Alex Jones

[eots]

meet daws101s boyfriend

are you outing yourself yousent me that clip?....

don't involve me in your gaiety..fruity boy

 

[daws101]

meet daws101s boyfriend

are you outing yourself? you sent me that clip?....

don't involve me in your gaiety..fruity boy

your ignorance shines!

 

[daws101]

How did the fires cause WTC 7 to collapse?
The heat from the uncontrolled fires caused steel floor beams and girders to thermally expand, leading to a chain of events that caused a key structural column to fail. The failure of this structural column then initiated a fire-induced progressive collapse of the entire building.

According to the report's probable collapse sequence, heat from the uncontrolled fires caused thermal expansion of the steel beams on the lower floors of the east side of WTC 7, damaging the floor framing on multiple floors.

Eventually, a girder on Floor 13 lost its connection to a critical column, Column 79, that provided support for the long floor spans on the east side of the building (see Diagram 1). The displaced girder and other local fire-induced damage caused Floor 13 to collapse, beginning a cascade of floor failures down to the 5th floor. Many of these floors had already been at least partially weakened by the fires in the vicinity of Column 79. This collapse of floors left Column 79 insufficiently supported in the east-west direction over nine stories.

The unsupported Column 79 then buckled and triggered an upward progression of floor system failures that reached the building's east penthouse. What followed in rapid succession was a series of structural failures. Failure first occurred all the way to the roof line-involving all three interior columns on the easternmost side of the building (79, 80, 81). Then, progressing from east to west across WTC 7, all of the columns failed in the core of the building (58 through 78). Finally, the entire façade collapsed.

 

[daws101]

And still no answer........................................

yes, why did building 7 fall ?

How did the fires cause WTC 7 to collapse?
The heat from the uncontrolled fires caused steel floor beams and girders to thermally expand, leading to a chain of events that caused a key structural column to fail. The failure of this structural column then initiated a fire-induced progressive collapse of the entire building.

According to the report's probable collapse sequence, heat from the uncontrolled fires caused thermal expansion of the steel beams on the lower floors of the east side of WTC 7, damaging the floor framing on multiple floors.

Eventually, a girder on Floor 13 lost its connection to a critical column, Column 79, that provided support for the long floor spans on the east side of the building (see Diagram 1). The displaced girder and other local fire-induced damage caused Floor 13 to collapse, beginning a cascade of floor failures down to the 5th floor. Many of these floors had already been at least partially weakened by the fires in the vicinity of Column 79. This collapse of floors left Column 79 insufficiently supported in the east-west direction over nine stories.

The unsupported Column 79 then buckled and triggered an upward progression of floor system failures that reached the building's east penthouse. What followed in rapid succession was a series of structural failures. Failure first occurred all the way to the roof line-involving all three interior columns on the easternmost side of the building (79, 80, 81). Then, progressing from east to west across WTC 7, all of the columns failed in the core of the building (58 through 78). Finally, the entire façade collapsed.

 

[eots]

How did the fires cause WTC 7 to collapse?
The heat from the uncontrolled fires caused steel floor beams and girders to thermally expand, leading to a chain of events that caused a key structural column to fail. The failure of this structural column then initiated a fire-induced progressive collapse of the entire building.

According to the report's probable collapse sequence, heat from the uncontrolled fires caused thermal expansion of the steel beams on the lower floors of the east side of WTC 7, damaging the floor framing on multiple floors.

Eventually, a girder on Floor 13 lost its connection to a critical column, Column 79, that provided support for the long floor spans on the east side of the building (see Diagram 1). The displaced girder and other local fire-induced damage caused Floor 13 to collapse, beginning a cascade of floor failures down to the 5th floor. Many of these floors had already been at least partially weakened by the fires in the vicinity of Column 79. This collapse of floors left Column 79 insufficiently supported in the east-west direction over nine stories.

The unsupported Column 79 then buckled and triggered an upward progression of floor system failures that reached the building's east penthouse. What followed in rapid succession was a series of structural failures. Failure first occurred all the way to the roof line-involving all three interior columns on the easternmost side of the building (79, 80, 81). Then, progressing from east to west across WTC 7, all of the columns failed in the core of the building (58 through 78). Finally, the entire façade collapsed.

if fire alone could cause the failure of a single column initiating a collapse sequence..then couldn't a bomb or bombs taking out a critical column create the same progressive collapse ?

 

[daws101]

How did the fires cause WTC 7 to collapse?
The heat from the uncontrolled fires caused steel floor beams and girders to thermally expand, leading to a chain of events that caused a key structural column to fail. The failure of this structural column then initiated a fire-induced progressive collapse of the entire building.

According to the report's probable collapse sequence, heat from the uncontrolled fires caused thermal expansion of the steel beams on the lower floors of the east side of WTC 7, damaging the floor framing on multiple floors.

Eventually, a girder on Floor 13 lost its connection to a critical column, Column 79, that provided support for the long floor spans on the east side of the building (see Diagram 1). The displaced girder and other local fire-induced damage caused Floor 13 to collapse, beginning a cascade of floor failures down to the 5th floor. Many of these floors had already been at least partially weakened by the fires in the vicinity of Column 79. This collapse of floors left Column 79 insufficiently supported in the east-west direction over nine stories.

The unsupported Column 79 then buckled and triggered an upward progression of floor system failures that reached the building's east penthouse. What followed in rapid succession was a series of structural failures. Failure first occurred all the way to the roof line-involving all three interior columns on the easternmost side of the building (79, 80, 81). Then, progressing from east to west across WTC 7, all of the columns failed in the core of the building (58 through 78). Finally, the entire façade collapsed.

if fire alone could cause the failure of a single column initiating a collapse sequence..then couldn't a bomb or bombs taking out a critical column create the same progressive collapse ?

there are no coulds, either it did or it did not. also a conventional bomb detonation would have been seen causing the collapse none was ,no blast wave, the signature of explosives
please don't make an more of an ass out of yourself by answering thermite!

 

[Obamerican]

I would think that the windows would've responded differently if there were explosives going off inside the building. Instead all you see are occasional ones breaking as the building begins its collapse.

 

[eots]

There where many explosions and reports of explosions...so what are you talking about ? Could an explosion not of weakened column 79 ?

 

[daws101]

There where many explosions and reports of explosions...so what are you talking about ? Could an explosion not of weakened column 79 ?

asked and answerd, not without being detected.
what kind of explosions and what exploded?
earwittness testimony is not admissible unless it can be linked to hard evidence.

 

[eots]

There where many explosions and reports of explosions...so what are you talking about ? Could an explosion not of weakened column 79 ?

asked and answerd, not without being detected.
what kind of explosions and what exploded?
earwittness testimony is not admissible unless it can be linked to hard evidence.

detected how ?

 

[daws101]

There where many explosions and reports of explosions...so what are you talking about ? Could an explosion not of weakened column 79 ?

asked and answerd, not without being detected.
what kind of explosions and what exploded?
earwittness testimony is not admissible unless it can be linked to hard evidence.

detected how ?

asked and answered ,but since you're extremely thick: no flash no blast wave no blast pattern were seen on any video photo or recorded on audio devices no evidence of a conventional bomb or thermite at all.

answer this question:what kind of explosions and what exploded?

 

[Obamerican]

I would think that explosives powerful enough to take out columns like 79 would be strong enough to blow windows outward. Instead you see windows shatter as the building collapses as their frames lose their square form.

 

[daws101]

I would think that explosives powerful enough to take out columns like 79 would be strong enough to blow windows outward. Instead you see windows shatter as the building collapses as their frames lose their square form.

if it had been an explosion in any of the wtc buildings there would have been tons of razor sharp glass fragments whizzing around and many more casualties.

 

[Obamerican]

I would think that explosives powerful enough to take out columns like 79 would be strong enough to blow windows outward. Instead you see windows shatter as the building collapses as their frames lose their square form.

if it had been an explosion in any of the wtc buildings there would have been tons of razor sharp glass fragments whizzing around and many more casualties.

Exactly! And I don't see any of that.

 

[eots]

I would think that explosives powerful enough to take out columns like 79 would be strong enough to blow windows outward. Instead you see windows shatter as the building collapses as their frames lose their square form.

if it had been an explosion in any of the wtc buildings there would have been tons of razor sharp glass fragments whizzing around and many more casualties.

why ? the building was unoccupied..the explosive force required to blow a single or even several columns would not result tons of razor sharp glass

 

[daws101]

I would think that explosives powerful enough to take out columns like 79 would be strong enough to blow windows outward. Instead you see windows shatter as the building collapses as their frames lose their square form.

if it had been an explosion in any of the wtc buildings there would have been tons of razor sharp glass fragments whizzing around and many more casualties.

Exactly! And I don't see any of that.

I thought it obvious ,why can't our resident twoofers see it ?

 

[Obamerican]

I would think that explosives powerful enough to take out columns like 79 would be strong enough to blow windows outward. Instead you see windows shatter as the building collapses as their frames lose their square form.

if it had been an explosion in any of the wtc buildings there would have been tons of razor sharp glass fragments whizzing around and many more casualties.

why ? the building was unoccupied..the explosive force required to blow a single or even several columns would not result tons of razor sharp glass

Does someone need to post the pressure generated from explosives strong enough to bring WTC down? You have gotten dumber in the last two weeks. Better quality drugs or is that ugly hat on too tight?

 

[eots]

also thermite or thermite or in combination could of been utilized as well as sound damping

 

[daws101]

I would think that explosives powerful enough to take out columns like 79 would be strong enough to blow windows outward. Instead you see windows shatter as the building collapses as their frames lose their square form.

if it had been an explosion in any of the wtc buildings there would have been tons of razor sharp glass fragments whizzing around and many more casualties.

why ? the building was unoccupied..the explosive force required to blow a single or even several columns would not result tons of razor sharp glass

bullshit...it's called a pressure wave..and all explosives generate one. you conveniently left out the fact that due to the damage wtc7 had already sustained that any broken or loose glass would have been sent flying by even a small blast.

 

[eots]

if it had been an explosion in any of the wtc buildings there would have been tons of razor sharp glass fragments whizzing around and many more casualties.

why ? the building was unoccupied..the explosive force required to blow a single or even several columns would not result tons of razor sharp glass

Does someone need to post the pressure generated from explosives strong enough to bring WTC down? You have gotten dumber in the last two weeks. Better quality drugs or is that ugly hat on too tight?

yes please post what would be required to cut or explode column 79 to the point it would weaken and fail as it is claimed to have from office fires alone