A simple qst. for R-W'ers defending Trump on the NO tapes admission

That Lynch has nothing to do with Russia or that Mueller isn't authorized to investigate Lynch?


My friend, right wingers are scared of Mueller.....and like a fish out of water, they're floundering to find something....anything.....to steer the investigation away from the orange clown..........Just pity their lame attempt.
 
My friend, right wingers are scared of Mueller.....and like a fish out of water, they're floundering to find something....anything.....to steer the investigation away from the orange clown..........Just pity their lame attempt.

I'd be afraid of Mueller too. The second longest serving FBI director in history. Confirmed by the senate 98-0. Building a team of experts at going after the money, flipping witnesses, and prosecuting criminals.
 
I'd be afraid of Mueller too. The second longest serving FBI director in history. Confirmed by the senate 98-0. Building a team of experts at going after the money, flipping witnesses, and prosecuting criminals.


Right on target........and the REAL fear by right wingers is the Mueller objective to investigate the financial shenanigans (subpoenas of Trump's tax returns for the last decade???)
 
Now it's left wing speculation about what might have happened if Comey said (fill in the blanks). Lefties need to stop reading fake news and come up for air and face reality. It seems that CNN is giving up on the Trump-Russia connection and democrats are blaming Nancy Pelosi for the crushing loss in the Ga. special election. A more logical fantasy is what if Hussein's former A.G. doesn't take the 5th and spills the beans about her boss's negligence and the Billary team gets indicted? Y'all lefties need to understand that President Trump has been playing with you for six months and he knew that sooner or later the crazy left would eat their own.
 
I responded on another thread about the issue, and I am honestly asking this question of those FEW right wingers still capable of thinking on their own.....

What would you (right wingers) be saying today had COMEY stated, "....Trump better hope that the there are no tapes of our conversation....."???

Would you, today, be "excusing" Comey for the implication asserted in the above statement?
That would be a blatant violation of his duty. Trump has no such duty. Furthermore it constitutes espionage. It would constitute a government wiretap without a warrant.

In a private business, your employer is free to record everything you do and everything you say. Those are the terms of your employment, and Comey was Trump's employee.
 
I'd be afraid of Mueller too. The second longest serving FBI director in history. Confirmed by the senate 98-0. Building a team of experts at going after the money, flipping witnesses, and prosecuting criminals.


Right on target........and the REAL fear by right wingers is the Mueller objective to investigate the financial shenanigans (subpoenas of Trump's tax returns for the last decade???)
He has no authority to investigate Trump's tax returns.
 
That would be a blatant violation of his duty. Trump has no such duty. Furthermore it constitutes espionage. It would constitute a government wiretap without a warrant.

In a private business, your employer is free to record everything you do and everything you say. Those are the terms of your employment, and Comey was Trump's employee.


Wrong, middlefingerfuckhead........Comey did NOT divulge any classified dats and his revelations were that of a private citizen.....
 
That would be a blatant violation of his duty. Trump has no such duty. Furthermore it constitutes espionage. It would constitute a government wiretap without a warrant.

In a private business, your employer is free to record everything you do and everything you say. Those are the terms of your employment, and Comey was Trump's employee.


Wrong, middlefingerfuckhead........Comey did NOT divulge any classified dats and his revelations were that of a private citizen.....
No one claimed he divulged classified dats [sic]. Comey was a government employee. As such, his boss has a right to record any communications with him. On the other hand, he has no authority to conduct espionage on the President. Doing so would have been a crime.
 
He has no authority to investigate Trump's tax returns.


Go wipe your ass.....You know NOTHING of what a special counsel can and cannot do....You hopes are based on your obvious stupidity........

As special counsel, Robert Mueller has all of the same powers as a United States District Attorney. This includes the ability to conduct a thorough investigation of potential crimes committed, to issue subpoenas, and to ultimately file charges.

28 CFR Part 600 outlines the powers of a special counsel. The law states that the counsel shall “exercise, within the scope of his or her jurisdiction, the full power and independent authority to exercise all investigative and prosecutorial functions of any United States Attorney.”

Mueller’s powers are quite broad, and he could theoretically, for example, subpoena Donald Trump’s tax returns as part of the investigation. He could also subpoena any tapes that may exist of conversations in the White House.
 
He has no authority to investigate Trump's tax returns.


Go wipe your ass.....You know NOTHING of what a special counsel can and cannot do....You hopes are based on your obvious stupidity........

As special counsel, Robert Mueller has all of the same powers as a United States District Attorney. This includes the ability to conduct a thorough investigation of potential crimes committed, to issue subpoenas, and to ultimately file charges.

28 CFR Part 600 outlines the powers of a special counsel. The law states that the counsel shall “exercise, within the scope of his or her jurisdiction, the full power and independent authority to exercise all investigative and prosecutorial functions of any United States Attorney.”

Mueller’s powers are quite broad, and he could theoretically, for example, subpoena Donald Trump’s tax returns as part of the investigation. He could also subpoena any tapes that may exist of conversations in the White House.

Wrong, moron:

§ 600.4 Jurisdiction.

(a)Original jurisdiction. The jurisdiction of a Special Counsel shall be established by the Attorney General. The Special Counsel will be provided with a specific factual statement of the matter to be investigated.
 
The special counsel is actually looking at Loretta Lynch.

NOPE, that's the senate judiciary chair (a republican) dictated to the rest of the committee. The tanking member calls it a witch hunt.

Mueller is investigating russia, which Lynch had nothing to do with.
How do you know?

That Lynch has nothing to do with Russia or that Mueller isn't authorized to investigate Lynch?
Sure he is, you all stated all is open! Ruh roh
 
He has no authority to investigate Trump's tax returns.


Go wipe your ass.....You know NOTHING of what a special counsel can and cannot do....You hopes are based on your obvious stupidity........

As special counsel, Robert Mueller has all of the same powers as a United States District Attorney. This includes the ability to conduct a thorough investigation of potential crimes committed, to issue subpoenas, and to ultimately file charges.

28 CFR Part 600 outlines the powers of a special counsel. The law states that the counsel shall “exercise, within the scope of his or her jurisdiction, the full power and independent authority to exercise all investigative and prosecutorial functions of any United States Attorney.”

Mueller’s powers are quite broad, and he could theoretically, for example, subpoena Donald Trump’s tax returns as part of the investigation. He could also subpoena any tapes that may exist of conversations in the White House.
And Loretta lynch and Comey and Hitlery and fking anyone
 
Wow, this OP really has gone all-in on the Democrat incitement propaganda. How many loony 'I really really hate that Trump!' thread-starters can he post in one day? There really should be a rule limiting loony folks' repetitive thread-starters. It's gotten to be so boring and tiresome. Not to mention, the state of the poster's mental health should be considered. Maybe putting a limit on their lunacy, would actually help them?
 
Furthermore it constitutes espionage. It would constitute a government wiretap without a warrant.

In a private business, your employer is free to record everything you do and everything you say. Those are the terms of your employment, and Comey was Trump's employee.

Can't you get even one law right? In DC (it's different in maryland where Linda Trip did it) The federal statute allows parties to the conversation to record the conversation.

Which means nobody can legally record Trump without being in the room. So when Trump cleared the room, the only people who could have recorded it are Trump and Comey, and Both said they didn't have tapes.
 
If there is any type of taping system in the white house, it has to be with the full authority and permission of the president of the united states.
Kennedy had tapes
Johnson had tapes
Nixon famously had tapes
That's pretty much where it ended, since tapes are now part of the presidential records act.
 
Sounds like the same outcome Hillary the Hag had?


Actually no, nitwit....For democrats to have made such voters' gains in the Georgian district held by the fat, hypocritical fuck, Newt, is a harbinger of things to come.

How is getting less votes than you did in November when you spent nothing a gain? What exactly did you gain?
 

Forum List

Back
Top