Your guide to manmade climate disasters in the world today

[otto105]

Fvck, you can't even spell in what I presume is your native language.

I'll give you an out. Are you drunk?

Come on meaty.

 

[otto105]

LOL!!!


You are just parroting that which is 100% outed as wrong, deliberate intentional fudge.

You don't understand science at all.

GAME OVER

Where is the science before you run away climate toddler.

Post your attempt to debunk those facts.

 

[Meathead]

Come on meaty.

I don't do trans faggots. Move on. Sealyfag?

 

[markef]

How did science change its mind?

Science is based on what’s provable?

Unlike this maga exercise in being the stupidest versions of yourselves

"Science' claimed the Piltdown Man was one of the greatest fossil finds in history, and that lie found its way into school textbooks for nearly 50 years before Christians finally proved the evolutionists themselves had fabricated the hoaz.

 

[markef]

Evidently, she doesn’t give a shit about climate anymore .. it’s the new and improved political topic — “Palastenians”. You know .. the group of people who don’t really have a country

 

[markef]

Exactly .. except when men can magically become women.

 

[otto105]

I don't do trans faggots. Move on. Sealyfag?

Damn, run along loser.

 

[markef]

Hilarious

You know how maga man feels the day changed. He believes the sun revolves around a flat earth.

BTW do 95% of nuclear scientists trust carbon dating theory?

The brightest and most honest scientists do not simply dismiss data that contradicts generally accepted narratives. There are many unanswered questions and unsolved mysteries about carbon dating that make carbon dating speculations open to debate.

More Bad News for Radiometric Dating (unc.edu)

Most scientists today believe that life has existed on the earth for billions of years. This belief in long ages for the earth and the existence of life is derived largely from radiometric dating. These long time periods are computed by measuring the ratio of daughter to parent substance in a rock and inferring an age based on this ratio. This age is computed under the assumption that the parent substance (say, uranium) gradually decays to the daughter substance (say, lead), so the higher the ratio of lead to uranium, the older the rock must be. Of course, there are many problems with such dating methods, such as parent or daughter substances entering or leaving the rock, as well as daughter product being present at the beginning. ...

Geologists assert that older dates are found deeper down in the geologic column, which they take as evidence that radiometric dating is giving true ages, since it is apparent that rocks that are deeper must be older. But even if it is true that older radiometric dates are found lower down in the geologic column, which is open to question, this can potentially be explained by processes occurring in magma chambers which cause the lava erupting earlier to appear older than the lava erupting later. Lava erupting earlier would come from the top of the magma chamber, and lava erupting later would come from lower down. A number of processes could cause the parent substance to be depleted at the top of the magma chamber, or the daughter product to be enriched, both of which would cause the lava erupting earlier to appear very old according to radiometric dating, and lava erupting later to appear younger. ...

Mechanisms that can alter daughter-to-parent ratios

What happens when magma solidifies and melts and its implications for radiometric dating​

The following quote from The Earth: An Introduction to Physical Geology by Tarbuck & Lutgens, pp. 55-57, (1987), gives us an idea of the tremendous complexity of the processes that occur when magma solidifies. The general idea is that many different minerals are formed, which differ from one another in composition, even though they come from the same magma.

The mineral makeup of an igneous rock is ultimately determined by the chemical composition of the magma from which it crystallized. Such a large variety of igneous rocks exists that it is logical to assume an equally large variety of magmas must also exist. However, geologists have found that various eruptive stages of the same volcano often extrude lavas exhibiting somewhat different mineral compositions, particularly if an extensive period of time separated the eruptions. Evidence of this type led them to look into the possibility that a single magma might produce rocks of varying mineral content.

A pioneering investigation into the crystallization of magma was carried out by N. L. Bowen in the first quarter of this century. Bowen discovered that as magma cools in the laboratory, certain minerals crystallize first. At successively lower temperature, other minerals begin to crystallize as shown in Figure 3.6. As the crystallization process continues, the composition of the melt (liquid portion of a magma, excluding any solid material continually changes. For example, at the stage when about 50 percent of the magma has solidified, the melt will be greatly depleted in iron, magnesium, and calcium, because these elements are found in the earliest formed minerals. But at the same time, it will be enriched in the elements contained in the later forming minerals, namely sodium and potassium. Further, the silicon content of the melt becomes enriched toward the latter stages of crystallization. Bowen also demonstrated that if a mineral remained in the melt after it had crystallized, it would react with the remaining melt and produce the next mineral in the sequence shown in Figure 3.6. For this reason, this arrangement of minerals became known as Bowen's reaction series. On the upper left branch of this reaction series, olivine, the first mineral to form, Ml] react with the remaining melt to become pyroxene. This reaction will continue until the last mineral in the series, biotite mica, is formed. This left branch is called a discontinuous reaction series because each mineral has a different crystalline structure. Recall that olivine is composed of a single tetrahedra and that the other minerals in this sequence are composed of single chains, double chains, and sheet structures, respectively. Ordinarily, these reactions are not complete so that various amounts of each of these minerals may exist at any given time. ...

 

[markef]

The brightest and most honest scientists do not simply dismiss data that contradicts generally accepted narratives. There are many unanswered questions and unsolved mysteries about carbon dating that make carbon dating speculations open to debate.

More Bad News for Radiometric Dating (unc.edu)


The right branch of the reaction series is a continuum in which the earliest formed calcium-rich feldspar crystals react with the sodium ions contained in the melt to become progressively more sodium rich. Oftentimes the rate of cooling occurs rapidly enough to prohibit the complete transformation of calcium-rich feldspar into sodium-rich feldspar. In these instances, the feldspar crystals will have calcium-rich interiors surrounded by zones that are progressively richer in sodium. During the last stage of crystallization, after most of the magma has solidified, the remaining melt will form the minerals quartz, muscovite mica, and potassium feldspar. Although these minerals crystallize in the order shown, this sequence is not a true reaction series. Bowen demonstrated that minerals crystallize from magma in a systematic fashion. But how does Bowen's reaction series account for the great diversity of igneous rocks? It appears that at one or more stages in the crystallization process, a separation of the solid and liquid components of a magma frequently occurs. This can happen, for example, if the earlier formed minerals are heavier than the liquid portion and settle to the bottom of the magma chamber as shown in Figure 3.7A. This settling is thought to occur frequently with the dark silicates, such as olivine. When the remaining melt crystallizes, either in place or in a new location if it migrates out of the chamber, it will form a rock with a chemical composition much different from the original magma (Figure 3.7B). In many instances the melt which has migrated from the initial magma chamber will undergo further segregation. As crystallization progresses in the " new" magma, the solid particles may accumulate into rocklike masses surrounded by pockets of the still molten material. It is very likely that some of this melt will be squeezed from the mixture into the cracks which develop in the surrounding rock. This process will generate an igneous rock of yet another composition.

The process involving the segregation of minerals by differential crystallization an separation is called fractional crystallization. At any stage in the crystallization process the melt might be separated from the solid portion of the magma. Consequently, fractional crystallization can produce igneous rocks having a wide range of compositions. Bowen successfully demonstrated that through fractional crystallization one magma can generate several different igneous rocks. However, more recent work has indicated that this process cannot account for the relative quantities of the various rock types known to exist. Although more than one rock type can be generated from a single magma, apparently other mechanisms also exist to generate magmas of quite varied chemical compositions. We will examine some of these mechanisms at the end of the next chapter.

 

[Meathead]

Damn, run along loser.

Sealybobo aka Sealyfag. A current member. Look him up. He likes it too.

 

[otto105]

"Science' claimed the Piltdown Man was one of the greatest fossil finds in history, and that lie found its way into school textbooks for nearly 50 years before Christians finally proved the evolutionists themselves had fabricated the hoaz.

Hilarious

It was science doing its function that exposed the Piltdown Man to be a forgery after 41 years. Additionally, it wasn't "science" that claimed the forgery the greatest fossil find as many people questioned the find immediately.

It was also science which exposed the christian shroud of Turin to be a hoax after centuries.

Currently, the fossil records is very complete in spite of christianty.

 

[otto105]

Sealybobo aka Sealyfag. A current member. Look him up. He likes it too.

Likes what?

Claiming a sky god to be real and provable.

 

[Meathead]

Likes what?

Claiming a sky god to be real and provable.

Buttsex

 

[markef]

The brightest and most honest scientists do not simply dismiss data that contradicts generally accepted narratives. There are many unanswered questions and unsolved mysteries about carbon dating that make carbon dating speculations open to debate.

More Bad News for Radiometric Dating (unc.edu)

So we see that many varieties of minerals are produced from the same magma by the different processes of crystallization, and these different minerals may have very different compositions. It is possible that the ratio of daughter to parent substances for radiometric dating could differ in the different minerals. Clearly, it is important to have a good understanding of these processes in order to evaluate the reliability of radiometric dating. ...

Contamination and fractionation issues are frankly acknowledged by the geologic community.2 For example, if a magma chamber does not have homogeneously mixed isotopes, lighter daughter products could accumulate in the upper portion of the chamber. If this occurs, initial volcanic eruptions would have a preponderance of daughter products relative to the parent isotopes. Such a distribution would give the appearance of age. As the magma chamber is depleted in daughter products, subsequent lava flows and ash beds would have younger dates. ...

It is interesting that contamination and fractionation issues are frankly acknowledged by the geologic community. But they may not be so familiar to the readers of talk.origins and other forums where creation and evolution are discussed. ...

Another possibility to keep in mind is that lead becomes gaseous at low temperatures, and would be gaseous in magma if it were not for the extreme pressures deep in the earth. It also becomes very mobile when hot. These processes could influence the distribution of lead in magma chambers. ...

We need to consider the implications of this for radiometric dating. How is this excess of radium being produced? This radium cannot be the result of decay of uranium, since there is far too much of it. Either it is the result of an unknown decay process, or it is the result of fractionation which is greatly increasing the concentration of radium or greatly decreasing the concentration of uranium. Thus only a small fraction of the radium present in the lava (at most 10 percent) is the result of decay of the uranium in the lava. ...

This is interesting because both radium and lead are daughter products of uranium. If similar fractionation processes are operating for lead, this would mean that only a small fraction of the lead is the result of decay from the parent uranium, implying that the U-Pb radiometric dates are much, much too old. Cortini, in an article appearing in the Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research also suggests this possibility. He says:

"The invalidity of the Th-230 dating method is a consequence of the open-system behaviour of U and Th. By analogy with the behaviour of Ra, Th and U it can be suggested that Pb, owing to its large mobility, was also fed to the magma by fluids. This can and must be tested. The open-system behaviour of Pb, if true, would have dramatic consequences...." J Vol Geotherm Res 14 (1982) 247-260.

 

[markef]

Where is the evidence that convince that he has committed a crime?

Also, how does our justice system work? Is it guilty until proven innocent?

Some very intelligent and respectable lawmakers in congress are investigating Fauci's testimony because of some very disturbing signs of lying.

 

[otto105]

The brightest and most honest scientists do not simply dismiss data that contradicts generally accepted narratives. There are many unanswered questions and unsolved mysteries about carbon dating that make carbon dating speculations open to debate.

More Bad News for Radiometric Dating (unc.edu)

Most scientists today believe that life has existed on the earth for billions of years. This belief in long ages for the earth and the existence of life is derived largely from radiometric dating. These long time periods are computed by measuring the ratio of daughter to parent substance in a rock and inferring an age based on this ratio. This age is computed under the assumption that the parent substance (say, uranium) gradually decays to the daughter substance (say, lead), so the higher the ratio of lead to uranium, the older the rock must be. Of course, there are many problems with such dating methods, such as parent or daughter substances entering or leaving the rock, as well as daughter product being present at the beginning. ...

Geologists assert that older dates are found deeper down in the geologic column, which they take as evidence that radiometric dating is giving true ages, since it is apparent that rocks that are deeper must be older. But even if it is true that older radiometric dates are found lower down in the geologic column, which is open to question, this can potentially be explained by processes occurring in magma chambers which cause the lava erupting earlier to appear older than the lava erupting later. Lava erupting earlier would come from the top of the magma chamber, and lava erupting later would come from lower down. A number of processes could cause the parent substance to be depleted at the top of the magma chamber, or the daughter product to be enriched, both of which would cause the lava erupting earlier to appear very old according to radiometric dating, and lava erupting later to appear younger. ...

Mechanisms that can alter daughter-to-parent ratios

What happens when magma solidifies and melts and its implications for radiometric dating​

The following quote from The Earth: An Introduction to Physical Geology by Tarbuck & Lutgens, pp. 55-57, (1987), gives us an idea of the tremendous complexity of the processes that occur when magma solidifies. The general idea is that many different minerals are formed, which differ from one another in composition, even though they come from the same magma.

The mineral makeup of an igneous rock is ultimately determined by the chemical composition of the magma from which it crystallized. Such a large variety of igneous rocks exists that it is logical to assume an equally large variety of magmas must also exist. However, geologists have found that various eruptive stages of the same volcano often extrude lavas exhibiting somewhat different mineral compositions, particularly if an extensive period of time separated the eruptions. Evidence of this type led them to look into the possibility that a single magma might produce rocks of varying mineral content.

A pioneering investigation into the crystallization of magma was carried out by N. L. Bowen in the first quarter of this century. Bowen discovered that as magma cools in the laboratory, certain minerals crystallize first. At successively lower temperature, other minerals begin to crystallize as shown in Figure 3.6. As the crystallization process continues, the composition of the melt (liquid portion of a magma, excluding any solid material continually changes. For example, at the stage when about 50 percent of the magma has solidified, the melt will be greatly depleted in iron, magnesium, and calcium, because these elements are found in the earliest formed minerals. But at the same time, it will be enriched in the elements contained in the later forming minerals, namely sodium and potassium. Further, the silicon content of the melt becomes enriched toward the latter stages of crystallization. Bowen also demonstrated that if a mineral remained in the melt after it had crystallized, it would react with the remaining melt and produce the next mineral in the sequence shown in Figure 3.6. For this reason, this arrangement of minerals became known as Bowen's reaction series. On the upper left branch of this reaction series, olivine, the first mineral to form, Ml] react with the remaining melt to become pyroxene. This reaction will continue until the last mineral in the series, biotite mica, is formed. This left branch is called a discontinuous reaction series because each mineral has a different crystalline structure. Recall that olivine is composed of a single tetrahedra and that the other minerals in this sequence are composed of single chains, double chains, and sheet structures, respectively. Ordinarily, these reactions are not complete so that various amounts of each of these minerals may exist at any given time. ...

Really.

Like
Dislike

Carbon dating is a scientifically validated method for estimating the age of organic materials up to about 50,000–60,000 years old.​

How Carbon Dating Works​

Carbon dating, also known as radiocarbon dating, relies on the radioactive decay of carbon-14 (C-14), a naturally occurring isotope of carbon. C-14 is formed in the upper atmosphere when cosmic rays interact with nitrogen-14, and it becomes incorporated into living organisms through carbon dioxide in plants and the food chain. While an organism is alive, it maintains a constant ratio of C-14 to stable carbon-12 (C-12). After death, C-14 decays back into nitrogen-14 at a predictable rate, with a half-life of approximately 5,730 years. By measuring the remaining C-14 in a sample, scientists can estimate the time since the organism died biologyinsights.com+2.

Reliability and Validation​

Carbon dating is widely used in archaeology, geology, and environmental science and has been validated through cross-referencing with other dating methods, such as dendrochronology (tree-ring dating) and historically dated artifacts like the Dead Sea Scrolls. Calibration curves account for variations in atmospheric C-14 over time, improving accuracy. Modern laboratories also correct for contamination and other potential sources of error biologyinsights.com+2.

Limitations​

While carbon dating is reliable, it has limitations. It is effective only for organic materials up to roughly 50,000–60,000 years old; beyond this, the remaining C-14 is too low to measure accurately. It cannot date inorganic materials like rocks or metals, and results can be affected by contamination, reservoir effects, or unusual carbon sources in the organism’s environment scienceinsights.org+1. These limitations are well understood and accounted for in scientific practice.

Conclusion​

Carbon dating is a proven and reliable scientific method for dating relatively recent organic materials. Its accuracy is supported by decades of research, cross-validation, and Nobel Prize–winning work by Willard Libby, who developed the technique in the late 1940s. While it has specific constraints, when applied correctly, it provides trustworthy chronological information for archaeology, geology, and related fields

 

[otto105]

Some very intelligent and respectable lawmakers in congress are investigating Fauci's testimony because of some very disturbing signs of lying.

Name them.

Because I just see hacks on one side.

Also, what lying? Show the work.

 

[markef]

Can you offer proof like science has to offer?

Didn't SCOTUS rule that nobody could speak with authority on transgenderism without a high level of training in science fiction wokism, or something like that?

 

[otto105]

Buttsex

Why did you bring up your latent sexual insecurities in a discussion about proof of any god?

 

[otto105]

Didn't SCOTUS rule that nobody could speak with authority on transgenderism without a high level of training in science fiction wokism, or something like that?

View attachment 1272980

Do the doctors involved (or anyone for that matter) not know what gender is?