A Historic Vote on Palestine in the British Parliament

pbel

Gold Member
Feb 26, 2012
5,653
449
130
Israel's atrocities are losing some of the most powerful allies she has counted on for decades...
A Historic Vote on Palestine in the British Parliament David Hearst
Israel is losing the battle for public opinion in Britain. Few are in a better position to chart the draining of support than the Israeli ambassador to Britain. Daniel Taub was born and educated here and has only to compare the benign views about Israel of his youth with the cold, unvarnished judgments of today.
Gone is the rose-tinted vision of Israel as an island of democracy in a sea of irrational and violent Arabs. Gone is the belief that Israel wants to negotiate, if only it could find a partner to talk to. Gone, too, is the notion that there is symmetry in this conflict, that this is a battle between equal forces.
This is not the effect of a larger Muslim community. All Britons today are more likely to be aware of the 14,000 settlements Israel approved d
Israel is losing the battle for public opinion in Britain. Few are in a better position to chart the draining of support than the Israeli ambassador to Britain. Daniel Taub was born and educated here and has only to compare the benign views about Israel of his youth with the cold, unvarnished judgments of today.
Gone is the rose-tinted vision of Israel as an island of democracy in a sea of irrational and violent Arabs. Gone is the belief that Israel wants to negotiate, if only it could find a partner to talk to. Gone, too, is the notion that there is symmetry in this conflict, that this is a battle between equal forces.
This is not the effect of a larger Muslim community. All Britons today are more likely to be aware of the 14,000 settlements Israel approved during its nine month peace talks with the Palestinians; to wonder where a Palestinian state is going to go , with more than 600,000 settlers in occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank; to acknowledge the insouciant racism of Israeli discourse about non-Jews; to recoil at the cost in Palestinian civilian lives of Israel's definition of its own security.
The more Israel insists that its supporters choose between their liberalism and their zionism, the weaker its case becomes that the two can co-exist. Britons are losing faith that a solution is just around the corner. The idea of Israel is changing in the minds of its allies. It is no longer a cause. It is becoming heavy baggage.
uring its nine month peace talks with the Palestinians; to wonder where a Palestinian state is going to go , with more than 600,000 settlers in occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank; to acknowledge the insouciant racism of Israeli discourse about non-Jews; to recoil at the cost in Palestinian civilian lives of Israel's definition of its own security.
The more Israel insists that its supporters choose between their liberalism and their zionism, the weaker its case becomes that the two can co-exist. Britons are losing faith that a solution is just around the corner. The idea of Israel is changing in the minds of its allies. It is no longer a cause. It is becoming heavy baggage.
 
Israel's atrocities are losing some of the most powerful allies she has counted on for decades...
A Historic Vote on Palestine in the British Parliament David Hearst
Israel is losing the battle for public opinion in Britain. Few are in a better position to chart the draining of support than the Israeli ambassador to Britain. Daniel Taub was born and educated here and has only to compare the benign views about Israel of his youth with the cold, unvarnished judgments of today.
Gone is the rose-tinted vision of Israel as an island of democracy in a sea of irrational and violent Arabs. Gone is the belief that Israel wants to negotiate, if only it could find a partner to talk to. Gone, too, is the notion that there is symmetry in this conflict, that this is a battle between equal forces.
This is not the effect of a larger Muslim community. All Britons today are more likely to be aware of the 14,000 settlements Israel approved d
Israel is losing the battle for public opinion in Britain. Few are in a better position to chart the draining of support than the Israeli ambassador to Britain. Daniel Taub was born and educated here and has only to compare the benign views about Israel of his youth with the cold, unvarnished judgments of today.
Gone is the rose-tinted vision of Israel as an island of democracy in a sea of irrational and violent Arabs. Gone is the belief that Israel wants to negotiate, if only it could find a partner to talk to. Gone, too, is the notion that there is symmetry in this conflict, that this is a battle between equal forces.
This is not the effect of a larger Muslim community. All Britons today are more likely to be aware of the 14,000 settlements Israel approved during its nine month peace talks with the Palestinians; to wonder where a Palestinian state is going to go , with more than 600,000 settlers in occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank; to acknowledge the insouciant racism of Israeli discourse about non-Jews; to recoil at the cost in Palestinian civilian lives of Israel's definition of its own security.
The more Israel insists that its supporters choose between their liberalism and their zionism, the weaker its case becomes that the two can co-exist. Britons are losing faith that a solution is just around the corner. The idea of Israel is changing in the minds of its allies. It is no longer a cause. It is becoming heavy baggage.
uring its nine month peace talks with the Palestinians; to wonder where a Palestinian state is going to go , with more than 600,000 settlers in occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank; to acknowledge the insouciant racism of Israeli discourse about non-Jews; to recoil at the cost in Palestinian civilian lives of Israel's definition of its own security.
The more Israel insists that its supporters choose between their liberalism and their zionism, the weaker its case becomes that the two can co-exist. Britons are losing faith that a solution is just around the corner. The idea of Israel is changing in the minds of its allies. It is no longer a cause. It is becoming heavy baggage.




DOUBLE SPEAK as the vote is just to decide if the UK will recognise Palestine as a state under the rules of the UN charter......................NOTHING MORE
 
Israel's atrocities are losing some of the most powerful allies she has counted on for decades...
A Historic Vote on Palestine in the British Parliament David Hearst
Israel is losing the battle for public opinion in Britain. Few are in a better position to chart the draining of support than the Israeli ambassador to Britain. Daniel Taub was born and educated here and has only to compare the benign views about Israel of his youth with the cold, unvarnished judgments of today.
Gone is the rose-tinted vision of Israel as an island of democracy in a sea of irrational and violent Arabs. Gone is the belief that Israel wants to negotiate, if only it could find a partner to talk to. Gone, too, is the notion that there is symmetry in this conflict, that this is a battle between equal forces.
This is not the effect of a larger Muslim community. All Britons today are more likely to be aware of the 14,000 settlements Israel approved d
Israel is losing the battle for public opinion in Britain. Few are in a better position to chart the draining of support than the Israeli ambassador to Britain. Daniel Taub was born and educated here and has only to compare the benign views about Israel of his youth with the cold, unvarnished judgments of today.
Gone is the rose-tinted vision of Israel as an island of democracy in a sea of irrational and violent Arabs. Gone is the belief that Israel wants to negotiate, if only it could find a partner to talk to. Gone, too, is the notion that there is symmetry in this conflict, that this is a battle between equal forces.
This is not the effect of a larger Muslim community. All Britons today are more likely to be aware of the 14,000 settlements Israel approved during its nine month peace talks with the Palestinians; to wonder where a Palestinian state is going to go , with more than 600,000 settlers in occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank; to acknowledge the insouciant racism of Israeli discourse about non-Jews; to recoil at the cost in Palestinian civilian lives of Israel's definition of its own security.
The more Israel insists that its supporters choose between their liberalism and their zionism, the weaker its case becomes that the two can co-exist. Britons are losing faith that a solution is just around the corner. The idea of Israel is changing in the minds of its allies. It is no longer a cause. It is becoming heavy baggage.
uring its nine month peace talks with the Palestinians; to wonder where a Palestinian state is going to go , with more than 600,000 settlers in occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank; to acknowledge the insouciant racism of Israeli discourse about non-Jews; to recoil at the cost in Palestinian civilian lives of Israel's definition of its own security.
The more Israel insists that its supporters choose between their liberalism and their zionism, the weaker its case becomes that the two can co-exist. Britons are losing faith that a solution is just around the corner. The idea of Israel is changing in the minds of its allies. It is no longer a cause. It is becoming heavy baggage.




DOUBLE SPEAK as the vote is just to decide if the UK will recognise Palestine as a state under the rules of the UN charter......................NOTHING MORE
You just don't get it Phoney, an avalanche of nations are awaking to the fact that Israel's atrocities are delegitimizing her...
 
Israel's atrocities are losing some of the most powerful allies she has counted on for decades...
A Historic Vote on Palestine in the British Parliament David Hearst
Israel is losing the battle for public opinion in Britain. Few are in a better position to chart the draining of support than the Israeli ambassador to Britain. Daniel Taub was born and educated here and has only to compare the benign views about Israel of his youth with the cold, unvarnished judgments of today.
Gone is the rose-tinted vision of Israel as an island of democracy in a sea of irrational and violent Arabs. Gone is the belief that Israel wants to negotiate, if only it could find a partner to talk to. Gone, too, is the notion that there is symmetry in this conflict, that this is a battle between equal forces.
This is not the effect of a larger Muslim community. All Britons today are more likely to be aware of the 14,000 settlements Israel approved d
Israel is losing the battle for public opinion in Britain. Few are in a better position to chart the draining of support than the Israeli ambassador to Britain. Daniel Taub was born and educated here and has only to compare the benign views about Israel of his youth with the cold, unvarnished judgments of today.
Gone is the rose-tinted vision of Israel as an island of democracy in a sea of irrational and violent Arabs. Gone is the belief that Israel wants to negotiate, if only it could find a partner to talk to. Gone, too, is the notion that there is symmetry in this conflict, that this is a battle between equal forces.
This is not the effect of a larger Muslim community. All Britons today are more likely to be aware of the 14,000 settlements Israel approved during its nine month peace talks with the Palestinians; to wonder where a Palestinian state is going to go , with more than 600,000 settlers in occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank; to acknowledge the insouciant racism of Israeli discourse about non-Jews; to recoil at the cost in Palestinian civilian lives of Israel's definition of its own security.
The more Israel insists that its supporters choose between their liberalism and their zionism, the weaker its case becomes that the two can co-exist. Britons are losing faith that a solution is just around the corner. The idea of Israel is changing in the minds of its allies. It is no longer a cause. It is becoming heavy baggage.
uring its nine month peace talks with the Palestinians; to wonder where a Palestinian state is going to go , with more than 600,000 settlers in occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank; to acknowledge the insouciant racism of Israeli discourse about non-Jews; to recoil at the cost in Palestinian civilian lives of Israel's definition of its own security.
The more Israel insists that its supporters choose between their liberalism and their zionism, the weaker its case becomes that the two can co-exist. Britons are losing faith that a solution is just around the corner. The idea of Israel is changing in the minds of its allies. It is no longer a cause. It is becoming heavy baggage.

Poor guy, can't even read his own article: "The vote will be a symbolic one. A Palestinian state is a virtual concept..."

You might as well vote for Batman and Robin. They are virtual in concept too. Ha ha ha.
 
The more Israel insists that its supporters choose between their liberalism and their zionism, the weaker its case becomes that the two can co-exist. .

Let's see here -- Women in Israel are doctors, lawyers and captains of industry, whereas in Pallyland, women are mere chattel to be killed for "honor". Israel is a world leader in developing innovative green technology. Pallylanders only know how to destroy high tech greenhouses. In Tel Aviv, gay pride parades are held openly. That would be a death sentence in Pallyland. Academic books are among the best sellers in Israel, while Mein Kampf tops the charts in Pallyland. In Israel, highest honors go to all its myriad Nobel Laureates. Pallylanders rewards its mass murderers with highest honors.

Now, what kind of absolutely cretinously stupid would a person have to be to think the LIBERAL choice here would entail this cult-like devotion to all things Pally?

I swear, the world has been turned upside down in recent decades. That sure wasn't the definition of liberal when I was studying political science in the late 60s and early 70s.
 
The more Israel insists that its supporters choose between their liberalism and their zionism, the weaker its case becomes that the two can co-exist. .

Let's see here -- Women in Israel are doctors, lawyers and captains of industry, whereas in Pallyland, women are mere chattel to be killed for "honor". Israel is a world leader in developing innovative green technology. Pallylanders only know how to destroy high tech greenhouses. In Tel Aviv, gay pride parades are held openly. That would be a death sentence in Pallyland. Academic books are among the best sellers in Israel, while Mein Kampf tops the charts in Pallyland. In Israel, highest honors go to all its myriad Nobel Laureates. Pallylanders rewards its mass murderers with highest honors.

Now, what kind of absolutely cretinously stupid would a person have to be to think the LIBERAL choice here would entail this cult-like devotion to all things Pally?

I swear, the world has been turned upside down in recent decades. That sure wasn't the definition of liberal when I was studying political science in the late 60s and early 70s.

"Let's see here -- Women in Israel are doctors, lawyers and captains of industry, whereas in Pallyland, women are mere chattel to be killed for "honor". "

"PLO official Hanan Ashrawi: Israel’s assault on Gaza is ‘state terrorism’ and should be referred to the International Criminal Court"

She is a Christian Palestinian too.

- See more at: PLO official Hanan Ashrawi Israel s assault on Gaza is state terrorism
 
Britain thought that terror won't find it, so it turned one cheek. It got slapped, so now it turns the other.

Still not working, so they turn their rears.

What next, I wonder.
 
The more Israel insists that its supporters choose between their liberalism and their zionism, the weaker its case becomes that the two can co-exist. .

Let's see here -- Women in Israel are doctors, lawyers and captains of industry, whereas in Pallyland, women are mere chattel to be killed for "honor". Israel is a world leader in developing innovative green technology. Pallylanders only know how to destroy high tech greenhouses. In Tel Aviv, gay pride parades are held openly. That would be a death sentence in Pallyland. Academic books are among the best sellers in Israel, while Mein Kampf tops the charts in Pallyland. In Israel, highest honors go to all its myriad Nobel Laureates. Pallylanders rewards its mass murderers with highest honors.

Now, what kind of absolutely cretinously stupid would a person have to be to think the LIBERAL choice here would entail this cult-like devotion to all things Pally?

I swear, the world has been turned upside down in recent decades. That sure wasn't the definition of liberal when I was studying political science in the late 60s and early 70s.

"Let's see here -- Women in Israel are doctors, lawyers and captains of industry, whereas in Pallyland, women are mere chattel to be killed for "honor". "

"PLO official Hanan Ashrawi: Israel’s assault on Gaza is ‘state terrorism’ and should be referred to the International Criminal Court"

She is a Christian Palestinian too.

- See more at: PLO official Hanan Ashrawi Israel s assault on Gaza is state terrorism
She also holds a Ph.D. in Medieval and Comparative Literature from the University of Virginia.

Ashrawi received an Honorary Doctoral Degree at the American University of Beirut on June 28, 2008.

Not bad for a Christian woman in a "Muslim" country.
 

Forum List

Back
Top