YouGov poll (Scientific poll) finds Clinton won debate comfortably

[The VOR]

I don't consider the Democratic Party to be an American political party.

This should go into a book on how to tell you are crazy.

Their location does not make them American.

Their passport does.

Nope. We're talking philosophy here. Democrats would dispense with the Constitution if possible. It's just an impediment to their goals.

What the Democrats seek is diametrically opposed to American founding philosophy.

USMB needs a 'Loony Posts' forum.

You mean to tell me this isn't it?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

I don't consider the Democratic Party to be an American political party.

This should go into a book on how to tell you are crazy.

Their location does not make them American.

Their passport does.

Nope. We're talking philosophy here. Democrats would dispense with the Constitution if possible. It's just an impediment to their goals.

What the Democrats seek is diametrically opposed to American founding philosophy.

You go right back to FF suppressing workers, women, and minorities all you want.

Spoken like a true Comrade.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Remember that the Alt Right and the Far Right make up their own facts and terms and definitions and narratives, and then they

when the have to deal with the truth.

 

[JakeStarkey]

This should go into a book on how to tell you are crazy.

Their location does not make them American.

Their passport does.

Nope. We're talking philosophy here. Democrats would dispense with the Constitution if possible. It's just an impediment to their goals.

What the Democrats seek is diametrically opposed to American founding philosophy.

You go right back to FF suppressing workers, women, and minorities all you want.

Spoken like a true Comrade.

You deny that the FF oppressed workers, women, and minorities.

 

[Iceweasel]

When did I say so? I don't pay attention to polling, I can make up my own mind thankyouverymuch.

You spend a lot of time in poll threads for a guy who doesn't pay attention to polls.

Liar. If someone tries to make them an issue and declare victory I may comment on it. That doesn't mean I take the poll seriously. The subject is them, not the poll. That needed to be explained to you, huh?

All I know is you're wrong because polls properly done are reasonably accurate snapshots.

And a snapshot doesn't tell the whole story. No poll had Trump winning the nomination. No poll had him breaking records for votes or contributions. You can live by polling, not me.

Five months before the primaries, pretty much all the polls had Trump winning the nomination.

He was already the nominee before I had the chance to vote. But which polls are you referring to?

 

[whitehall]

The second scientific poll conducted about the debate has found that Hillary Clinton kick Trump's butt.
Trump supporters have touted unscientific internet polls where nothing is controlled for (Party ID, gender, race, etc).

Just out of curiosity, what constitutes a "scientific poll", 30 phone calls to a democrat demographic area?

 

[Toro]

Even though Hillary won - according to real polls - she has to translate that into broader support.

Trump's poor performance and really dumb remarks about Miss Universe yesterday will shift the spotlight back to him and away from Hillary's poor past couple of weeks.

 

[Iceweasel]

When did I say so? I don't pay attention to polling, I can make up my own mind thankyouverymuch.

You spend a lot of time in poll threads for a guy who doesn't pay attention to polls.

Liar. If someone tries to make them an issue and declare victory I may comment on it. That doesn't mean I take the poll seriously. The subject is them, not the poll. That needed to be explained to you, huh?

All I know is you're wrong because polls properly done are reasonably accurate snapshots.

And a snapshot doesn't tell the whole story. No poll had Trump winning the nomination. No poll had him breaking records for votes or contributions. You can live by polling, not me.

Did you really just say that? No poll had Trump winning the nomination?

Trump led the Republican nomination polling from Nov. 18th, 2015. You really are grievously uninformed. Shockingly uninformed.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - 2016 Republican Presidential Nomination

April? By early May there were only three left with Kaisich refusing to drop out.

 

[Toro]

You spend a lot of time in poll threads for a guy who doesn't pay attention to polls.

Liar. If someone tries to make them an issue and declare victory I may comment on it. That doesn't mean I take the poll seriously. The subject is them, not the poll. That needed to be explained to you, huh?

All I know is you're wrong because polls properly done are reasonably accurate snapshots.

And a snapshot doesn't tell the whole story. No poll had Trump winning the nomination. No poll had him breaking records for votes or contributions. You can live by polling, not me.

Five months before the primaries, pretty much all the polls had Trump winning the nomination.

He was already the nominee before I had the chance to vote. But which polls are you referring to?

All of them. Trump started to take the lead at the end of August.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - 2016 Republican Presidential Nomination

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

And

every time the far right lies and says Trump won.

Here in the Texas Hill Country, many hard core GOP cons are very disappointed in Trump.

I was a bit disappointed in Trump's performance myself.

That said, I personally wouldn't care if he were caught in a compromising position with a goat. I will vote for him over any Democrat, and especially Hillary Clinton.

Exactly

You see, that is the thing with you partisan hacks. You lame ***** don't even care who is actually running for whatever office. All partisan idiots like you just go into the voting booth and vote straight republican [ticket]

A recent development. Prior to 2000, I considered everyone. No longer. I don't consider the Democratic Party to be an American political party. They've become a weird hybrid of Euro-Fascism and Democratic Socialism combined with a nonsensically wacky New Age worldview reminiscent of a amusement ride at Disney World, which I won't name here due to its earworm theme song.

They lack any coherent idea of human nature.

I now vote straight ticket. Give me a reason to change, and I may consider it. But don't hold your breath.

So, in other words, it is irrelevant to you who is running on the republican ticket. It could be the biggest scumbag in the world, but you will vote for him anyway, because he is running as a republican.

At this point in time, essentially true, though I look to determine the level of Democrat the opposition candidate may be. There are lots of ringers around these days.

As I stated earlier, Trump could be caught in a compromising position with a one-eyed goat, and I would still vote against any Democrat, especially Hillary Clinton.

The winning candidate brings the party with him, regardless of his individual qualities. I want the Democratic Party politically neutered.

Hell, I doubt you even look at the candidate’s names of the people that are running for office before you vote the straight republican ticket, do you?

I know each in detail, Democrats too.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

I don't consider the Democratic Party to be an American political party.

This should go into a book on how to tell you are crazy.

Their location does not make them American.

Their passport does.

Nope. We're talking philosophy here. Democrats would dispense with the Constitution if possible. It's just an impediment to their goals.

What the Democrats seek is diametrically opposed to American founding philosophy.

USMB needs a 'Loony Posts' forum.

Yup. You and Jake could be the poster boys.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Their location does not make them American.

Their passport does.

Nope. We're talking philosophy here. Democrats would dispense with the Constitution if possible. It's just an impediment to their goals.

What the Democrats seek is diametrically opposed to American founding philosophy.

You go right back to FF suppressing workers, women, and minorities all you want.

Spoken like a true Comrade.

You deny that the FF oppressed workers, women, and minorities.

Your attempt to apply 21st Century mores to 18th Century thought is pathetically impotent.

 

[The VOR]

LOL The people spoke...she lost. But keep trying to convince yourself otherwise

Are you referring to unscientific polls?

She believes the Earth is 6000 years old. You're surprised she believes unscientific polls only because she likes them?

Another one who is trying to pretend they know me, I'm not a fundamentalist, dumbass

You're not a true christian either. That is clearly obvious from your hate-filled posts.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

LOL The people spoke...she lost. But keep trying to convince yourself otherwise

Are you referring to unscientific polls?

She believes the Earth is 6000 years old. You're surprised she believes unscientific polls only because she likes them?

Another one who is trying to pretend they know me, I'm not a fundamentalist, dumbass

You're not a true christian either. That is clearly obvious from your hate-filled posts.

What constitutes a "true Christian"? Please define.

Just curious.

 

[NYcarbineer]

You spend a lot of time in poll threads for a guy who doesn't pay attention to polls.

Liar. If someone tries to make them an issue and declare victory I may comment on it. That doesn't mean I take the poll seriously. The subject is them, not the poll. That needed to be explained to you, huh?

All I know is you're wrong because polls properly done are reasonably accurate snapshots.

And a snapshot doesn't tell the whole story. No poll had Trump winning the nomination. No poll had him breaking records for votes or contributions. You can live by polling, not me.

Did you really just say that? No poll had Trump winning the nomination?

Trump led the Republican nomination polling from Nov. 18th, 2015. You really are grievously uninformed. Shockingly uninformed.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - 2016 Republican Presidential Nomination

April? By early May there were only three left with Kaisich refusing to drop out.

November is not April.

Let's review what you claimed:

"No poll had Trump winning the nomination."

...that is idiocy. Trump led them all starting in November 2015. Wire to Wire from that point on.

 

[NYcarbineer]

LOL The people spoke...she lost. But keep trying to convince yourself otherwise

Are you referring to unscientific polls?

She believes the Earth is 6000 years old. You're surprised she believes unscientific polls only because she likes them?

Another one who is trying to pretend they know me, I'm not a fundamentalist, dumbass

You're not a true christian either. That is clearly obvious from your hate-filled posts.

What constitutes a "true Christian"? Please define.

Just curious.

The same things that constitute a "true Muslim".

 

[AntonToo]

I'm responding to this farce and it gives you loons gas it's a worthless poll

You keep saying that without also the reasonably NECESSARY admission that the internet polls you tout are much worse, much less trustworthy.

Why can't you admit the obvious? Because you are either too stupid or too dishonest. I just don't see another way here. I'll go with stupid.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Your attempt to apply 21st Century mores to 18th Century thought is pathetically impotent.

Of course it is not. You are attempt to apply 18th century thought to today. And that is pathetic.

 

[toxicmedia]

The second scientific poll conducted about the debate has found that Hillary Clinton kick Trump's butt.
Trump supporters have touted unscientific internet polls where nothing is controlled for (Party ID, gender, race, etc).

If I were to rate how much of the debate Hillary seemed "righter"...I would have said about 75%-80%.

It pretty much looks like Hillary got most of the undecided, and probably some of the Independents (who are almost all Republicans in Sheep clothing) and she should be very pleased with the outcome.

Trump on the other hand, needs to figure out a way to win the next 2 debates, without coming across as a clod. His strategists tried to have him behave, but he only lasted 20 minutes that way in the first, before his true colors shined right through

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I'm responding to this farce and it gives you loons gas it's a worthless poll

You keep saying that without also the reasonably NECESSARY admission that the internet polls you tout are much worse, much less trustworthy.

Why can't you admit the obvious? Because you are either too stupid or too dishonest. I just don't see another way here. I'll go with stupid.

Except I don't "tout" Internet polls. Keep trying. Why can't you just admit the poll in question is flawed and nowhere near "scientific". Too stupid or just dishonest?