Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
As Americans face a fiscal cliff, the Obamas make do with 54 Christmas trees by Andrew Malcolm - Investors.com
Oh, maybe the Obamination family calls them "holiday trees," but still 54 trees for the White House.
Since liberals here are worried about a private citizen in Mitt Romney buying an Audi.....what about the so-called "GREEN" POTUS killing 54 trees to decorate his house?
Or what about blowing that much money on being an over the top show off during a budget crisis and millions out of work......
Come on liberals, explain this away.
54 dead trees????
Read up, Champ. I bolded a bit so it won't tax you too much.You're either an idiot or a liar to not know about the Army and Marine personnel cuts made by Obamination to "save money."
Fuck off, you piece of shit.
Obama is firing the Marines?
Link, please.
How will the tots get toys, now?
Rep. Randy Forbes, R-Va., chairman of the U.S. House Armed Services subcommittee on readiness, said July 26 at a hearing that the estimate is based on an 11.3 percent cut across all U.S. Defense Department accounts, except for military personnel, which he assumes would likely be exempted from cuts. The budget cuts would be required by sequestration, which are automatic cuts that would be triggered Jan. 2 if a long-term budget-cutting deal is not struck.
Forecast: 89,000 civilian job cuts at DoD under sequestration | Defense News | defensenews.com
As Americans face a fiscal cliff, the Obamas make do with 54 Christmas trees by Andrew Malcolm - Investors.com
Oh, maybe the Obamination family calls them "holiday trees," but still 54 trees for the White House.
Since liberals here are worried about a private citizen in Mitt Romney buying an Audi.....what about the so-called "GREEN" POTUS killing 54 trees to decorate his house?
Or what about blowing that much money on being an over the top show off during a budget crisis and millions out of work......
Come on liberals, explain this away.
54 dead trees????
That's one expense that should be on him and since he is doing quite well financially, thanks to the tax payers, I am sure he had no trouble paying for all of them. It seems over the top, but who cares.
Actually, I'd be more worried if there were no Christmas trees, but as long as he is footing the bill, I don't care. Maybe tax payers have to pay for the ones the public would see during tours of the White House. Do they still allow tours?
Still, no Marine has lost his/her job, Skippy. Personnel cuts do not mean Marines are being fired, you know.Good god, you're a fucking idiot. The pending DoD cuts will cost about 1 million jobs across the DoD and contractors according to studies.
The 47,000 Army and Marines personnel FIRED from the military has already been put into motion by ex-SECDEF Gates. You are just a dumbfuck on the internet acting like you know your ass from your mouth.
I'm sure those able bodied Vets without jobs today appreciate scum like you defending the fraud, waste and abuse of 54 Christmas trees by Obamination.
“New” fiscally prudent Obama cuts military personnel, raising veteran family health care premiums | Flopping Aces
Read up, Champ. I bolded a bit so it won't tax you too much.You're either an idiot or a liar to not know about the Army and Marine personnel cuts made by Obamination to "save money."
Fuck off, you piece of shit.
Rep. Randy Forbes, R-Va., chairman of the U.S. House Armed Services subcommittee on readiness, said July 26 at a hearing that the estimate is based on an 11.3 percent cut across all U.S. Defense Department accounts, except for military personnel, which he assumes would likely be exempted from cuts. The budget cuts would be required by sequestration, which are automatic cuts that would be triggered Jan. 2 if a long-term budget-cutting deal is not struck.
Forecast: 89,000 civilian job cuts at DoD under sequestration | Defense News | defensenews.com
As Americans face a fiscal cliff, the Obamas make do with 54 Christmas trees by Andrew Malcolm - Investors.com
Oh, maybe the Obamination family calls them "holiday trees," but still 54 trees for the White House.
Since liberals here are worried about a private citizen in Mitt Romney buying an Audi.....what about the so-called "GREEN" POTUS killing 54 trees to decorate his house?
Or what about blowing that much money on being an over the top show off during a budget crisis and millions out of work......
Come on liberals, explain this away.
54 dead trees????
That's one expense that should be on him and since he is doing quite well financially, thanks to the tax payers, I am sure he had no trouble paying for all of them. It seems over the top, but who cares.
Actually, I'd be more worried if there were no Christmas trees, but as long as he is footing the bill, I don't care. Maybe tax payers have to pay for the ones the public would see during tours of the White House. Do they still allow tours?
Many idiots here seem to think blowing taxpayer money on 54 trees during a budget mess is no big deal.
I have no problem with 1-5 decorated trees for the public to view on tours but 54 is outrageous.
As Americans face a fiscal cliff, the Obamas make do with 54 Christmas trees by Andrew Malcolm - Investors.com
Oh, maybe the Obamination family calls them "holiday trees," but still 54 trees for the White House.
Since liberals here are worried about a private citizen in Mitt Romney buying an Audi.....what about the so-called "GREEN" POTUS killing 54 trees to decorate his house?
Or what about blowing that much money on being an over the top show off during a budget crisis and millions out of work......
Come on liberals, explain this away.
54 dead trees????
That's one expense that should be on him and since he is doing quite well financially, thanks to the tax payers, I am sure he had no trouble paying for all of them. It seems over the top, but who cares.
Actually, I'd be more worried if there were no Christmas trees, but as long as he is footing the bill, I don't care. Maybe tax payers have to pay for the ones the public would see during tours of the White House. Do they still allow tours?
Still, no Marine has lost his/her job, Skippy. Personnel cuts do not mean Marines are being fired, you know.Good god, you're a fucking idiot. The pending DoD cuts will cost about 1 million jobs across the DoD and contractors according to studies.
The 47,000 Army and Marines personnel FIRED from the military has already been put into motion by ex-SECDEF Gates. You are just a dumbfuck on the internet acting like you know your ass from your mouth.
I'm sure those able bodied Vets without jobs today appreciate scum like you defending the fraud, waste and abuse of 54 Christmas trees by Obamination.
“New” fiscally prudent Obama cuts military personnel, raising veteran family health care premiums | Flopping Aces
Read up, Champ. I bolded a bit so it won't tax you too much.
Rep. Randy Forbes, R-Va., chairman of the U.S. House Armed Services subcommittee on readiness, said July 26 at a hearing that the estimate is based on an 11.3 percent cut across all U.S. Defense Department accounts, except for military personnel, which he assumes would likely be exempted from cuts. The budget cuts would be required by sequestration, which are automatic cuts that would be triggered Jan. 2 if a long-term budget-cutting deal is not struck.
Forecast: 89,000 civilian job cuts at DoD under sequestration | Defense News | defensenews.com
Civilians maybe, but not Marines.
So did the Bush's.As Americans face a fiscal cliff, the Obamas make do with 54 Christmas trees by Andrew Malcolm - Investors.com
Oh, maybe the Obamination family calls them "holiday trees," but still 54 trees for the White House.
Since liberals here are worried about a private citizen in Mitt Romney buying an Audi.....what about the so-called "GREEN" POTUS killing 54 trees to decorate his house?
Or what about blowing that much money on being an over the top show off during a budget crisis and millions out of work......
Come on liberals, explain this away.
54 dead trees????
That's one expense that should be on him and since he is doing quite well financially, thanks to the tax payers, I am sure he had no trouble paying for all of them. It seems over the top, but who cares.
Actually, I'd be more worried if there were no Christmas trees, but as long as he is footing the bill, I don't care. Maybe tax payers have to pay for the ones the public would see during tours of the White House. Do they still allow tours?
The Obamas allow tours.
Many idiots here seem to think blowing taxpayer money on 54 trees during a budget mess is no big deal.
I have no problem with 1-5 decorated trees for the public to view on tours but 54 is outrageous.
That's one expense that should be on him and since he is doing quite well financially, thanks to the tax payers, I am sure he had no trouble paying for all of them. It seems over the top, but who cares.
Actually, I'd be more worried if there were no Christmas trees, but as long as he is footing the bill, I don't care. Maybe tax payers have to pay for the ones the public would see during tours of the White House. Do they still allow tours?
So, you were red with outrage when the Bush's had 50 trees, right? When Laura loved to decorate her trees with all hand painted specially commissioned bulbs, right?
Many idiots here seem to think blowing taxpayer money on 54 trees during a budget mess is no big deal.
I have no problem with 1-5 decorated trees for the public to view on tours but 54 is outrageous.
That's one expense that should be on him and since he is doing quite well financially, thanks to the tax payers, I am sure he had no trouble paying for all of them. It seems over the top, but who cares.
Actually, I'd be more worried if there were no Christmas trees, but as long as he is footing the bill, I don't care. Maybe tax payers have to pay for the ones the public would see during tours of the White House. Do they still allow tours?
So, you were red with outrage when the Bush's had 50 trees, right? When Laura loved to decorate her trees with all hand painted specially commissioned bulbs, right?
I'll type slowly......You keep digging for more stupid, don't you?
Obamination told the DoD to downsize the Army and Marines to "save money" so soldiers and Marines were told their enlistements wouldn't be renewed.....so they were fired.
Now those fired Marines and soldiers can sit at home seeing idiots like you defend blowing $500,000 to $1,000,000 on christmas trees in the White House after that money could've kept them serving with a job.
Shut the fuck up.
Still, no Marine has lost his/her job, Skippy. Personnel cuts do not mean Marines are being fired, you know.Good god, you're a fucking idiot. The pending DoD cuts will cost about 1 million jobs across the DoD and contractors according to studies.
The 47,000 Army and Marines personnel FIRED from the military has already been put into motion by ex-SECDEF Gates. You are just a dumbfuck on the internet acting like you know your ass from your mouth.
I'm sure those able bodied Vets without jobs today appreciate scum like you defending the fraud, waste and abuse of 54 Christmas trees by Obamination.
New fiscally prudent Obama cuts military personnel, raising veteran family health care premiums | Flopping Aces
Civilians maybe, but not Marines.
Many idiots here seem to think blowing taxpayer money on 54 trees during a budget mess is no big deal.
I have no problem with 1-5 decorated trees for the public to view on tours but 54 is outrageous.
So, you were red with outrage when the Bush's had 50 trees, right? When Laura loved to decorate her trees with all hand painted specially commissioned bulbs, right?
I do not agree with the outrage over this...
But I believe GB is referring to the fact that such was done by the Obama White House amist a serious debate about the fiscal cliff....
Did the Bush's do it when 24 million Americans were out of work? When unemployment was at 8% or higher for 4 straight years? When 47 million Americans were on food stamps?
If not....debate him on the topic....let him know the White House has a responsibility to show the rest of the world how we move forward despite our challanges....not by comparing him to a man who has not been in the white house for 4 years....and governed under a different set of circumstances.
So did the Bush's.That's one expense that should be on him and since he is doing quite well financially, thanks to the tax payers, I am sure he had no trouble paying for all of them. It seems over the top, but who cares.
Actually, I'd be more worried if there were no Christmas trees, but as long as he is footing the bill, I don't care. Maybe tax payers have to pay for the ones the public would see during tours of the White House. Do they still allow tours?
The Obamas allow tours.
And, it's not either family's call, you know.
and that is why he will be remembered as an infinately better president...and Obamas only claim to fame will be the "First African American President"..Many idiots here seem to think blowing taxpayer money on 54 trees during a budget mess is no big deal.
I have no problem with 1-5 decorated trees for the public to view on tours but 54 is outrageous.
So, you were red with outrage when the Bush's had 50 trees, right? When Laura loved to decorate her trees with all hand painted specially commissioned bulbs, right?
Bush didn't engage in class warfare, nor did he constantly admonish the working man to spend less on himself but more on taxes, and tighten his belt in order to better serve everyone else.
Yup. And, the temporary closure was not the First Family's call. Any closure or opening is not the First Family's call.So did the Bush's.The Obamas allow tours.
And, it's not either family's call, you know.
The white house was closed to tours after sept. 11th, and was opened very limitedly a few years later. Now many of those limits have been lifted. The white house is expecting around 100k people to tour this holiday season.
I'll type slowly......You keep digging for more stupid, don't you?
Obamination told the DoD to downsize the Army and Marines to "save money" so soldiers and Marines were told their enlistements wouldn't be renewed.....so they were fired.
Now those fired Marines and soldiers can sit at home seeing idiots like you defend blowing $500,000 to $1,000,000 on christmas trees in the White House after that money could've kept them serving with a job.
Shut the fuck up.
Still, no Marine has lost his/her job, Skippy. Personnel cuts do not mean Marines are being fired, you know.
Civilians maybe, but not Marines.
That doesn't mean any military personnel, enlisted or commissioned, are going to be fired. It DOES mean that the budget for additional personnel would be less.
And, no one has a right to have a tour or commission renewed or even a right to serve.
I swear.... I am not kidding you.
But, I give you this: Now you're on a more important topic than WH Xmas trees.
