Alleged new Deal proposes Two-State Solution

Read it yesterday, another one of a whole variety of different "leaked" versions.
Each month or some claim they already saw it and describe completely different plans.

If I remember correctly, the US admin openly said the term "Two State Solution" is not the framework,
and not going to be used.

The term has lost all meaning, there ARE already 2 Arab states in that territory.
 
And the caliphte of Gaza and kingdom Jordan
Allegedly...

The term lost all meaning.

D2mvOMdX0AAe7kk.jpg
 
Last edited:
And the caliphte of Gaza and kingdom Jordan
Allegedly...

The term lost all meaning.

D2mvOMdX0AAe7kk.jpg
The image sounds logic but this is not how international law works.

Usually when people mention the words "international law" they mean something vague that UN members mindlessly repeat in unison wishing it to become reality, but has nothing in common with any binding law.

D2sKGbNX4AAir01.jpg
 
And the caliphte of Gaza and kingdom Jordan
Allegedly...

The term lost all meaning.

D2mvOMdX0AAe7kk.jpg
The image sounds logic but this is not how international law works.

Usually when people mention the words "international law" they mean something vague that UN members mindlessly repeat in unison wishing it to become reality, but has nothing in common with any binding law.

D2sKGbNX4AAir01.jpg
It is set of very simple rules the nations agreed upon.
 
And the caliphte of Gaza and kingdom Jordan
Allegedly...

The term lost all meaning.

D2mvOMdX0AAe7kk.jpg
The image sounds logic but this is not how international law works.

When someone breaks international law ... do you call an international cop?
Problem with this law is that the cop is the culprit mostly.

Sure, did the EU stop funding settlements in Sahara?

:www_MyEmoticons_com__shush:
The questions is, is there anything the EU is not funding?
 
And the caliphte of Gaza and kingdom Jordan
Allegedly...

The term lost all meaning.

D2mvOMdX0AAe7kk.jpg
The image sounds logic but this is not how international law works.

Usually when people mention the words "international law" they mean something vague that UN members mindlessly repeat in unison wishing it to become reality, but has nothing in common with any binding law.

D2sKGbNX4AAir01.jpg
It is set of very simple rules the nations agreed upon.

Which none of them follow, contrary to the UN charter itself
that includes binding obligations to the Jewish Nation in that territory.

What international law does not oblige for is - establishment of an Arab state.
 
Last edited:
And the caliphte of Gaza and kingdom Jordan
Allegedly...

The term lost all meaning.

D2mvOMdX0AAe7kk.jpg
The image sounds logic but this is not how international law works.

Usually when people mention the words "international law" they mean something vague that UN members mindlessly repeat in unison wishing it to become reality, but has nothing in common with any binding law.

D2sKGbNX4AAir01.jpg
There is a great misinterpretation of the Mandate.
 
And the caliphte of Gaza and kingdom Jordan
Allegedly...

The term lost all meaning.

D2mvOMdX0AAe7kk.jpg
The image sounds logic but this is not how international law works.

When someone breaks international law ... do you call an international cop?
Problem with this law is that the cop is the culprit mostly.

Sure, did the EU stop funding settlements in Sahara?

:www_MyEmoticons_com__shush:
The questions is, is there anything the EU is not funding?

Then don't run around with a diaper full of poo blaming others for the stink.
Which part of Berlin are You giving to the caliphate?
 
And the caliphte of Gaza and kingdom Jordan
Allegedly...

The term lost all meaning.

D2mvOMdX0AAe7kk.jpg
The image sounds logic but this is not how international law works.

Usually when people mention the words "international law" they mean something vague that UN members mindlessly repeat in unison wishing it to become reality, but has nothing in common with any binding law.

D2sKGbNX4AAir01.jpg
There is a great misinterpretation of the Mandate.

I know, 9 years and You still don't get it,
no Arab nation is suggested or even mentioned anywhere in the text.
 
And the caliphte of Gaza and kingdom Jordan
Allegedly...

The term lost all meaning.

D2mvOMdX0AAe7kk.jpg
The image sounds logic but this is not how international law works.

Usually when people mention the words "international law" they mean something vague that UN members mindlessly repeat in unison wishing it to become reality, but has nothing in common with any binding law.

D2sKGbNX4AAir01.jpg
It is set of very simple rules the nations agreed upon.

Which none of them follow, contrary to the UN charter itself
that includes binding obligations to the Jewish Nation in that territory.

What international law does not oblige for is - establishment of an Arab state.
The sovereignty of each nation is the foundation of international law. Only a sovereign nation is able to agree to and implement international law. When there are terrorists threatening a country, the UN-countries must help.
You claim it is unacceptable when Arab nations create a union. But that is what countries do. I guess it is not not just the others.
Why can´t Israel make peace with neighbors? The others are not much better. Saudi Arabia, ect. But they are secular and no anti-semitism is on their agenda, so this should not be a problem. So now there is Iran in Syria and Lebanon.
 
Last edited:
And the caliphte of Gaza and kingdom Jordan
Allegedly...

The term lost all meaning.

D2mvOMdX0AAe7kk.jpg
The image sounds logic but this is not how international law works.

Usually when people mention the words "international law" they mean something vague that UN members mindlessly repeat in unison wishing it to become reality, but has nothing in common with any binding law.

D2sKGbNX4AAir01.jpg
There is a great misinterpretation of the Mandate.

I know, 9 years and You still don't get it,
no Arab nation is suggested or even mentioned anywhere in the text.
That doesn't address my post.
 
And the caliphte of Gaza and kingdom Jordan
Allegedly...

The term lost all meaning.

D2mvOMdX0AAe7kk.jpg
The image sounds logic but this is not how international law works.

Usually when people mention the words "international law" they mean something vague that UN members mindlessly repeat in unison wishing it to become reality, but has nothing in common with any binding law.

D2sKGbNX4AAir01.jpg
It is set of very simple rules the nations agreed upon.

Which none of them follow, contrary to the UN charter itself
that includes binding obligations to the Jewish Nation in that territory.

What international law does not oblige for is - establishment of an Arab state.
The sovereignty of each nation is the foundation of international law. Only a sovereign nation is able to agree to an implement international law. When there are terrorists threatening a country, the UN-countries must help.
You claim it is unacceptable when Arab nations create a union. But that is what countries do. I guess it is not not just the others.
Why can´t Israel make peace with neighbors? The others are not much better. Saudi Arabia, ect. But they are secular and no anti-semitism is on their agenda, so this should not be a problem. So now there is Iran in Syria and Lebanon.

Did I claim that?
All I said, there're are already at least 2 Arab states in that territory,
and that there's no moral or logical reason for Israel to relinquish any land for another one.
 
And the caliphte of Gaza and kingdom Jordan
Allegedly...

The term lost all meaning.

D2mvOMdX0AAe7kk.jpg
The image sounds logic but this is not how international law works.

Usually when people mention the words "international law" they mean something vague that UN members mindlessly repeat in unison wishing it to become reality, but has nothing in common with any binding law.

D2sKGbNX4AAir01.jpg
There is a great misinterpretation of the Mandate.

How's it going? Any luck yet?
 

Forum List

Back
Top