- Banned
- #21
What is gained by turning electricity into hydrogen, given the inherent distribution and safety issues, rather than using the electrify directly?
None for grid energy, which is why flac specified off-grid. If you've got power available that would otherwise go to waste, then making hydrogen can be a winning solution. Or non-peak grid could qualify, but non-peak grid could just as easily be used to charge electric cars.
However, not everyone with a few solar cells can make hydrogen successfully. It's not the generation that's the issue, it's the compression. High pressure compressors are not cheap, so you'd need to be working on a pretty big scale to make it worthwhile.
Actually went thru this with Ye OleRocks awhile back. The production can be easily scaled. Even the compression part. There are a couple kits you can buy for under $500 for small scale use. A huge boon for 3rd world. The $500 kit is enough to keep your car fueled.
Estimates for a hydrogen "gas station" are now below the $150K range.
The concept of using renewables to make FUELS off-grid is a much better application for wind and solar because the FUEL IS the storage mechanism for lapses in power generation. Under those rules, it doesn't matter if the wind don't blow for an hour if your AVERAGE production of fuel is acceptable. The compression, storage and distribution part would have to be from ON GRID sources.
I'd sink money into a hydrogen fuel network that has a source of free raw materials and power.
The concept of pricing EV battery charging when sustainable power is available would have much the same effect, and would use the batteries for storage.
Like, for instance, EV chargers at work powered by roof top solar.