Nay, nay, fuckstick! Your criticism of Dogbert's plualization referred to his use of "others and their religions."Religions are like fishes. When you have more than one kind, they are religions. Various religions use various standards and methods of worship. Religion suffices as a definition of each one of the many religions in existence just as fish suffices as a definition of each of the various fishes known to man."Religions?" Where did you get the plural from?
In this case, Dogbert is correct...you are not.
In this case, both you and Dogbert are incorrect. I referred to "one" religion, "specifically." Not two, three, four, or any other type of conglomerate that you are trying to spin this into. The correct term when referencing "one specific item" is to describe it singularly.
My mother was a teacher. It appears I benefited from that more than whatever education it is that you or Dogbert have. Possibly you're still in school and haven't gotten to basic grammar yet.
Perhaps you should take a comprehension class.
Your mother failed you.
...and the neg rep was expected...candy ass!
Last edited: