easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,101
- 2,645
Snopes Caught Playing Defense For Democrats Who Sat During Navy SEAL Tribute
"'Mythbusting' website Snopes got caught pushing a misleading fact-check that offered cover for Democratic Reps. Keith Ellison and Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who remained seated during the second standing ovation for Carryn Owens, the widow of deceased Navy SEAL Ryan Owens."
"Snopes, which is staffed with a solid lineup of leftists, used the fact that Ellison and Wasserman Schultz stood and clapped during the first standing ovation as reason to declare it “false” that they remained seated during the second standing ovation, which they clearly did. (As John Sexton at HotAir points out, Snopes significantly revised their “fact-check” without any sort of editor’s note, contrary to journalistic standards.) "
The Left doesn't have 'journalistic standards', which makes doing what they do easier.
"Snopes got the facts wrong despite deploying not one but two fact-checkers to the case."
Surprise, surprise. Just SHOCKING.
"This is hardly the first time Snopes has struggled with the facts while “fact-checking.” Last December, Snopes published a fact-check defending John Kerry’s State Department that was riddled with factual errors and omissions. As reported by The Daily Caller last summer, Snopes butchered the truth about the lack of flags at the Democratic National Convention."
One or two times = 'mistake'. 3 or more = 'FAKE NEWS' / 'ALL-IN;
"'Mythbusting' website Snopes got caught pushing a misleading fact-check that offered cover for Democratic Reps. Keith Ellison and Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who remained seated during the second standing ovation for Carryn Owens, the widow of deceased Navy SEAL Ryan Owens."
"Snopes, which is staffed with a solid lineup of leftists, used the fact that Ellison and Wasserman Schultz stood and clapped during the first standing ovation as reason to declare it “false” that they remained seated during the second standing ovation, which they clearly did. (As John Sexton at HotAir points out, Snopes significantly revised their “fact-check” without any sort of editor’s note, contrary to journalistic standards.) "
The Left doesn't have 'journalistic standards', which makes doing what they do easier.
"Snopes got the facts wrong despite deploying not one but two fact-checkers to the case."
Surprise, surprise. Just SHOCKING.
"This is hardly the first time Snopes has struggled with the facts while “fact-checking.” Last December, Snopes published a fact-check defending John Kerry’s State Department that was riddled with factual errors and omissions. As reported by The Daily Caller last summer, Snopes butchered the truth about the lack of flags at the Democratic National Convention."
One or two times = 'mistake'. 3 or more = 'FAKE NEWS' / 'ALL-IN;
