Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The status quo is supported because a lot of people in government benefit from preserving it and politicians get support both politically and financially by keeping it propped up. That is why public sector unions should have never been allowed to exist. The public school system today does not exist for the benefit of American children; it exists for the benefit of public school employees.
yes its exactly like health care!! The liberals have socialized it and it works like the Soviet Union and Red China worked when they were socialized.
Our health care system has not been socialized. The federal government has unconstitutionally intruded into it, but it has not been socialized in the true sense of the word. We do not have a single payer government run system.
yes its exactly like health care!! The liberals have socialized it and it works like the Soviet Union and Red China worked when they were socialized.
Our health care system has not been socialized. The federal government has unconstitutionally intruded into it, but it has not been socialized in the true sense of the word. We do not have a single payer government run system.
yes but modern socialism or the transition to modern socialism merely involves taking more and more control since the Constitution and our loyality to it prevent a full scale revolution .
Norman Thomas quotes:
The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.
This was precisely the tactic of infiltration advocated by Lenin and Stalin.[3] As Communist International General Secretary Georgi Dimitroff told the Seventh World Congress of the Comintern in 1935:
"Comrades, you remember the ancient tale of the capture of Troy. Troy was inaccessible to the armies attacking her, thanks to her impregnable walls. And the attacking army, after suffering many sacrifices, was unable to achieve victory until, with the aid of the famous Trojan horse, it managed to penetrate to the very heart of the enemys camp."[4]
C. S. Lewis on Diabolical Democracy, Socialism, and Public Education « Conservative Colloquium
Buckley endorsed Chambers analysis of modern liberalism as a watered-down version of Communist ideology. The New Deal, Chambers insists, is not liberal democratic but revolutionary in its nature and intentions, seeking a basic change in the social and, above all, the power relationships within the nation.
Our health care system has not been socialized. The federal government has unconstitutionally intruded into it, but it has not been socialized in the true sense of the word. We do not have a single payer government run system.
yes but modern socialism or the transition to modern socialism merely involves taking more and more control since the Constitution and our loyality to it prevent a full scale revolution .
Norman Thomas quotes:
The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.
This was precisely the tactic of infiltration advocated by Lenin and Stalin.[3] As Communist International General Secretary Georgi Dimitroff told the Seventh World Congress of the Comintern in 1935:
"Comrades, you remember the ancient tale of the capture of Troy. Troy was inaccessible to the armies attacking her, thanks to her impregnable walls. And the attacking army, after suffering many sacrifices, was unable to achieve victory until, with the aid of the famous Trojan horse, it managed to penetrate to the very heart of the enemys camp."[4]
C. S. Lewis on Diabolical Democracy, Socialism, and Public Education « Conservative Colloquium
Buckley endorsed Chambers analysis of modern liberalism as a watered-down version of Communist ideology. The New Deal, Chambers insists, is not liberal democratic but revolutionary in its nature and intentions, seeking a basic change in the social and, above all, the power relationships within the nation.
Oooohhhhhh!!
So it's "modern" socialism!
Far be it from Republicans to embrace anything "modern".
yes its exactly like health care!! The liberals have socialized it and it works like the Soviet Union and Red China worked when they were socialized.
Our health care system has not been socialized. The federal government has unconstitutionally intruded into it, but it has not been socialized in the true sense of the word. We do not have a single payer government run system.
yes but modern socialism or the transition to modern socialism merely involves taking more and more control since the Constitution and our loyality to it prevent a full scale revolution .
Uh, no.
uh no????????????? let me quess , you're a liberal!! Gee, how did I know that??
Probably because we've talked here on the board several times.
uh no????????????? let me quess , you're a liberal!! Gee, how did I know that??
Probably because we've talked here on the board several times.
no because you found "Uh, no" to be a meaningful response!!!!!!!!
See why we are positive a liberal will be slow, so very very slow!!
Our health care system has not been socialized. The federal government has unconstitutionally intruded into it, but it has not been socialized in the true sense of the word. We do not have a single payer government run system.
yes but modern socialism or the transition to modern socialism merely involves taking more and more control since the Constitution and our loyality to it prevent a full scale revolution .
I'm not disagreeing that ObamaCare was a step towards Socialism, but you claimed they already socialized it and that is simply false.
You mistake my apathy towards your inanities for a lack of something substantial to say.
I'm waiting on you.
yes but modern socialism or the transition to modern socialism merely involves taking more and more control since the Constitution and our loyality to it prevent a full scale revolution .
Norman Thomas quotes:
The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.
This was precisely the tactic of infiltration advocated by Lenin and Stalin.[3] As Communist International General Secretary Georgi Dimitroff told the Seventh World Congress of the Comintern in 1935:
"Comrades, you remember the ancient tale of the capture of Troy. Troy was inaccessible to the armies attacking her, thanks to her impregnable walls. And the attacking army, after suffering many sacrifices, was unable to achieve victory until, with the aid of the famous Trojan horse, it managed to penetrate to the very heart of the enemys camp."[4]
C. S. Lewis on Diabolical Democracy, Socialism, and Public Education « Conservative Colloquium
Buckley endorsed Chambers analysis of modern liberalism as a watered-down version of Communist ideology. The New Deal, Chambers insists, is not liberal democratic but revolutionary in its nature and intentions, seeking a basic change in the social and, above all, the power relationships within the nation.
Oooohhhhhh!!
So it's "modern" socialism!
Far be it from Republicans to embrace anything "modern".
no idea what you mean, do you????????????????????
This is so strange. Our science is the best in the world. But in Red States, they want to include mysticism into the science class and only a tiny 6% of scientists are Republican.
The most strange. If you do any searches, you can find scientific organizations made up of blacks, Hispanics, gays and other minorities. But you can't find a single one of "conservative white scientists" or "Republican scientists".
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/29/opinion/republicans-against-science.html
The reason blacks and Hispanics and others make these organization is to encourage youngsters to develop the same interest in science they have. Only Republicans have no interest. Except to corrupt science. That's their plan. Corrupt science.
Only that the general thrust of so much of the Conservative ideology is a return to medieval thinking.
We are 14th. Not the dumbest, but places like Canada, the uk, Australia, and every major Asian nation are kicking are butts.
Only that the general thrust of so much of the Conservative ideology is a return to medieval thinking.
too stupid even for a liberal. Our Founder's philosophy about limited government was created in the late 18th Century when they lived. I swear only a liberal could be dumb enough to think that the 18th century was medieval!!
See why we are 100% positive that a liberal will less than slow!!!
Only that the general thrust of so much of the Conservative ideology is a return to medieval thinking.
too stupid even for a liberal. Our Founder's philosophy about limited government was created in the late 18th Century when they lived. I swear only a liberal could be dumb enough to think that the 18th century was medieval!!
See why we are 100% positive that a liberal will less than slow!!!
This is so strange. Our science is the best in the world. But in Red States, they want to include mysticism into the science class and only a tiny 6% of scientists are Republican.
The most strange. If you do any searches, you can find scientific organizations made up of blacks, Hispanics, gays and other minorities. But you can't find a single one of "conservative white scientists" or "Republican scientists".
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/29/opinion/republicans-against-science.html
The reason blacks and Hispanics and others make these organization is to encourage youngsters to develop the same interest in science they have. Only Republicans have no interest. Except to corrupt science. That's their plan. Corrupt science.
a liberal smart enough to change the subject rather than defend the liberal status quo that has made our kids the dumbest in the civilized world
This is so strange. Our science is the best in the world. But in Red States, they want to include mysticism into the science class and only a tiny 6% of scientists are Republican.
The most strange. If you do any searches, you can find scientific organizations made up of blacks, Hispanics, gays and other minorities. But you can't find a single one of "conservative white scientists" or "Republican scientists".
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/29/opinion/republicans-against-science.html
The reason blacks and Hispanics and others make these organization is to encourage youngsters to develop the same interest in science they have. Only Republicans have no interest. Except to corrupt science. That's their plan. Corrupt science.
a liberal smart enough to change the subject rather than defend the liberal status quo that has made our kids the dumbest in the civilized world
I agree that many children of the conservatives are the dumbest in the civilized world. Their parents insist:
GOP Opposes Critical Thinking: Party platform paints original ideas as a liberal conspiracy - The Austin Chronicle
"Knowledge-Based Education We oppose the teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) (values clarification), critical thinking skills and similar programs that are simply a relabeling of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) (mastery learning) which focus on behavior modification and have the purpose of challenging the students fixed beliefs and undermining parental authority."
The majority of dumb Americans are more lazy than unintelligent and live in a society where excelling in school earns you the nerd label, and all the wedgies that come with it.
