Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, GM, AIG? That's pretty much where your hard earned dollars are going.
Terrible ain't it. How many people do those companies employ between them? 50? 100? 150?
You ain't a 'bigger picture' person are ya Mash?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, GM, AIG? That's pretty much where your hard earned dollars are going.
There are reasonable taxes on the ones that are rich, they are a reversal of the unreasonable expensive taxcuts from the Bush years. If you want fiscal responsibility, this is the biggest example of it.
The rich are still making enough money
There are reasonable taxes on the ones that are rich, they are a reversal of the unreasonable expensive taxcuts from the Bush years. If you want fiscal responsibility, this is the biggest example of it.
The rich are still making enough money
What is the appropriate amount of cash a person should be able to keep after they have earned it?
The way the rich, bitch and moan about taxes, is pathetic.
I'm not rich, neither were our founders. Remember no taxation without representation? An economic fascist like yourself would contend that we are merely puppets on a string of government, and that all of our income is there's, and what's left over we should be grateful for. It is the other way around. Government exists to serve us.. if we don't like it, we have every right to abolish it, as said so in the Constitution and Declaration of Independence.
Not to mention, income tax is tantamount to slavery for 4 months of the year. How does it feel that you're being forced to work for 4 months for the government so they can line the pockets of the likes of Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, GM, AIG? That's pretty much where your hard earned dollars are going. Don't believe propaganda that it's going to end poverty, because we're certainly poorer today than we were 30 years ago.[/QUOTE]
30 years ago was 1979. Remember "Whip Inflatioon Now"? Oil Embargo? Jimmy Carter? America Held Hostage day 198? Stagflation? Misery Index?
In 1957, I was a four year old, my family moved to a new town. My father built a house with 4 bedrooms and 1 bath. A family of 6. No garage, 1 car, 1 TV (B&W), 1 phone on a party line and sometimes the evening meal was Corn on the Cob. That's it. The house was partially completed when we moved in and Dad put down the hardwood floors, installed and finished all of the trim and painted all of the walls. The price tag was $19,500 including the acre of land on which it was built.
We rarely ordered pizza and there were many things that are common today that were rare then like picking up take out on the way home or expensive games.
I never recall being hungry, and while I never felt rich, I never felt poor. I thought that the folks who vacationed in Florida or went to Disneyland were otherworldly.
Anyway, today I live in a three bedroom with 2 baths & attached garage, 2 cars, 2 computers, two big screen TV's with satelite and Cable, 2 cell and 1 land line phone, travel and vacation as the mood hits. I still don't feel rich or feel poor.
So, am I richer today than my parents were back then? By our standards today, that world was poverty-ville. By the standards of that day, my life style today is otherworldly. Comparing the lot of one generation to another is difficult.
There are reasonable taxes on the ones that are rich, they are a reversal of the unreasonable expensive taxcuts from the Bush years. If you want fiscal responsibility, this is the biggest example of it.
The rich are still making enough money
Your definition of what is rich will probably differ from mine but that is not the point. We punish those that are successful in business by huge taxes. The Bush tax cuts were not deep enough. I want fairness in taxation.
It is not up to you and should not be up to the government to decide if the rich is making enough money or not. Purhaps you wish to have a maximum wage in this country.... I do not. The unemployment will sky rocket even more as Obama raises these taxes on small business.
Unemployment has skyrocketed since the Bush tax cuts. What does that tell you?
A rich man complaining about money is pretty pathetic.
But, hey, some people worship money. Others God or something else.
My father is rich, and he earned it, but he is obsessed with money. I just visited him a couple months ago (we get along great), and he asked me how I was doing financially. I said I don't really worry about money.
He said, "I do. I think about it all the time."
He used to try to earn love with his money (and still does with my sister by supporting her financially, even though she's almost 45).
He used to tell me (especially when drinking), "You kids are going to be well taken care of when I'm gone."
One day I told him, "I don't care. By the time you die---which I hope is when you're a hundred--I'll be 70 and long retired."
He hasn't brought up my "big inheritance" since. I really don't care. I don't want his money.
Must be a bummer to be that obsessed with money, like an addiction.
I don't worry about or obsess about money because I believe God will provide, and He consistently does. I'm very thankful that I am doing fine in this economy. I have a nice home with a very small mortgage and no other debt whatsoever. I have a stable job with health benefits and a good pension system.
Some months we spend a little too much, and other months we spend less, but we are fine, and that includes giving ten percent of our income for tithing (not just to the church, but to charities, food pantries, etc.).
And I have a few beers in the fridge for this afternoon.
I am blessed by God and happy. His grace and love have freed me from stress about pieces of paper with a president's face on it.
The way the rich, bitch and moan about taxes, is pathetic.
I'm not rich, neither were our founders. Remember no taxation without representation?
YOU have representation you moron! You have state legislature which include state representators and state senators, you have a united states representative for your district and you have two senators. YOU HAVE REPRESENTATION. Just because YOU disagree with what the people YOU elect say and do, doesn't mean you don't have any fucking representation you moron.
Now shut the fuck up.
There are reasonable taxes on the ones that are rich, they are a reversal of the unreasonable expensive taxcuts from the Bush years. If you want fiscal responsibility, this is the biggest example of it.
The rich are still making enough money
Your definition of what is rich will probably differ from mine but that is not the point. We punish those that are successful in business by huge taxes. The Bush tax cuts were not deep enough. I want fairness in taxation.
It is not up to you and should not be up to the government to decide if the rich is making enough money or not. Purhaps you wish to have a maximum wage in this country.... I do not. The unemployment will sky rocket even more as Obama raises these taxes on small business.
Up to who is it then? Who decides how much/little the government should tax companies? Ultimately it is the people who decide this through elections, thereby electing a government. So the government should decide how much or how little companies get taxed. Bush decided that the rich should make more money by cutting taxes for them, but when you look at the Bush deficit you ll see that that was not a good idea.It is not up to you and should not be up to the government to decide if the rich is making enough money or not.
I didn't say that, I m against maximum wages and I m also against a tax system where the middle class and lower classes have to pay the burden for tax cuts given to the rich. The taxcuts given to the rich were fiscally unresponsible, they are simply turned back to the normal tax levels (before the Bush tax-cuts).Purhaps you wish to have a maximum wage in this country.... I do not.
Ah yes you forgot to mention that the current unemployment (which is what you can describe as skyrocketed unemployment) level wasn't stopped by the Bush tax-cuts for the rich. I agree that rising taxes very much is bad during an economic crisis, but that s not the case and another argument is that the rich are usually the ones who are the least effected by this (raising taxes) during an economic crisis: because the impact on them is relatively lower then when you tax lower incomes. Again, we re only going back to normal levels of taxes.The unemployment will sky rocket even more as Obama raises these taxes on small business.
With the unreasonable taxes on those that are successful how can anyone think it is anything less that a declaration of war against the successful in this country. We have seen propaganda for some time in the media against the wealthy with exception of the movie industry.
I have a grandson in school at this time and he makes very good grades. There must be a way to prepare him for this future America. Perhaps he should recieve "time out" when he aces a test. Perhaps we should remove points off his test score and give it to one of the children that does not do the work. Maybe we should all become "C" students.
There are reasonable taxes on the ones that are rich, they are a reversal of the unreasonable expensive taxcuts from the Bush years. If you want fiscal responsibility, this is the biggest example of it.
The rich are still making enough money
There are reasonable taxes on the ones that are rich, they are a reversal of the unreasonable expensive taxcuts from the Bush years. If you want fiscal responsibility, this is the biggest example of it.
The rich are still making enough money
i love class warfare.....
Unemployment has skyrocketed since the Bush tax cuts. What does that tell you?
There are reasonable taxes on the ones that are rich, they are a reversal of the unreasonable expensive taxcuts from the Bush years. If you want fiscal responsibility, this is the biggest example of it.
The rich are still making enough money
Your definition of what is rich will probably differ from mine but that is not the point. We punish those that are successful in business by huge taxes. The Bush tax cuts were not deep enough. I want fairness in taxation.
It is not up to you and should not be up to the government to decide if the rich is making enough money or not. Purhaps you wish to have a maximum wage in this country.... I do not. The unemployment will sky rocket even more as Obama raises these taxes on small business.
Ah yes, there you have the small businesses argument. If you would look at the policy then you know that small businesses are not the ones who are getting much higher taxes. Most people who bring up this argument are the ones who support big businesses and want to protect them, they can't bring up that they want to protect the big businesses because that s not popular and that is why they hide behind the small businesses. The irony is usually that the big businesses are the ones who get the most out of everything, as a result the small businesses get hurt by the unfair competition against the big ones.
The argument that you won't work harder if you will get taxed more when you get richer is simply stupid: You will still make more money then before when you are richer, so you will still want to be richer by working harder.
The other argument that there will be more unemployment when businesses are taxed higher is only true if taxes were to go up significantly, which is not the case: these are in no sense huge taxes.
Up to who is it then? Who decides how much/little the government should tax companies? Ultimately it is the people who decide this through elections, thereby electing a government. So the government should decide how much or how little companies get taxed. Bush decided that the rich should make more money by cutting taxes for them, but when you look at the Bush deficit you ll see that that was not a good idea.
I didn't say that, I m against maximum wages and I m also against a tax system where the middle class and lower classes have to pay the burden for tax cuts given to the rich. The taxcuts given to the rich were fiscally unresponsible, they are simply turned back to the normal tax levels (before the Bush tax-cuts).Purhaps you wish to have a maximum wage in this country.... I do not.
Ah yes you forgot to mention that the current unemployment (which is what you can describe as skyrocketed unemployment) level wasn't stopped by the Bush tax-cuts for the rich. I agree that rising taxes very much is bad during an economic crisis, but that s not the case and another argument is that the rich are usually the ones who are the least effected by this (raising taxes) during an economic crisis: because the impact on them is relatively lower then when you tax lower incomes. Again, we re only going back to normal levels of taxes.The unemployment will sky rocket even more as Obama raises these taxes on small business.
With the unreasonable taxes on those that are successful how can anyone think it is anything less that a declaration of war against the successful in this country. We have seen propaganda for some time in the media against the wealthy with exception of the movie industry.
I have a grandson in school at this time and he makes very good grades. There must be a way to prepare him for this future America. Perhaps he should recieve "time out" when he aces a test. Perhaps we should remove points off his test score and give it to one of the children that does not do the work. Maybe we should all become "C" students.
Unreasonable? The wealthy act like they are successful in a vacume. If you think you could do better under the protection of another nation ..go there.
With the unreasonable taxes on those that are successful how can anyone think it is anything less that a declaration of war against the successful in this country. We have seen propaganda for some time in the media against the wealthy with exception of the movie industry.
I have a grandson in school at this time and he makes very good grades. There must be a way to prepare him for this future America. Perhaps he should recieve "time out" when he aces a test. Perhaps we should remove points off his test score and give it to one of the children that does not do the work. Maybe we should all become "C" students.
Unreasonable? The wealthy act like they are successful in a vacume. If you think you could do better under the protection of another nation ..go there.
I choose to correct what we have here as I have invested so much in it. Besides individuals such as yourself depend so much on people such as myself. If we left what would you do?
Unreasonable? The wealthy act like they are successful in a vacume. If you think you could do better under the protection of another nation ..go there.
I choose to correct what we have here as I have invested so much in it. Besides individuals such as yourself depend so much on people such as myself. If we left what would you do?
You don't know me at all. I come from a wealthy family and have several inventions. I am in a better position than most to be affected by higher taxes above the $250,000 threshhold.
From you personally I don't need you to subsidise anything. I don't care if you can even afford to PAY attention