Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 26,871
- 12,613
- 973
But it has to be documented as such.There is no law that says someone can use their personal income to pay for their campaign
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
But it has to be documented as such.There is no law that says someone can use their personal income to pay for their campaign
Well the Federal Election Commission, who enforces those laws, doesn't see a violation here. Like they did with Clinton.But it has to be documented as such.
Cohen was already federally prosecuted for it.Well the Federal Election Commission, who enforces those laws, doesn't see a violation here. Like they did with Clinton.
THe NY DA doesn't enforce Federal election laws.
AG Barr put immense pressure on SDNY to drop it...Cohen was already federally prosecuted for it.
The Republican FEC commissioners refused to take the matter further even after their investigatory team said this was most likely illegal. They swept it under the rug for Trump.
I’m not sure. It’s possible they could find something that runs afoul of due process, will they? Who knows.True, but we can’t go back into the past. So let’s do the next best thing: stop this case tomorrow.
Any idea if SCOTUS can intervene if they see the Constitution being ripped to spreads by a political operative trying to imprison the opponent?
But if they were personal funds, then they weren’t business funds, so if they weren’t business funds. Then there is no violation of New York law for falsifying business records, right?The issue is how the funds were covered up in regard to the campaign. Where the funds came from makes no difference
hahah Cohen was prosecuted for his crimes....Cohen was already federally prosecuted for it.
The Republican FEC commissioners refused to take the matter further even after their investigatory team said this was most likely illegal. They swept it under the rug for Trump.
But if they were personal funds, then they weren’t business funds, so if they weren’t business funds. Then there is no violation of New York law for falsifying business records, right?
You don’t know what you’re talking about.hahah Cohen was prosecuted for his crimes....
There is no Republican FEC, it was Obama's that was in charge of monitoring the 2016 election and enforcing the law.
I am not the one that said it was a Republican FEC., you were.You don’t know what you’re talking about.
Leadership and structure - FEC.gov
The FEC is an independent, regulatory agency with more than 300 employees, led by six Commissioners. Access information on current and past Commissioners, the agency's structure, and view Commission directives, procedures and internal policies.www.fec.gov
You don’t know what you’re talking about. This post is gibberish.I am not the one that said it was a Republican FEC., you were.
The 2016 election handled when Obama was President....in 2016 1/3 were hand picked by Obama himself
hahaha says the guy that claims a Commission made up of 3 dems and 3 republicans, 1/3 of which were Obama's appointees....was a Republican Commission.You don’t know what you’re talking about. This post is gibberish.
I didn’t say that at all.hahaha says the guy that claims a Commission made up of 3 dems and 3 republicans, 1/3 of which were Obama's appointees....was a Republican Commission.
I am not the one that said it was a Republican FEC., you were.
The 2016 election handled when Obama was President....in 2016 1/3 were hand picked by Obama himself
oooooooookI didn’t say that at all.
No, Stormy et al was discussed at length while Trump was campaigning. Trump didn't get anyone on the FEC until Dec of 2020.Yes, it took place in 2016, but was not found till later, when Trump was POTUS, with his people on the FEC.
Seems you know this but are just playing dumb
The investigators recommended continuing the investigation but the Republican commissioners voted against doing so. They said it wasn’t worth their time.oooooooook
The reality is the FEC investigators said Pecker and American Media might have, but there was insufficent evidence to suggest Trump did.
So you're just going to pretend that $210,000,000 DIDN'T end up in Biden family bank accounts, IM2? Never happened?Nope, it doesn't matter. Because it didn't happen.
Cohen was put in prison for income tax evasion...something that has nothing to do with Donald Trump.hahah Cohen was prosecuted for his crimes....
There is no Republican FEC, it was Obama's that was in charge of monitoring the 2016 election and enforcing the law.
The reality is that the Bragg case gets more diminished with each one of its witnesses.They are busting trump rght now in court. Trump org employees are testifying about the signed checks.
Live Updates: Former Employee Says Trump Used Personal Account to Repay Hush Money
A longtime Trump Organization employee testified in Donald J. Trump’s criminal trial that Mr. Trump had used his personal bank account to reimburse his longtime fixer for the money that bought a porn star’s silence.
Live Updates: Former Employee Says Trump Used Personal Account to Repay Hush Money
A longtime Trump Organization employee testified in Donald J. Trump’s criminal trial that Mr. Trump had used his personal bank account to reimburse his longtime fixer for the money that bought a porn star’s silence.www.nytimes.com
They are showing the copies of the signed checks in court right now.