1,600-plus Scientists Say Climate "Emergency" Is a Myth

[elektra]

That's absolutely incredible.
The U.S. Budget is about 6 trillion. We are currently over 30 trillion in debt.
And they want 200 trillion ??????
That has to be the most ridiculous thing I've read yet.

it sure is, $200 trillion for green energy, the Federal Reserve, which is a semi-private organization will make $5 trillion printing the money

 

[HikerGuy83]

it sure is, $200 trillion for green energy, the Federal Reserve, which is a semi-private organization will make $5 trillion printing the money

People just need to get used to the idea that we are going to melt some sea ice.....or so it would seem.

 

[Stryder50]

And he sucks hard at climate science. I'm much, much better at it than he is.

Remember, you can't gaslight people who aren't cult fuktards. You're essentially telling me to believe that 2+2=5 because some important names said so.

At 400 ppm = parts per million, amount of CO2 in our atmosphere, that works out to one part/molecule of CO2 in every 2,500 parts/molecules of air, most of which are Nitrogen and Oxygen.

The unexplained issue here is how can one molecule pass on the same amount of energy/heat to the 2,499 other molecules that will raise their temperatures by the one degree that the CO2 got warmer by ???

Middle school science answer is that it can't !!!

The one molecule of CO2 might pass on a portion of it's heat/energy to one other molecule, but not in significant(or even measurable) amount to 2,499 other molecules.

The gaslighting of people is coming from you cult fuktards whom promote ACC/AGW (Human caused climate change/global warming) by blindly following the psuedo-scientists chasing after grant dollar$$$. You all are essentially telling the rest of use to believe that 2+2=500.

 

[Stryder50]

Gonna need some proof of the solar panels. and what do you think making a windmill tall does?

Makes it more expensive to build and thereby less cost effective in terms of cost to build versus electricity it produces. Especially since the wind doesn't always blow and the windmills aren't remaining functional long enough to pay off the cost of building them.

 

[abu afak]

A coalition of 1,609 scientists from around the world have signed a declaration stating “there is no climate emergency” and that they “strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy” being pushed across the globe. The declaration does not deny the harmful effect of greenhouse gasses, but instead challenges the hysteria brought about by the narrative of imminent doom.

More than 1,600 scientists, including two Nobel laureates, declare climate 'emergency' a myth

The global coalition of scientists say that politics and a journalistic frenzy has propelled a doomsday climate change hysteria. The signatories also ask other scientists to "address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming."

justthenews.com

What goes around comes around. The Klimate Kult set the bar on what’s required and it’s come around. Good and harder.
Karma.

You stupid MAGAt a$$hole.​

Fact check: Did 1,200 climate experts sign 'declaration' denying climate emergency?​

​

16/09/2022 -

A document claiming that 'there is no climate emergency' has been circulating on social media.

A climate-denying document, supposedly signed by 1,200 leading scientists and academics, has gone viral on social media.
The "World Climate Declaration" -- which claims that there is "no climate emergency" -- was first shared on 27 June. One Australian Senator shared the document on Facebook claiming that "this is further confirmation that there is no climate emergency".

Other well-known Conspiracy groups have argued that there is no scientific consensus that humans are to blame for global warming because the “Earth's climate has varied since the planet first existed, with naturally occurring cold and warm phases".

A 2021 report by Cornell University found that 99.9% of more than 88,000 climate change studies agree that humans have accelerated the phenomenon, largely due to carbon emissions.

Moreover, the last 15 warmest years on record have occurred since 2005, with the most recent eight years being the warmest, according to NASA.

Investigations show that practically None of the signatories to the "World Climate Declaration" are climate scientists.

The two main Dutch actors behind the declaration are Guus Berkhout, a retired geophysicist who has worked for oil giant Shell, and journalist Marcel Crok. Both have been accused of receiving money from fossil fuel companies to finance their climate-sceptic work. They deny the allegations,

When looking closer at the list of signatories, there are precisely 1,107, including six people who are dead. Less than 1% of the names listed describe themselves as climatologists or climate scientists.

Eight of the signatories are former or current employees of the oil giant Shell, while many other names have links to mining companies.

One of the signatories is Ivar Giaever, a joint winner of the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1973 for work on superconductors. However, he has never published any work on climate science.

According to an independent 2019 count of the declaration's signatories, 21% were engineers, many linked to the fossil fuel industry. Others were lobbyists, and some even worked as fishermen or airline pilots.
[.....]

Fact check: Did 1,200 climate experts sign viral misinformation?​

A document claiming that 'there is no climate emergency' has been circulating on social media. #TheCube

www.euronews.com
`
`

 

[EMH]

You are incorrect. They will gain efficiency through scale.

LOL!!!

when "will" the Arctic be "ice free?"

Co2 does NOTHING. Every tech should compete on its own - NO SUBSIDIES for the Co2 FRAUD.

 

[EMH]

At 400 ppm = parts per million, amount of CO2 in our atmosphere, that works out to one part/molecule of CO2 in every 2,500 parts/molecules of air, most of which are Nitrogen and Oxygen.

The unexplained issue here is how can one molecule pass on the same amount of energy/heat to the 2,499 other molecules that will raise their temperatures by the one degree that the CO2 got warmer by ???

Middle school science answer is that it can't !!!

The one molecule of CO2 might pass on a portion of it's heat/energy to one other molecule, but not in significant(or even measurable) amount to 2,499 other molecules.

The gaslighting of people is coming from you cult fuktards whom promote ACC/AGW (Human caused climate change/global warming) by blindly following the psuedo-scientists chasing after grant dollar$$$. You all are essentially telling the rest of use to believe that 2+2=500.

Co2 does NOTHING

Sincerely,

highly correlated satellite and balloon data

 

[EMH]

Can I use Bloomberg as a source, they are pretty much pure, DEMOCRAT

$200 Trillion Is Needed to Stop Global Warming. That’s a Bargain.

Failing to invest in fossil-fuel alternatives will result in a far higher price tag — and an increasingly unlivable planet.

www.bloomberg.com

View attachment 823571

Meanwhile, Cal and Stanford are now part of the ATLANTIC Coast Conference, will play FSU, Miami, UNC etc...

The taxpayer funds the Co2 FRAUD, the elites at the top of every left wing university that claims the Co2 FRAUD is real behave as if it is NOT, just like homO and Big Mike in Martha's Vineyard...

 

[mamooth]

The unexplained issue here is how can one molecule pass on the same amount of energy/heat to the 2,499 other molecules that will raise their temperatures by the one degree that the CO2 got warmer by ???

That makes no sense at all. You have no grasp of physics or numbers. That's an observation, not a hypothesis.

Individual molecules don't have a temperature. Temperature is a statistical quality of a very large number of molecules.

You seem to presenting a bizarre scenario where that a CO2 molecule aborbing an IR photon causing that individual molecule to "rise in temperature" by, say, 1C, and that causes 2500 other molecules to rise by 1C, That's not right. That's so completely at odds with reality, it doesn't even rise to "wrong". It is not even remotely like anything that science proposes.

I blame participation trophies and the internet. They've convinced clueless people like you that they're very special.

 

[Crepitus]

Can I use Bloomberg as a source, they are pretty much pure, DEMOCRAT

$200 Trillion Is Needed to Stop Global Warming. That’s a Bargain.

Failing to invest in fossil-fuel alternatives will result in a far higher price tag — and an increasingly unlivable planet.

www.bloomberg.com

View attachment 823571

Not one word in there about the "thousands of square miles of solar" you claimed.

Cool deflection from your lie though.

 

[Weatherman2020]

You stupid MAGAt a$$hole.​

Fact check: Did 1,200 climate experts sign 'declaration' denying climate emergency?​

​

16/09/2022 -

A document claiming that 'there is no climate emergency' has been circulating on social media.

A climate-denying document, supposedly signed by 1,200 leading scientists and academics, has gone viral on social media.
The "World Climate Declaration" -- which claims that there is "no climate emergency" -- was first shared on 27 June. One Australian Senator shared the document on Facebook claiming that "this is further confirmation that there is no climate emergency".

Other well-known Conspiracy groups have argued that there is no scientific consensus that humans are to blame for global warming because the “Earth's climate has varied since the planet first existed, with naturally occurring cold and warm phases".

A 2021 report by Cornell University found that 99.9% of more than 88,000 climate change studies agree that humans have accelerated the phenomenon, largely due to carbon emissions.

Moreover, the last 15 warmest years on record have occurred since 2005, with the most recent eight years being the warmest, according to NASA.

Investigations show that practically None of the signatories to the "World Climate Declaration" are climate scientists.

The two main Dutch actors behind the declaration are Guus Berkhout, a retired geophysicist who has worked for oil giant Shell, and journalist Marcel Crok. Both have been accused of receiving money from fossil fuel companies to finance their climate-sceptic work. They deny the allegations,

When looking closer at the list of signatories, there are precisely 1,107, including six people who are dead. Less than 1% of the names listed describe themselves as climatologists or climate scientists.

Eight of the signatories are former or current employees of the oil giant Shell, while many other names have links to mining companies.

One of the signatories is Ivar Giaever, a joint winner of the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1973 for work on superconductors. However, he has never published any work on climate science.

According to an independent 2019 count of the declaration's signatories, 21% were engineers, many linked to the fossil fuel industry. Others were lobbyists, and some even worked as fishermen or airline pilots.
[.....]

Fact check: Did 1,200 climate experts sign viral misinformation?​

A document claiming that 'there is no climate emergency' has been circulating on social media. #TheCube

www.euronews.com
`
`

My petition is after yours, therefore the science is settled on my side of the position

 

[abu afak]

Not one word in there about the "thousands of square miles of solar" you claimed.

Cool deflection from your lie though.

Elektra is the biggest LIAR on this mb.
May 14, 2023

elektra​

How Much Land Would it Require to Get Most of Our Electricity from Wind and Solar?​

A recent study from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory offers a detailed and heartening answer.
blog.ucsusa.org

We could get All of our power from Solar Alone covering an area Only as big as Lake Michigan!
Spread over the country that's Nothing.

"...Solar's abundance and potential throughout the United States is staggering: PV panels on just 22,000 square miles of the nation's total land area – about the size of Lake Michigan – could supply enough electricity to power the entire United States.".."

How Much Land Would it Require to Get Most of Our Electricity from Wind and Solar?​

A recent study from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory offers a detailed and heartening answer.
blog.ucsusa.org
- - - - - - - - - - --


Call it 50% With Wind and some NG back up, that's really nothing. 10,000 sq miles. Or 100x100 miles spread out over the whole country.

`

 

[abu afak]

My petition is after yours, therefore the science is settled on my side of the position

No.
It's Same running one started at 1000, then 1200, now 1600.
(Two Dutch Nobel guys)
Note how they never use the word 'Climate Scientist.'
(in fact many/most not even scientists)

`

 

[Weatherman2020]

No.
It's Same running one started at 1000, then 1200, now 1600.

`

Mine is after yours. So therefore science is on my side.

 

[abu afak]

Mine is after yours. So therefore science is on my side.

No.
It's the SAME Running one started at 1000, then 1200, now 1600.
(Two Dutch Nobel guys)
Note how they never use the word 'Climate Scientist.'
(in fact, many/most not even scientists)

`

 

[Weatherman2020]

No.
It's the SAME Running one started at 1000, then 1200, now 1600.
(Two Dutch Nobel guys)
Note how they never use the word 'Climate Scientist.'
(in fact, many/most not even scientists)

`

Mine is the last petition, so mine is science.

 

[Crepitus]

A coalition of 1,609 scientists from around the world have signed a declaration stating “there is no climate emergency” and that they “strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy” being pushed across the globe. The declaration does not deny the harmful effect of greenhouse gasses, but instead challenges the hysteria brought about by the narrative of imminent doom.

More than 1,600 scientists, including two Nobel laureates, declare climate 'emergency' a myth

The global coalition of scientists say that politics and a journalistic frenzy has propelled a doomsday climate change hysteria. The signatories also ask other scientists to "address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming."

justthenews.com

What goes around comes around. The Klimate Kult set the bar on what’s required and it’s come around. Good and harder.
Karma.

Turns out that none of them are climate scientists and a large percentage of them aren't scientists at all. This has already been done here a couple of days ago.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Turns out that none of them are climate scientists and a large percentage of them aren't scientists at all. This has already been done here a couple of days ago.

Yes, I know almost all of Abu’s petition was signed by people who aren’t climate scientists.

 

[elektra]

Elektra is the biggest LIAR on this mb.
Solar's abundance and potential throughout the United States is staggering: PV panels on just 22,000 square miles of the nation's total land area – about the size of Lake Michigan – could supply enough electricity to power the entire United States.".."

I said it would take thousands of square miles. Of course, the opinion piece that abu afuk uses underestimates the total land area by 80%

But hey, they are selling their $200 trillion dollar dream (says bloomberg, the investment news site).

 

[elektra]

At 400 ppm = parts per million, amount of CO2 in our atmosphere, that works out to one part/molecule of CO2 in every 2,500 parts/molecules of air, most of which are Nitrogen and Oxygen.

The unexplained issue here is how can one molecule pass on the same amount of energy/heat to the 2,499 other molecules that will raise their temperatures by the one degree that the CO2 got warmer by ???

Middle school science answer is that it can't !!!

The one molecule of CO2 might pass on a portion of it's heat/energy to one other molecule, but not in significant(or even measurable) amount to 2,499 other molecules.

The gaslighting of people is coming from you cult fuktards whom promote ACC/AGW (Human caused climate change/global warming) by blindly following the psuedo-scientists chasing after grant dollar$$$. You all are essentially telling the rest of use to believe that 2+2=500.

in the real world, there is a loss of energy when molecules collide