Zohran Mamdani is promising free child care for New York City residents.

The state of New Mexico is starting a free to all childcare program on November 1. There seems to be problems because many childcare facilities are closing due to new rules being imposed. So the bottom line is that there will be LESS childcare available after the "free universal childcare " law goes into effect.
I have a friend who's daughter runs a childcare here in Arizona, and she is getting a lot of calls from parents looking for childcare even if they have to drive them over here to Arizona and pick them up after their work is done.
Somehow this "free" shit always causes problems and never seems to work.
Women are shirking their child raising duty in the first place. They should marry and have children before their eggs become geriatric and men need to make a commitment before sticking their penises into the baby-making place. Feminism has destroyed families and men need to fight to re-establish sanity in child bearing and child raising. Only men can do this because they have all the power over women.
 
Women don't have to work. The government does not require that however, it does in Communist governments. Like the one Mandama wants to set up in NY.
In todays america most women do have to work just to help a household just barely scrape by.
 
In Animal Farm didn't the pigs take over "daycare" for the puppies when they took over the farm, and they turned out to be their enforcers when they grew up? What was that lead pigs name, Napoleon?
 
In Animal Farm didn't the pigs take over "daycare" for the puppies when they took over the farm, and they turned out to be their enforcers when they grew up? What was that lead pigs name, Napoleon?
"The lead pig"....lol.....has a ring to it
 
.

See: Mamdani’s Free Childcare Plan Is the New Progressive Test Case

"Mamdani’s proposal for free citywide childcare could reset the conversation about what local government owes working families. He advocates for public responsibility for basic needs like care and food access, proposing city-owned grocery stores to combat food deserts and rising prices."

For Mamdani’s free childcare to become a reality in New York City, Mamdani would have to end the NYC’s 3% Plus income tax on NYC’s hard working wage earners paychecks.

Has Mamdani proposed to end confiscating the 3% plus New York City’s income tax on NYC’s poor working families?

JWK

Mamdani’s strategy, like the Democrat Party Leadership’s game plan, is to lie, distort, deflect and project an illusionary picture to gain support. This strategy is based on the self-evident truth that a lie and misrepresentations will circle the earth before the truth gets its shoes on.
The idiot citizens of New York City are about to get what they deserve...a Mayor who is going to destroy their city Will the last sane person please turn off the lights as you're leaving for Florida!
 
The idiot citizens of New York City are about to get what they deserve...a Mayor who is going to destroy their city Will the last sane person please turn off the lights as you're leaving for Florida!
I have always supported states' rights, and the people get what they want. If that is what they want, fine. Where I split off is when the state tries to bleed the other states' taxpayers to shore up their bullshit programs.
 
In todays america most women do have to work just to help a household just barely scrape by.
Feminism and the denigration of women staying home has diluted the workforce causing wages to plummet for men so, women now have to work.
 
.

See: Mamdani’s Free Childcare Plan Is the New Progressive Test Case

"Mamdani’s proposal for free citywide childcare could reset the conversation about what local government owes working families. He advocates for public responsibility for basic needs like care and food access, proposing city-owned grocery stores to combat food deserts and rising prices."

For Mamdani’s free childcare to become a reality in New York City, Mamdani would have to end the NYC’s 3% Plus income tax on NYC’s hard working wage earners paychecks.

Has Mamdani proposed to end confiscating the 3% plus New York City’s income tax on NYC’s poor working families?

JWK

Mamdani’s strategy, like the Democrat Party Leadership’s game plan, is to lie, distort, deflect and project an illusionary picture to gain support. This strategy is based on the self-evident truth that a lie and misrepresentations will circle the earth before the truth gets its shoes on.
It's hard to beat Santa Claus.
 
The idiot citizens of New York City are about to get what they deserve...a Mayor who is going to destroy their city Will the last sane person please turn off the lights as you're leaving for Florida!


The only glimmer of hope is, considering how Mamdani has been found to be a habitual liar, those who have already cast an absentee ballot for Mamdani, will change that vote on election day and vote in person, changing their Mamdani vote.
 
I have always supported states' rights, and the people get what they want. If that is what they want, fine. Where I split off is when the state tries to bleed the other states' taxpayers to shore up their bullshit programs.
And you KNOW that New York City will be crying for Federal funds as soon as Mamdani runs it into the ground! Too bad Trump won't give him a dime.
 
"The lead pig"....lol.....has a ring to it
And if elected, Mamdani will be more equal than others___ he will get to live large in Gracie Mansion, have top of the shelf healthcare, maids, cooks, a chauffeur, armed guards, and everything the big pig gets in Animal Farm. And poor working wage earners will be taxed and pay for Mamdani’s new life style, while also being taxed to finance the “free” stuff Mamdani has promised them ___ all to be partially paid for by NYC's 3% income tax on poor working people's paychecks.
 
15th post
  1. Raise taxes on high earners
    • "He proposes a 2 % additional tax on city residents earning more than $1 million per year. NBC New York+1
TRANSLATION: "Raise taxes of course"
TRANSLATION: "A straightforward way to say that same thing is 'raise taxes' "
  1. "Raise the corporate tax rate
    • "He proposes increasing the corporate tax rate (for the city/state) to match that of neighboring New Jersey at 11.5 %. NYC
as mayor he has no say or device's at his disposal in the means of increasing state taxes meaning he is going to raise the taxes on his constituents, [for those who haven't noticed yet there is an undeniable trend emerging here]...he will however be the first mayor of NYC to use Jersey as a template for governing.
    • Journals
    • He frames it as making corporations pay their 'fair share' to support the city’s services. TJvNews+1
TRANSLATION: " 'frames it' = not calling it what it is, 'raising taxes', notice how there is no number next to 'fair share' as marxism needs no number, just access to the money of others so he/they can/will determine what is fair"
  1. "Improve revenue collection, reforms
    • "His plan includes tackling unpaid fines (e.g., landlord code-violations) and procurement reforms to raise additional revenue. City & State New York+
TRANSLATION: "and as the need for more and more funds grows so too will the number of violations handed out"...btw, "procurement" is/was a term often used by 'pimps', it may be perhaps the most honest and telling statement in/of the 'article'
    • Use more effective city revenue tools and tighter enforcement to grow the base of funds."
notice it say's "base of funds" i.e. tax base...so now we know the secret and why it is such a secret...that said, he is the best candidate running
 
Last edited:
TRANSLATION: "Raise taxes of course"

TRANSLATION: "A straightforward way to say that same thing is 'raise taxes' "

as mayor he has no say or device's at his disposal in the means of increasing state taxes meaning he is going to raise the taxes on his constituents, [for those who haven't noticed yet there is an undeniable trend emerging here]...he will however be the first mayor of NYC to use Jersey as a template for governing.

TRANSLATION: " 'frames it' = not calling it what it is, 'raising taxes', notice how there is no number next to 'fair share' as marxism needs no number, just access to the money of others so he/they can/will determine what is fair"

TRANSLATION: "and as the need for more and more funds grows so too will the number of violations handed out"...btw, "procurement" is/was a term often used by 'pimps', it may be perhaps the most honest and telling statement in/of the 'article'

notice it say's "base of funds" i.e. tax base...so now we know the secret and why it is such a secret...that said, he is the best candidate running
Do you believe taxing rich parasites to fund programs that benefit millions is a bad thing?

Parsing the Impact of Mamdani's Tax Hike Plans - Empire Center for Public Policy

"Mamdani’s hike in the city income tax would exclusively target people who make more than $1 million per year, which is about 1 percent of filers.

"His proposed increase in corporate taxes would affect about 1,000 of the city’s 250,000 businesses.

"His campaign estimates that the two proposals would generate an additional $9 billion per year, which would an 11 percent increase in tax revenues."
 
Do you believe taxing rich parasites to fund programs that benefit millions is a bad thing?

Parsing the Impact of Mamdani's Tax Hike Plans - Empire Center for Public Policy

"Mamdani’s hike in the city income tax would exclusively target people who make more than $1 million per year, which is about 1 percent of filers.

"His proposed increase in corporate taxes would affect about 1,000 of the city’s 250,000 businesses.

"His campaign estimates that the two proposals would generate an additional $9 billion per year, which would an 11 percent increase in tax revenues."
His campaign estimated that, Georgie? A group of highly trained experts in finance? (Eye Roll) This is coming from the same group of people who have NEVER been able to come up with a viable plan on how they will pay for all of the give a ways that Mamdani has promised!
Do you want to know what will REALLY happen when they try to "target" the wealthy in NYC? Look at what happened in New Jersey when they imposed their version of a "millionaires tax"! Tax revenues didn't go up...they went down...substantially! Why? Because wealthy people are good at maintaining their wealth. They don't sit there and let others take their wealth. They either leave for places that won't tax them or they put their wealth into tax shelters that won't be taxed. Either way, you not only don't get the revenues you were anticipating but because they're living elsewhere...you're not getting the taxes you USED to be getting!
 
His campaign estimated that, Georgie? A group of highly trained experts in finance? (Eye Roll) T
Where did you get that idea?

Bill Hammond is the author of my link, and I don't see the connection between him and Mamdani's campaign.

Senior Fellow for Health Policy

"Bill Hammond​

"Senior Fellow for Health Policy​

"As the Empire Center’s senior fellow for health policy, Bill Hammond tracks fast-moving developments in New York’s massive health care industry, with a focus on how decisions made in Albany and Washington affect the well-being of patients, providers, taxpayers and the state’s economy.

"Bill has authored reports critiquing a proposed state-run single-payer health care system, documenting Albany’s excessive reliance on health insurance taxes, analyzing the pros and cons of 'block-granting' Medicaid, and examining the regulatory missteps surrounding the collapse of Health Republic Insurance."
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom