Meathead
Diamond Member
I don't care much for Zimmerman, but you got to admire how he gets his detractors panties bunched up. It's almost like he's doing it on purpose.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Countless times. Probably over a million.How many times has this happened to you?I've had someone accuse me of throwing bottle at them when I threw it directly on the ground. I got the incident on security camera video and the liar was convicted of perjury.
I don't care much for Zimmerman, but you got to admire how he gets his detractors panties bunched up. It's almost like he's doing it on purpose.
He keeps himself in the news probably just to aggravate prigs like the OP.I don't care much for Zimmerman, but you got to admire how he gets his detractors panties bunched up. It's almost like he's doing it on purpose.
The guy is an idiot and the lefties go nuts over him. They seem to hang on every arrest and subsequent release. It is very amusing.
I expect a new thread to pop up the next time he`s arrested....and he will be. You think? He`s more than a nut, he`s a nut that took a kids` life and got away with it only because Florida has a "right to shoot an unarmed man" law.How exciting another Zimmerman thread.
Zimmerman is a nut, big deal.
Good grief the left is so obsessed with this guy.
How many more threads on this latest nothing story?
The interest people have in him is that he got away with murder and he is clearly someone who is violent and psychotic. He is another OJ Simpson, and some day it's going to catch up with him, as it did with OJ. We pay attention to him because we are waiting to see that happen: that he gets what he deserves.I expect a new thread to pop up the next time he`s arrested....and he will be. You think? He`s more than a nut, he`s a nut that took a kids` life and got away with it only because Florida has a "right to shoot an unarmed man" law.How exciting another Zimmerman thread.
Zimmerman is a nut, big deal.
Good grief the left is so obsessed with this guy.
How many more threads on this latest nothing story?
How many times has this happened to you? Because it happens over and over again to him. Where there is smoke, there is fire.I've had someone accuse me of throwing bottle at them when I threw it directly on the ground. I got the incident on security camera video and the liar was convicted of perjury.
The interest people have in him is that he got away with murder and he is clearly someone who is violent and psychotic. He is another OJ Simpson, and some day it's going to catch up with him, as it did with OJ. We pay attention to him because we are waiting to see that happen: that he gets what he deserves.
Okay, it's time to ignore you. You're stupid as well as crazy. Your use of hyperbole does not help your position: you are apparently the one obsessed with defending someone who is not defensible. Men who are domestic abusers should not be defended: but only a decent, reasonable man would know that. Anyway, bye. You are not worthy of my attention.
How many times has this happened to you? Because it happens over and over again to him. Where there is smoke, there is fire.I've had someone accuse me of throwing bottle at them when I threw it directly on the ground. I got the incident on security camera video and the liar was convicted of perjury.
I expect a new thread to pop up the next time he`s arrested....and he will be. You think? He`s more than a nut, he`s a nut that took a kids` life and got away with it only because Florida has a "right to shoot an unarmed man" law.How exciting another Zimmerman thread.
Zimmerman is a nut, big deal.
Good grief the left is so obsessed with this guy.
How many more threads on this latest nothing story?
No, I disagree. This is similar to the OJ thing. He was let off by a jury that was mostly black. Most people, black and white, believed he was guilty. Zimmerman, who is a 'white' Hispanic, was let off by a jury that was mostly white. Most people believe Zimmerman is guilty. People continued to be interested in OJ and were pleased to see he eventually got what they believed he deserves. Same thing with Zimmerman: he's a tragedy waiting to happen. At some point, he's going to end up in jail: hope it won't be because he injures someone, or kills again.The interest people have in him is that he got away with murder and he is clearly someone who is violent and psychotic. He is another OJ Simpson, and some day it's going to catch up with him, as it did with OJ. We pay attention to him because we are waiting to see that happen: that he gets what he deserves.
Horseshit, the interest in Zimm is the wing-nuts who can't let this go, who will not abide in the courts decisions in this matter and the fact that his skin is light, thereby making him a "white Hispanic," whatever the hell THAT is supposed to mean...
Actually, what's perfectly possible is that this guy is a domestic abuser and at some point, he's going to end up in jail where he belongs.How many times has this happened to you? Because it happens over and over again to him. Where there is smoke, there is fire.I've had someone accuse me of throwing bottle at them when I threw it directly on the ground. I got the incident on security camera video and the liar was convicted of perjury.
Bad analogy. We know smoke comes from fire, but we don't know whether 4 accusations or 100 accusations are true unless they are proven true. Could it be that women involved with Zimmerman take advantage of his fame to blame him for things he didn't do when they get mad at him? That's perfectly possible, but you are a liberal, so you have to pretend you know the truth.
People are most likely to say what happened the closer to the incident. That's not a mistake: that is backed up by psychology. He said she threw the bottle after she accused him of throwing it: as always, he claims the other person did what he actually did (same thing with his encounter with Martin). He has repeatedly shown rage and disregard for the safety of others. And finally, it may be that the woman is not the one to prosecute, but the authorities know without the woman supporting a prosecution, they are unlikely to win.Your thread contains several idiotic errors which I list here:
1) But it also shows his rage and his disregard for the safety of others.
In fact, it only shows his rage if it's proved that HE threw the bottle. He said she threw it and she said he threw it, and you were not there.
2) And it did happen, as the woman spoke of it just a few minutes after it happened.
The fact that a woman says something happen doesn't necessarily mean it happened. What you mean is that you WANT it to have happened because you want Zimmerman locked up. Get it right.
3) For some reason, like most victims of domestic abuse, these women choose to not prosecute.
It's not up to the alleged victim to prosecute. It is the DA who prosecutes or doesn't prosecute.
You need to stop and think for a minute or two before you post something so you won't make these obvious mistakes.
Made any sweeping accusations lately? You don't know anything about me or my perspective on the world. What I do know, and it's not from the media but from knowledge of sociology and psychology, are the characteristics of men who are domestic abusers. The incident he was most recently engaged in is one of a series of domestic abuse incidents in which he has been involved. How can you question that? Don't you know his history. And, btw, I am not a 'media groupie.' I don't even live in the States and rarely pay attention to US media. As well, a feminist is someone who believes in equal rights for men and women: you are probably a feminist. LOLOkay, it's time to ignore you. You're stupid as well as crazy. Your use of hyperbole does not help your position: you are apparently the one obsessed with defending someone who is not defensible. Men who are domestic abusers should not be defended: but only a decent, reasonable man would know that. Anyway, bye. You are not worthy of my attention.
You really demonstrate how unfair-minded and thin-skinned you are with statements like this.
"Men who are domestic abusers."
Who said he was and where is any proof of this alleged abuse? There is none. You are such a wide eye'd pro-feminist media groupie that you willingly accept any information that paints Zimmerman in a bad light.
Made any sweeping accusations lately? You don't know anything about me or my perspective on the world. What I do know, and it's not from the media but from knowledge of sociology and psychology, are the characteristics of men who are domestic abusers. The incident he was most recently engaged in is one of a series of domestic abuse incidents in which he has been involved. How can you question that? Don't you know his history. And, btw, I am not a 'media groupie.' I don't even live in the States and rarely pay attention to US media. As well, a feminist is someone who believes in equal rights for men and women: you are probably a feminist. LOL
People are most likely to say what happened the closer to the incident. That's not a mistake: that is backed up by psychology. He said she threw the bottle after she accused him of throwing it: as always, he claims the other person did what he actually did (same thing with his encounter with Martin). He has repeatedly shown rage and disregard for the safety of others. And finally, it may be that the woman is not the one to prosecute, but the authorities know without the woman supporting a prosecution, they are unlikely to win.
I haven't made any mistakes. You have misinterpreted the situation.