Your guide to manmade climate disasters in the world today

[markef]

View attachment 1272963

Someone should tell poor Greta that she is getting all worked up over nothing. Hundreds of 'experts' may offer thousands of different opinions about the effects of human activities or volcanoes on the global warming assumptions but nobody's position has yet been proven irrefutably accurate.

How Can Volcanic Eruptions Cause Global Warming? Nature’s Unexpected Role

Discover how volcanic eruptions impact global warming in surprising ways. Explore nature’s unexpected role in climate change and volcanic activity’s effects on our planet’s temperature.

agclimate.org

The connection between volcanic activity and climate change is complex. When a volcano erupts, it expels vast quantities of ash and gases into the atmosphere, including carbon dioxide (CO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and various other aerosols. This release can have both cooling and warming effects on global temperatures, depending on the composition and intensity of the eruption. Initially, one might think that volcanic eruptions emit a significant amount of CO2, a known greenhouse gas. However, the reality is more nuanced.

 

[markef]

Hilarious

It was science doing its function that exposed the Piltdown Man to be a forgery after 41 years. Additionally, it wasn't "science" that claimed the forgery the greatest fossil find as many people questioned the find immediately.

It was also science which exposed the christian shroud of Turin to be a hoax after centuries.

Currently, the fossil records is very complete in spite of christianty.

Christians rejected the fake Piltdown Man from the beginning. It took decades for secular scientists to finally look into the hoax like Christians were telling them to do for years.

 

[markef]

Really.

Like
Dislike

Carbon dating is a scientifically validated method for estimating the age of organic materials up to about 50,000–60,000 years old.​

How Carbon Dating Works​

Carbon dating, also known as radiocarbon dating, relies on the radioactive decay of carbon-14 (C-14), a naturally occurring isotope of carbon. C-14 is formed in the upper atmosphere when cosmic rays interact with nitrogen-14, and it becomes incorporated into living organisms through carbon dioxide in plants and the food chain. While an organism is alive, it maintains a constant ratio of C-14 to stable carbon-12 (C-12). After death, C-14 decays back into nitrogen-14 at a predictable rate, with a half-life of approximately 5,730 years. By measuring the remaining C-14 in a sample, scientists can estimate the time since the organism died biologyinsights.com+2.

Reliability and Validation​

Carbon dating is widely used in archaeology, geology, and environmental science and has been validated through cross-referencing with other dating methods, such as dendrochronology (tree-ring dating) and historically dated artifacts like the Dead Sea Scrolls. Calibration curves account for variations in atmospheric C-14 over time, improving accuracy. Modern laboratories also correct for contamination and other potential sources of error biologyinsights.com+2.

Limitations​

While carbon dating is reliable, it has limitations. It is effective only for organic materials up to roughly 50,000–60,000 years old; beyond this, the remaining C-14 is too low to measure accurately. It cannot date inorganic materials like rocks or metals, and results can be affected by contamination, reservoir effects, or unusual carbon sources in the organism’s environment scienceinsights.org+1. These limitations are well understood and accounted for in scientific practice.

Conclusion​

Carbon dating is a proven and reliable scientific method for dating relatively recent organic materials. Its accuracy is supported by decades of research, cross-validation, and Nobel Prize–winning work by Willard Libby, who developed the technique in the late 1940s. While it has specific constraints, when applied correctly, it provides trustworthy chronological information for archaeology, geology, and related fields

The fact that reliable dating labs tested the dinosaur bones and found them to be less than 50,000 years old proves several things.

Old bones can be carbon dated fairly accurately regardless of how old the bones are. If the bones are older than 100,000 years the remaining carbon will be so low that the results will reflect that. There is no scientific way to use carbon dating to distinguish between bones that are supposedly too old to test and bones that are supposedly young enough to be tested.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Someone should tell poor Greta that she is getting all worked up over nothing. Hundreds of 'experts' may offer thousands of different opinions about the effects of human activities or volcanoes on the global warming assumptions but nobody's position has yet been proven irrefutably accurate.

How Can Volcanic Eruptions Cause Global Warming? Nature’s Unexpected Role

Discover how volcanic eruptions impact global warming in surprising ways. Explore nature’s unexpected role in climate change and volcanic activity’s effects on our planet’s temperature.

agclimate.org

The connection between volcanic activity and climate change is complex. When a volcano erupts, it expels vast quantities of ash and gases into the atmosphere, including carbon dioxide (CO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and various other aerosols. This release can have both cooling and warming effects on global temperatures, depending on the composition and intensity of the eruption. Initially, one might think that volcanic eruptions emit a significant amount of CO2, a known greenhouse gas. However, the reality is more nuanced.

Greta is an idiot.
Your blogspot photo was still wrong.
And there were no dinosaurs 39000 years ago.

 

[markef]

Science uses radioisotope dating for that.

Some labs were tricked into carbon dating dinosaur bones and the findings were really eye-opening.

 

[markef]

Greta is an idiot.
Your blogspot photo was still wrong.
And there were no dinosaurs 39000 years ago.

You've been told that dinosaurs went extinct millions of years ago but that speculation is wrong.

 

[otto105]

Some labs were tricked into carbon dating dinosaur bones and the findings were really eye-opening.

Irrelevant.

 

[otto105]

You've been told that dinosaurs went extinct millions of years ago but that speculation is wrong.

The bible puts the earth at about 8,000 years old.

Do you believe that?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Democrats live in a world short on facts and long on hysteria.

If only the widmill people would bribe Trump you could believe it was real.

 

[EMH]

Wow, an article from 2005.

Hilarious

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

You offered that.

Indeed, and what it shows is the ACTUAL DATA from the instruments showed NO WARMING for more than 3 decades of rising atmospheric CO2 in highly correlated fashion, then was FUDGED with BS excuses that don't explain the changes.

Orbit wobble wouldn't change the satellite readings at all.

A "shade issue" would be corrected by adding a CONSTANT to all data in the series, keeping a flat line a FLAT LINE


but somehow both managed to turn a FLAT LINE into a fudged "upward slope," and only a REAL SCIENCE INVALID MORON like you would accept that.

KEEP READING that OP, it gets better....

 

[markef]

The bible puts the earth at about 8,000 years old.

Do you believe that?

The archaeological record lists the oldest civilization on earth at about 10,000 years.

 

[EMH]

The archaeological record lists the oldest civilization on earth at about 10,000 years.

Antarctica has 2.7 million ice core layers, and that's not even a mile down.

How old is Antarctic ice?

 

[markef]

Antarctica has 2.7 million ice core layers, and that's not even a mile down.

How old is Antarctic ice?

Somewhere in the neighborhood of 10,000 years, give or take

 

[otto105]

Yup

Why?

Are you so stupid.

 

[EMH]

Somewhere in the neighborhood of 10,000 years, give or take

So God created it 2.5 miles thick with those ice core layers already there?


Ice core layers are annual accumulations of snowfall compressed into ice over millennia. Like tree rings, these strata form a geological archive. Scientists extract long cylinders of ice to drill deep into glaciers and ice sheets, unlocking thousands of years of historical climate data

https://www.science.org/content/article/record-shattering-27-million-year-old-ice-core-reveals-start-ice-ages

 

[westwall]

You've been told that dinosaurs went extinct millions of years ago but that speculation is wrong.

Ummm, no. I personally know for a fact that dinosaurs went extinct millions of years ago because I took part in excavations that removed fossils from formations that we KNOW were 60+ million years old.

 

[otto105]

Indeed, and what it shows is the ACTUAL DATA from the instruments showed NO WARMING for more than 3 decades of rising atmospheric CO2 in highly correlated fashion, then was FUDGED with BS excuses that don't explain the changes.

Orbit wobble wouldn't change the satellite readings at all.

A "shade issue" would be corrected by adding a CONSTANT to all data in the series, keeping a flat line a FLAT LINE


but somehow both managed to turn a FLAT LINE into a fudged "upward slope," and only a REAL SCIENCE INVALID MORON like you would accept that.

KEEP READING that OP, it gets better....

What is the point of the article?

Climate Toddler.

 

[markef]

So God created it 2.5 miles thick with those ice core layers already there?


Ice core layers are annual accumulations of snowfall compressed into ice over millennia. Like tree rings, these strata form a geological archive. Scientists extract long cylinders of ice to drill deep into glaciers and ice sheets, unlocking thousands of years of historical climate data

https://www.science.org/content/article/record-shattering-27-million-year-old-ice-core-reveals-start-ice-ages

Perhaps the assumption that ice core layers are formed yearly is an erroneous assumption. Given other details about ice cores I would guarantee that ice core layers are not formed just yearly.

 

[markef]

So God created it 2.5 miles thick with those ice core layers already there?


Ice core layers are annual accumulations of snowfall compressed into ice over millennia. Like tree rings, these strata form a geological archive. Scientists extract long cylinders of ice to drill deep into glaciers and ice sheets, unlocking thousands of years of historical climate data

https://www.science.org/content/article/record-shattering-27-million-year-old-ice-core-reveals-start-ice-ages

Let's do a little math. If the average thickness of a single Greenland ice core layer is 2 meters and the longest ice core measures 1,900 meters in dept, how long must it have taken for those 1,900 meters of ice to have formed? I'm coming up with 950 years, not hundreds of thousands of years.


Average thickness of Greenland ice core layers

1. 
   
   
   
   
   
   

   Average Thickness of Greenland Ice Core Layers​

   The average thickness of a single layer in a Greenland ice core is typically about 1–2 meters. This corresponds to roughly one year’s worth of snow accumulation in the ice sheet’s climate record Center for Science Education.
   
   

   How layer thickness relates to climate​

   • Layer formation: Each year, snow falls on the ice sheet and compresses over time into a distinct layer. The thickness of that layer depends on the amount of snowfall that year.
   • Thicker layers: Indicate higher snowfall, often linked to warmer global climates, because more precipitation falls at the poles when temperatures are higher Center for Science Education.
   • Thinner layers: Suggest lower snowfall, often associated with cooler periods.
   • Seasonal resolution: In some cores, especially from high-elevation sites, layers can be resolved to seasonal detail, allowing scientists to study annual and even seasonal climate changes.

   Context for Greenland ice cores​

   • The longest Greenland ice cores extend back over 3 km (about 1,900 meters) in depth, representing hundreds of thousands of years of climate history Center for Science Education.
   • Layer thickness varies with location, elevation, and climate conditions. For example, cores from the North Greenland Ice Core Project (NGRIP) and NGRIP-2 show annual layers averaging 1–2 m, with some years exceeding 3 m during high-snowfall periods and others less than 1 m during low-snowfall years Center for Science Education.
     In summary:
   If you see a layer in a Greenland ice core, it’s usually about 1–2 meters thick, representing one year’s snowpack, with variations reflecting annual climate conditions. Wikipedia

 

[westwall]

Perhaps the assumption that ice core layers are formed yearly is an erroneous assumption. Given other details about ice cores I would guarantee that ice core layers are not formed just yearly.

Actually, they are. So long as precipitation falls, a layer is formed. It may be thin as hell, but it's there.