, but choose to post lies in order to support their religion..

 

[Faun]

[

You're insane. FDR was not president in 1948. My claim remains intact.

No it does not! Even your own link does not support your claims as Herbert Hoover served in 1929–1933, which is not supported by your link..

Also when one does the actual math provided by your link..

George W. Bush

2001–2005

132,466

132,553

-13

-0.002%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

George W. Bush

2005–2009

132,553

133,631

+1,129

+0.21%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Once again proving your comments are wrong and your link did nothing to support your far left hack claims..

WOW, THINK YOU WOULDN'T GET CALLED OUT ON YOUR LIE?

PRIVATE sector jobs

Jan 2001 111,859,000

Jan 2009 111,397,000


THAT'S A LOSS OF 673,000+ PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS BUBBA, LOL

Yes, Dubya like ALL GOPers, grew Gov't jobs and spending. Shocking I know

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

And once again your link does not prove what you posted since it starts in 2004..

Oh, look, here's the link going back to 2001....

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

sad you have to lie.

Says the one that can not prove their original comments that started all this.

I have just proven that you posted a lie, as you should have been able to easily prove your comments.

You are liar and a far left hack..

It's well established that Hoover lost private sector jobs as the Great Depression saw unemployment skyrocket on his watch from 3% to over 20%. But you're right in that BLS data only goes as far back as 1948. So according to BLS stats, George Bush is the only president recorded to lose private sector jobs.

Ain't ya proud? LOL

 

[Faun]

[

No it does not! Even your own link does not support your claims as Herbert Hoover served in 1929–1933, which is not supported by your link..

Also when one does the actual math provided by your link..

George W. Bush

2001–2005

132,466

132,553

-13

-0.002%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

George W. Bush

2005–2009

132,553

133,631

+1,129

+0.21%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Once again proving your comments are wrong and your link did nothing to support your far left hack claims..

WOW, THINK YOU WOULDN'T GET CALLED OUT ON YOUR LIE?

PRIVATE sector jobs

Jan 2001 111,859,000

Jan 2009 111,397,000


THAT'S A LOSS OF 673,000+ PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS BUBBA, LOL

Yes, Dubya like ALL GOPers, grew Gov't jobs and spending. Shocking I know

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

And once again your link does not prove what you posted since it starts in 2004..

\

HOW FUKKKING HARD IS IT TO PUT IN 2001 AND THEN HIT GO? LOL

Oh right you're a conservative. Try it Buba

LMAO

And the far left hack (along with another far left hack) is still unable to prove their original comments..

Thus proving my original comments about you being a far left Hack and a Liar.

Of course the far left a so easy to lead down this path as they can easily show what they want, but choose to post lies in order to support their religion..

Are you ignoring your own lies that FDR was president in 1948 and then your lie of posting total employment and calling in private sector jobs?

 

[Kosh]

[

No it does not! Even your own link does not support your claims as Herbert Hoover served in 1929–1933, which is not supported by your link..

Also when one does the actual math provided by your link..

George W. Bush

2001–2005

132,466

132,553

-13

-0.002%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

George W. Bush

2005–2009

132,553

133,631

+1,129

+0.21%

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Once again proving your comments are wrong and your link did nothing to support your far left hack claims..

WOW, THINK YOU WOULDN'T GET CALLED OUT ON YOUR LIE?

PRIVATE sector jobs

Jan 2001 111,859,000

Jan 2009 111,397,000


THAT'S A LOSS OF 673,000+ PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS BUBBA, LOL

Yes, Dubya like ALL GOPers, grew Gov't jobs and spending. Shocking I know

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

And once again your link does not prove what you posted since it starts in 2004..

Oh, look, here's the link going back to 2001....

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

sad you have to lie.

Says the one that can not prove their original comments that started all this.

I have just proven that you posted a lie, as you should have been able to easily prove your comments.

You are liar and a far left hack..

It's well established that Hoover lost private sector jobs as the Great Depression saw unemployment skyrocket on his watch from 3% to over 20%. But you're right in that BLS data only goes as far back as 1948. So according to BLS stats, George Bush is the only president recorded to lose private sector jobs.

Ain't ya proud? LOL

Also the way we count unemployment is different now then back in those days, you can thank the far left Congress and Clinton for that one.

See all this to get you admit the truth..

Why does the far left insist on doing this?

 

[Kosh]

[

WOW, THINK YOU WOULDN'T GET CALLED OUT ON YOUR LIE?

PRIVATE sector jobs

Jan 2001 111,859,000

Jan 2009 111,397,000


THAT'S A LOSS OF 673,000+ PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS BUBBA, LOL

Yes, Dubya like ALL GOPers, grew Gov't jobs and spending. Shocking I know

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

And once again your link does not prove what you posted since it starts in 2004..

\

HOW FUKKKING HARD IS IT TO PUT IN 2001 AND THEN HIT GO? LOL

Oh right you're a conservative. Try it Buba

LMAO

And the far left hack (along with another far left hack) is still unable to prove their original comments..

Thus proving my original comments about you being a far left Hack and a Liar.

Of course the far left a so easy to lead down this path as they can easily show what they want, but choose to post lies in order to support their religion..

Are you ignoring your own lies that FDR was president in 1948 and then your lie of posting total employment and calling in private sector jobs?

No I know I posted bunk, just to show that you could post information if it existed.

Instead you insisted on carrying on with you lie and acting like the far left hack we know you to be..