Alan Dershowitz Reveals One Motion He Believes Trump’s Lawyers Must File ‘Immediately

No, this "trial" is ANOTHER example that shows the electorate that you neo-Bolshevik communist assholes are attacking us ALL.
This whole effort is ELECTION INTERFERENCE!!!
Maybe some of the judiciary residents are afraid of showing President Trump any semblance of .mercy everyone else gets due to lockstep policies and traditions amongst their contemporaries. Politics stink. It's too bad they Don't know that the majority of Americans love President Trump FWIW.
 
Maybe some of the judiciary residents are afraid of showing President Trump any semblance of .mercy everyone else gets due to lockstep policies and traditions amongst their contemporaries. Politics stink. It's too bad they Don't know that the majority of Americans love President Trump FWIW.
The majority has always despised him.

A lot of Republicans despise him, but see him as a useful tool.
 
Not even close.

A defendant nor a lawyer is going to dictate, when THEY want to show up in court.
Dershowitz didn't try that in the OJ Simpson trial, because he knew what the answer would be.
I’ll go with Dershowitz any day as he is more knowledgeable about the law.

In passing, O. J. Simpson was a murder case, Trump‘s case is election interference.
 
Yep, it is up to a defendant if he wants to be there daily.

Instead, we have the hack Bragg and the hack judge making a decision that is deliberate attempt to interfere.

PURE election interference. And isn't that the thing they are accusing Trump of having done with the NDA, election interference (Hell, he was the candidate!).

Orwellian.


Noted attorney Alan Dershowitz said Monday that attorneys for former President Donald Trump should file a motion to allow Trump to periodically skip court dates during his Manhattan trial.
Judge Juan Merchan threatened Trump with arrest if he did not attend the trial regarding a $130,000 payout to porn star Stormy Daniels as part of a confidentiality agreement during Trump’s successful run for the White House after Trump asked to attend the Supreme Court’s oral arguments on presidential immunity set for April 25. Dershowitz suggested Trump’s attorneys act immediately to address Merchan’s threat, which he viewed as a form of “election interference.”
“I would hope Trump’s lawyers bring a mandamus right now, at the very least, let Trump out of the courtroom, let him campaign,” Dershowitz told Fox Business host Larry Kudlow. “If he makes a decision that he would like to waive the right to be there, there is nothing in the Constitution which gives the prosecution the right to keep him there. It is only a defendant’s right.”
WATCH:

...



Change of venue should be upfront

Another Dem shit show
 
But they were both guilty, that was the problem. Only guilty people hire a shyster like Dershawitz... OJ, Epstein, von Bulow, Trump.
Trump is innocent until proven guilty.

Many legal experts (not the ones you see on the liberal media) consider the cases against Trump to be weak and if Trump is convicted they will be overturned on appeal.

The presumption of innocence is a legal principle that every person accused of any crime is considered innocent until proven guilty. Under the presumption of innocence, the legal burden of proof is thus on the prosecution, which must present compelling evidence to the trier of fact (a judge or a jury). If the prosecution does not prove the charges true, then the person is acquitted of the charges. The prosecution must in most cases prove that the accused is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. If reasonable doubt remains, the accused must be acquitted. The opposite system is a presumption of guilt.
 
But they were both guilty, that was the problem. Only guilty people hire a shyster like Dershawitz... OJ, Epstein, von Bulow, Trump.
President Trump did not commit a crime. That in and of itself closes the issue except the Demmies insist on incarceration of a rival based on a non- crime. Ain't gonna happen. :rolleyes-41:
 

Amendment VI​

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
 
President Trump did not commit a crime. That in and of itself closes the issue except the Demmies insist on incarceration of a rival based on a non- crime. Ain't gonna happen. :rolleyes-41:
Except falsifying business records IS a crime.

And your party were the ones who impeached Bill Clinton for lying about a blow job.
 
Yep, it is up to a defendant if he wants to be there daily.

Instead, we have the hack Bragg and the hack judge making a decision that is deliberate attempt to interfere.

PURE election interference. And isn't that the thing they are accusing Trump of having done with the NDA, election interference (Hell, he was the candidate!).

Orwellian.


Noted attorney Alan Dershowitz said Monday that attorneys for former President Donald Trump should file a motion to allow Trump to periodically skip court dates during his Manhattan trial.
Judge Juan Merchan threatened Trump with arrest if he did not attend the trial regarding a $130,000 payout to porn star Stormy Daniels as part of a confidentiality agreement during Trump’s successful run for the White House after Trump asked to attend the Supreme Court’s oral arguments on presidential immunity set for April 25. Dershowitz suggested Trump’s attorneys act immediately to address Merchan’s threat, which he viewed as a form of “election interference.”
“I would hope Trump’s lawyers bring a mandamus right now, at the very least, let Trump out of the courtroom, let him campaign,” Dershowitz told Fox Business host Larry Kudlow. “If he makes a decision that he would like to waive the right to be there, there is nothing in the Constitution which gives the prosecution the right to keep him there. It is only a defendant’s right.”
WATCH:

...



Jonah Bromwich wrote:
"Merchan’s tone becames sharp as he questions Blanche. “You don’t think you should be here at all right now?” he asks. Blanche says that yes, they don’t believe this trial should happen during campaign season. Merchan reminds him that his client is a criminal defendant and required to be in court."

Also, I thought the imbecile was going to try and sue judge, Juan M. Merchan :laughing0301:


"Trump attorney Todd Blanche asked some of the jurors their feelings about his client, a question some tried to sidestep."

"One answered "That's not important," while another said, “I’m here to judge the facts that are presented and not the individual.”"
 
Except falsifying business records IS a crime.

And your party were the ones who impeached Bill Clinton for lying about a blow job.
I was registered as an Independent voter at the time. I do recollect very little about bringing a man's indiscretions was a foul ball all the way around.
 
Read the indictment!

The Trump Jan. 6 Indictment, Annotated​

By Charlie Savage and Adam GoldmanAug. 1, 2023

The Justice Department unveiled an indictment on Tuesday charging former President Donald J. Trump with four criminal counts. They relate to Mr. Trump’s attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, which culminated in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol by a mob of his supporters.

1 count: Conspiracy to defraud the United States
The charge against Mr. Trump details the various methods he and co-conspirators used to try to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

2 counts: Related to efforts to obstruct the vote certification proceedings

Mr. Trump faces two charges involving the vote certification proceedings at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021: one of obstructing that process and one of conspiring to do so.

1 count: Conspiracy to violate civil rights

Related to Mr. Trump’s attempts to reverse election results in states with close elections in 2020.


The New York Times annotated the document.
Download the full PDF

 
Last edited:
Read the indictment!

The Trump Jan. 6 Indictment, Annotated​

By Charlie Savage and Adam GoldmanAug. 1, 2023

The Justice Department unveiled an indictment on Tuesday charging former President Donald J. Trump with four criminal counts. They relate to Mr. Trump’s attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, which culminated in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol by a mob of his supporters.

1 count: Conspiracy to defraud the United States
The charge against Mr. Trump details the various methods he and co-conspirators used to try to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

2 counts: Related to efforts to obstruct the vote certification proceedings

Mr. Trump faces two charges involving the vote certification proceedings at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021: one of obstructing that process and one of conspiring to do so.

1 count: Conspiracy to violate civil rights

Related to Mr. Trump’s attempts to reverse election results in states with close elections in 2020.


The New York Times annotated the document.
Download the full PDF


Take away the two counts of obstruction, and there are still two counts left.
 
Maybe some of the judiciary residents are afraid of showing President Trump any semblance of .mercy everyone else gets due to lockstep policies and traditions amongst their contemporaries. Politics stink. It's too bad they Don't know that the majority of Americans love President Trump FWIW.
:laughing0301:

too, too funny
 
I’ll go with Dershowitz any day as he is more knowledgeable about the law.

In passing, O. J. Simpson was a murder case, Trump‘s case is election interference.

Run with it!

Former Trump lawyer
Alan Dershowitz said former Attorney General Bill Barr’s claims that free speech isn’t on trial in former President Trump’s election fraud case is “dead wrong.”


“I like Bill Barr, he’s a good man, but I think he’s just dead wrong about that. Of course this is a free speech case,” Dershowitz said in a Fox Radio interview Friday. “Everything involves his exercise of free speech. Not just his First Amendment free speech but also his First Amendment right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”


Dershowitz says Hur report ‘a disaster,’ ‘unfair to both sides’​


 

Forum List

Back
Top