9/11 Conspiracy Theory - NOT! How to Demolish a Building

1.the 84 unreleased surveillance tapes and the release of wreckage to a independent investigation`is the only definitive evidence it isas of yet still classified...why

2.again wreckage or the lack there of is classified and needs to be released to a independent investigation

3 yes hijackers flew planes into the towers.. but this does not explain the collapse or wtc 7 or NORAD standing down or the many accounts of secondary explosions or the exclusion of eyewitness and building 7 from the 911 commission report etc-etc


Do yourself a favour take the time to watch this

9/11 Press For Truth - Victims' Families Tell the Story the Media Won'...
1 hr 24 min - 7-Sep-06 - (129 ratings)
The filmmakers have made the entire feature-length movie available here as a public service.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...48042993700360

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You failed to answer all the questions. Is there a reason for that? Come on it can't be to hard to voice an opinion can it? You want a discussion but won't answer the important questions.
 
You failed to answer all the questions. Is there a reason for that? Come on it can't be to hard to voice an opinion can it? You want a discussion but won't answer the important questions.

you are ridiculous whats wrong is your attention span to limited to watch the film..I am not giving answers just like the official story of improbable event after another I am offering theories some mine ,some others .
I am asking the important questions that remain even according to the 911 commission unanswered what is it you don't understand there is a cover up without
one all we have is the unproven official theory which should be proved by those presenting it seeing as they hold all the evidence ,until then all anyone has is theories, personally i put more faith in the pilots and patriots of 911truth, the family's of victims ,the physic professors and my own sense , the 911 commision members than a administration that has lied and distorted us into a war of world domination
 
you are ridiculous whats wrong is your attention span to limited to watch the film..I am not giving answers just like the official story of improbable event after another I am offering theories some mine ,some others .
I am asking the important questions that remain even according to the 911 commission unanswered what is it you don't understand there is a cover up without
one all we have is the unproven official theory which should be proved by those presenting it seeing as they hold all the evidence ,until then all anyone has is theories, personally i put more faith in the pilots and patriots of 911truth, the family's of victims ,the physic professors and my own sense , the 911 commision members than a administration that has lied and distorted us into a war of world domination

In other words you won't answer two simple questions. I wonder why that is? Actually you have answered these questions on more than one occassion, but now you can't muster the nerve to state your opinion.
 
In other words you won't answer two simple questions. I wonder why that is? Actually you have answered these questions on more than one occassion, but now you can't muster the nerve to state your opinion.


I have answered your questions but you just repeat the same thing over and over and do nothing to inform yourself other than fox news maybe you can answer some questions

REASONS TO DOUBT THE OFFICIAL STORY OF SEPTEMBER 11th, 2001

... An outline in simple talking points ...





THE DAY ITSELF - EVIDENCE OF COMPLICITY

1) AWOL Chain of Command
a. It is well documented that the officials topping the chain of command for response to a domestic attack - George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Myers, Montague Winfield - all found reason to do something else during the actual attacks, other than assuming their duties as decision-makers.
b. Who was actually in charge? Dick Cheney, Richard Clarke, Norman Mineta and the 9/11 Commission directly conflict in their accounts of top-level response to the unfolding events, such that several (or all) of them must be lying.
2) Air Defense Failures
a. The US air defense system failed to follow standard procedures for responding to diverted passenger flights.
b. Timelines: The various responsible agencies - NORAD, FAA, Pentagon, USAF, as well as the 9/11 Commission - gave radically different explanations for the failure (in some cases upheld for years), such that several officials must have lied; but none were held accountable.
c. Was there an air defense standdown?

3) Pentagon Strike
How was it possible the Pentagon was hit 1 hour and 20 minutes after the attacks began? Why was there no response from Andrews Air Force Base, just 10 miles away and home to Air National Guard units charged with defending the skies above the nation''s capital? How did Hani Hanjour, a man who failed as a Cessna pilot on his first flight in a Boeing, execute a difficult aerobatic maneuver to strike the Pentagon? Why did the attack strike the just-renovated side, which was largely empty and opposite from the high command?

4) Wargames
a. US military and other authorities planned or actually rehearsed defensive response to all elements of the 9/11 scenario during the year prior to the attack - including multiple hijackings, suicide crashbombings, and a strike on the Pentagon.
b. The multiple military wargames planned long in advance and held on the morning of September 11th included scenarios of a domestic air crisis, a plane crashing into a government building, and a large-scale emergency in New York. If this was only an incredible series of coincidences, why did the official investigations avoid the issue? There is evidence that the wargames created confusion as to whether the unfolding events were "real world or exercise." Did wargames serve as the cover for air defense sabotage, and/or the execution of an "inside job"?

5) Flight 93
Did the Shanksville crash occur at 10:06 (according to a seismic report) or 10:03 (according to the 9/11 Commission)? Does the Commission wish to hide what happened in the last three minutes of the flight, and if so, why? Was Flight 93 shot down, as indicated by the scattering of debris over a trail of several miles?


THE DAY - POSSIBLE SMOKING GUNS

6) Did cell phones work at 30,000 feet in 2001? How many hijackings were attempted? How many flights were diverted?

7) Demolition Hypothesis
What caused the collapse of a third skyscraper, WTC 7, which was not hit by a plane? Were the Twin Towers and WTC 7 brought down by explosives? (See "The Case for Demolitions," the websites wtc7.net and 911research.wtc7.net, and the influential article by physicist Steven Jones. See also items no. 16 and 24, below.)


FOREKNOWLEDGE & THE ALLEGED HIJACKERS

8) What did officials know? How did they know it?
a. Multiple allied foreign agencies informed the US government of a coming attack in detail, including the manner and likely targets of the attack, the name of the operation (the "Big Wedding"), and the names of certain men later identified as being among the perpetrators.
b. Various individuals came into possession of specific advance knowledge, and some of them tried to warn the US prior to September 11th.
c. Certain prominent persons received warnings not to fly on the week or on the day of September 11th.

9) Able Danger, Plus - Surveillance of Alleged Hijackers
a. The men identified as the 9/11 ringleaders were under surveillance for years beforehand, on the suspicion they were terrorists, by a variety of US and allied authorities - including the CIA, the US military''s "Able Danger" program, the German authorities, Israeli intelligence and others.
b. Two of the alleged ringleaders who were known to be under surveillance by the CIA also lived with an FBI asset in San Diego, but this is supposed to be yet another a coincidence.
10) Obstruction of FBI Investigations prior to 9/11
A group of FBI officials in New York systematically suppressed field investigations of potential terrorists that might have uncovered the alleged hijackers - as the Moussaoui case once again showed. The stories of Sibel Edmonds, Robert Wright, Coleen Rowley and Harry Samit, the "Phoenix Memo," David Schippers, the 199i orders restricting investigations, the Bush administration''s order to back off the Bin Ladin family, the reaction to the "Bojinka" plot, and John O''Neil do not, when considered in sum, indicate mere incompetence, but high-level corruption and protection of criminal networks, including the network of the alleged 9/11 conspirators. (Nearly all of these examples were omitted from or relegated to fleeting footnotes in The 9/11 Commission Report.)

11) Insider Trading
a. Unknown speculators allegedly used foreknowledge of the Sept. 11th events to profiteer on many markets internationally - including but not limited to "put options" placed to short-sell the two airlines, WTC tenants, and WTC re-insurance companies in Chicago and London.
b. In addition, suspicious monetary transactions worth hundreds of millions were conducted through offices at the Twin Towers during the actual attacks.
c. Initial reports on these trades were suppressed and forgotten, and only years later did the 9/11 Commission and SEC provide a partial, but untenable explanation for only a small number of transactions (covering only the airline put options through the Chicago Board of Exchange).

12) Who were the perpetrators?
a. Much of the evidence establishing who did the crime is dubious and miraculous: bags full of incriminating material that happened to miss the flight or were left in a van; the "magic passport" of an alleged hijacker, found at Ground Zero; documents found at motels where the alleged perpetrators had stayed days and weeks before 9/11.
b. The identities of the alleged hijackers remain unresolved, there are contradictions in official accounts of their actions and travels, and there is evidence several of them had "doubles," all of which is omitted from official investigations.
c. What happened to initial claims by the government that 50 people involved in the attacks had been identified, including the 19 alleged hijackers, with 10 still at large (suggesting that 20 had been apprehended)? http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/sns-worldtrade-50suspects,0,1825231.story


THE 9/11 COVER-UP, 2001-2006

13) Who Is Osama Bin Ladin?
a. Who judges which of the many conflicting and dubious statements and videos attributed to Osama Bin Ladin are genuine, and which are fake? The most important Osama Bin Ladin video (Nov. 2001), in which he supposedly confesses to masterminding 9/11, appears to be a fake. In any event, the State Department''s translation of it is fraudulent.
b. Did Osama Bin Ladin visit Dubai and meet a CIA agent in July 2001 (Le Figaro)? Was he receiving dyalisis in a Pakistani military hospital on the night of September 10, 2001 (CBS)?
c. Whether by Bush or Clinton: Why is Osama always allowed to escape?
d. The terror network associated with Osama, known as the "data base" (al-Qaeda), originated in the CIA-sponsored 1980s anti-Soviet jihad in Afghanistan. When did this network stop serving as an asset to covert operations by US intelligence and allied agencies? What were its operatives doing in Kosovo, Bosnia and Chechnya in the years prior to 9/11?

14) All the Signs of a Systematic 9/11 Cover-up
a. Airplane black boxes were found at Ground Zero, according to two first responders and an unnamed NTSB official, but they were "disappeared" and their existence is denied in The 9/11 Commission Report.
b. US officials consistently suppressed and destroyed evidence (like the tapes recorded by air traffic controllers who handled the New York flights).
c. Whistleblowers (like Sibel Edmonds and Anthony Shaffer) were intimidated, gagged and sanctioned, sending a clear signal to others who might be thinking about speaking out.
d. Officials who "failed" (like Myers and Eberhard, as well as Frasca, Maltbie and Bowman of the FBI) were given promotions.

15) Poisoning New York
The White House deliberately pressured the EPA into giving false public assurances that the toxic air at Ground Zero was safe to breathe. This knowingly contributed to an as-yet unknown number of health cases and fatalities, and demonstrates that the administration does consider the lives of American citizens to be expendable on behalf of certain interests.

16) Disposing of the Crime Scene
The rapid and illegal scrapping of the WTC ruins at Ground Zero disposed of almost all of the structural steel indispensable to any investigation of the collapse mechanics. (See also item no. 23, below.)

17) Anthrax
Mailings of weapons-grade anthrax - which caused a practical suspension of the 9/11 investigations - were traced back to US military stock. Soon after the attacks began in October 2001, the FBI approved the destruction of the original samples of the Ames strain, disposing of perhaps the most important evidence in identifying the source of the pathogens used in the mailings. Were the anthrax attacks timed to coincide with the Afghanistan invasion? Why were the letters sent only to media figures and to the leaders of the opposition in the Senate (who had just raised objections to the USA PATRIOT Act)?

18) The Stonewall
a. Colin Powell promised a "white paper" from the State Department to establish the authorship of the attacks by al-Qaeda. This was never forthcoming, and was instead replaced by a paper from Tony Blair, which presented only circumstantial evidence, with very few points actually relating to September 11th.
b. Bush and Cheney pressured the (freshly-anthraxed) leadership of the Congressional opposition into delaying the 9/11 investigation for months. The administration fought against the creation of an independent investigation for more than a year.
c. The White House thereupon attempted to appoint Henry Kissinger as the chief investigator, and acted to underfund and obstruct the 9/11 Commission.

19) A Record of Official Lies
a. "No one could have imagined planes into buildings" - a transparent falsehood upheld repeatedly by Rice, Rumsfeld and Bush.
b. "Iraq was connected to 9/11" - The most "outrageous conspiracy theory" of all, with the most disastrous impact.

20) Pakistani Connection - Congressional Connection
a. The Pakistani intelligence agency ISI, creator of the Taliban and close ally to both the CIA and "al-Qaeda," allegedly wired $100,000 to Mohamed Atta just prior to September 11th, reportedly through the ISI asset Omar Saeed Sheikh (later arrested for the killing of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, who was investigating ISI connections to "al-Qaeda.")
b. This was ignored by the congressional 9/11 investigation, although the senator and congressman who ran the probe (Bob Graham and Porter Goss) were meeting with the ISI chief, Mahmud Ahmed, on Capitol Hill on the morning of September 11th.
c. About 25 percent of the report of the Congressional Joint Inquiry was redacted, including long passages regarding how the attack (or the network allegedly behind it) was financed. Graham later said foreign allies were involved in financing the alleged terror network, but that this would only come out in 30 years.

21) Unanswered Questions and the "Final Fraud" of the 9/11 Commission:
a. The September 11th families who fought for and gained an independent investigation (the 9/11 Commission) posed 400-plus questions, which the 9/11 Commission adopted as its roadmap. The vast majority of these questions were completely ignored in the Commission hearings and the final report.
b. The membership and staff of the 9/11 Commission displayed awesome conflicts of interest. The families called for the resignation of Executive Director Philip Zelikow, a Bush administration member and close associate of "star witness" Condoleezza Rice, and were snubbed. Commission member Max Cleland resigned, condemning the entire exercise as a "scam" and "whitewash."
c.The 9/11 Commission Report is notable mainly for its obvious omissions, distortions and outright falsehoods - ignoring anything incompatible with the official story, banishing the issues to footnotes, and even dismissing the still-unresolved question of who financed 9/11 as being "of little practical significance."

22) Crown Witnesses Held at Undisclosed Locations
The alleged masterminds of 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohamed (KSM) and Ramzi Binalshibh, are reported to have been captured in 2002 and 2003, although one Pakistani newspaper said KSM was killed in an attempted capture. They have been held at undisclosed locations and their supposed testimonies, as provided in transcript form by the government, form much of the basis for The 9/11 Commission Report (although the Commission''s request to see them in person was denied). After holding them for years, why doesn''t the government produce these men and put them to trial?

23) Spitzer Redux
a. Eliot Spitzer, attorney general of New York State, snubbed pleas by New York citizens to open 9/11 as a criminal case (Justicefor911.org).
b. Spitzer also refused to allow his employee, former 9/11 Commission staff member Dietrich Snell, to testify to the Congress about his (Snell''s) role in keeping "Able Danger" entirely out of The 9/11 Commission Report.

24) NIST Omissions
After the destruction of the WTC structural steel, the official Twin Towers collapse investigation was left with almost no forensic evidence, and thus could only provide dubious computer models of ultimately unprovable hypotheses. It failed to even test for the possibility of explosives. (Why not clear this up?)

25) Radio Silence
The 9/11 Commission and NIST both allowed the continuing cover-up of how Motorola''s faulty radios, purchased by the Giuliani administration, caused firefighter deaths at the WTC - once again showing the expendability, even of the first responders.

26) The Legal Catch-22
a. Hush Money - Accepting victims'' compensation barred September 11th families from pursuing discovery through litigation.
b. Judge Hallerstein - Those who refused compensation to pursue litigation and discovery had their cases consolidated under the same judge (and as a rule dismissed).

27) Saudi Connections
a. The 9/11 investigations made light of the "Bin Ladin Airlift" during the no-fly period, and ignored the long-standing Bush family business ties to the Bin Ladin family fortune. (A company in which both families held interests, the Carlyle Group, was holding its annual meeting on September 11th, with George Bush Sr., James Baker, and two brothers of Osama Bin Ladin in attendance.)
b. The issue of Ptech.

28) Media Blackout of Prominent Doubters
The official story has been questioned and many of the above points were raised by members of the US Congress, retired high-ranking officers of the US military, the three leading third-party candidates for President in the 2004 election, a member of the 9/11 Commission who resigned in protest, a former high-ranking adviser to the George W. Bush administration, former ministers to the German, British and Canadian governments, the commander-in-chief of the Russian air force, 100 luminaries who signed the "9/11 Truth Statement," and the presidents of Iran and Venezuela. Not all of these people agree fully with each other, but all would normally be considered newsworthy. Why has the corporate-owned US mass media remained silent about these statements, granting due coverage only to the comments of actor Charlie Sheen?


GEOPOLITICS, TIMING AND POSSIBLE MOTIVES

29) "The Great Game"
The Afghanistan invasion was ready for Bush''s go-ahead on September 9, 2001, with US and UK force deployments to the region already in place or underway. This followed the failure earlier that year of backdoor diplomacy with the Taliban (including payments of $125 million in US government aid to Afghanistan), in an attempt to secure a unity government for that country as a prerequisite to a Central Asian pipeline deal.

30) The Need for a "New Pearl Harbor"
Principals in US foreign policy under the current Bush administration (including Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle and others) have been instrumental in developing long-running plans for worldwide military hegemony, including an invasion of the Middle East, dating back to the Ford, Reagan and Bush Sr. administrations. They reiterated these plans in the late 1990s as members of the "Project for a New American Century," and stated a clear intent to invade Iraq for the purpose of "regime change." After 9/11, they lost no time in their attempt to tie Iraq to the attacks.

31) Perpetual "War on Terror"
9/11 is supposed to provide carte-blanche for an open-ended, global and perpetual "War on Terror," against any enemy, foreign or domestic, that the executive branch chooses to designate, and regardless of whether evidence exists to actually connect these enemies to 9/11.

32) Attacking the Constitution
a. The USA PATRIOT Act was written before 9/11, Homeland Security and the "Shadow Government" were developed long before 9/11, and plans for rounding up dissidents as a means for suppressing civil disturbance have been in the works for decades.
b. 9/11 was used as the pretext to create a new, extra-constitutional executive authority to declare anyone an "enemy combatant" (including American citizens), to detain persons indefinitely without habeas corpus, and to "render" such persons to secret prisons where torture is practiced.

33) Legal Trillions
9/11 triggers a predictable shift of public spending to war, and boosts public and private spending in the "new" New Economy of "Homeland Security," biometrics, universal surveillance, prisons, civil defense, secured enclaves, security, etc.

34) Plundered Trillions?
On September 10, 2001, Donald Rumsfeld announced a "war on waste" after an internal audit found that the Pentagon was "missing" 2.3 trillion dollars in unaccounted assets. On September 11th, this was as good as forgotten.

35) Did 9/11 prevent a stock market crash?
Did anyone benefit from the destruction of the Securities and Exchange Commission offices at WTC 7, and the resultant crippling of hundreds of fraud investigations?

36) Resource Wars
a. What was discussed in the Energy Task Force meetings under Dick Cheney in 2001? Why is the documentation of these meetings still being suppressed?
b. Is Peak Oil a motive for 9/11 as inside job?

37) The "Little Game"
Why was the WTC privatized just before its destruction?


HISTORY

38) "Al-CIA-da?"
The longstanding relationship between US intelligence networks and radical Islamists, including the network surrounding Osama Bin Ladin. (See also point 13d.)

39) Historical Precedents for "Synthetic Terror"
a. In the past many states, including the US government, have sponsored attacks on their own people, fabricated the "cause for war," created (and armed) their own enemies of convenience, and sacrificed their own citizens for "reasons of state."
b. Was 9/11 an update of the Pentagon-approved "Project Northwoods" plan for conducting self-inflicted, false-flag terror attacks in the United States, and blaming them on a foreign enemy?

40) Secret Government
a. The record of criminality and sponsorship of coups around the world by the covert networks based within the US intelligence complex.
b. Specifically also: The evidence of crime by Bush administration principals and their associates, from October Surprise to Iran-Contra and the S&L plunder to PNAC, Enron/Halliburton and beyond.
 
So Eots believes terrorists hijack two aircraft and drove them into the Towers. But doesn't believe that terrorists hijacked flight 93 or 77. These planes mysteriously just disappeared. They did not crash where we all think they did.

That leaves us with several questions.

Who took those two aircraft? Or is the claim those flights never existed?

Where did the two aircraft go? How come no one saw them fly away? Where are the passengers and crew from those two aircraft and the aircraft themselves.

Now remember Eots has repeatedly claimed that 9/11 was a False Flag operation.

So the next questions are who were the hijackers, the terrorists? Even on the two aircraft that hit the WTC.

Eots continues to claim that NORAD and all Air National Guard and Air Force aircraft were ORDERED to stand down. That would required hundreds of flight crew, air crew, security, air traffic controllers, weapons loaders and ancilliary personnel in the Air National Guard and Air Force to have recieved those orders. Yet no one has talked in 6 years, not one person on duty that day has come forward to inform us of a "Stand Down" order. We are to believe that some how the Government has kept all these people silent OR they were all in on it. Such an order would have to be in writing also. Yet we have no paper trail, no whistle blower leaking this damning order. Further Eots claims Vice President Cheney gave this order. Something he has no authority to do. He is NOT in the chain of command at all unless the President is dead or incapacitated. We are to believe NORAD and every Air National Guard and Air Force squadron supposedly on alert that day obeyed illegal orders from a man not even in the Chain of Command.

So much for the theory only a few people were involved. And this is before we even get to the WTC and the claims they were blown up from with in and that a missile was fired on the Pentagon.

Yup, I can see why Eots can not use his/her own words to explain these events. Talk about unbelievable.
 
So Eots believes terrorists hijack two aircraft and drove them into the Towers. But doesn't believe that terrorists hijacked flight 93 or 77. These planes mysteriously just disappeared. They did not crash where we all think they did.

That leaves us with several questions.

Who took those two aircraft? Or is the claim those flights never existed?

Where did the two aircraft go? How come no one saw them fly away? Where are the passengers and crew from those two aircraft and the aircraft themselves.

Now remember Eots has repeatedly claimed that 9/11 was a False Flag operation.

So the next questions are who were the hijackers, the terrorists? Even on the two aircraft that hit the WTC.

Eots continues to claim that NORAD and all Air National Guard and Air Force aircraft were ORDERED to stand down. That would required hundreds of flight crew, air crew, security, air traffic controllers, weapons loaders and ancilliary personnel in the Air National Guard and Air Force to have recieved those orders. Yet no one has talked in 6 years, not one person on duty that day has come forward to inform us of a "Stand Down" order. We are to believe that some how the Government has kept all these people silent OR they were all in on it. Such an order would have to be in writing also. Yet we have no paper trail, no whistle blower leaking this damning order. Further Eots claims Vice President Cheney gave this order. Something he has no authority to do. He is NOT in the chain of command at all unless the President is dead or incapacitated. We are to believe NORAD and every Air National Guard and Air Force squadron supposedly on alert that day obeyed illegal orders from a man not even in the Chain of Command.

So much for the theory only a few people were involved. And this is before we even get to the WTC and the claims they were blown up from with in and that a missile was fired on the Pentagon.

Yup, I can see why Eots can not use his/her own words to explain these events. Talk about unbelievable.

you never answered one of my questions and again attributed statements to me I never made. with your ability to lie and distort you really should look at working for fox you make up scenarios ,without even knowing the protocols or that Cheney took control from NORAD to shoot down with out direct orders
other than watch the news, you have done no research what so ever that is very apparent WITH THE ASSUMPTIONS IE; CHENEY NOT IN THE CHAIN OF COMMAND you make with no idea what your talking about only how you think it is or how it works
 
Cheney in Command of NORAD 3:30 min For the past 50 years, NORAD has had the duty of protecting US airspace from attack, and has always been under the direct command of select US Military Generals. Three months before the attack of 9-11, Dick Cheney usurped control of NORAD, and therefore he, and no one else, had the power to call for military sorties on the hijacked airliners on 9-11. He did not exercise that power, and consequently, the Pentagon, WTC2 and WTC7 were left unprotected, and then destroyed, resulting in the death of thousands of innocents.
Question: Why was Cheney in command of NORAD? And why did Cheney "stand down" our defences, allowing the attacks to succeed?
 
Cheney in Command of NORAD 3:30 min For the past 50 years, NORAD has had the duty of protecting US airspace from attack, and has always been under the direct command of select US Military Generals. Three months before the attack of 9-11, Dick Cheney usurped control of NORAD, and therefore he, and no one else, had the power to call for military sorties on the hijacked airliners on 9-11. He did not exercise that power, and consequently, the Pentagon, WTC2 and WTC7 were left unprotected, and then destroyed, resulting in the death of thousands of innocents.
Question: Why was Cheney in command of NORAD? And why did Cheney "stand down" our defences, allowing the attacks to succeed?

Provide evidence of the stand down. Other then your saying it so. Hundreds of people would have been privy to the order. How have they all been kept quiet all these years? How have all the pilots, all the air crews, ordanance teams, Air Traffic Controllers, command personnel, radio operators, security personnel, how have they all been kept from tell us about this order to stand down?

All you have is people NOT in the command chain, not in Norad, not in a squadron, not on a base that day, saying they think.... This doesn't require a rocket scientist. We are talking about HUNDREDS of Air National Guard and Air Force personnel. Why have NONE come forward? NOT a single one. For 6 YEARS.

It really is a simply question. Answer it if you can.

You have said that a plane did not hit the Pentagon and you have said a plane did not crash in Pennsylvania. You can pretend all you want that you haven't but all one need do is read your posts.
 
Provide evidence of the stand down. Other then your saying it so. Hundreds of people would have been privy to the order. How have they all been kept quiet all these years? How have all the pilots, all the air crews, ordanance teams, Air Traffic Controllers, command personnel, radio operators, security personnel, how have they all been kept from tell us about this order to stand down?

All you have is people NOT in the command chain, not in Norad, not in a squadron, not on a base that day, saying they think.... This doesn't require a rocket scientist. We are talking about HUNDREDS of Air National Guard and Air Force personnel. Why have NONE come forward? NOT a single one. For 6 YEARS.

It really is a simply question. Answer it if you can.

You have said that a plane did not hit the Pentagon and you have said a plane did not crash in Pennsylvania. You can pretend all you want that you haven't but all one need do is read your posts.

The obvious lack of any real knowledge of what it would take to order such a standown is so ridiculous that it's funny. As you stated, the cast of thousands that would be required to carry out such a conspiracy makes the very idea completely absurd. Half to three-quarters would already be makin gdeals with Hollyweird for their stories.
 
Right.

And you'd think someone, somewhere would be spilling the beans.

Could you imagine the press on the person if he had tangible evidence?

Now, its all theory and conjecture, based on hearsay and faulty analysis.
 
40 question on the official theory and you cant even answer one

I can certainly tell you that number 11 is crap.

There was no unusual short-selling of re-insurers or "other tenants" prior to 9/11

Besides, many of those 40 "questions" are not really questions, but rather vague assertions, such as 9/11 and peak oil, where we do not know if we are at peak oil.
 
Right.

And you'd think someone, somewhere would be spilling the beans.

Could you imagine the press on the person if he had tangible evidence?

Now, its all theory and conjecture, based on hearsay and faulty analysis.

YouTube - The Senator Wellstone Assassination
While many citizens believe that Senator Paul Wellstone's ...
59 min -
[ame]www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Vbf49kzWFw[/ame]

frontline: the man who knew | PBSFBI Special Agent John O'Neill was the FBI's leading expert on Al Qaeda. But to people at FBI headquarters he was too much of a maverick and they stopped ...
www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/knew/ - 16k
l
Tragedy struck a 9/11 family for a second time when the daughter of one of the hijacked pilots was killed in a suspicious blaze in New Jersey yesterday.

Wendy Burlingame, 32, and her two dogs died when flames ripped through her 10th-floor apartment in Guttenberg, Hudson County.

Burlingame was the daughter of American Airlines pilot Charles (Chick) Burlingame, whose plane crashed into the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001.

"It's just an extreme tragedy," said Tim Sumner, who knew Wendy Burlingame from the 9/11 Families survivor group. "It's an amazing blow to that family."

Wendy Burlingame's aunt, Debra Burlingame, a member of the World Trade Center Memorial Foundation board, was too heartbroken to speak last night.

The fire broke out about 12:30 a.m. in the Galaxy Towers apartment Burlingame shared with her fiancé, Kevin Roderick.

Neighbors said Burlingame moved into the apartment overlooking the Hudson River about a month ago. Roderick escaped the fire.

Firefighters battled the stubborn blaze for about three hours before bringing it under control. Firefighters found Burlingame's body in a hallway between the kitchen and a bedroom, investigators said.

"It is suspicious at this point because the cause and origin have not been established," Hudson County Prosecutor Edward De Fazio said.

De Fazio said the fire damaged neighboring apartments. A neighbor reported hearing a commotion coming from Burlingame's apartment just before the fire alarms in the building sounded.

Originally published on December 6, 2006

BY HELEN KENNEDY and BILL HUTCHINSON


Dr David Kelly
In 2003 Dr David Kelly was found dead in the woods. Caught in a political vortex, Dr Kelly had been forced to appear before a televised government committee investigating whether he had accused British government figures of planting in a dossier the questionable claim that WMDs could be unleashed from Iraq in 45 minutes. The Hutton Inquiry concluded that Dr Kelly took his own life. But did he?

Uncovering the Truth about the Death of David KellyCelsius 911 World Takeover & the War of Terror ..... A coroner has the power of subpoena, witnesses give testimony under oath and a jury is usually involved ...
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=3249 - 71k




and there are more.....dead men tell no tales
 
- Cite This Source
incredulous [inˈkredjuləs, (American) -dʒu-] adjective

unwilling to believe
Example: he listened to him with an incredulous expression.

adjective
not disposed or willing to believe
 
- Cite This Source
incredulous [inˈkredjuləs, (American) -dʒu-] adjective

unwilling to believe
Example: he listened to him with an incredulous expression.

adjective
not disposed or willing to believe

How about we just conclude that you are trying to fill the unknown with a series of hypotheticals that all just "happen" to fit the way you would like to believe the unknown to be. Or aren't you able to see your DESIRE for there to have been a conspiracy ?
 
How about we just conclude that you are trying to fill the unknown with a series of hypotheticals that all just "happen" to fit the way you would like to believe the unknown to be. Or aren't you able to see your DESIRE for there to have been a conspiracy ?

how about we conclude the need for a real 911 investigation instead
and definitively prove or disprove the official conspiracy theory
 
how about we conclude the need for a real 911 investigation instead
and definitively prove or disprove the official conspiracy theory

Go for it. Anything would be better than the stories you use to fill in the "blanks". Are you gonna pay for it too ?
 
People are always adding speculation to facts in an attempt to re-write or, add to history.

This is one of those cases and regardless of how much time and money is spent in all the 'investigations' to come, nothing truly new (and true) can ever be added.
 
not surprised your willing to fund billions for a invasion of another country based on lies or just accept the missing trillions from the pentagon but not to know the truth ,that you want me to pay for .the mock commission had a budget of 3 million so 6 might buy some real answers a small price to pay in relation to all that
 

Forum List

Back
Top