You Just Lived Through Earth's Hottest Year on Record.

[Orangecat]

No, no I'm not, unfortunately for you, dummy.

 

[Crepitus]

You might as well just deal with it. It's far too late for you to change.

The fact that you're too dumb to even know you are is part of it.

 

[Orangecat]

The fact that you're too dumb to even know you are is part of it.

You write like an uneducated buffoon.
Are you upset because Trump won?

 

[EMH]

I said the planet cools in January? Where? Link?

HERE

Earth proves SAP rises when it's colder.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

HERE

When it's cold in Chicago, Chicago SAP rises.
When it's warm in Chicago, Chicago SAP drops.

Now if you can show that helps your claim, let me know.

 

[CrazyTrader55]

Wait, Democrats claim man globally controls weather. They claim man fixes climate to get hot. But i show them true photos of record snows and cold weather.

And then, right on cue, some cult leftist says, hey! you stupid conservative, that's weather, not climate.

 

[CrazyTrader55]

Well, we have to. You screwed it up, and we are going to fix it. Let the adults manage this program.
You children sit in the corner and take notes.

You aren't going to fix anything.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

They go by the evidence.

The consensus of the scientists arises from the consensus of the evidence.

Please post the “evidence” the repeatable lab experiments, demonstrating the 1C temperature increase when CO2 increases from 280 to 400 PPM so I too can believe in manmadeup global warming

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Well, we have to. You screwed it up, and we are going to fix it. Let the adults manage this program.
You children sit in the corner and take notes.

Like you fixed the CA wildfires?

No, thanks

 

[EMH]

When it's cold in Chicago, Chicago SAP rises.
When it's warm in Chicago, Chicago SAP drops.

Now if you can show that helps your claim, let me know.

You keep trying to make this about LOCAL WEATHER when it is in fact about PLANETARY TEMPERATURE and when Chicago is coldest in January EARTH IS AT ITS WARMEST....

So "when it is cold in Chicago" IT IS WARMEST ON PLANET EARTH BECAUSE EARTH IS CLOSEST TO SUN

DUH....


How about one more "hot air rises..."

 

[EMH]

Please post the “evidence” the repeatable lab experiments, demonstrating the 1C temperature increase when CO2 increases from 280 to 400 PPM so I too can believe in manmadeup global warming

We don't need a lab for that. We have THE ACTUAL DATA...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

documents that the actual data from satellites and balloons showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere for decades of rising CO2, before being FUDGED in 2005...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You keep trying to make this about LOCAL WEATHER when it is in fact about PLANETARY TEMPERATURE and when Chicago is coldest in January EARTH IS AT ITS WARMEST....

So "when it is cold in Chicago" IT IS WARMEST ON PLANET EARTH BECAUSE EARTH IS CLOSEST TO SUN

DUH....


How about one more "hot air rises..."

If you can show that when it's colder in Chicago, Chicago SAP rises
but when it's colder in the world, world SAP falls, you should do that.

Come on pussy, post some facts for once.

Show why the planetary data is the opposite of the local data. Pussy.

 

[jc456]

Unfortunately no.

what happened because it was warm? Can you explain the problem?

 

[jc456]

Global Warming deniers, the floor is yours
Step up

what's the issue?

 

[jc456]

Way to go dude, "Climate change can't be real because it's cold where I am".


Dolt.

Is cold better than warm?

 

[Redfish]

Another ridiculous statement.

Scientific consensus is the generally held judgment, position, and opinion of the majority or the supermajority of scientists in a particular field of study at any particular time.[1][2]

Consensus is achieved through scholarly communication at conferences, the publication process, replication of reproducible results by others, scholarly debate,[3][4][5][6] and peer review. A conference meant to create a consensus is termed as a consensus conference.[7][8][9] Such measures lead to a situation in which those within the discipline can often recognize such a consensus where it exists; however, communicating to outsiders that consensus has been reached can be difficult, because the "normal" debates through which science progresses may appear to outsiders as contestation.[10] On occasion, scientific institutes issue position statements intended to communicate a summary of the science from the "inside" to the "outside" of the scientific community, or consensus review articles[11] or surveys[12] may be published. In cases where there is little controversy regarding the subject under study, establishing the consensus can be quite straightforward.

Popular or political debate on subjects that are controversial within the public sphere but not necessarily controversial within the scientific community may invoke scientific consensus: note such topics as evolution,[13][14] climate change,[15] the safety of genetically modified organisms,[16] or the lack of a link between MMR vaccinations and autism.[10]

Scientific consensus - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

the scientists will conclude whatever those paying them want to conclude.

 

[ding]

LOL!!!


Your "temperature record" will be all tossed in the trashcan once CO2 FRAUD is prosecuted.

Those who have studied Jurassic have this to say


WARMER, WETTER, HIGHER SURFACE AIR PRESSURE


notice the correlation

WARMER = HIGHER SURFACE AIR PRESSURE

If air pressure correlates to temperature, then what's the temperature readings for these air pressures?

 

[EMH]

Show why the planetary data is the opposite of the local data

SAP is planetary. That's why it is defined as a "constant."

What Mars proves in spades, "northern hemisphere winter" proves as well, because local weather is not planetary, SAP is.

Planet closer to Sun = Planet warms = higher SAP =

Mars
Pluto
Earth

 

[jc456]

They go by the evidence.

The consensus of the scientists arises from the consensus of the evidence.

but CrusaderFrank rightfully stated there is no consensus in science. Only the cults use it.

 

[Robert W]

And then, right on cue, some cult leftist says, hey! you stupid conservative, that's weather, not climate.

Every damned time they say that, we need to drill down into their heads, why do they being up climate when it is weather?