Design and purpose matters...I know it doesnt matter to those who want to compare SUVs to guns.
Inanimate objects are inanimate until the will of the user animates them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Design and purpose matters...I know it doesnt matter to those who want to compare SUVs to guns.
Existing law already requires ID. Unless you think you can be anonymous and go through a background check.
OK, how about this:
Voter ID's are fine, as long as the state government that requires them to be presented does the following:
- issue IDs to the voters free of charge
- provide transportation to and from any facility they need to go to in order to procure said IDs, and
- makes absolutely sure all voters have a reasonable amount of time to procure said IDs between the time the law is passed requiring them, and the next election.
If those procedures are followed, then a voter ID is not a poll tax, or a gimmick to stop people from voting, and is fair.
If they are not followed, then the state in question is interfering with the citizen's right to vote, and is therefore in violation of the Constitution.
I just don't think it's that big of an inconvenience, and provides minimal invasion on Constitutional right for maximum results.
Besides, a 3 day background check is a hell of a lot easier than the process New York City has in place right now to obtain a legal handgun.
I just don't think it's that big of an inconvenience, and provides minimal invasion on Constitutional right for maximum results.
Besides, a 3 day background check is a hell of a lot easier than the process New York City has in place right now to obtain a legal handgun.
We presently have back ground checks and waiting periods.
That still isn' t enough for you = the point.
Seems like a pretty good deal to me...
Wanna bet?
At the very least, it would provide a mechanism to identify and prosecute criminals who illegally obtain guns, while allowing law-abiding average citizens to own them without being hassled about it.
Existing law already requires ID. Unless you think you can be anonymous and go through a background check.
IDs can be faked, forged, or substituted with other people's IDs.
Background checks require quite a bit more.
I just don't think it's that big of an inconvenience, and provides minimal invasion on Constitutional right for maximum results.
Besides, a 3 day background check is a hell of a lot easier than the process New York City has in place right now to obtain a legal handgun.
I can see the need for background checks and waiting periods.
However, in return, there should be no need for gun licenses, and open carry laws should be the norm everywhere, except on private property where the owner doesn't allow it of course.
Right wingers want a higher level of proof and eligibility on the right to vote than to purchase assault rifles with 30 shot clips.
I agree it is a most important right.. hence why it should be verified that someone is not countering your right with an illegal vote
It is an important right, hence it should not be abridged on capricious grounds.
No legal citizen with the right to vote is being prevented from voting upon verification that they are that legal citizen and who they say they are
You prove who you are to cash a check, and that is less of a right than a vote
Cashing a check is a private transaction. Voting is a civil right. Your analogy makes no sense.
Design and purpose matters...I know it doesnt matter to those who want to compare SUVs to guns.
Inanimate objects are inanimate until the will of the user animates them.
Cashing a check is a private transaction. Voting is a civil right. Your analogy makes no sense.
Not applying for or cashing a welfare check........how does one do that without ID ?
It is an important right, hence it should not be abridged on capricious grounds.
No legal citizen with the right to vote is being prevented from voting upon verification that they are that legal citizen and who they say they are
You prove who you are to cash a check, and that is less of a right than a vote
Requiring photo id, for many, is an unreasonable demand. The elderly, innercity poor, and rural poor may not have photo id. They probably have a voter registration card, which ought to be sufficient. Hell, in your own state a phone bill is sufficient identification.
Cashing a check is a private transaction. Voting is a civil right. Your analogy makes no sense.
Man in Hahira Georgia got into a property dispute with his neighbor while he was weed eating the area by his driveway and mailbox. It escalated and the man took his weed eater to the elderly man and after 10 mintues of it in his face he killed him.
We need a 3 day waiting period on weed eaters folks.
Driveway weeds can wait 3 days to be cut. We have to have this to save lives.
Weed eaters kill folks.
Man in Hahira Georgia got into a property dispute with his neighbor while he was weed eating the area by his driveway and mailbox. It escalated and the man took his weed eater to the elderly man and after 10 mintues of it in his face he killed him.
We need a 3 day waiting period on weed eaters folks.
Driveway weeds can wait 3 days to be cut. We have to have this to save lives.
Weed eaters kill folks.
A man tripped over his dog and hit his head on a mailbox. As he laid there unconscious a pack of wolves ate his face off but was chased away by a bear. Then explosive diarehhea from the Chalupa he ate kicked in a collapsed his bowels. We should have a 3 day wait period for dogs, mail boxes, wolves and mexican foods. Make Bear ownership legal.
Thats a true story
It is an important right, hence it should not be abridged on capricious grounds.
No legal citizen with the right to vote is being prevented from voting upon verification that they are that legal citizen and who they say they are
You prove who you are to cash a check, and that is less of a right than a vote
If I go to vote without ID, my right to vote is blocked. That is as unconstitutional as going to buy a gun and being told you can't because you're bat shit crazy.
Yet you are 100% in favour of one and not the other.
Honestly, I don't get it.
should be on folks prescribed hardcore pyschotropic pharmeceutical drugs.
Folks can wait 3 days for their dope.
After all, people do not kill people. Guns and drugs do.
Don't forget the SUVs that also kill. Need to get a background check and waiting period on those when you go into the auto dealer.
Even driving an SUV down a crowded sidewalk is unlikely to create the carnage created by on semi auto with a large magazine - try not to be an idiot.
OK, how about this:
Voter ID's are fine, as long as the state government that requires them to be presented does the following:
- issue IDs to the voters free of charge
- provide transportation to and from any facility they need to go to in order to procure said IDs, and
- makes absolutely sure all voters have a reasonable amount of time to procure said IDs between the time the law is passed requiring them, and the next election.
If those procedures are followed, then a voter ID is not a poll tax, or a gimmick to stop people from voting, and is fair.
If they are not followed, then the state in question is interfering with the citizen's right to vote, and is therefore in violation of the Constitution.
Man in Hahira Georgia got into a property dispute with his neighbor while he was weed eating the area by his driveway and mailbox. It escalated and the man took his weed eater to the elderly man and after 10 mintues of it in his face he killed him.
We need a 3 day waiting period on weed eaters folks.
Driveway weeds can wait 3 days to be cut. We have to have this to save lives.
Weed eaters kill folks.
A man tripped over his dog and hit his head on a mailbox. As he laid there unconscious a pack of wolves ate his face off but was chased away by a bear. Then explosive diarehhea from the Chalupa he ate kicked in a collapsed his bowels. We should have a 3 day wait period for dogs, mail boxes, wolves and mexican foods. Make Bear ownership legal.
Thats a true story
Drunk men trip over dogs on to mailboxes. If he would have been sober with a gun the wolves and bear would have not been involved. He shit himself because of the 17 margaritas he drank at the Mexican restaurant.
You need to learn something about personal responsibility. It is hard for some folk to accept and learn discipline as government and the nanny state have pampered their baby asses for so long. But you will catch on quick.
Guns save lives. True story.