1st 2016 Oregon poll shows massive Clinton strength

Oregon would vote for Baal himself, were he to run as a democrat.


I think conservatives already have Baal....under a different name, of course.
We are not talking about conservatives.

The subject is Oregon, which is the very essence of bats in the belfry.

Actually, the subject is the 1st 2016 Prez poll out of Oregon, just to be very clear. Hope that is not too much for your mind to handle.


Have you ever been to Oregon?

Do you know what people from Oregon are like?


I just love it when people demean an entire state just because of it's political leanings, as if that's going to change that state or attract voters to the other party.

LOL.
 
Is this the same state which made Kathleen Sebelius look like a master web site designer?

.

Uh, no.

Oregon and Kansas are not the same state.

Gotta love that Right-Wing intelligence. Funny!!
Oregon's state Obiecare exchanged crashed and burned worse than Sebelius' train wreck.

Gotta love the arrogant progressive jerk, who is not even up on current events. FUNNY! :lmao:
 
Actually, the subject is the 1st 2016 Prez poll out of Oregon, just to be very clear. Hope that is not too much for your mind to handle.


Have you ever been to Oregon?

Do you know what people from Oregon are like?


I just love it when people demean an entire state just because of it's political leanings, as if that's going to change that state or attract voters to the other party.

LOL.
Which explains why the left never ridicules conservative states, of course. Losta libs there, but when you move closer to Portland, like Seattle, the libtard is strong.
 
Is this the same state which made Kathleen Sebelius look like a master web site designer?

.

Uh, no.

Oregon and Kansas are not the same state.

Gotta love that Right-Wing intelligence. Funny!!
Oregon's state Obiecare exchanged crashed and burned worse than Sebelius' train wreck.

Gotta love the arrogant progressive jerk, who is not even up on current events. FUNNY! :lmao:

If we ever get to a 58th state, it will be called 'Denial'.

.
 
Why does a badly designed website have any weight on anything?? Who cares about it nowadays???
 
Why does a badly designed website have any weight on anything?? Who cares about it nowadays???
It has to do with what a state of utter disarray and chaos that the State of Oregon is in, due to its foolhardy progressive politics.

It has to do with a large portion of the citizens of that state being stuck on stupid, in continuing to support such a demonstrably and conspicuously failed ideology.

That help any?
 
Why does a badly designed website have any weight on anything?? Who cares about it nowadays???
It has to do with what a state of utter disarray and chaos that the State of Oregon is in, due to its foolhardy progressive politics.

It has to do with a large portion of the citizens of that state being stuck on stupid, in continuing to support such a demonstrably and conspicuously failed ideology.

That help any?

Okay, so in Connecticut where the state exchange did spectacularly that means that progressive politics there are brilliant and the people are thriving because of them...right?

A website's success or failure comes down to hiring the right contractors to do a good job, it has "extremely" little to do with politics, if anything at all.
 
Why does a badly designed website have any weight on anything?? Who cares about it nowadays???
It has to do with what a state of utter disarray and chaos that the State of Oregon is in, due to its foolhardy progressive politics.

It has to do with a large portion of the citizens of that state being stuck on stupid, in continuing to support such a demonstrably and conspicuously failed ideology.

That help any?

Okay, so in Connecticut where the state exchange did spectacularly that means that progressive politics there are brilliant and the people are thriving because of them...right?

A website's success or failure comes down to hiring the right contractors to do a good job, it has "extremely" little to do with politics, if anything at all.
What it means is that Connecticut basically got lucky.

Almost all of the failed money pit state exchanges are in progressive states. Minnesota, Vermont, Maryland, Oregon and Hawai'i being the prime examples.

Obamacare?s Failed State Exchanges - Reason.com

Seems that progressives have a devil of a time getting the "right" central planners in place, no matter where you go.

BTW, are the streets of Hartford overrun with street urchins, as are those of Portland?
 
Last edited:
Why does a badly designed website have any weight on anything?? Who cares about it nowadays???
It has to do with what a state of utter disarray and chaos that the State of Oregon is in, due to its foolhardy progressive politics.

It has to do with a large portion of the citizens of that state being stuck on stupid, in continuing to support such a demonstrably and conspicuously failed ideology.

That help any?

Okay, so in Connecticut where the state exchange did spectacularly that means that progressive politics there are brilliant and the people are thriving because of them...right?

A website's success or failure comes down to hiring the right contractors to do a good job, it has "extremely" little to do with politics, if anything at all.

Unless, of course, the no-bid contractor is a old friend of the presidents wife.

Michelle Obama's Princeton classmate was Obamacare website builder | The Daily Caller
 
Last edited:
It has to do with what a state of utter disarray and chaos that the State of Oregon is in, due to its foolhardy progressive politics.

It has to do with a large portion of the citizens of that state being stuck on stupid, in continuing to support such a demonstrably and conspicuously failed ideology.

That help any?

Okay, so in Connecticut where the state exchange did spectacularly that means that progressive politics there are brilliant and the people are thriving because of them...right?

A website's success or failure comes down to hiring the right contractors to do a good job, it has "extremely" little to do with politics, if anything at all.
What it means is that Connecticut basically got lucky.

Almost all of the failed money pit state exchanges are in progressive states. Minnesota, Vermont, Maryland, Oregon and Hawai'i being the prime examples.

Obamacare?s Failed State Exchanges - Reason.com

Seems that progressives have a devil of a time getting the "right" central planners in place, no matter where you go.

BTW, are the streets of Hartford overrun with street urchins, as are those of Portland?

It still has very little to do with politics....it's basically just hate-bashing. A functional state-exchange website is certainly possible. It has nothing to do with policy or ideology, it's all just the contracting and planning of the site. The government is still...new, let's say, to the internet age, so it really doesn't surprise me that the first year of state exchanges didn't go smoothly.
 
Okay, so in Connecticut where the state exchange did spectacularly that means that progressive politics there are brilliant and the people are thriving because of them...right?

A website's success or failure comes down to hiring the right contractors to do a good job, it has "extremely" little to do with politics, if anything at all.
What it means is that Connecticut basically got lucky.

Almost all of the failed money pit state exchanges are in progressive states. Minnesota, Vermont, Maryland, Oregon and Hawai'i being the prime examples.

Obamacare?s Failed State Exchanges - Reason.com

Seems that progressives have a devil of a time getting the "right" central planners in place, no matter where you go.

BTW, are the streets of Hartford overrun with street urchins, as are those of Portland?

It still has very little to do with politics....it's basically just hate-bashing. A functional state-exchange website is certainly possible. It has nothing to do with policy or ideology, it's all just the contracting and planning of the site. The government is still...new, let's say, to the internet age, so it really doesn't surprise me that the first year of state exchanges didn't go smoothly.
It has everything to do with politics. As does your giving a pass to progressive failures and just brushing aside pointing them out as hate, because you are one of them.

Would be breathtaking, were it not so predictable.
 
Last edited:
It has to do with what a state of utter disarray and chaos that the State of Oregon is in, due to its foolhardy progressive politics.

It has to do with a large portion of the citizens of that state being stuck on stupid, in continuing to support such a demonstrably and conspicuously failed ideology.

That help any?

Okay, so in Connecticut where the state exchange did spectacularly that means that progressive politics there are brilliant and the people are thriving because of them...right?

A website's success or failure comes down to hiring the right contractors to do a good job, it has "extremely" little to do with politics, if anything at all.

Unless, of course, the no-bid contractor is a old friend of the presidents wife.

Michelle Obama's Princeton classmate was Obamacare website builder | The Daily Caller
$100 billion here, $100 billion there.

What difference does it make? :rolleyes:
 
What it means is that Connecticut basically got lucky.

Almost all of the failed money pit state exchanges are in progressive states. Minnesota, Vermont, Maryland, Oregon and Hawai'i being the prime examples.

Obamacare?s Failed State Exchanges - Reason.com

Seems that progressives have a devil of a time getting the "right" central planners in place, no matter where you go.

BTW, are the streets of Hartford overrun with street urchins, as are those of Portland?

It still has very little to do with politics....it's basically just hate-bashing. A functional state-exchange website is certainly possible. It has nothing to do with policy or ideology, it's all just the contracting and planning of the site. The government is still...new, let's say, to the internet age, so it really doesn't surprise me that the first year of state exchanges didn't go smoothly.
It has everything to do with politics. As does your giving a pass to progressive failures and just brushing aside pointing them out as hate, because you are one of them.

Would be breathtaking, were it not so predictable.

Okay, so you just brush off Connecticut's success as "lucky" but don't put Oregon's failure as "unlucky"

State exchanges are possible to make and be successful with, it has nothing to do with policy. Frankly it's the first year of national healthcare reform and bumps should be expected, next year I'd expect improvements.
 
Okay, so in Connecticut where the state exchange did spectacularly that means that progressive politics there are brilliant and the people are thriving because of them...right?

A website's success or failure comes down to hiring the right contractors to do a good job, it has "extremely" little to do with politics, if anything at all.

Unless, of course, the no-bid contractor is a old friend of the presidents wife.

Michelle Obama's Princeton classmate was Obamacare website builder | The Daily Caller
$100 billion here, $100 billion there.

What difference does it make? :rolleyes:

The federal and state exchanges all added together did not add up to 100 billion dollars.
 
I think conservatives already have Baal....under a different name, of course.
We are not talking about conservatives.

The subject is Oregon, which is the very essence of bats in the belfry.

Actually, the subject is the 1st 2016 Prez poll out of Oregon, just to be very clear. Hope that is not too much for your mind to handle.


Have you ever been to Oregon?

Do you know what people from Oregon are like?


I just love it when people demean an entire state just because of it's political leanings, as if that's going to change that state or attract voters to the other party.

LOL.

You mean like you and all liberal assholes do to TEXAS. Hypocrite
 

Forum List

Back
Top