Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I see, this is why you applied this sticker. That´s not a good idea. Mad people might insult or attack you.The questions is, is there anything the EU is not funding?Problem with this law is that the cop is the culprit mostly.The image sounds logic but this is not how international law works.
When someone breaks international law ... do you call an international cop?
Sure, did the EU stop funding settlements in Sahara?
Then don't run around with a diaper full of poo blaming others for the stink.
Which part of Berlin are You giving to the caliphate?
The sovereignty of each nation is the foundation of international law. Only a sovereign nation is able to agree to an implement international law. When there are terrorists threatening a country, the UN-countries must help.It is set of very simple rules the nations agreed upon.The image sounds logic but this is not how international law works.And the caliphte of Gaza and kingdom Jordan
Allegedly...
The term lost all meaning.
Usually when people mention the words "international law" they mean something vague that UN members mindlessly repeat in unison wishing it to become reality, but has nothing in common with any binding law.
Which none of them follow, contrary to the UN charter itself
that includes binding obligations to the Jewish Nation in that territory.
What international law does not oblige for is - establishment of an Arab state.
You claim it is unacceptable when Arab nations create a union. But that is what countries do. I guess it is not not just the others.
Why can´t Israel make peace with neighbors? The others are not much better. Saudi Arabia, ect. But they are secular and no anti-semitism is on their agenda, so this should not be a problem. So now there is Iran in Syria and Lebanon.
That doesn't address my post.There is a great misinterpretation of the Mandate.The image sounds logic but this is not how international law works.And the caliphte of Gaza and kingdom Jordan
Allegedly...
The term lost all meaning.
Usually when people mention the words "international law" they mean something vague that UN members mindlessly repeat in unison wishing it to become reality, but has nothing in common with any binding law.
I know, 9 years and You still don't get it,
no Arab nation is suggested or even mentioned anywhere in the text.
I see, this is why you applied this sticker. That´s not a good idea. Mad people might insult or attack you.The questions is, is there anything the EU is not funding?Problem with this law is that the cop is the culprit mostly.When someone breaks international law ... do you call an international cop?
Sure, did the EU stop funding settlements in Sahara?
Then don't run around with a diaper full of poo blaming others for the stink.
Which part of Berlin are You giving to the caliphate?
If you can´t get along imagine what you would do without the US. Their could be a diplomatic and permanent solution that can only benefit, when costs turn into income.The sovereignty of each nation is the foundation of international law. Only a sovereign nation is able to agree to an implement international law. When there are terrorists threatening a country, the UN-countries must help.It is set of very simple rules the nations agreed upon.The image sounds logic but this is not how international law works.
Usually when people mention the words "international law" they mean something vague that UN members mindlessly repeat in unison wishing it to become reality, but has nothing in common with any binding law.
Which none of them follow, contrary to the UN charter itself
that includes binding obligations to the Jewish Nation in that territory.
What international law does not oblige for is - establishment of an Arab state.
You claim it is unacceptable when Arab nations create a union. But that is what countries do. I guess it is not not just the others.
Why can´t Israel make peace with neighbors? The others are not much better. Saudi Arabia, ect. But they are secular and no anti-semitism is on their agenda, so this should not be a problem. So now there is Iran in Syria and Lebanon.
Did I claim that?
All I said, there're are already at least 2 Arab states in that territory,
and that there's no moral or logical reason for Israel to relinquish any land for another one.
It is true that Jews can live anywhere in Palestine. What is always left out is that Jews are to become citizens of Palestine. Of course citizens of Palestine can live anywhere in Palestine. There is no mention of the rights of foreign nationals.That doesn't address my post.There is a great misinterpretation of the Mandate.The image sounds logic but this is not how international law works.
Usually when people mention the words "international law" they mean something vague that UN members mindlessly repeat in unison wishing it to become reality, but has nothing in common with any binding law.
I know, 9 years and You still don't get it,
no Arab nation is suggested or even mentioned anywhere in the text.
There was nothing specific to address,
I'm sure You have nothing that could change international law.
I see, this is why you applied this sticker. That´s not a good idea. Mad people might insult or attack you.The questions is, is there anything the EU is not funding?Problem with this law is that the cop is the culprit mostly.When someone breaks international law ... do you call an international cop?
Sure, did the EU stop funding settlements in Sahara?
Then don't run around with a diaper full of poo blaming others for the stink.
Which part of Berlin are You giving to the caliphate?
The question is:The sovereignty of each nation is the foundation of international law. Only a sovereign nation is able to agree to an implement international law. When there are terrorists threatening a country, the UN-countries must help.It is set of very simple rules the nations agreed upon.The image sounds logic but this is not how international law works.
Usually when people mention the words "international law" they mean something vague that UN members mindlessly repeat in unison wishing it to become reality, but has nothing in common with any binding law.
Which none of them follow, contrary to the UN charter itself
that includes binding obligations to the Jewish Nation in that territory.
What international law does not oblige for is - establishment of an Arab state.
You claim it is unacceptable when Arab nations create a union. But that is what countries do. I guess it is not not just the others.
Why can´t Israel make peace with neighbors? The others are not much better. Saudi Arabia, ect. But they are secular and no anti-semitism is on their agenda, so this should not be a problem. So now there is Iran in Syria and Lebanon.
Can't believe anyone would come out with such a disingenuous statement:
"Why can't Israel make peace with its neighbors?"
Are we still living in the Stone Age?
The consequences are not part of the joke.I see, this is why you applied this sticker. That´s not a good idea. Mad people might insult or attack you.The questions is, is there anything the EU is not funding?Problem with this law is that the cop is the culprit mostly.
Sure, did the EU stop funding settlements in Sahara?
Then don't run around with a diaper full of poo blaming others for the stink.
Which part of Berlin are You giving to the caliphate?
Be careful,your women might be actually raped on main squares while you get jailed for saying "Muslim".
What, all of a sudden "2 state solution" doesn't look like a good idea?
I say, go forth show by example, I'll get the popcorn.
Because Jews are not considered foreign nationals but rightful claimants to national sovereignty.It is true that Jews can live anywhere in Palestine. What is always left out is that Jews are to become citizens of Palestine. Of course citizens of Palestine can live anywhere in Palestine. There is no mention of the rights of foreign nationals.That doesn't address my post.There is a great misinterpretation of the Mandate.Usually when people mention the words "international law" they mean something vague that UN members mindlessly repeat in unison wishing it to become reality, but has nothing in common with any binding law.
I know, 9 years and You still don't get it,
no Arab nation is suggested or even mentioned anywhere in the text.
There was nothing specific to address,
I'm sure You have nothing that could change international law.
ART. 7.
The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.
The Avalon Project : The Palestine Mandate
The question is:The sovereignty of each nation is the foundation of international law. Only a sovereign nation is able to agree to an implement international law. When there are terrorists threatening a country, the UN-countries must help.It is set of very simple rules the nations agreed upon.Usually when people mention the words "international law" they mean something vague that UN members mindlessly repeat in unison wishing it to become reality, but has nothing in common with any binding law.
Which none of them follow, contrary to the UN charter itself
that includes binding obligations to the Jewish Nation in that territory.
What international law does not oblige for is - establishment of an Arab state.
You claim it is unacceptable when Arab nations create a union. But that is what countries do. I guess it is not not just the others.
Why can´t Israel make peace with neighbors? The others are not much better. Saudi Arabia, ect. But they are secular and no anti-semitism is on their agenda, so this should not be a problem. So now there is Iran in Syria and Lebanon.
Can't believe anyone would come out with such a disingenuous statement:
"Why can't Israel make peace with its neighbors?"
Are we still living in the Stone Age?
Is Israel able to propose a political map at the UN that Tel Aviv claims belongs to them. Would the UN be able to negotiate this map with neighboring states and submit an answer?
Very simple.
It is just a general question.The question is:The sovereignty of each nation is the foundation of international law. Only a sovereign nation is able to agree to an implement international law. When there are terrorists threatening a country, the UN-countries must help.It is set of very simple rules the nations agreed upon.
Which none of them follow, contrary to the UN charter itself
that includes binding obligations to the Jewish Nation in that territory.
What international law does not oblige for is - establishment of an Arab state.
You claim it is unacceptable when Arab nations create a union. But that is what countries do. I guess it is not not just the others.
Why can´t Israel make peace with neighbors? The others are not much better. Saudi Arabia, ect. But they are secular and no anti-semitism is on their agenda, so this should not be a problem. So now there is Iran in Syria and Lebanon.
Can't believe anyone would come out with such a disingenuous statement:
"Why can't Israel make peace with its neighbors?"
Are we still living in the Stone Age?
Is Israel able to propose a political map at the UN that Tel Aviv claims belongs to them. Would the UN be able to negotiate this map with neighboring states and submit an answer?
Very simple.
Isn't it just!
How naive are you?
So you are going to argue with documents?Because Jews are not considered foreign nationals but rightful claimants to national sovereignty.It is true that Jews can live anywhere in Palestine. What is always left out is that Jews are to become citizens of Palestine. Of course citizens of Palestine can live anywhere in Palestine. There is no mention of the rights of foreign nationals.That doesn't address my post.There is a great misinterpretation of the Mandate.
I know, 9 years and You still don't get it,
no Arab nation is suggested or even mentioned anywhere in the text.
There was nothing specific to address,
I'm sure You have nothing that could change international law.
ART. 7.
The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.
The Avalon Project : The Palestine Mandate
So where is there an obligation for or even a mention of an Arab nation?
So you are going to argue with documents?Because Jews are not considered foreign nationals but rightful claimants to national sovereignty.It is true that Jews can live anywhere in Palestine. What is always left out is that Jews are to become citizens of Palestine. Of course citizens of Palestine can live anywhere in Palestine. There is no mention of the rights of foreign nationals.That doesn't address my post.I know, 9 years and You still don't get it,
no Arab nation is suggested or even mentioned anywhere in the text.
There was nothing specific to address,
I'm sure You have nothing that could change international law.
ART. 7.
The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.
The Avalon Project : The Palestine Mandate
So where is there an obligation for or even a mention of an Arab nation?
Nowhere. Palestine was not for any particular ethnic or religious categories.So you are going to argue with documents?Because Jews are not considered foreign nationals but rightful claimants to national sovereignty.It is true that Jews can live anywhere in Palestine. What is always left out is that Jews are to become citizens of Palestine. Of course citizens of Palestine can live anywhere in Palestine. There is no mention of the rights of foreign nationals.That doesn't address my post.
There was nothing specific to address,
I'm sure You have nothing that could change international law.
ART. 7.
The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.
The Avalon Project : The Palestine Mandate
So where is there an obligation for or even a mention of an Arab nation?
Where is that document that mentions an Arab nation?
Come back when You have that fixed.
I agree, nowhere, therefore can't back that delusional none sense.Nowhere. Palestine was not for any particular ethnic or religious categories.So you are going to argue with documents?Because Jews are not considered foreign nationals but rightful claimants to national sovereignty.It is true that Jews can live anywhere in Palestine. What is always left out is that Jews are to become citizens of Palestine. Of course citizens of Palestine can live anywhere in Palestine. There is no mention of the rights of foreign nationals.There was nothing specific to address,
I'm sure You have nothing that could change international law.
ART. 7.
The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.
The Avalon Project : The Palestine Mandate
So where is there an obligation for or even a mention of an Arab nation?
Where is that document that mentions an Arab nation?
Come back when You have that fixed.
It is just a general question.The question is:The sovereignty of each nation is the foundation of international law. Only a sovereign nation is able to agree to an implement international law. When there are terrorists threatening a country, the UN-countries must help.Which none of them follow, contrary to the UN charter itself
that includes binding obligations to the Jewish Nation in that territory.
What international law does not oblige for is - establishment of an Arab state.
You claim it is unacceptable when Arab nations create a union. But that is what countries do. I guess it is not not just the others.
Why can´t Israel make peace with neighbors? The others are not much better. Saudi Arabia, ect. But they are secular and no anti-semitism is on their agenda, so this should not be a problem. So now there is Iran in Syria and Lebanon.
Can't believe anyone would come out with such a disingenuous statement:
"Why can't Israel make peace with its neighbors?"
Are we still living in the Stone Age?
Is Israel able to propose a political map at the UN that Tel Aviv claims belongs to them. Would the UN be able to negotiate this map with neighboring states and submit an answer?
Very simple.
Isn't it just!
How naive are you?
The consequences are not part of the joke.I see, this is why you applied this sticker. That´s not a good idea. Mad people might insult or attack you.The questions is, is there anything the EU is not funding?Sure, did the EU stop funding settlements in Sahara?
Then don't run around with a diaper full of poo blaming others for the stink.
Which part of Berlin are You giving to the caliphate?
Be careful,your women might be actually raped on main squares while you get jailed for saying "Muslim".
What, all of a sudden "2 state solution" doesn't look like a good idea?
I say, go forth show by example, I'll get the popcorn.
I could actually argue otherwise,If you can´t get along imagine what you would do without the US. Their could be a diplomatic and permanent solution that can only benefit, when costs turn into income.The sovereignty of each nation is the foundation of international law. Only a sovereign nation is able to agree to an implement international law. When there are terrorists threatening a country, the UN-countries must help.It is set of very simple rules the nations agreed upon.Usually when people mention the words "international law" they mean something vague that UN members mindlessly repeat in unison wishing it to become reality, but has nothing in common with any binding law.
Which none of them follow, contrary to the UN charter itself
that includes binding obligations to the Jewish Nation in that territory.
What international law does not oblige for is - establishment of an Arab state.
You claim it is unacceptable when Arab nations create a union. But that is what countries do. I guess it is not not just the others.
Why can´t Israel make peace with neighbors? The others are not much better. Saudi Arabia, ect. But they are secular and no anti-semitism is on their agenda, so this should not be a problem. So now there is Iran in Syria and Lebanon.
Did I claim that?
All I said, there're are already at least 2 Arab states in that territory,
and that there's no moral or logical reason for Israel to relinquish any land for another one.
The question is:The sovereignty of each nation is the foundation of international law. Only a sovereign nation is able to agree to an implement international law. When there are terrorists threatening a country, the UN-countries must help.It is set of very simple rules the nations agreed upon.Usually when people mention the words "international law" they mean something vague that UN members mindlessly repeat in unison wishing it to become reality, but has nothing in common with any binding law.
Which none of them follow, contrary to the UN charter itself
that includes binding obligations to the Jewish Nation in that territory.
What international law does not oblige for is - establishment of an Arab state.
You claim it is unacceptable when Arab nations create a union. But that is what countries do. I guess it is not not just the others.
Why can´t Israel make peace with neighbors? The others are not much better. Saudi Arabia, ect. But they are secular and no anti-semitism is on their agenda, so this should not be a problem. So now there is Iran in Syria and Lebanon.
Can't believe anyone would come out with such a disingenuous statement:
"Why can't Israel make peace with its neighbors?"
Are we still living in the Stone Age?
Is Israel able to propose a political map at the UN that Tel Aviv claims belongs to them. Would the UN be able to negotiate this map with neighboring states and submit an answer?
Very simple.
