Zimmerman Threatens Man's Life

[Meathead]

Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.

Trayvon didn't go home which he could have easily done and/or called the police. His limited intellect and violent impulse turned him around, stalk and attack the "creepy ass cracker".

No theory about it. For all the whining, this was an open-and-shut case from the get go.

 

[Inevitable]

The difference is, this guy has actually killed someone.

That's why his threatening to kill someone in a road rage incident - AND following him to his place of work- should be taken a lot more seriously.

The system had the chance to lock him up after the Trayvon thing. It didn't.

So either he will kill someone else, or someone will kill him in self-defense. Or maybe some brothers on the street might recognize him and hilarity will ensue.

The difference is, this guy has actually killed someone and gotten away with it. In his dim witted little mind, he's been given a license to kill.

The court deemed out self defense. Anybody would get away with killing somebody in self defense.

Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.

We don't have just his word we have a TRIAL and the VERDICT of a Jury that believed him and so ruled.

The trial and jury verdict only prove that the jury found him not guilty based on their opinions of the evidence. He was never proven innocent. If the tables were turned and a black man hunted down and killed a white boy, your opinion would be just the opposite.

Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.

Trayvon didn't go home which he could have easily done and/or called the police. His limited intellect and violent impulse turned him around, stalk and attack the "creepy ass cracker".

No theory about it. For all the whining, this was an open-and-shut case from the get go.

Esmeralda is trying to say his actions sense means he wasn't defending himself. Even if he is a Scum bag the courts can't try him for murder again.

 

[Meathead]

The difference is, this guy has actually killed someone and gotten away with it. In his dim witted little mind, he's been given a license to kill.

The court deemed out self defense. Anybody would get away with killing somebody in self defense.

Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.

We don't have just his word we have a TRIAL and the VERDICT of a Jury that believed him and so ruled.

The trial and jury verdict only prove that the jury found him not guilty based on their opinions of the evidence. He was never proven innocent. If the tables were turned and a black man hunted down and killed a white boy, your opinion would be just the opposite.

Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.

Trayvon didn't go home which he could have easily done and/or called the police. His limited intellect and violent impulse turned him around, stalk and attack the "creepy ass cracker".

No theory about it. For all the whining, this was an open-and-shut case from the get go.

Esmeralda is trying to say his actions sense means he wasn't defending himself. Even if he is a Scum bag the courts can't try him for murder again.

I know what Esmeralda's doing. She is trying to drive a wedge between racial communities. That's what race pimps do.

 

[Inevitable]

The court deemed out self defense. Anybody would get away with killing somebody in self defense.

Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.

We don't have just his word we have a TRIAL and the VERDICT of a Jury that believed him and so ruled.

The trial and jury verdict only prove that the jury found him not guilty based on their opinions of the evidence. He was never proven innocent. If the tables were turned and a black man hunted down and killed a white boy, your opinion would be just the opposite.

Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.

Trayvon didn't go home which he could have easily done and/or called the police. His limited intellect and violent impulse turned him around, stalk and attack the "creepy ass cracker".

No theory about it. For all the whining, this was an open-and-shut case from the get go.

Esmeralda is trying to say his actions sense means he wasn't defending himself. Even if he is a Scum bag the courts can't try him for murder again.

I know what Esmeralda's doing. She is trying to drive a wedge between racial communities. That's what race pimps do.

Meh, murder is murder and I think most people see it that way.

 

[Meathead]

Meh, murder is murder and I think most people see it that way.

"Murder is murder" is a tautology and thus doubtlessly true. What happened to Martin was not murder according the doctrine of self defense and most people agree. After the trial, only hard-core race pimps and the ignorant were still calling it murder.

 

[Esmeralda]

The difference is, this guy has actually killed someone and gotten away with it. In his dim witted little mind, he's been given a license to kill.

The court deemed out self defense. Anybody would get away with killing somebody in self defense.

Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.

We don't have just his word we have a TRIAL and the VERDICT of a Jury that believed him and so ruled.

The trial and jury verdict only prove that the jury found him not guilty based on their opinions of the evidence. He was never proven innocent. If the tables were turned and a black man hunted down and killed a white boy, your opinion would be just the opposite.

Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.

Trayvon didn't go home which he could have easily done and/or called the police. His limited intellect and violent impulse turned him around, stalk and attack the "creepy ass cracker".

No theory about it. For all the whining, this was an open-and-shut case from the get go.

Esmeralda is trying to say his actions sense means he wasn't defending himself. Even if he is a Scum bag the courts can't try him for murder again.

They can try him for another murder, which he may very well do, given his behavior and personality.

 

[Esmeralda]

The difference is, this guy has actually killed someone and gotten away with it. In his dim witted little mind, he's been given a license to kill.

The court deemed out self defense. Anybody would get away with killing somebody in self defense.

Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.

Can you prove his guilt?

He killed someone, that is a fact. Whether he did it in self defense or not is the question. The evidence does not support self defense on his part any more than it supports self defense on Travyon's part. The jury chose to believe one thing. The verdict is controversial, as it should be. Zimmerman has proven, since the trial, to be a man who is trigger happy. That in itself is evidence that the killing of Martin was not justified. All indications are that Zimmerman will kill again, and part of that concept is based on the fact he already killed someone and did not suffer any legal penalty for it. I believe that in his mind, he has a license to kill. Why does he believe that? Because he is a trigger happy dimwit.

There is no question, a Jury determined he acted in self defense. End of story.

LOL It hasn't been the end of the story sense the end of the trial. That's what this thread is about. Over and over again this guy creates situations where he is threatening other people with death, at gun point. He's a murder waiting to happen. Let's just hope this time he's the one who ends up dead or in prison before he kills someone else.

 

[Politico]

The court deemed out self defense. Anybody would get away with killing somebody in self defense.

Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.

We don't have just his word we have a TRIAL and the VERDICT of a Jury that believed him and so ruled.

The trial and jury verdict only prove that the jury found him not guilty based on their opinions of the evidence. He was never proven innocent. If the tables were turned and a black man hunted down and killed a white boy, your opinion would be just the opposite.

Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.

Trayvon didn't go home which he could have easily done and/or called the police. His limited intellect and violent impulse turned him around, stalk and attack the "creepy ass cracker".

No theory about it. For all the whining, this was an open-and-shut case from the get go.

Esmeralda is trying to say his actions sense means he wasn't defending himself. Even if he is a Scum bag the courts can't try him for murder again.

They can try him for another murder, which he may very well do, given his behavior and personality.

You hate guns we get it.

 

[JoeB131]

How many blacks killed other blacks last weekend? Oh, that is right. Liberals do not care.

Those blacks, if caught by police, will be arrested, tried, and imprisoned for killing people. They will not be given a pat on the back and sent home, which is what the system did with Zimmerman.

 

[Esmeralda]

Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.

We don't have just his word we have a TRIAL and the VERDICT of a Jury that believed him and so ruled.

The trial and jury verdict only prove that the jury found him not guilty based on their opinions of the evidence. He was never proven innocent. If the tables were turned and a black man hunted down and killed a white boy, your opinion would be just the opposite.

Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.

Trayvon didn't go home which he could have easily done and/or called the police. His limited intellect and violent impulse turned him around, stalk and attack the "creepy ass cracker".

No theory about it. For all the whining, this was an open-and-shut case from the get go.

Esmeralda is trying to say his actions sense means he wasn't defending himself. Even if he is a Scum bag the courts can't try him for murder again.

They can try him for another murder, which he may very well do, given his behavior and personality.

You hate guns we get it.

What a stupid comment.

 

[JoeB131]

No Murder was committed you retard.

Oh so he died from natural causes then? bye stupid

You still haven't figured out that there is sometimes a difference between murder and homicide.

Seriously, you're in JoeB territory.

You mean awesomely humiliating the Euro-Trash? We know. I awesomely humiliate the Euro-trash all the time.

But Zimmerman straight up murdered this kid, and it's only a matter of time before he murders someone else.

 

[Esmeralda]

How many blacks killed other blacks last weekend? Oh, that is right. Liberals do not care.

Those blacks, if caught by police, will be arrested, tried, and imprisoned for killing people. They will not be given a pat on the back and sent home, which is what the system did with Zimmerman.

62% of those found to be innocent through DNA testing by 'The Innocence Project' have been African American.

The fact is a black man in this country is far more likely to be accused and found guilty of a crime than a white man. And far more of them are not actually guilty of the crime for which they are arrested and convicted. So the statistic that blacks commit so much more crime than whites is not accurate. Too many black men are in prison for crimes they did not commit.

Races of the 317 exonerees:

199 African Americans
94 Caucasians
22 Latinos
2 Asian American

 

[JoeB131]

The system had the chance to lock him up after the Trayvon thing. It didn't.

So either he will kill someone else, or someone will kill him in self-defense. Or maybe some brothers on the street might recognize him and hilarity will ensue.

The system cannot lock him away, he committed no crime.

You find thuggery hilarious? That's rather sick.

They couldn't lock him away because the Police didn't do their jobs. They didn't drug test him on the spot to see what he was under the influence of. They didn't do forenenics on the crime scene. IN fact, they didn't do anything near an investigation until months after the fact.

But what is becoming really obvious after his THIRD run in with the police since the murder, is that this guy is a time bomb waiting to go off.

 

[Theowl32]

How many blacks killed other blacks last weekend? Oh, that is right. Liberals do not care.

Those blacks, if caught by police, will be arrested, tried, and imprisoned for killing people. They will not be given a pat on the back and sent home, which is what the system did with Zimmerman.

62% of those found to be innocent through DNA testing by 'The Innocence Project' have been African American.

The fact is a black man in this country is far more likely to be accused and found guilty of a crime than a white man. And far more of them are not actually guilty of the crime for which they are arrested and convicted. So the statistic that blacks commit so much more crime than whites is not accurate. Too many black men are in prison for crimes they did not commit.

Races of the 317 exonerees:

199 African Americans
94 Caucasians
22 Latinos
2 Asian American

Huh, those found "innocent" or exonerated, means that another black man did not do the crime that they were accused of?

Meaning, just because a black man has been exonerated by DNA, does that mean a black man did not commit the crime that they went to prison for?

That sure as shit seems to be what you are implying.

What I do not know is OJ, regardless of what the DNA evidence conclusively said, was found NOT GUILTY for hacking two white people to death. Then after that, I saw loud cheers in the streets of America.

**** you, you race baiting, race dividing typical liberal piece of shit.

Hey everyone, just remember. Stats are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, what they conceal is vital.

This piece of left wing hack shit seems to be saying that since black men have been exonerated through DNA, means that a black person never committed the crime they were accused of.

Black people are just such innocent victims of right wing white people. There, I just summed up what this piece of shit wants us all to say.

 

[Theowl32]

The difference is, this guy has actually killed someone and gotten away with it. In his dim witted little mind, he's been given a license to kill.

The court deemed out self defense. Anybody would get away with killing somebody in self defense.

Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.

We don't have just his word we have a TRIAL and the VERDICT of a Jury that believed him and so ruled.

The trial and jury verdict only prove that the jury found him not guilty based on their opinions of the evidence. He was never proven innocent. If the tables were turned and a black man hunted down and killed a white boy, your opinion would be just the opposite.

Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.

Trayvon didn't go home which he could have easily done and/or called the police. His limited intellect and violent impulse turned him around, stalk and attack the "creepy ass cracker".

No theory about it. For all the whining, this was an open-and-shut case from the get go.

Esmeralda is trying to say his actions sense means he wasn't defending himself. Even if he is a Scum bag the courts can't try him for murder again.

Hi ******.

Murder is not murder when a thug is on top of you beating you down.

That is called self defense. Those are the facts. Now, go cry to your little boyfriend and have him pat you on your dandy head as you grind your teeth about how much you hate truth.

 

[Inevitable]

The court deemed out self defense. Anybody would get away with killing somebody in self defense.

Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.

We don't have just his word we have a TRIAL and the VERDICT of a Jury that believed him and so ruled.

The trial and jury verdict only prove that the jury found him not guilty based on their opinions of the evidence. He was never proven innocent. If the tables were turned and a black man hunted down and killed a white boy, your opinion would be just the opposite.

Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.

Trayvon didn't go home which he could have easily done and/or called the police. His limited intellect and violent impulse turned him around, stalk and attack the "creepy ass cracker".

No theory about it. For all the whining, this was an open-and-shut case from the get go.

Esmeralda is trying to say his actions sense means he wasn't defending himself. Even if he is a Scum bag the courts can't try him for murder again.

They can try him for another murder, which he may very well do, given his behavior and personality.

Being a dick to your wife and road rage equals murderer?

Good luck convincing a jury.

If/when he does murder somebody, than he will likely be convicted.

 

[Inevitable]

The court deemed out self defense. Anybody would get away with killing somebody in self defense.

Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.

We don't have just his word we have a TRIAL and the VERDICT of a Jury that believed him and so ruled.

The trial and jury verdict only prove that the jury found him not guilty based on their opinions of the evidence. He was never proven innocent. If the tables were turned and a black man hunted down and killed a white boy, your opinion would be just the opposite.

Except it wasn't self defense. We have only his word on that. He isn't believable. He set up the whole situation when he left his vehicle and followed Trayvon instead of waiting for the police, followed Trayvon and carried a loaded gun. As far as reality: Trayvon may have been acting in self defense: in fact, that's very likely as some stranger scary guy was following him. That Zimmerman was acting in self defense is not a fact, it is a theory, a self serving one for those who want the black kid to be the bad guy.

Trayvon didn't go home which he could have easily done and/or called the police. His limited intellect and violent impulse turned him around, stalk and attack the "creepy ass cracker".

No theory about it. For all the whining, this was an open-and-shut case from the get go.

Esmeralda is trying to say his actions sense means he wasn't defending himself. Even if he is a Scum bag the courts can't try him for murder again.

Hi ******.

Murder is not murder when a thug is on top of you beating you down.

That is called self defense. Those are the facts. Now, go cry to your little boyfriend and have him pat you on your dandy head as you grind your teeth about how much you hate truth.

Hi way too interested in my sex life to claim you are straight, no shit. I know Zimmerman didn't murder anybody. He was it was deemed self defense by police on the scene then by the court.

You just agreed with me you moron.

 

[JoeB131]

[
Being a dick to your wife and road rage equals murderer?

Good luck convincing a jury.

If/when he does murder somebody, than he will likely be convicted.

When he does murder someone, we are going to wonder why we didn't lock him up the FIRST time he killed someone.

 

[Inevitable]

The system had the chance to lock him up after the Trayvon thing. It didn't.

So either he will kill someone else, or someone will kill him in self-defense. Or maybe some brothers on the street might recognize him and hilarity will ensue.

The system cannot lock him away, he committed no crime.

You find thuggery hilarious? That's rather sick.

They couldn't lock him away because the Police didn't do their jobs. They didn't drug test him on the spot to see what he was under the influence of. They didn't do forenenics on the crime scene. IN fact, they didn't do anything near an investigation until months after the fact.

But what is becoming really obvious after his THIRD run in with the police since the murder, is that this guy is a time bomb waiting to go off.

If you have proof he is guilty, why didn't you inform the prosecution?

 

[Inevitable]

[
Being a dick to your wife and road rage equals murderer?

Good luck convincing a jury.

If/when he does murder somebody, than he will likely be convicted.

When he does murder someone, we are going to wonder why we didn't lock him up the FIRST time he killed someone.

You shouldn't, you can't lock somebody up if the prosecution couldn't prove guilt.