Zimmerman's a Democrat

[Sallow]

Sallow's decided the white guy is guilty. Do keep up.

I was right. You're not playing stupid.

Find the post where I said Zimmerman was guilty.

Link it.

Don't you have to believe someone is guilty, and have suficent evidence to make an arrest, detective Sallow?

No. You have to believe that something has happened that requires further action.

 

[Avatar4321]

Guess it means you guys can stop defending him now!

If it's ok with you.... I'll carry on defending the process, not the individuals.

So will I.

Dead body on the ground = arrest.

So your wife has a stroke and dies while in the same room, you expect the police to arrest you as long as she is on the ground and not sitting in a chair?

 

[Rocko]

Find the post where I said Zimmerman was guilty.

Link it.

Don't you have to believe someone is guilty, and have suficent evidence to make an arrest, detective Sallow?

No. You have to believe that something has happened that requires further action.

so you don't have to believe someone is guilty of a crime before arresting?

 

[Dick Tuck]

Cool.

This has what to do with the Trayvon Martin case?

Ask all your fellow Progressives who have been claiming he was a Conservative.

First off, they haven't. Secondly, how do you know he's not a conservative? I don't know many liberals that go around saying "fucking coons" while on a 911 call.

 

[Sallow]

If it's ok with you.... I'll carry on defending the process, not the individuals.

So will I.

Dead body on the ground = arrest.

So your wife has a stroke and dies while in the same room, you expect the police to arrest you as long as she is on the ground and not sitting in a chair?

Well as long as she doesn't have a bullet in her chest..probably not.

 

[Sallow]

Don't you have to believe someone is guilty, and have suficent evidence to make an arrest, detective Sallow?

No. You have to believe that something has happened that requires further action.

so you don't have to believe someone is guilty of a crime before arresting?

Guilty? No..suspected? Yes.

 

[Avatar4321]

Guilty until proven innocent then right?

That's exactly what he's saying.

It absolutely is not.

Arrest is what you do..before you determine guilt or innocence.

That's determined by a Judge and Jury. Are you familiar with our Judicial system? Or the concept of Justice in general?

It may not be perfect..but it's one of those things that keeps our civil society..civil.

So the police witness you shooting someone who in clear self defense, you're saying they are obligated to arrest you for being clearly innocent of any crime?

 

[mudwhistle]

Cool.

This has what to do with the Trayvon Martin case?

Nothing, but if he was a Republican.............

Guess it means you guys can stop defending him now!

Yeah.....hope they fry him.

 

[daveman]

Whaaaaaa?

Sallow's decided the white guy is guilty. Do keep up.

I was right. You're not playing stupid.

Find the post where I said Zimmerman was guilty.

Link it.

Okay.

If you believed Zimmerman was innocent, you wouldn't believe the public was in danger.

 

[mudwhistle]

This is how they go about turning a farce into Urban Legend.



Guess these race-baiters don't care if they didn't do their homework.

They figure all concerned with simply ignore the facts and continue acting like it's genuine.

 

[Synthaholic]

Actually, it means you guys can stop blaming the right for it.

But you won't.

Who is blaming the Right for this?

More emotional victim card playing from you. Sad.

Oh, you stupid, stupid little man...

Krugman's insane Trayvon blame game | Campaign 2012 | Washington Examiner

Let's look at this first one. From your link:

There’s been another high-profile shooting – the killing of Trayvon Martin – and so Krugman has again weighed in, blaming the Right. No, not the stupid Right – not the “ignorant yahoos” as he puts it – but the bought-off corporate Right.

So this writer - not Krugman - first equates "ignorant yahoos" with the Right, then in the rest of the piece has NO quotes from Krugman blaming the Right. In fact, he doesn't include any Krugman quotes at all!

You really are one dumb motherfucker, aren't you?

 

[Synthaholic]

Not immediately executing the "white" guy.

Whaaaaaa?

Sallow's decided the white guy is guilty. Do keep up.

I was right. You're not playing stupid.

You can't hide the fact that you're a racist. Is that what got you dishonorably discharged?

 

[Rocko]

No. You have to believe that something has happened that requires further action.

so you don't have to believe someone is guilty of a crime before arresting?

Guilty? No..suspected? Yes.

I've never heard of someone being arrested and put on trial, where the detectives of that case did not belive in the defendant's guilt.

 

[Sallow]

Sallow's decided the white guy is guilty. Do keep up.

I was right. You're not playing stupid.

Find the post where I said Zimmerman was guilty.

Link it.

Okay.

If you believed Zimmerman was innocent, you wouldn't believe the public was in danger.

He just shot someone. And he admitted it.

People that kill other people can pose a threat to the public.

Or maybe you don't think so.

 

[Synthaholic]

Find the post where I said Zimmerman was guilty.

Link it.

Okay.

If you believed Zimmerman was innocent, you wouldn't believe the public was in danger.

He just shot someone. And he admitted it.

People that kill other people can pose a threat to the public.

Or maybe you don't think so.

You could have left off that last word.

 

[Sallow]

so you don't have to believe someone is guilty of a crime before arresting?

Guilty? No..suspected? Yes.

I've never heard of someone being arrested and put on trial, where the led detectives of that case did not belive in the defendant's guilt.

Zimmerman didn't run a stop light. He shot an unarmed kid. That he was chasing around. At the very least there are 2 sides to that story. And it needed to be sorted out. That doesn't happen in one night. And shooting a person dead should always be treated seriously.

 

[Dick Tuck]

Sallow's decided the white guy is guilty. Do keep up.

I was right. You're not playing stupid.

Find the post where I said Zimmerman was guilty.

Link it.

Okay.

If you believed Zimmerman was innocent, you wouldn't believe the public was in danger.

I hope people follow your link, that you claim supports your contention. It shows your for the pathological liar that you are.

 

[Rocko]

Guilty? No..suspected? Yes.

I've never heard of someone being arrested and put on trial, where the led detectives of that case did not belive in the defendant's guilt.

Zimmerman didn't run a stop light. He shot an unarmed kid. That he was chasing around. At the very least there are 2 sides to that story. And it needed to be sorted out. That doesn't happen in one night. And shooting a person dead should always be treated seriously.

unbelievable.

Good luck Dave.

 

[bodecea]

Remember, if you're white and conservative, you're automatically guilty.

You know the biggest irony in this Dave?

They say it's not about race, It's about justice, but want to ignore our justice system. go figure.

In their justice, Whitey is always guilty.

Period.

Oh really. So you will have no trouble showing us evidence that all white people who are put on trial are convicted (found guilty).

Because you certainly wouldn't lie about this, would you?

 

[Avatar4321]

Justice..is Trial by jury.

Simple as that.

No... Justice would be not getting arrested if you don't commit a crime to begin with.