Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Let me guess, they're all Democrats?Yes, election fraud happens.
[LaRose: Two Hamilton County voters among 10 who committed voter fraud in Ohio] LaRose: Two Hamilton County voters among 10 who committed voter fraud in Ohio
I read the link you posted. NO mention of what political party they belong to. It IS a USA Today story, so yes, the voters were MOST likely Dems.Yes, election fraud happens.
[LaRose: Two Hamilton County voters among 10 who committed voter fraud in Ohio] LaRose: Two Hamilton County voters among 10 who committed voter fraud in Ohio
I read the link you posted. NO mention of what political party they belong to. It IS a USA Today story, so yes, the voters were MOST likely Dems.
Well, since you asked, USA Today is part of the biased mainstream media that always favors Dems. And because MANY more Dems have been found to have voted illegally in the 2016 election than Republicans. Those who voted illegally are almost EXCLUSIVELY Democrats.I read the link you posted. NO mention of what political party they belong to. It IS a USA Today story, so yes, the voters were MOST likely Dems.
How does that make it MOST likely?
Well, since you asked, USA Today is part of the biased mainstream media that always favors Dems. And because MANY more Dems have been found to have voted illegally in the 2016 election than Republicans. Those who voted illegally are almost EXCLUSIVELY Democrats.I read the link you posted. NO mention of what political party they belong to. It IS a USA Today story, so yes, the voters were MOST likely Dems.
How does that make it MOST likely?
And the OTHER 16 - Dim Dems. Thanks for proving my point. You're welcome.Well, since you asked, USA Today is part of the biased mainstream media that always favors Dems. And because MANY more Dems have been found to have voted illegally in the 2016 election than Republicans. Those who voted illegally are almost EXCLUSIVELY Democrats.I read the link you posted. NO mention of what political party they belong to. It IS a USA Today story, so yes, the voters were MOST likely Dems.
How does that make it MOST likely?
Two Republicans charged in Ohio election fraud, win anyway
here's two
And the OTHER 16 - Dim Dems. Thanks for proving my point. You're welcome.
18-2 = 16. Do the math, Taz!And the OTHER 16 - Dim Dems. Thanks for proving my point. You're welcome.
Where did it say that?
18-2 = 16. Do the math, Taz!And the OTHER 16 - Dim Dems. Thanks for proving my point. You're welcome.
Where did it say that?
Only TWO were Republicans, the REST, SIXTEEN, were Dim Dems. You're welcome. I would try to find a link, but you're too dense to acknowledge it anyway. PLEASE stick to your "moderation", you fail badly EVERY time you post.18-2 = 16. Do the math, Taz!And the OTHER 16 - Dim Dems. Thanks for proving my point. You're welcome.
Where did it say that?
Yes, I learned that in Kindergarten, thanks.
Now try answering my question.
Wow. Election fraud is rampant. 18! Omg.
Only TWO were Republicans, the REST, SIXTEEN, were Dim Dems.
AGAIN, DO THE MATH. Now PLEASE go away...........Only TWO were Republicans, the REST, SIXTEEN, were Dim Dems.
Who said ONLY two were Republican? The article simply talked about these two who happen to be Republicans. It didn't say anything about the other 16.
AGAIN, DO THE MATH. Now PLEASE go away...........Only TWO were Republicans, the REST, SIXTEEN, were Dim Dems.
Who said ONLY two were Republican? The article simply talked about these two who happen to be Republicans. It didn't say anything about the other 16.
You all have been going about horrendous fraud and yet the numbers never support your claim.Wow. Election fraud is rampant. 18! Omg.
That we know of.
You all have been going about horrendous fraud and yet the numbers never support your claim.Wow. Election fraud is rampant. 18! Omg.
That we know of.
If one were going to attempt to sway an election through fraud, this would be the least effective means of doing so.
OMG...they help get out the vote? How criminal! That must really put a crimp in Republican efforts to suppress the voteYou all have been going about horrendous fraud and yet the numbers never support your claim.Wow. Election fraud is rampant. 18! Omg.
That we know of.
If one were going to attempt to sway an election through fraud, this would be the least effective means of doing so.
I have no doubt that democrats especially in "diverse" urban areas engage in election fraud. That's where the most extreme leftist radicals reside after all. They run the polling centers and have dozens of "non profit community organizations" to help "get out the vote".
OMG...they help get out the vote? How criminal! That must really put a crimp in Republican efforts to suppress the vote
