Ravi
Diamond Member
Um, no. What are you talking about?Wait, didn't you JUST claim I was wrong when I said you had made that claim? Which is it Ravi?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Um, no. What are you talking about?Wait, didn't you JUST claim I was wrong when I said you had made that claim? Which is it Ravi?
Ya cuase we all know Saddam didn't have any, right?
Just the 500 metric tons or so that was recently shipped out to other locations.
Post a link please....OH, THAT'S RIGHT, YOU DON'T HAVE ONE! HHHMMMmmm...seems this could be a "falsehood?"
Here we go, read this and tell me where a single claim has been substantiated? This guy writes fiction and sells it as fact and you Bush haters buy it up and believe it.
Meanwhile you still claim Clinton did not commit Perjury. What a fucking joke.
Book says White House ordered forgery - Yahoo! News
I do think everyone that voted for Bush the second time is stupid.
I guess I'm really stupid
Cause I'd pick Bush over McCain or O'Bama
can i ask why?
You are a joke:
The unresolved story of ABC News' false Saddam-anthrax reports
(a) "the anthrax in the tainted letter sent to Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle was laced with bentonite";
(b) bentonite is "a troubling chemical additive that authorities consider their first significant clue yet";
(c) "only one country, Iraq, has used bentonite to produce biological weapons";
(d) bentonite "is a trademark of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's biological weapons program"; and,
(e) "the anthrax found in a letter to Senator Daschle is nearly identical to samples they recovered in Iraq in 1994" and "the anthrax spores found in the letter to Senator Daschle are almost identical in appearance to those they recovered in Iraq in 1994 when viewed under an electron microscope."
At different times, Ross attributed these claims to "three well-placed but separate sources" and, alternatively, to "at least four well-placed sources."
All of those factual claims -- each and every one of them, separately -- were completely false, demonstrably and unquestionably so.
(1) How can ABC News just let these Saddam-anthrax reports -- as false as they were consequential -- remain uncorrected and unexplained, even through today?
(2) More importantly, Ross claimed at the time, and there is no reason to doubt it, that these false reports -- clearly designed to blame Iraq for the anthrax attacks in the eyes of Americans -- were fed to him by "at least four well-placed sources." Who were the well-placed, multiple sources feeding ABC News completely fictitious claims linking Saddam Hussein to the anthrax attacks, including false claims about the results of government tests? What possible justification is there for concealing the identity of those who manipulated ABC to disseminate these fictitious claims?
I do think everyone that voted for Bush the second time is stupid.
I guess I'm really stupid
Cause I'd pick Bush over McCain or O'Bama
You are a joke:
The unresolved story of ABC News' false Saddam-anthrax reports
(a) "the anthrax in the tainted letter sent to Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle was laced with bentonite";
(b) bentonite is "a troubling chemical additive that authorities consider their first significant clue yet";
(c) "only one country, Iraq, has used bentonite to produce biological weapons";
(d) bentonite "is a trademark of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's biological weapons program"; and,
(e) "the anthrax found in a letter to Senator Daschle is nearly identical to samples they recovered in Iraq in 1994" and "the anthrax spores found in the letter to Senator Daschle are almost identical in appearance to those they recovered in Iraq in 1994 when viewed under an electron microscope."
At different times, Ross attributed these claims to "three well-placed but separate sources" and, alternatively, to "at least four well-placed sources."
All of those factual claims -- each and every one of them, separately -- were completely false, demonstrably and unquestionably so.
(1) How can ABC News just let these Saddam-anthrax reports -- as false as they were consequential -- remain uncorrected and unexplained, even through today?
(2) More importantly, Ross claimed at the time, and there is no reason to doubt it, that these false reports -- clearly designed to blame Iraq for the anthrax attacks in the eyes of Americans -- were fed to him by "at least four well-placed sources." Who were the well-placed, multiple sources feeding ABC News completely fictitious claims linking Saddam Hussein to the anthrax attacks, including false claims about the results of government tests? What possible justification is there for concealing the identity of those who manipulated ABC to disseminate these fictitious claims?
So would I, but that really isn't saying much for Bush on my part. He's just less of a joke than the two current jokes running.
you read that and that's all you have to say? no wonder the country is falling apart.Pffft .... sealybobo calling someone else a joke. Absurd.
you read that and that's all you have to say? no wonder the country is falling apart.
for the simpleset of all reasons
Bush best represents my political point of view
of the three
infact more so than any president or presidential nominee since Reagan
I believe there have been many candidates that have been better
but not nominees of the two major parties
I'm well aware of the attacks this point of view might unleash on me
so save it
bush holds the record for most vacation days. 506 days and counting.
bush doesn't want a timetable for withdrawl. he wants a horizon. because no matter how much you move toward it, you never get there.
not a bailout. its a liquidity backstop.
we don't torture, we enduce stress.
I'm watchng the daily show. lol
If the country is falling apart because of a person, YOU would be the nominee of this board, hands down, to fill that billet. You are at the moment the dumbest MFer on here and nobody's close to threatening you for the title.
You think bush is better than mccain?
you are one of the dumbest people in america. in fact, you are tag team chump with the other douche here suggesting the same thing.
no you aren't a republican. you are worse. seriously.
Guess that explains where you get your news from ....