- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,788
- 28,071
- 2,180
so answer me this, why is it that the only scientists who believe AGW is real are all funded by government money? There is not one scientist that is funded by other sources that agree with that list. NONE!!!---You didn't read the report and you're citing it like Scripture---The one that says 93% of the Excess Heat is being absorbed by the oceans for starters.---If the evidence in support of AGW is so overwhelming and compelling, then bring some of it here....slap me down with it....make me your bitch...show me some actual , observed, measured, quantified, empirical data ....
Just open your ignorant bitchy anti-science eyes/brain to the evidence in the IPCC-WG1 AR5 report that over 1,000 expert reviewers from 55 countries approved. Easy to google.
Let us know which of the over 9,000 cited scientific publications you dispute.
LOL.
.
You read that, right?
Citation?
Let is also know the publication that disputes what the real scientist indicated.
.
We did a whole thread on the Excess Heat, whatever that is
You don't believe in Scripture, right?
Good for you!
I have more faith in reputable scientists than Scripture.
Since i am not a climate scientist, i cannot comment intelligently on publications regarding "Excess Heat".
Are you a climate scientist?
Obviously not. The best you can do is cite conclusions from reputable scientists who specialize in that area.
Otherwise, you're trolling a political view.
.
I don't need anymore than that to tell me it is a hoax. Nothing more. Oh, one other thing since you wish to quote the IPCC AR5 report, why is there an agreement with the hiatus in the report? Please answer me that?