Allegiance Excluded Citizenship Extension Adherents Members Creeds

[Monk-Eye]

" Allegiance Excluded Citizenship Extension Adherents Members Creeds "

* Background And Proposition *

A proposed inference from non aggression principles is that threats of , or an act of , illegitimate aggression against self ownership or self determination of another is violence entitling any victim to self defense .

It is prefaced that religion is analogous with creed and creed may be evaluated apatheistically in whether a particular creed qualifies as a threat of , or an act of , illegitimate aggression .

Public policy within a representative democracy is constructed by or buy creed of a majority .

Is allegiance of adherent to a creed for enacting public policy qualifying as illegitimate aggression a sufficient basis to exclude extending citizenship to its members ?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

 

[Marion Morrison]

 

[Bob Blaylock]

 

[miketx]

" Allegiance Excluded Citizenship Extension Adherents Members Creeds "

* Background And Proposition *

A proposed inference from non aggression principles is that threats of , or an act of , illegitimate aggression against self ownership or self determination of another is violence entitling any victim to self defense .

It is prefaced that religion is analogous with creed and creed may be evaluated apatheistically in whether a particular creed qualifies as a threat of , or an act of , illegitimate aggression .

Public policy within a representative democracy is constructed by or buy creed of a majority .

Is allegiance of adherent to a creed for enacting public policy qualifying as illegitimate aggression a sufficient basis to exclude extending citizenship to its members ?

stfu.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Beyond Pejoratives "

* Simple Cow Advice *

The question scope is narrow and direct ; it did not delve into whether it could be established that a particular creed surmounts to illegitimate aggression .

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Damn.

and right when my gibberish to English translation device is on the Fritz, too!

 

[Monk-Eye]

" If Hue Say Sew "

* Easy Goal *

Damn.
and right when my gibberish to English translation device is on the Fritz, too!

It was late after a very long day and this morning edit is unavailable , such that the last statement would be better phrased thus , "Is allegiance of members to a creed , for enacting public policy - qualifying as illegitimate aggression , a sufficient basis to exclude extending citizenship to those adherents ? "

One might begin by supposing a creed that represents illegitimate aggression and decide whether such an adherent should be extended citizenship ; a simple example would be whether to extend citizenship to a terrorist whose creed includes an expectation for killing innocents .

 

[Bob Blaylock]

" Allegiance Excluded Citizenship Extension Adherents Members Creeds "

* Background And Proposition *

A proposed inference from non aggression principles is that threats of , or an act of , illegitimate aggression against self ownership or self determination of another is violence entitling any victim to self defense .

It is prefaced that religion is analogous with creed and creed may be evaluated apatheistically in whether a particular creed qualifies as a threat of , or an act of , illegitimate aggression .

Public policy within a representative democracy is constructed by or buy creed of a majority .

Is allegiance of adherent to a creed for enacting public policy qualifying as illegitimate aggression a sufficient basis to exclude extending citizenship to its members ?

" Beyond Pejoratives "

* Simple Cow Advice *

The question scope is narrow and direct ; it did not delve into whether it could be established that a particular creed surmounts to illegitimate aggression .

" If Hue Say Sew "

* Easy Goal *

Damn.
and right when my gibberish to English translation device is on the Fritz, too!

It was late after a very long day and this morning edit is unavailable , such that the last statement would be better phrased thus , "Is allegiance of members to a creed , for enacting public policy - qualifying as illegitimate aggression , a sufficient basis to exclude extending citizenship to those adherents ? "

One might begin by supposing a creed that represents illegitimate aggression and decide whether such an adherent should be extended citizenship ; a simple example would be whether to extend citizenship to a terrorist whose creed includes an expectation for killing innocents .

This is what happens when a Monkey puts the shiny side inward. You MUST put the shiny side outward, or else it doesn't work.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Ode To The Vacuous Drivel Club "

* Comedy Of Missing Creativity Within The Critic *

This is what happens when a Monkey puts the shiny side inward. You MUST put the shiny side outward, or else it doesn't work.

Whatever you say blabbering blob - Church of the SubGenius - Wikipedia .

 

[Bob Blaylock]

" Ode To The Vacuous Drivel Club "

* Comedy Of Missing Creativity Within The Critic *

This is what happens when a Monkey puts the shiny side inward. You MUST put the shiny side outward, or else it doesn't work.

Whatever you say blabbering blob - Church of the SubGenius - Wikipedia .

 

[Ringel05]

" Allegiance Excluded Citizenship Extension Adherents Members Creeds "

* Background And Proposition *

A proposed inference from non aggression principles is that threats of , or an act of , illegitimate aggression against self ownership or self determination of another is violence entitling any victim to self defense .

It is prefaced that religion is analogous with creed and creed may be evaluated apatheistically in whether a particular creed qualifies as a threat of , or an act of , illegitimate aggression .

Public policy within a representative democracy is constructed by or buy creed of a majority .

Is allegiance of adherent to a creed for enacting public policy qualifying as illegitimate aggression a sufficient basis to exclude extending citizenship to its members ?

Captain Midnight? Is that you?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Driving On Ward "

* Exceeding Imagination *

It has been prefaced that religion is analogous with creed and that creed may be evaluated apatheistically as to whether a particular tenet of creed qualifies as a threat of , or an act of , illegitimate aggression .

Thus consider this thesis on the antithesis of nomianism versus antinomianism .

Consider a premise for antinomianism that by no name may a law be invoked : not by mu sah ; not by is sa ; not by mu ham mad ; not by pretense from an ineffable deity ; not by john queue politician ; such that all laws are to be removed from social constructs , which represents a logical paradox - both utopian and dystopian .

By presumption , antinomainism is incapable of issuing a retort or reprisal for violating laws which are not noted , albeit antinomianism implies behavior of its adherents be consistent with utopianism .

Thus , a creed for antinomianism would not implement illegitimate aggression through public policy ; albeit , antinomianism is incapable of asserting a retort or reprise against illegitimate aggression , which some may accuse as a public policy for illegitimate aggression by negligence , which is a contradiction , an absurdity .

Thus remains is to propose whether when or where tenets of creed from nomianism bear allegiance to implement illegitimate aggression as public policy .

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Hue Grew Imbued "

* Peers Happens Stances *

Captain Midnight? Is that you?

Yes to this en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hanged_Man_(Tarot_card) .

What due you believe ?

* Ethical Fundamentals Polynomial Sequences *

Due you follow pythagorean numbers ?

1 squared plus 2 squared = 5
2 squared plus 3 squared = 13
3 squared plus 4 squared = 25
4 squared plus 5 squared = 41
5 squared plus 6 squared = 61
6 squared plus 7 squared = 85
7 squared plus 8 squared = 113 - surah 9 presumed written 113th out of 114 in chronology
8 squared plus 9 squared = 145
9 squared plus 10 squared = 181
10 squared plus 11 squared = 221
11 squared plus 12 squared = 265
12 squared plus 13 squared = 313
13 squared plus 14 squared = 365
10 squared plus 11 squared plus 12 squared = 365
14 squared plus 15 squared = 421
15 squared plus 16 squared = 613 - number of mitzvah in masoretic text

3 cubed plus 4 cubed plus 5 cubed = 6 cubed = 216

* If And Only If Nomianism Iff Ewe Knew Gnaw *'

A creed to implement public policy of illegitimate aggression is directed within Surah 9 ; however , had such directives been restricted to hejaz , as qurayshism , as torahnism is to israel , then self defense would be palatable ; thus , be warned that those illicit tenets are presumed to apply universally by adherent members for fictional ishmaelism .

9:111. Indeed, God has purchased from the believers their lives and their properties [in exchange] for that they will have Paradise. They fight in the cause of God, so they kill and are killed. [It is] a true promise [binding] upon Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur’ān. And who is truer to his covenant than God? So rejoice in your transaction which you have contracted. And it is that which is the great attainment.

* Rhetorical Addition All *

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Ching
openlibrary.org/books/OL24131257M/Iconologia_or_Moral_emblems

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Steve Oh Jack Ass Entertainment "

* Homeys Can Not Hang With It *

194428

No problem , i get that often , until they know me .

As usual , the trolls are always the first to show up , however once they realize that the gravity , most just skulk away quietly wondering what happened to their long held perceptions .

 

[Erinwltr]

Legitimate aggression. What's your take on that?

 

[AsherN]

" Allegiance Excluded Citizenship Extension Adherents Members Creeds "

* Background And Proposition *

A proposed inference from non aggression principles is that threats of , or an act of , illegitimate aggression against self ownership or self determination of another is violence entitling any victim to self defense .

It is prefaced that religion is analogous with creed and creed may be evaluated apatheistically in whether a particular creed qualifies as a threat of , or an act of , illegitimate aggression .

Public policy within a representative democracy is constructed by or buy creed of a majority .

Is allegiance of adherent to a creed for enacting public policy qualifying as illegitimate aggression a sufficient basis to exclude extending citizenship to its members ?

Whatyou talkin' about Willis?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Aught Opportunity Leverage Tools "

* Diffusion Well Planned Entropy *

Legitimate aggression. What's your take on that?

It has been supposed in some sources that among a general populace a median intelligence quotient of ninety or greater is a prerequisite to establishment of stable democracy .

As an extreme emphasis from adherents for individualism , informed consent provides an emphatic advantage .

Where efficiency of work , or of power , or of energy , equals the ratio of output units divided by input units , communication of sufficient ideas can be both efficient and effective .

* Which Would Be A Useful Example *

As regards whether aggression is legitimate or illegitimate , each situation may range in uniqueness , or in complexity , as to which actor may have violated non aggression principles and is in fault for having committed violence that presumably entitles some victim to self defense .

 

[Bob Blaylock]

This is your brain on drugs. Any questions?

 

[Erinwltr]

" Aught Opportunity Leverage Tools "

* Diffusion Well Planned Entropy *

Legitimate aggression. What's your take on that?

It has been supposed in some sources that among a general populace a median intelligence quotient of ninety or greater is a prerequisite to establishment of stable democracy .

As an extreme emphasis from adherents for individualism , informed consent provides an emphatic advantage .

Where efficiency of work , or of power , or of energy , equals the ratio of output units divided by input units , communication of sufficient ideas can be both efficient and effective .

* Which Would Be A Useful Example *

As regards whether aggression is legitimate or illegitimate , each situation may range in uniqueness , or in complexity , as to which actor may have violated non aggression principles and is in fault for having committed violence that presumably entitles some victim to self defense .

"that presumably entitles some victim to self defense." Thank you for your reply. Actually no presumption needed in self defense.