60 Truths about Liberal Democrats

That comes from one of the most screwball websites I've seen in awhile. I thought I'd seen every variation the Theonomist's and Reconstructionist's could come up with, but this one takes the cake.

Most Reconstructionist's and their fellow travelers at least have SOME semblance of Christianity on which to base their lunacy. Not this bunch!

They first say this about themselves:

A nonprofit, nondenominational Christian (religious) ministry

Then, they say this:

Family Guardian does not have any religious tests or faith requirements, other than that people are believers. They don't have to be Methodists or Buddhists or Christians or Mormons or Jehovah's Witnesses, or any other such thing, as long as they:

4 Strictly follow the laws in whatever sacred book their God is described in.* They put allegiance to those laws above that of any earthly law or government or man.

Family Guardian Fellowship Website - Nonprofit Christian ministry dedicated to protecting American families from fraud etc | Love for Life

They don't even know what a Christian is, yet have the audacity to interpret holy Scriptures while denying what it says!

It's not surprising that their interpretation of Scripture is WAAAAY off base.

You'd be well advised to stay away from that kind dangerous heresy.


We can't be having any of that religious tolerance among the religious.

No sir.

That stuff's dangerous.
 
Last edited:
Every major freedom in our society has come from liberals.....ending slavery, womens vote, civil rights, gay rights.......FACT



Ending slavery was a debacle. We're still feeling the effects of that particular high-handed play. "Freeing" people to starve or steal in a ruined economy was perhaps the stupidest thing the federal government has ever done.

Did the ex-slaves receive any land, any reparations, any recompense for their servitude?

Hell no.

People are still suffering from it.

Are you dim enough to think slavery wouldn't have ended without the illegal, immoral invasion of the southern states?

It really does relate well to modern liberalism -- using the physical force of the state to make people's lives miserable.
 
That comes from one of the most screwball websites I've seen in awhile. I thought I'd seen every variation the Theonomist's and Reconstructionist's could come up with, but this one takes the cake.

Most Reconstructionist's and their fellow travelers at least have SOME semblance of Christianity on which to base their lunacy. Not this bunch!

They first say this about themselves:

A nonprofit, nondenominational Christian (religious) ministry

Then, they say this:

Family Guardian does not have any religious tests or faith requirements, other than that people are believers. They don't have to be Methodists or Buddhists or Christians or Mormons or Jehovah's Witnesses, or any other such thing, as long as they:

4 Strictly follow the laws in whatever sacred book their God is described in.* They put allegiance to those laws above that of any earthly law or government or man.

Family Guardian Fellowship Website - Nonprofit Christian ministry dedicated to protecting American families from fraud etc | Love for Life

They don't even know what a Christian is, yet have the audacity to interpret holy Scriptures while denying what it says!

It's not surprising that their interpretation of Scripture is WAAAAY off base.

You'd be well advised to stay away from that kind dangerous heresy.


We can't be having any of that religious tolerance among the religious.

No sir.

That stuff's dangerous.

:lol:
 
.. sheesh.. and this is just the first ten...enjoy

----------------------------:popcorn:

1)At the most basic level, the Liberal is anti-God. He is an intellectually dishonest, unprincipled, mentally immature, spoiled child who is forever in search of a world without moral consequence. That is why the Liberal makes "The State" his god. The Liberal worships THE STATE. The Liberal attempts to use his god (government) to eliminate all moral consequences for immoral behavior. In the name of "Justice," the Liberal also pretends to make his god (The State) "level" all peoples so that the wise or the beautiful or the genius will have no advantage over the unwise, the ugly and the simpleton in the marketplace. The Liberal calls this tyrannical State of Government, UTOPIA.

2)The Liberal vainly imagines that freedom from moral consequence can be secured by a collectivist, totalitarian state.

3)Liberals use moralistic platitudes and catchy phrases like "social justice" and "The Brotherhood of Man" to appeal to the naive masses who are duped into believing that the ultimate goals of Liberals are genuinely benign and beneficient. However at the root, like the Prince in Machiavelli's greatest work, the single moral principle that Liberals adhere to is the continual accumulation and centralization of all power.

4)The ideologies of Liberals must inevitably end in world-wide totalitarianism.

5)All non-sexual individual freedoms are despised by the Liberal. Why? Because those kinds of individual freedoms, (such as economic self-reliance) demand moral responsibility.

6)The fundamental power struggle of Liberals may be classified as the individual versus the collective. The Liberal supports the collective in every contest against the individual. The individual must be relieved of all power in favor of the collective. All power must be centralized.

7)Liberals hate Individualism because it demands moral responsibility. Liberals support collectivism because they hope to eliminate the need for moral responsibility.

8)The U.S. Constitution and specifically the support for rugged individualism which is evident in the Bill of Rights, is the enemy of the Liberal.

9)The Liberal despises the United States because it is the premier protector and promoter of individualism in the world.

10)In the mind of a Liberal, all institutions and concerns schools, environment, courts, etc. - serve no relevant purpose other than the promotion of collectivism.

More at the link...


60 Hard Truths About "Liberals"

Don't you get tired of demonizing liberals with this bullshit absolute thinking? I know you are scared to learn new things when it comes to politics, but posting crap like this that is painfully inaccurate makes you look like a tool.

You can be conservative and still consider the point of view of people you don't agree with in general. I seriously doubt you know anything about the left besides what you hear on Fox News or from nutters like Glenn Beck and Limbaugh.
 
Last edited:
.. sheesh.. and this is just the first ten...enjoy

----------------------------:popcorn:

1)At the most basic level, the Liberal is anti-God. He is an intellectually dishonest, unprincipled, mentally immature, spoiled child who is forever in search of a world without moral consequence. That is why the Liberal makes "The State" his god. The Liberal worships THE STATE. The Liberal attempts to use his god (government) to eliminate all moral consequences for immoral behavior. In the name of "Justice," the Liberal also pretends to make his god (The State) "level" all peoples so that the wise or the beautiful or the genius will have no advantage over the unwise, the ugly and the simpleton in the marketplace. The Liberal calls this tyrannical State of Government, UTOPIA.

2)The Liberal vainly imagines that freedom from moral consequence can be secured by a collectivist, totalitarian state.

3)Liberals use moralistic platitudes and catchy phrases like "social justice" and "The Brotherhood of Man" to appeal to the naive masses who are duped into believing that the ultimate goals of Liberals are genuinely benign and beneficient. However at the root, like the Prince in Machiavelli's greatest work, the single moral principle that Liberals adhere to is the continual accumulation and centralization of all power.

4)The ideologies of Liberals must inevitably end in world-wide totalitarianism.

5)All non-sexual individual freedoms are despised by the Liberal. Why? Because those kinds of individual freedoms, (such as economic self-reliance) demand moral responsibility.

6)The fundamental power struggle of Liberals may be classified as the individual versus the collective. The Liberal supports the collective in every contest against the individual. The individual must be relieved of all power in favor of the collective. All power must be centralized.

7)Liberals hate Individualism because it demands moral responsibility. Liberals support collectivism because they hope to eliminate the need for moral responsibility.

8)The U.S. Constitution and specifically the support for rugged individualism which is evident in the Bill of Rights, is the enemy of the Liberal.

9)The Liberal despises the United States because it is the premier protector and promoter of individualism in the world.

10)In the mind of a Liberal, all institutions and concerns schools, environment, courts, etc. - serve no relevant purpose other than the promotion of collectivism.

More at the link...


60 Hard Truths About "Liberals"

Don't you get tired of demonizing liberals with this bullshit absolute thinking? I know you are scared to learn new things when it comes to politics, but posting crap like this that is painfully inaccurate makes you look like a tool.

You can be conservative and still consider the point of view of people you don't agree with in general. I seriously doubt you know anything about the left besides what you hear on Fox News or from nutters like Glenn Beck and Limbaugh.

:lol:.. You ask for tolerance with one hand and demand/insult to stifle the opposing view with the other..correct

In essence, I believe your method and point of view is on the list.
 
Last edited:
.. sheesh.. and this is just the first ten...enjoy

----------------------------:popcorn:

1)At the most basic level, the Liberal is anti-G-d.

That's as far as I got before I realized what nonsense this is.

While some Liberals are anti-G-d, not all are; and it's not because they are Liberal as there are many Conservatives who are also anti-G-d.

After determining that was complete nonsense, there was really no reason to continue.
 
.. sheesh.. and this is just the first ten...enjoy

----------------------------:popcorn:

1)At the most basic level, the Liberal is anti-G-d.

That's as far as I got before I realized what nonsense this is.

While some Liberals are anti-G-d, not all are; and it's not because they are Liberal as there are many Conservatives who are also anti-G-d.

After determining that was complete nonsense, there was really no reason to continue.

Okay..
 
That comes from one of the most screwball websites I've seen in awhile. I thought I'd seen every variation the Theonomist's and Reconstructionist's could come up with, but this one takes the cake.

Most Reconstructionist's and their fellow travelers at least have SOME semblance of Christianity on which to base their lunacy. Not this bunch!

They first say this about themselves:

A nonprofit, nondenominational Christian (religious) ministry

Then, they say this:

Family Guardian does not have any religious tests or faith requirements, other than that people are believers. They don't have to be Methodists or Buddhists or Christians or Mormons or Jehovah's Witnesses, or any other such thing, as long as they:

4 Strictly follow the laws in whatever sacred book their God is described in.* They put allegiance to those laws above that of any earthly law or government or man.

Family Guardian Fellowship Website - Nonprofit Christian ministry dedicated to protecting American families from fraud etc | Love for Life

They don't even know what a Christian is, yet have the audacity to interpret holy Scriptures while denying what it says!

It's not surprising that their interpretation of Scripture is WAAAAY off base.

You'd be well advised to stay away from that kind dangerous heresy.

.............................................

I don't know what you think you have accomplished here. I kept waiting for you to refute the article...but you never did. You called it a few names. But the premise, the logic, the reasoning....you ran from all that.
 
The liberals want to turn this country into a police state like the USSR. I'm dead serious.

Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.
Daniel Patrick Moynihan


FALSE...

I've been around since Harry Truman was President, so I lived through a good portion of the liberal era that started with the New Deal and ended with the Great Society. It was America's finest moment. It was an era with huge economic growth and shared wealth, fantastic successes in technology, vast expansion of citizen freedoms and liberties and the growth of a middle class that defined this country and made America the 'city on the hill', the envy of the world.

That era ended at the end of the 1960's and the conservative era began. It has continued ever since. It has been a negative mirror image of the liberal era. We now lead the world only in the dubious like incarcerating human beings, killing innocent people and launching Hirohito sneak attacks on sovereign nations.

Here are your names for the day...Nixon, Reagan.

XD0F1b6.gif


While not all conservatives are authoritarians; all highly authoritarian personalities are political conservatives.
Robert Altmeyer - The Authoritarians
 
The author of the links provided in the OP is Ludwig Von Mises who had this to say about Fascism in one of his books;

It cannot be denied that Fascism and similar movements aiming at the establishment of dictatorships are full of the best intentions and that their intervention has, for the moment, saved European civilization. The merit that Fascism has thereby won for itself will live on eternally in history.

His ideas about women and liberals are hardly any more credible. Best to pass on someone who might have known what he was talking about when it came to economics but was a complete and utter fool when it came to people.

Even staunch conservatives rejected his ideas about human nature.

Economic historian Bruce Caldwell writes that in the mid-20th century, with the ascendance of positivism and Keynesianism, Mises came to be perceived by many as the "archetypal 'unscientific' economist."[23] In a 1957 review of his book The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality, The Economist said of von Mises: "Professor von Mises has a splendid analytical mind and an admirable passion for liberty; but as a student of human nature he is worse than null and as a debater he is of Hyde Park standard."[24] Conservative commentator Whittaker Chambers published a similarly negative review of that book in the National Review, stating that Mises's thesis that anti-capitalist sentiment was rooted in "envy" epitomized "know-nothing conservatism" at its "know-nothingest."[25]

Economist Milton Friedman considered Mises inflexible in his thinking:[27]
The story I remember best happened at the initial Mont Pelerin meeting when he got up and said, "You're all a bunch of socialists." We were discussing the distribution of income, and whether you should have progressive income taxes. Some of the people there were expressing the view that there could be a justification for it.

Ludwig von Mises - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
.. sheesh.. and this is just the first ten...enjoy

----------------------------:popcorn:

1)At the most basic level, the Liberal is anti-God. He is an intellectually dishonest, unprincipled, mentally immature, spoiled child who is forever in search of a world without moral consequence. That is why the Liberal makes "The State" his god. The Liberal worships THE STATE. The Liberal attempts to use his god (government) to eliminate all moral consequences for immoral behavior. In the name of "Justice," the Liberal also pretends to make his god (The State) "level" all peoples so that the wise or the beautiful or the genius will have no advantage over the unwise, the ugly and the simpleton in the marketplace. The Liberal calls this tyrannical State of Government, UTOPIA.

2)The Liberal vainly imagines that freedom from moral consequence can be secured by a collectivist, totalitarian state.

3)Liberals use moralistic platitudes and catchy phrases like "social justice" and "The Brotherhood of Man" to appeal to the naive masses who are duped into believing that the ultimate goals of Liberals are genuinely benign and beneficient. However at the root, like the Prince in Machiavelli's greatest work, the single moral principle that Liberals adhere to is the continual accumulation and centralization of all power.

4)The ideologies of Liberals must inevitably end in world-wide totalitarianism.

5)All non-sexual individual freedoms are despised by the Liberal. Why? Because those kinds of individual freedoms, (such as economic self-reliance) demand moral responsibility.

6)The fundamental power struggle of Liberals may be classified as the individual versus the collective. The Liberal supports the collective in every contest against the individual. The individual must be relieved of all power in favor of the collective. All power must be centralized.

7)Liberals hate Individualism because it demands moral responsibility. Liberals support collectivism because they hope to eliminate the need for moral responsibility.

8)The U.S. Constitution and specifically the support for rugged individualism which is evident in the Bill of Rights, is the enemy of the Liberal.

9)The Liberal despises the United States because it is the premier protector and promoter of individualism in the world.

10)In the mind of a Liberal, all institutions and concerns schools, environment, courts, etc. - serve no relevant purpose other than the promotion of collectivism.

More at the link...


60 Hard Truths About "Liberals"

Don't you get tired of demonizing liberals with this bullshit absolute thinking? I know you are scared to learn new things when it comes to politics, but posting crap like this that is painfully inaccurate makes you look like a tool.

You can be conservative and still consider the point of view of people you don't agree with in general. I seriously doubt you know anything about the left besides what you hear on Fox News or from nutters like Glenn Beck and Limbaugh.

:lol:.. You ask for tolerance with one hand and demand/insult to stifle the opposing view with the other..correct

In essence, I believe your method and point of view is on the list.

No see what i am stifling is hyperbole bullshit. I am not stifling the right in general. The fact that you can't tell the difference is what's pathetic. There are many conservative viewpoints I respect. There are a few conservative commentators i respect. You on the other hand dismiss anything that has to do with the left. That makes you a coward who fears cognitive dissonance.
 
The author of the links provided in the OP is Ludwig Von Mises who had this to say about Fascism in one of his books;

It cannot be denied that Fascism and similar movements aiming at the establishment of dictatorships are full of the best intentions and that their intervention has, for the moment, saved European civilization. The merit that Fascism has thereby won for itself will live on eternally in history.

His ideas about women and liberals are hardly any more credible. Best to pass on someone who might have known what he was talking about when it came to economics but was a complete and utter fool when it came to people.

You left off the giant "BUT," that comes after these couple of sentences. That's because you're a giant POS lying scumbag.

Even staunch conservatives rejected his ideas about human nature.

Economic historian Bruce Caldwell writes that in the mid-20th century, with the ascendance of positivism and Keynesianism, Mises came to be perceived by many as the "archetypal 'unscientific' economist."[23] In a 1957 review of his book The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality, The Economist said of von Mises: "Professor von Mises has a splendid analytical mind and an admirable passion for liberty; but as a student of human nature he is worse than null and as a debater he is of Hyde Park standard."[24] Conservative commentator Whittaker Chambers published a similarly negative review of that book in the National Review, stating that Mises's thesis that anti-capitalist sentiment was rooted in "envy" epitomized "know-nothing conservatism" at its "know-nothingest."[25]

ROFL! And why should anyone take their opinion on anything? The economist is well known for being a disciple of the Keynesian mumbo-jumbo that Mises soundly rejected and disproved. Chambers may have been a profound anti-communist, but primarily for religious reasons. On economic matters he was a babbling fool.

Economist Milton Friedman considered Mises inflexible in his thinking:[27] The story I remember best happened at the initial Mont Pelerin meeting when he got up and said, "You're all a bunch of socialists." We were discussing the distribution of income, and whether you should have progressive income taxes. Some of the people there were expressing the view that there could be a justification for it.

Ludwig von Mises - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yeah, and Mises was right. Milton Friedman dreamed up the system of tax withholding when he worked for the Roosevelt administration during the war. Friedman isn't as much of a die-hard laizzes fair capitalist as most people believe. For example, he was a great exponent of fiat money and the Federal Reserve. He was quite naive when it came to the capacity for the federal government to reform itself.

You proved only that many of the supporters of the market have been infected with many of the premises of socialism.
 
Last edited:
While not all conservatives are authoritarians; all highly authoritarian personalities are political conservatives.
Robert Altmeyer - The Authoritarians

You mean like Chairman Mao, Joseph Stalin and Obama?
 

Forum List

Back
Top