and so it begins...

[skookerasbil]

Ever go to an Italian wake in Brooklyn, New York? People throw themselves on the casket and wail so loudly, it can be heard all the way in Queens.

THATS what these climate crusaders are like.......all hysterical, all the time.

 

[flacaltenn]

Really think it's time for intervention.. DotCom, GoldiRocks, Abraham, are now clinically panicked and borderline psychotic.
Who's with me? 10 days in treatment --- minimum --- to calm them the hell down

So that's your solution when you run out of intelligent responses?

Im sorry. Was there an intelligient response to someone mistaking hail for snow or goin bonkers over rain in Saudi? I must be slipping......

 

[westwall]

climate change = hot AND cold variations deniers!!!

According to you CO2 can only cause temperatures to rise thanks to the GREENHOUSE GAS EFFECT. Are greenhouses warm or cold?

 

[westwall]

Really think it's time for intervention.. DotCom, GoldiRocks, Abraham, are now clinically panicked and borderline psychotic.
Who's with me? 10 days in treatment --- minimum --- to calm them the hell down

No, unlike them, I am not in favor of compelling people to seek psychiatric help unless they are violent.

 

[Pop23]

we've passed the "tipping-point" deniers. Thanks for hastening the end times. Rare downpours and floods hit Saudi capital

I just looked outside

In my world the sky is not falling

 

[flacaltenn]

Really think it's time for intervention.. DotCom, GoldiRocks, Abraham, are now clinically panicked and borderline psychotic.
Who's with me? 10 days in treatment --- minimum --- to calm them the hell down

No, unlike them, I am not in favor of compelling people to seek psychiatric help unless they are violent.

But what if they seem to believe that death and destruction validates their mission? You knw. Like Jim Jones and The Peoples Temple stuff? Wouldnt be ignoring a clear threat to society? I might compromise my " no initiation of force" self to get them to treatment.. Never to rat them out for legal abuse.

'Cept I got a lower regard for psychiatric science than I have for climate science.. oh well.

forget it youre right......

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

climate change = hot AND cold variations deniers!!!

AGW, is there anything it can't do?

 

[flacaltenn]

climate change = hot AND cold variations deniers!!!

AGW, is there anything it can't do?

Cant get my Titans a playoff game or get the Chinese Carp out of the Great Lakes...

 

[daveman]

climate change = hot AND cold variations deniers!!!

AGW, is there anything it can't do?

AGW drank all my beer.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

climate change = hot AND cold variations deniers!!!

AGW, is there anything it can't do?

AGW drank all my beer.

AGW left the seat up, my wife yelled at me.
Fuck you, AGW!

 

[daveman]

Really think it's time for intervention.. DotCom, GoldiRocks, Abraham, are now clinically panicked and borderline psychotic.
Who's with me? 10 days in treatment --- minimum --- to calm them the hell down

No, unlike them, I am not in favor of compelling people to seek psychiatric help unless they are violent.

http://www.globalclimatescam.com/20...deniers-shouldnt-we-start-punishing-them-now/

AGW cultists have a tendency to desire violence.

 

[Abraham3]

To what other groups would you apply the term "cultists"? If we look at some actual parallels, we might suggest you could use the term with:

1) People who believe the Earth revolves around the Sun
2) People who believe American astronauts landed on the moon
3) People who accept the germ theory of disease
4) People who believe quantum theory is accurate outside of Planck scale singularities
5) People who think exercise is good for you, even if they don't get enough themselves
6) People who believe our government is intended to be a force for the good of its citizenry

What do these groups have in common? They believe a consensus opinion among experts has value and significance.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

What consensus? You still going on about that consensus?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

To what other groups would you apply the term "cultists"? If we look at some actual parallels, we might suggest you could use the term with:

1) People who believe the Earth revolves around the Sun
2) People who believe American astronauts landed on the moon
3) People who accept the germ theory of disease
4) People who believe quantum theory is accurate outside of Planck scale singularities
5) People who think exercise is good for you, even if they don't get enough themselves
6) People who believe our government is intended to be a force for the good of its citizenry

What do these groups have in common? They believe a consensus opinion among experts has value and significance.

97%? Out of how many? Show your work.

 

[Stephanie]

We see the effects of brainwashing with all this nonsense about Globull warming AKA climate change

do these people really believe the EARTH hasn't went through warming and cooling and climates changed before? And the we humans are really the cause of this?

This what's scary with the SKY IS FALLING politicians like Albert Gore, Obama, etc

What better way for a Government take control of your lives to do what they want?

think about that

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

climate change = hot AND cold variations deniers!!!

You gotta love how it started as global warming,but when that didnt pan out they switched to climate change. Maybe they should have stayed with "A new ice age" back in the seventies.
Whats next? Climate stagnation? Now that would be something to worry about.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

It was 70 today in Washington deniers. Think about it!!!

And there's not a damn thing you can do about it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It was 70 today in Washington deniers. Think about it!!!

Quick, let's spend trillions! Don't think about it!!!

 

[Stephanie]

It was 70 today in Washington deniers. Think about it!!!

Quick, let's spend trillions! Don't think about it!!!

yep, these cult members of globull warming are scary...and a real danger to us our Freedoms and our livelihoods

I hope people wake up before it too late

 

[Stephanie]

I was just reading this...this is what (climate change politicians and government) have in mind for THE PEOPLE....People better wake the hell up
links in article at site...

SNIP:
O’TOOLE and SCHIFF: Do single-family homes threaten the planet?

Climate crusaders want to phase out the American dream of a house and yard


A plan to squeeze most residents of the San Francisco Bay Area into multifamily housing offers a test case of whether land-use bureaucracies nationwide, encouraged by the Obama administration, should be allowed to transform American lifestyles under the pretext of combating climate change.

Currently, 56 percent of households in the nine-county Bay Area live in single-family homes. That number would drop to 48 percent by 2030, under a high-density development blueprint called Plan Bay Area, recently enacted by the Association of Bay Area Governments and the region’s Metropolitan Transportation Commission.

Plan Bay Area has already drawn several legal challenges, and the debate could spread nationwide if, as may happen, it becomes a model for regulators in other parts of the country.

Owning a single-family home has long been part of the American dream, but Plan Bay Area embraces a dramatically different vision of the ideal community: crowded rows of high-rises and mass-transit platforms.

Population density in the region’s urban areas would increase by 30 percent during the next two decades under the plan. Nearly 80 percent of all new housing and 62 percent of new jobs would be located in just 5 percent of the region’s surface area.

Planners admit this will make single-family housing in the already high-priced Bay area even less affordable.

To be sure, the plan isn’t the first attempt to herd families into condominiums and apartments. Since at least the 1970s, urban planners around the country have argued that the single-family-home lifestyle results in people driving too much, which supposedly wastes energy and pollutes the air. Thus, 17 years ago, Portland, Ore., adopted a scheme to reduce the share of residents living in single-family homes from 65 percent to 41 percent. In some neighborhoods, if a house burns down, it can be replaced only with an apartment structure.

Even if it’s not without precedent, Plan Bay Area could still be revolutionary because of the rationale behind it. It could help spur a nationwide movement for high-density “transit-oriented” development — in the name of reducing global warming. The federal government has signed on. The Obama administration has told metropolitan areas to include land-use regulations in the transportation plans that federal law requires them to update every five years. Washington is also giving communities “livability grants” aimed at promoting high-density development.

ALL of it here
Read more: O'TOOLE and SCHIFF: Do single-family homes threaten the planet? - Washington Times
Follow us: [MENTION=39892]Was[/MENTION]htimes on Twitter