9th Circuit Says Medical Marijuana Cardholders Have No Second Amendment Rights

[PredFan]

If it's legal in the state they are in, then there is no crime and this no reason to take their guns away.

MJ is illegal under federal law.

I'm a states rights guy.

Perhaps; this does not change the fact that MJ is illegal under federal law, and the federal government for not violate the 10th amendment by making it so.

I was just giving my opinion as to how it should be.

 

[Skull Pilot]

IMO just having a card isn't enough there must be an actual federal drug conviction or a state conviction of being under the influence while in possession of a firearm for second amendment rights to be nullified.

That's not what the law says,, and that's not the question asked on the 4473.

Well the law is fucked up.
It is not a crime to merely have a pot card.

No... however, having a pot card is proof of use.
This who use illegal drugs cannot buy guns, under federal law.

Well that's the problem things being arbitrarily illegal

 

[Pogo]

No... however, having a pot card is proof of use.

Nope. It isn't.
Again, just as being of legal drinking age is not "proof" of intoxication. That's absurd.

If I have five bucks in my pocket and a McBurger costs five bucks, is that "proof" that I'm fat?

This who use illegal drugs cannot buy guns, under federal law.

Cannabis is STILL not a "drug".