44 Senators kill Sassy Ben Sasse's anti-infanticide anti-abortion pro-life bill

[The Purge]

How can ANYONE BLOCK medical care for a BORN ALIVE ABORTION SURVIVOR..... The left has absolutely NO ETHICS, MORALS, OR PRINCIPLES.....how can any THINKING and FEELINGZ human vote for these piles of shit???..simply beyond comprehension!!!!

Senate Democrats on Monday defeated a GOP attempt to advance legislation that would clarify that babies who survive attempted abortions must receive medical care.

Republicans and anti-abortion advocates pushed for the bill, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, to receive a vote so that they could put individual senators on the spot regarding the issue of third-trimester abortion. GOP senators have been aiming to pressure Democrats to state whether they believe any limits should be placed on abortion after controversial comments appearing to indicate otherwise from Democratic Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam.

The legislation fell short of the 60 votes it needed to advance in a procedural maneuver, 53 to 44. Democrats Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, Joe Manchin of West Virginia, and Doug Jones of Alabama joined all Republicans present in voting in favor.

Democrats block bill to ensure medical care for abortion survivors

 

[OKTexas]

It's all part of their plan to replace the US population with third world shit that will be their base. It's time to use their tactics and take this to court.

.

 

[Timmy]

Aren’t you pro death penalty?

That person on death row had his day in court with a jury of 12 peers. That baby never did.

Should we give the zygote a trial ?

Ever think of people wrongfully convicted?

The zygote is a human being. We know, you and other libs call it a blob, a mass, zygote.....just anything to try to cleanse your own mind from the killing of an actual human being that has taken place. You cant desensitize it.

It’s a potential human . It is not viable on its own .

Dude a fertilized egg needs the exact same things to live as a born human.......it's a person

potential is a sperm or egg...since they have to come together to form....a person......

That’s a disingenuous argument .

An egg is not viable on its own. It can’t live outside the mother .

You can take a newborn away from the mom and care for it just fine .

 

[Timmy]

It’s a potential human . It is not viable on its own .

Is a one year old child viable on its own? How about at two years?

Tell you what . When a woman has a month old fetus removed from her you can then take and care for it . Abortion problem solved !

 

[Chuz Life]

No respect for life...

Aren’t you pro death penalty?

Lol
Quit falling down the well
Who is more innocent a convicted violent criminal or an unborn baby?
Some assholes have no right to live

So call yourself pro innocent. You can't be pro life if you actively support the death penalty.

Sure you can.

 

[Hale]

That’s a disingenuous argument .
An egg is not viable on its own. It can’t live outside the mother .
You can take a newborn away from the mom and care for it just fine .

No, your argument is disingenuous. On one hand you're depriving care (removing the egg from it's mother), on the other you're providing care (by someone other than the mother).

Deprive care from the newborn and it will die, the same as the egg.

 

[Wry Catcher]

IF attacks on R v. W are successful, and it is repealed, more backstreet abortions will occur, putting the life of the women in jeopardy. More unwanted and unplanned pregnancies will occur as more efforts to demean planned parenthood and limit the number of clinics which perform legal abortions continues.

Of course most "outraged" posts on abortion have zero concern for the fetus. Their posts are filled by false pathos solely to benefit the GOP, the party that also whines about abortions. But a party that has done nothing to repeal R v. W, or to reduce the number of abortions by supporting age appropriate education in the Public Schools on a comprehensive health curriculum which includes human sexuality and topics on contraception and STD's.

 

[Timmy]

They also ignore the fact that many pregnancies end in heartbreak .

For example you may have a severely deformed fetus that may live a few minutes post birth . This law would require the doctors to try to save the fetus ?! That’s insnane .

 

[Timmy]

That’s a disingenuous argument .
An egg is not viable on its own. It can’t live outside the mother .
You can take a newborn away from the mom and care for it just fine .

No, your argument is disingenuous. On one hand you're depriving care (removing the egg from it's mother), on the other you're providing care (by someone other than the mother).

Deprive care from the newborn and it will die, the same as the egg.

If somthing is viable it can live independently. The fetus can not . Otherwise anyone could care for it . It is not viable on its own .

 

[The Purge]

They also ignore the fact that many pregnancies end in heartbreak .

For example you may have a severely deformed fetus that may live a few minutes post birth . This law would require the doctors to try to save the fetus ?! That’s insnane .

No it's not...YOU are insane it is a human life and because it is deformed YOU KILL IT....LET'S do that to the demented left...you first!

 

[BULLDOG]

No respect for life...

Aren’t you pro death penalty?

Lol
Quit falling down the well
Who is more innocent a convicted violent criminal or an unborn baby?
Some assholes have no right to live

So call yourself pro innocent. You can't be pro life if you actively support the death penalty.

Sure you can.

Not if honesty or integrity mean anything to you.

 

[Hale]

If somthing is viable it can live independently. The fetus can not . Otherwise anyone could care for it . It is not viable on its own .

You seem to define "viable" as both "able to live independently" and as "needing care to live".

This is contradictory; please give us your definition of "viable".

 

[Chuz Life]

No respect for life...

Aren’t you pro death penalty?

Lol
Quit falling down the well
Who is more innocent a convicted violent criminal or an unborn baby?
Some assholes have no right to live

So call yourself pro innocent. You can't be pro life if you actively support the death penalty.

Sure you can.

Not if honesty or integrity mean anything to you.

Bull shit.

Pro-life is a very broad term that basically means "opposed to legalized abortion" (look it up for yourself) it is not unusual at all to oppose abortion to protect innocent life and support the execution of violent criminals at the same time.

Apples and oranges. . . Unless you are a simpleton with an agenda, that is.

 

[progressive hunter]

America has a mental illness problem disguised as democrats

Oh please . Righties will freak out to protect a zygote yet turn a blind eye to the thousands and thousands of preventable gun deaths .

more lives are saved by guns each yr than taken,,,and the gun doesnt kill anyone

 

[buckeye45_73]

That person on death row had his day in court with a jury of 12 peers. That baby never did.

Should we give the zygote a trial ?

Ever think of people wrongfully convicted?

The zygote is a human being. We know, you and other libs call it a blob, a mass, zygote.....just anything to try to cleanse your own mind from the killing of an actual human being that has taken place. You cant desensitize it.

It’s a potential human . It is not viable on its own .

Dude a fertilized egg needs the exact same things to live as a born human.......it's a person

potential is a sperm or egg...since they have to come together to form....a person......

That’s a disingenuous argument .

An egg is not viable on its own. It can’t live outside the mother .

You can take a newborn away from the mom and care for it just fine .

no shit that's why an egg is POtential life.
a fertilized egg need everything we need to survive...food, air, water, nothing we dont.....

 

[Chuz Life]

They also ignore the fact that many pregnancies end in heartbreak .

For example you may have a severely deformed fetus that may live a few minutes post birth . This law would require the doctors to try to save the fetus ?! That’s insnane .

Does the Constitution say that ALL PERSONS are entitled to the equal protections of our laws? Or does it say that only "viable" persons have that right?

 

[basquebromance]

 

[basquebromance]

Kyrsten Sinema voted for Infanticide of any baby. She is Not Independent or Moderate. To 1,191,100 Arizona voters, u voted to kill innocent babies. Life begins at conception. Every baby born alive is a person. Ku Klux Klan hosted founder of Planed Parenthood. Abortion is MURDER.

 

[beagle9]

That person on death row had his day in court with a jury of 12 peers. That baby never did.

Should we give the zygote a trial ?

Ever think of people wrongfully convicted?

The zygote is a human being. We know, you and other libs call it a blob, a mass, zygote.....just anything to try to cleanse your own mind from the killing of an actual human being that has taken place. You cant desensitize it.

It’s a potential human . It is not viable on its own .

Dude a fertilized egg needs the exact same things to live as a born human.......it's a person

potential is a sperm or egg...since they have to come together to form....a person......

That’s a disingenuous argument .

An egg is not viable on its own. It can’t live outside the mother .

You can take a newborn away from the mom and care for it just fine .

No, your attempt at a rebuttal is not only disingenuous, but it is actually you grabbing at every straw that you can grab at, in order to try and make some kind of sense to your own craziness on such an issue in life.

What a fail..... No one's buying your bullcrap excuses, otherwise where you attempt to cover for a very disgusting situation that has developed over these many years, and especially in pertaining to the humanatarion compassionate caring of a developing human being inside of a woman's body.

 

[beagle9]

That’s a disingenuous argument .
An egg is not viable on its own. It can’t live outside the mother .
You can take a newborn away from the mom and care for it just fine .

No, your argument is disingenuous. On one hand you're depriving care (removing the egg from it's mother), on the other you're providing care (by someone other than the mother).

Deprive care from the newborn and it will die, the same as the egg.

If somthing is viable it can live independently. The fetus can not . Otherwise anyone could care for it . It is not viable on its own .

The mother is caring for it, until she decides she don't want it, then just goes down to the baby butcher to have it killed within her.