ABC News: Obama's Credibility on Line in Reversal .....

[Contumacious]

Obama's Credibility on Line in Reversal

For more than a week, the White House had been barreling toward imminent military action against Syria. But President Barack Obama's abrupt decision to instead ask Congress for permission left him with a high-risk gamble that could devastate his credibility if no action is ultimately taken in response to a deadly chemical weapons attack that crossed his own "red line."

Analysis​

1- The scumbags did not, and could not identify the SPECIFICALLY ENUMERATED Constitutional proviso which authorizes the President to intervene in Syria's internal affairs;

2- The interveners did not , and could not , explain why they believe that the major players in the Syrian saga, the CIA, The Mossad and the Mabahith, could have not perpetrated a false flag operation;

3- The retards did not, and could not, explain why a BANKRUPT US of A should engage in another deadly , expensive military affair.

For shame.

.

 

[Contumacious]

Remember US War Crimes

Ignore US lies. Article by Eric Margolis.


If the US directly attacks Syria, the real cause will not be the recent chemical attacks. What are 300 or so dead in a 2-year old war fuelled by the western powers that has so far killed over 100,000?

How many innocent bystanders are going to be killed by the Tomahawk missiles?

.

 

[Contumacious]

As the Obama administration beats the drum for yet another military engagement, here are three MORE reasons we shouldn’t go to war with Syria.

1. It’s not our fight

U.S. foreign policy - especially military actions - should proceed from clear and compelling national interests. But neither the president nor anyone in his administration has clarified what America’s security stake is in Syria’s civil war.

Humanitarian interventions are notoriously ineffective in practice. If the president wants to reduce the violence that’s already claimed over 100,000 lives, lobbing cruise missiles or putting boots on the ground is no way to accomplish that.

2. Chemical weapons shouldn’t be a red line

President Obama has said that chemical weapons are a red line that no country should be allowed to cross. But even assuming such weapons were used by the murderous Assad regime, the case for treating poison gas as qualitatively different than far more deadly conventional weapons is hardly clear.

Why should weapons that have at most killed a tiny fraction of people in a war be a trigger for action?

3. What constitutes victory?

Obama hasn’t just failed to articulate a cause for action, he hasn’t even bothered to explain what might constitute victory in Syria. The inherent risks are compounded massively by regional and global politics involving Iran, Jordan, Russia, Israel, and European countrie

 

[Contumacious]

.

 

[bodecea]

.

I hope the Navy finds out who that is by checking all the male chiefs of that rate with those ribbons.

Air medal with two stars? Correction....three stars? Should be easy to find that person.

Stand corrected...that's the Navy/Marine Corps Achievement medal...still.

 

[Contumacious]

.

I hope the Navy finds out who that is by checking all the male chiefs of that rate with those ribbons.

Air medal with two stars? Correction....three stars? Should be easy to find that person.

Stand corrected...that's the Navy/Marine Corps Achievement medal...still.

He forgot that the UCMJ supersedes the US Constitution.

.

 

[R.C. Christian]

.

I hope the Navy finds out who that is by checking all the male chiefs of that rate with those ribbons.

Air medal with two stars? Correction....three stars? Should be easy to find that person.

Stand corrected...that's the Navy/Marine Corps Achievement medal...still.

Statist, douche nozzle.

 

[Contumacious]

The US HAS USED GAS DOMESTICALLY AND INTERNATIONALLY

.

 

[Snouter]

Contumacious, it is indeed unbelievable how cleverly the MSM which is the propaganda branch of the US federal government played this. They got people arguing over irrelevant bullshit. Actually the only mainstream commentator who usually plays the race card for his own economic gain, Travis Smiley, implied he did not think the US should bomb anyone since Micheal Luther King was anti-war. But he was quickly suppressed by Peggy Noonan and other zionist warmongers and reminded who pays his paycheck.

 

[Contumacious]

Contumacious, it is indeed unbelievable how cleverly the MSM which is the propaganda branch of the US federal government played this. They got people arguing over irrelevant bullshit. Actually the only mainstream commentator who usually plays the race card for his own economic gain, Travis Smiley, implied he did not think the US should bomb anyone since Micheal Luther King was anti-war. But he was quickly suppressed by Peggy Noonan and other zionist warmongers and reminded who pays his paycheck.

They know Americans are narcotized so they can get away with murder.

So long as they get the welfare check they will see nothing, hear nothing speak nothing.

.

 

[FA_Q2]

Remember US War Crimes

Ignore US lies. Article by Eric Margolis.


If the US directly attacks Syria, the real cause will not be the recent chemical attacks. What are 300 or so dead in a 2-year old war fuelled by the western powers that has so far killed over 100,000?

How many innocent bystanders are going to be killed by the Tomahawk missiles?

.

This is a really important fact to examine. The real impacts here will be (if we go in militarily) far more killed both innocents and not than any chemical weapon attack that predicated it. If we go to war, we need to have a REASON. War does not ‘help’ those that we bomb – PERIOD. I had thought that we had learned something with Iraq. Apparently, Americans have thick skulls.

 

[Contumacious]

Remember US War Crimes

Ignore US lies. Article by Eric Margolis.


If the US directly attacks Syria, the real cause will not be the recent chemical attacks. What are 300 or so dead in a 2-year old war fuelled by the western powers that has so far killed over 100,000?

How many innocent bystanders are going to be killed by the Tomahawk missiles?

.

This is a really important fact to examine. The real impacts here will be (if we go in militarily) far more killed both innocents and not than any chemical weapon attack that predicated it. If we go to war, we need to have a REASON. War does not ‘help’ those that we bomb – PERIOD. I had thought that we had learned something with Iraq. Apparently, Americans have thick skulls.

But they have a reason, it is not palatable but they have a reason. He wants to please these two guys , primarily the first one

;

secondarily

Saud al-Faisal

Forget the dead children, that's just a pretext to engage in war.

.

 

[MACAULAY]

Obama's bungling should not cause us to lose sight of the real issue:

A tinhorn dictator has used a weapon of mass destruction to gas children.

If we do nothing, the use of this WMD will proliferate with impunity. We know that...just as sure as Churchill knew Hitler would grow hungrier with each concession he extracted from Chamberlain. Iran is completing its nuclear weapon.

The Chamberlains are out in full cry.

But Churchill would tell us it is time to man up...for humanity's sake.

We are the only ones who can or will.

 

[Contumacious]

:

A tinhorn dictator has used a weapon of mass destruction to gas children.
.

Are you referring to Bibi or Saud al-Faisal?

.

 

[RoadVirus]

Obama's Credibility on Line in Reversal

The problem with this is the author of this article assumes Obama has any credibility to begin with.

 

[deltex1]

Obama's Credibility on Line in Reversal

For more than a week, the White House had been barreling toward imminent military action against Syria. But President Barack Obama's abrupt decision to instead ask Congress for permission left him with a high-risk gamble that could devastate his credibility if no action is ultimately taken in response to a deadly chemical weapons attack that crossed his own "red line."

Analysis​

1- The scumbags did not, and could not identify the SPECIFICALLY ENUMERATED Constitutional proviso which authorizes the President to intervene in Syria's internal affairs;

2- The interveners did not , and could not , explain why they believe that the major players in the Syrian saga, the CIA, The Mossad and the Mabahith, could have not perpetrated a false flag operation;

3- The retards did not, and could not, explain why a BANKRUPT US of A should engage in another deadly , expensive military affair.

For shame.

.

If obabbles cred is on the line, nothing is on the line.

 

[FA_Q2]

Remember US War Crimes

Ignore US lies. Article by Eric Margolis.


If the US directly attacks Syria, the real cause will not be the recent chemical attacks. What are 300 or so dead in a 2-year old war fuelled by the western powers that has so far killed over 100,000?

How many innocent bystanders are going to be killed by the Tomahawk missiles?

.

This is a really important fact to examine. The real impacts here will be (if we go in militarily) far more killed both innocents and not than any chemical weapon attack that predicated it. If we go to war, we need to have a REASON. War does not ‘help’ those that we bomb – PERIOD. I had thought that we had learned something with Iraq. Apparently, Americans have thick skulls.

But they have a reason, it is not palatable but they have a reason. He wants to please these two guys , primarily the first one

;

secondarily

Saud al-Faisal

Forget the dead children, that's just a pretext to engage in war.

.

I stand corrected. We need a VALID reason.

Those are not valid.