You Don't Own That!

[PoliticalChic]

That is the corollary to the Leftist mantra 'You didn't build that!"

A fundamental principle of Communism is that there is no private property.


1. Only six years into our Republic, the United States Supreme Court ruled:

"From these passages it is evident; that the right of acquiring and possessing property, and having it protected, is one of the natural, inherent, and unalienable rights of man. Men have a sense of property: Property is necessary to their subsistence, and correspondent to their natural wants and desires; its security was one of the objects, that induced them to unite in society. No man would become a member of a community, in which he could not enjoy the fruits of his honest labour and industry. . . The constitution expressly declares, that the right of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property is natural, inherent, and unalienable. It is a right not ex gratia from the legislature, but ex debito from the constitution. . . Where is the security, where the inviolability of property, if the legislature, by a private act, affecting particular persons ONLY, can take land from one citizen, who acquired it legally, and vest it in another?"
VANHORNE'S LESSEE v. DORRANCE, 2 U.S. 304 (1795)



2. And the definition:
…private property, which specifies to whom the property belongs. Under this form, and individual or individuals have the right to use some good and to exclude others from doing so. If they so wish, they can sell the property, and retain the proceeds from said sale.



3. "The difference between [socialism and fascism] is superficial and purely formal, but it is significant psychologically: it brings the authoritarian nature of a planned economy crudely into the open. The main characteristic of socialism (and of communism) is public ownership of the means of production, and, therefore, the abolition of private property. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Under fascism, men retain the semblance or pretense of private property, but the government holds total power over its use and disposal."
Ayn Rand.


4. "Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add ‘Mandatory Rest Spaces’ For The Homeless
...Portland is overrun with people sleeping rough, many of whom suffer from drug addiction and mental illness.

There are humane ways to handle the homelessness problem but, it seems, a Portland city commission would rather change Portland’s building codes in order to force private property owners to accommodate members of Portland’s homeless population, according to local media."
Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add 'Mandatory Rest Spaces' For The Homeless


5. " OCCUPY WALL STREET GENIUS SAYS HE’S AGAINST “PRIVATE” PROPERTY, NOT “PERSONAL” PROPERTY

....that’s because he wants to keep his iPad 2, naturally, and not share it with the shiftless vagrants fighting over access to one of the three Porta-Potties recently delivered to the now-evacuated camp site in lower Manhattan.”
Occupy Wall Street Genius Says He's Against "Private" Property, Not "Personal" Property | Human Events



He, and every Democrat voter, misses the point: it suddenly dawns on the dopes that they own nothing.
Somehow, it's fine if government takes what that 'top 1%' legally owned....but not what they own.

 

[BULLDOG]

That is the corollary to the Leftist mantra 'You didn't build that!"

A fundamental principle of Communism is that there is no private property.


1. Only six years into our Republic, the United States Supreme Court ruled:

"From these passages it is evident; that the right of acquiring and possessing property, and having it protected, is one of the natural, inherent, and unalienable rights of man. Men have a sense of property: Property is necessary to their subsistence, and correspondent to their natural wants and desires; its security was one of the objects, that induced them to unite in society. No man would become a member of a community, in which he could not enjoy the fruits of his honest labour and industry. . . The constitution expressly declares, that the right of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property is natural, inherent, and unalienable. It is a right not ex gratia from the legislature, but ex debito from the constitution. . . Where is the security, where the inviolability of property, if the legislature, by a private act, affecting particular persons ONLY, can take land from one citizen, who acquired it legally, and vest it in another?"
VANHORNE'S LESSEE v. DORRANCE, 2 U.S. 304 (1795)



2. And the definition:
…private property, which specifies to whom the property belongs. Under this form, and individual or individuals have the right to use some good and to exclude others from doing so. If they so wish, they can sell the property, and retain the proceeds from said sale.



3. "The difference between [socialism and fascism] is superficial and purely formal, but it is significant psychologically: it brings the authoritarian nature of a planned economy crudely into the open. The main characteristic of socialism (and of communism) is public ownership of the means of production, and, therefore, the abolition of private property. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Under fascism, men retain the semblance or pretense of private property, but the government holds total power over its use and disposal."
Ayn Rand.


4. "Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add ‘Mandatory Rest Spaces’ For The Homeless
...Portland is overrun with people sleeping rough, many of whom suffer from drug addiction and mental illness.

There are humane ways to handle the homelessness problem but, it seems, a Portland city commission would rather change Portland’s building codes in order to force private property owners to accommodate members of Portland’s homeless population, according to local media."
Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add 'Mandatory Rest Spaces' For The Homeless


5. " OCCUPY WALL STREET GENIUS SAYS HE’S AGAINST “PRIVATE” PROPERTY, NOT “PERSONAL” PROPERTY

....that’s because he wants to keep his iPad 2, naturally, and not share it with the shiftless vagrants fighting over access to one of the three Porta-Potties recently delivered to the now-evacuated camp site in lower Manhattan.”
Occupy Wall Street Genius Says He's Against "Private" Property, Not "Personal" Property | Human Events



He, and every Democrat voter, misses the point: it suddenly dawns on the dopes that they own nothing.
Somehow, it's fine if government takes what that 'top 1%' legally owned....but not what they own.

From your OP, is it correct to assume you are against the government taking citizen's property to build that silly fence, or that you opposed them taking private property for the oil companies to build a pipeline on? These aren't just rhetorical questions. I'd like a real answer if you aren't too scared to reply.

 

[Norman]

That is the corollary to the Leftist mantra 'You didn't build that!"

A fundamental principle of Communism is that there is no private property.


1. Only six years into our Republic, the United States Supreme Court ruled:

"From these passages it is evident; that the right of acquiring and possessing property, and having it protected, is one of the natural, inherent, and unalienable rights of man. Men have a sense of property: Property is necessary to their subsistence, and correspondent to their natural wants and desires; its security was one of the objects, that induced them to unite in society. No man would become a member of a community, in which he could not enjoy the fruits of his honest labour and industry. . . The constitution expressly declares, that the right of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property is natural, inherent, and unalienable. It is a right not ex gratia from the legislature, but ex debito from the constitution. . . Where is the security, where the inviolability of property, if the legislature, by a private act, affecting particular persons ONLY, can take land from one citizen, who acquired it legally, and vest it in another?"
VANHORNE'S LESSEE v. DORRANCE, 2 U.S. 304 (1795)



2. And the definition:
…private property, which specifies to whom the property belongs. Under this form, and individual or individuals have the right to use some good and to exclude others from doing so. If they so wish, they can sell the property, and retain the proceeds from said sale.



3. "The difference between [socialism and fascism] is superficial and purely formal, but it is significant psychologically: it brings the authoritarian nature of a planned economy crudely into the open. The main characteristic of socialism (and of communism) is public ownership of the means of production, and, therefore, the abolition of private property. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Under fascism, men retain the semblance or pretense of private property, but the government holds total power over its use and disposal."
Ayn Rand.


4. "Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add ‘Mandatory Rest Spaces’ For The Homeless
...Portland is overrun with people sleeping rough, many of whom suffer from drug addiction and mental illness.

There are humane ways to handle the homelessness problem but, it seems, a Portland city commission would rather change Portland’s building codes in order to force private property owners to accommodate members of Portland’s homeless population, according to local media."
Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add 'Mandatory Rest Spaces' For The Homeless


5. " OCCUPY WALL STREET GENIUS SAYS HE’S AGAINST “PRIVATE” PROPERTY, NOT “PERSONAL” PROPERTY

....that’s because he wants to keep his iPad 2, naturally, and not share it with the shiftless vagrants fighting over access to one of the three Porta-Potties recently delivered to the now-evacuated camp site in lower Manhattan.”
Occupy Wall Street Genius Says He's Against "Private" Property, Not "Personal" Property | Human Events



He, and every Democrat voter, misses the point: it suddenly dawns on the dopes that they own nothing.
Somehow, it's fine if government takes what that 'top 1%' legally owned....but not what they own.

From your OP, is it correct to assume you are against the government taking citizen's property to build that silly fence, or that you opposed them taking private property for the oil companies to build a pipeline on? These aren't just rhetorical questions. I'd like a real answer if you aren't too scared to reply.

We build the glorious wall so that we can keep the communists out, and keep having private property.

It could not be simpler, nor more consistent.

 

[BULLDOG]

That is the corollary to the Leftist mantra 'You didn't build that!"

A fundamental principle of Communism is that there is no private property.


1. Only six years into our Republic, the United States Supreme Court ruled:

"From these passages it is evident; that the right of acquiring and possessing property, and having it protected, is one of the natural, inherent, and unalienable rights of man. Men have a sense of property: Property is necessary to their subsistence, and correspondent to their natural wants and desires; its security was one of the objects, that induced them to unite in society. No man would become a member of a community, in which he could not enjoy the fruits of his honest labour and industry. . . The constitution expressly declares, that the right of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property is natural, inherent, and unalienable. It is a right not ex gratia from the legislature, but ex debito from the constitution. . . Where is the security, where the inviolability of property, if the legislature, by a private act, affecting particular persons ONLY, can take land from one citizen, who acquired it legally, and vest it in another?"
VANHORNE'S LESSEE v. DORRANCE, 2 U.S. 304 (1795)



2. And the definition:
…private property, which specifies to whom the property belongs. Under this form, and individual or individuals have the right to use some good and to exclude others from doing so. If they so wish, they can sell the property, and retain the proceeds from said sale.



3. "The difference between [socialism and fascism] is superficial and purely formal, but it is significant psychologically: it brings the authoritarian nature of a planned economy crudely into the open. The main characteristic of socialism (and of communism) is public ownership of the means of production, and, therefore, the abolition of private property. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Under fascism, men retain the semblance or pretense of private property, but the government holds total power over its use and disposal."
Ayn Rand.


4. "Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add ‘Mandatory Rest Spaces’ For The Homeless
...Portland is overrun with people sleeping rough, many of whom suffer from drug addiction and mental illness.

There are humane ways to handle the homelessness problem but, it seems, a Portland city commission would rather change Portland’s building codes in order to force private property owners to accommodate members of Portland’s homeless population, according to local media."
Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add 'Mandatory Rest Spaces' For The Homeless


5. " OCCUPY WALL STREET GENIUS SAYS HE’S AGAINST “PRIVATE” PROPERTY, NOT “PERSONAL” PROPERTY

....that’s because he wants to keep his iPad 2, naturally, and not share it with the shiftless vagrants fighting over access to one of the three Porta-Potties recently delivered to the now-evacuated camp site in lower Manhattan.”
Occupy Wall Street Genius Says He's Against "Private" Property, Not "Personal" Property | Human Events



He, and every Democrat voter, misses the point: it suddenly dawns on the dopes that they own nothing.
Somehow, it's fine if government takes what that 'top 1%' legally owned....but not what they own.

From your OP, is it correct to assume you are against the government taking citizen's property to build that silly fence, or that you opposed them taking private property for the oil companies to build a pipeline on? These aren't just rhetorical questions. I'd like a real answer if you aren't too scared to reply.

We build the glorious wall so that we can keep the communists out, and keep having private property.

It could not be simpler, nor more consistent.

So it is fine for the government to take property, but only for things you want, right?

 

[Norman]

That is the corollary to the Leftist mantra 'You didn't build that!"

A fundamental principle of Communism is that there is no private property.


1. Only six years into our Republic, the United States Supreme Court ruled:

"From these passages it is evident; that the right of acquiring and possessing property, and having it protected, is one of the natural, inherent, and unalienable rights of man. Men have a sense of property: Property is necessary to their subsistence, and correspondent to their natural wants and desires; its security was one of the objects, that induced them to unite in society. No man would become a member of a community, in which he could not enjoy the fruits of his honest labour and industry. . . The constitution expressly declares, that the right of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property is natural, inherent, and unalienable. It is a right not ex gratia from the legislature, but ex debito from the constitution. . . Where is the security, where the inviolability of property, if the legislature, by a private act, affecting particular persons ONLY, can take land from one citizen, who acquired it legally, and vest it in another?"
VANHORNE'S LESSEE v. DORRANCE, 2 U.S. 304 (1795)



2. And the definition:
…private property, which specifies to whom the property belongs. Under this form, and individual or individuals have the right to use some good and to exclude others from doing so. If they so wish, they can sell the property, and retain the proceeds from said sale.



3. "The difference between [socialism and fascism] is superficial and purely formal, but it is significant psychologically: it brings the authoritarian nature of a planned economy crudely into the open. The main characteristic of socialism (and of communism) is public ownership of the means of production, and, therefore, the abolition of private property. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Under fascism, men retain the semblance or pretense of private property, but the government holds total power over its use and disposal."
Ayn Rand.


4. "Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add ‘Mandatory Rest Spaces’ For The Homeless
...Portland is overrun with people sleeping rough, many of whom suffer from drug addiction and mental illness.

There are humane ways to handle the homelessness problem but, it seems, a Portland city commission would rather change Portland’s building codes in order to force private property owners to accommodate members of Portland’s homeless population, according to local media."
Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add 'Mandatory Rest Spaces' For The Homeless


5. " OCCUPY WALL STREET GENIUS SAYS HE’S AGAINST “PRIVATE” PROPERTY, NOT “PERSONAL” PROPERTY

....that’s because he wants to keep his iPad 2, naturally, and not share it with the shiftless vagrants fighting over access to one of the three Porta-Potties recently delivered to the now-evacuated camp site in lower Manhattan.”
Occupy Wall Street Genius Says He's Against "Private" Property, Not "Personal" Property | Human Events



He, and every Democrat voter, misses the point: it suddenly dawns on the dopes that they own nothing.
Somehow, it's fine if government takes what that 'top 1%' legally owned....but not what they own.

From your OP, is it correct to assume you are against the government taking citizen's property to build that silly fence, or that you opposed them taking private property for the oil companies to build a pipeline on? These aren't just rhetorical questions. I'd like a real answer if you aren't too scared to reply.

We build the glorious wall so that we can keep the communists out, and keep having private property.

It could not be simpler, nor more consistent.

So it is fine for the government to take property, but only for things you want, right?

You could read the constitution if you are having trouble with the responsibilities of the federal government.

Now build that wall. Commies can stay in their 3rd world garbage holes.

Without the government the people would already have built a wall so big that it would be visible from the other side of the galaxy anyway.

 

[K9Buck]

You never really own property. The government taxes you FOREVER. Don't pay and they seize it.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

That is the corollary to the Leftist mantra 'You didn't build that!"

A fundamental principle of Communism is that there is no private property.


1. Only six years into our Republic, the United States Supreme Court ruled:

"From these passages it is evident; that the right of acquiring and possessing property, and having it protected, is one of the natural, inherent, and unalienable rights of man. Men have a sense of property: Property is necessary to their subsistence, and correspondent to their natural wants and desires; its security was one of the objects, that induced them to unite in society. No man would become a member of a community, in which he could not enjoy the fruits of his honest labour and industry. . . The constitution expressly declares, that the right of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property is natural, inherent, and unalienable. It is a right not ex gratia from the legislature, but ex debito from the constitution. . . Where is the security, where the inviolability of property, if the legislature, by a private act, affecting particular persons ONLY, can take land from one citizen, who acquired it legally, and vest it in another?"
VANHORNE'S LESSEE v. DORRANCE, 2 U.S. 304 (1795)



2. And the definition:
…private property, which specifies to whom the property belongs. Under this form, and individual or individuals have the right to use some good and to exclude others from doing so. If they so wish, they can sell the property, and retain the proceeds from said sale.



3. "The difference between [socialism and fascism] is superficial and purely formal, but it is significant psychologically: it brings the authoritarian nature of a planned economy crudely into the open. The main characteristic of socialism (and of communism) is public ownership of the means of production, and, therefore, the abolition of private property. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Under fascism, men retain the semblance or pretense of private property, but the government holds total power over its use and disposal."
Ayn Rand.


4. "Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add ‘Mandatory Rest Spaces’ For The Homeless
...Portland is overrun with people sleeping rough, many of whom suffer from drug addiction and mental illness.

There are humane ways to handle the homelessness problem but, it seems, a Portland city commission would rather change Portland’s building codes in order to force private property owners to accommodate members of Portland’s homeless population, according to local media."
Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add 'Mandatory Rest Spaces' For The Homeless


5. " OCCUPY WALL STREET GENIUS SAYS HE’S AGAINST “PRIVATE” PROPERTY, NOT “PERSONAL” PROPERTY

....that’s because he wants to keep his iPad 2, naturally, and not share it with the shiftless vagrants fighting over access to one of the three Porta-Potties recently delivered to the now-evacuated camp site in lower Manhattan.”
Occupy Wall Street Genius Says He's Against "Private" Property, Not "Personal" Property | Human Events



He, and every Democrat voter, misses the point: it suddenly dawns on the dopes that they own nothing.
Somehow, it's fine if government takes what that 'top 1%' legally owned....but not what they own.

From your OP, is it correct to assume you are against the government taking citizen's property to build that silly fence, or that you opposed them taking private property for the oil companies to build a pipeline on? These aren't just rhetorical questions. I'd like a real answer if you aren't too scared to reply.

We build the glorious wall so that we can keep the communists out, and keep having private property.

It could not be simpler, nor more consistent.

So it is fine for the government to take property, but only for things you want, right?

Actually dumb ass the Constitution provides a means for Government to obtain property from private citizens legally if they refuse to sell critical sites.

 

[Blues Man]

That is the corollary to the Leftist mantra 'You didn't build that!"

A fundamental principle of Communism is that there is no private property.


1. Only six years into our Republic, the United States Supreme Court ruled:

"From these passages it is evident; that the right of acquiring and possessing property, and having it protected, is one of the natural, inherent, and unalienable rights of man. Men have a sense of property: Property is necessary to their subsistence, and correspondent to their natural wants and desires; its security was one of the objects, that induced them to unite in society. No man would become a member of a community, in which he could not enjoy the fruits of his honest labour and industry. . . The constitution expressly declares, that the right of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property is natural, inherent, and unalienable. It is a right not ex gratia from the legislature, but ex debito from the constitution. . . Where is the security, where the inviolability of property, if the legislature, by a private act, affecting particular persons ONLY, can take land from one citizen, who acquired it legally, and vest it in another?"
VANHORNE'S LESSEE v. DORRANCE, 2 U.S. 304 (1795)



2. And the definition:
…private property, which specifies to whom the property belongs. Under this form, and individual or individuals have the right to use some good and to exclude others from doing so. If they so wish, they can sell the property, and retain the proceeds from said sale.



3. "The difference between [socialism and fascism] is superficial and purely formal, but it is significant psychologically: it brings the authoritarian nature of a planned economy crudely into the open. The main characteristic of socialism (and of communism) is public ownership of the means of production, and, therefore, the abolition of private property. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Under fascism, men retain the semblance or pretense of private property, but the government holds total power over its use and disposal."
Ayn Rand.


4. "Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add ‘Mandatory Rest Spaces’ For The Homeless
...Portland is overrun with people sleeping rough, many of whom suffer from drug addiction and mental illness.

There are humane ways to handle the homelessness problem but, it seems, a Portland city commission would rather change Portland’s building codes in order to force private property owners to accommodate members of Portland’s homeless population, according to local media."
Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add 'Mandatory Rest Spaces' For The Homeless


5. " OCCUPY WALL STREET GENIUS SAYS HE’S AGAINST “PRIVATE” PROPERTY, NOT “PERSONAL” PROPERTY

....that’s because he wants to keep his iPad 2, naturally, and not share it with the shiftless vagrants fighting over access to one of the three Porta-Potties recently delivered to the now-evacuated camp site in lower Manhattan.”
Occupy Wall Street Genius Says He's Against "Private" Property, Not "Personal" Property | Human Events



He, and every Democrat voter, misses the point: it suddenly dawns on the dopes that they own nothing.
Somehow, it's fine if government takes what that 'top 1%' legally owned....but not what they own.

From your OP, is it correct to assume you are against the government taking citizen's property to build that silly fence, or that you opposed them taking private property for the oil companies to build a pipeline on? These aren't just rhetorical questions. I'd like a real answer if you aren't too scared to reply.

But the government must reimburse the property owner for that land to be used for a road or a wall etc

Forcing a developer to build space at his own expense is an entirely different matter

 

[Gdjjr]

But the government must reimburse the property owner for that land to be used for a road or a wall etc

The only money gov't has is confiscated wealth- so tax payers pay for gov't confiscation, twice-

 

[K9Buck]

Leftists don't believe in freedom. For them, all citizens are both wards and slaves of the state.

 

[Gdjjr]

For them, all citizens are both wards and slaves of the state.

The original leftist were the opposite- they despised the State- they were more communal- not communist, communal- the people

 

[PoliticalChic]

That is the corollary to the Leftist mantra 'You didn't build that!"

A fundamental principle of Communism is that there is no private property.


1. Only six years into our Republic, the United States Supreme Court ruled:

"From these passages it is evident; that the right of acquiring and possessing property, and having it protected, is one of the natural, inherent, and unalienable rights of man. Men have a sense of property: Property is necessary to their subsistence, and correspondent to their natural wants and desires; its security was one of the objects, that induced them to unite in society. No man would become a member of a community, in which he could not enjoy the fruits of his honest labour and industry. . . The constitution expressly declares, that the right of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property is natural, inherent, and unalienable. It is a right not ex gratia from the legislature, but ex debito from the constitution. . . Where is the security, where the inviolability of property, if the legislature, by a private act, affecting particular persons ONLY, can take land from one citizen, who acquired it legally, and vest it in another?"
VANHORNE'S LESSEE v. DORRANCE, 2 U.S. 304 (1795)



2. And the definition:
…private property, which specifies to whom the property belongs. Under this form, and individual or individuals have the right to use some good and to exclude others from doing so. If they so wish, they can sell the property, and retain the proceeds from said sale.



3. "The difference between [socialism and fascism] is superficial and purely formal, but it is significant psychologically: it brings the authoritarian nature of a planned economy crudely into the open. The main characteristic of socialism (and of communism) is public ownership of the means of production, and, therefore, the abolition of private property. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Under fascism, men retain the semblance or pretense of private property, but the government holds total power over its use and disposal."
Ayn Rand.


4. "Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add ‘Mandatory Rest Spaces’ For The Homeless
...Portland is overrun with people sleeping rough, many of whom suffer from drug addiction and mental illness.

There are humane ways to handle the homelessness problem but, it seems, a Portland city commission would rather change Portland’s building codes in order to force private property owners to accommodate members of Portland’s homeless population, according to local media."
Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add 'Mandatory Rest Spaces' For The Homeless


5. " OCCUPY WALL STREET GENIUS SAYS HE’S AGAINST “PRIVATE” PROPERTY, NOT “PERSONAL” PROPERTY

....that’s because he wants to keep his iPad 2, naturally, and not share it with the shiftless vagrants fighting over access to one of the three Porta-Potties recently delivered to the now-evacuated camp site in lower Manhattan.”
Occupy Wall Street Genius Says He's Against "Private" Property, Not "Personal" Property | Human Events



He, and every Democrat voter, misses the point: it suddenly dawns on the dopes that they own nothing.
Somehow, it's fine if government takes what that 'top 1%' legally owned....but not what they own.

From your OP, is it correct to assume you are against the government taking citizen's property to build that silly fence, or that you opposed them taking private property for the oil companies to build a pipeline on? These aren't just rhetorical questions. I'd like a real answer if you aren't too scared to reply.

We build the glorious wall so that we can keep the communists out, and keep having private property.

It could not be simpler, nor more consistent.

So it is fine for the government to take property, but only for things you want, right?

You could read the constitution if you are having trouble with the responsibilities of the federal government.

Now build that wall. Commies can stay in their 3rd world garbage holes.

Without the government the people would already have built a wall so big that it would be visible from the other side of the galaxy anyway.

"Commies can stay in their 3rd world garbage holes."

Not according to the Democrat Party since the Nixon Administration.

Sadly.

 

[Gdjjr]

since the Nixon Administration

Implemented Wage and Price Controls and implemented the Federal Reserve Note to replace US Silver Certificates- i.e. Fiat Currency-

 

[PoliticalChic]

You never really own property. The government taxes you FOREVER. Don't pay and they seize it.

Perhaps it's time for you to fight back.

"Supreme Court rules for landowners fighting the government over wetlands"
Supreme Court rules for landowners fighting the government over wetlands

 

[PoliticalChic]

since the Nixon Administration

Implemented Wage and Price Controls and implemented the Federal Reserve Note to replace US Silver Certificates- i.e. Fiat Currency-

That's a totally different subject from what you corruptly took out of context.


This is the quote that you lied about.

"Commies can stay in their 3rd world garbage holes."

Not according to the Democrat Party since the Nixon Administration.

 

[Gdjjr]

That's a totally different subject from what you corruptly took out of context.


This is the quote that you lied about.

"Commies can stay in their 3rd world garbage holes."

Not according to the Democrat Party since the Nixon Administration.

No, it's an expansion on your words- that it doesn't fit your narrative is tough-

 

[HenryBHough]

For the vast majority of Americans there is NO private property. You own nothing; merely rent it from government.

Doubt me?

Try not paying your property tax (rent) and see how long you maintain the illusion of "owning" property.

Exception?

Yes. I have found one state in which there areas not within the boundaries of any city, village, town, county or borough. In those places - NO property taxes. No local police. No fire protection. A few state-built roads and limited state police activity. Schools? State-financed for those who will haul the kids to the nearest city/village/town; not always practical but home-schooling can be subsidized if one can navigate the bureaucracy.

How long can that freedom be allowed to last?

 

[bripat9643]

That is the corollary to the Leftist mantra 'You didn't build that!"

A fundamental principle of Communism is that there is no private property.


1. Only six years into our Republic, the United States Supreme Court ruled:

"From these passages it is evident; that the right of acquiring and possessing property, and having it protected, is one of the natural, inherent, and unalienable rights of man. Men have a sense of property: Property is necessary to their subsistence, and correspondent to their natural wants and desires; its security was one of the objects, that induced them to unite in society. No man would become a member of a community, in which he could not enjoy the fruits of his honest labour and industry. . . The constitution expressly declares, that the right of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property is natural, inherent, and unalienable. It is a right not ex gratia from the legislature, but ex debito from the constitution. . . Where is the security, where the inviolability of property, if the legislature, by a private act, affecting particular persons ONLY, can take land from one citizen, who acquired it legally, and vest it in another?"
VANHORNE'S LESSEE v. DORRANCE, 2 U.S. 304 (1795)



2. And the definition:
…private property, which specifies to whom the property belongs. Under this form, and individual or individuals have the right to use some good and to exclude others from doing so. If they so wish, they can sell the property, and retain the proceeds from said sale.



3. "The difference between [socialism and fascism] is superficial and purely formal, but it is significant psychologically: it brings the authoritarian nature of a planned economy crudely into the open. The main characteristic of socialism (and of communism) is public ownership of the means of production, and, therefore, the abolition of private property. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Under fascism, men retain the semblance or pretense of private property, but the government holds total power over its use and disposal."
Ayn Rand.


4. "Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add ‘Mandatory Rest Spaces’ For The Homeless
...Portland is overrun with people sleeping rough, many of whom suffer from drug addiction and mental illness.

There are humane ways to handle the homelessness problem but, it seems, a Portland city commission would rather change Portland’s building codes in order to force private property owners to accommodate members of Portland’s homeless population, according to local media."
Portland Wants Private Property Owners To Add 'Mandatory Rest Spaces' For The Homeless


5. " OCCUPY WALL STREET GENIUS SAYS HE’S AGAINST “PRIVATE” PROPERTY, NOT “PERSONAL” PROPERTY

....that’s because he wants to keep his iPad 2, naturally, and not share it with the shiftless vagrants fighting over access to one of the three Porta-Potties recently delivered to the now-evacuated camp site in lower Manhattan.”
Occupy Wall Street Genius Says He's Against "Private" Property, Not "Personal" Property | Human Events



He, and every Democrat voter, misses the point: it suddenly dawns on the dopes that they own nothing.
Somehow, it's fine if government takes what that 'top 1%' legally owned....but not what they own.

From your OP, is it correct to assume you are against the government taking citizen's property to build that silly fence, or that you opposed them taking private property for the oil companies to build a pipeline on? These aren't just rhetorical questions. I'd like a real answer if you aren't too scared to reply.

Eminent domain is in the Constitution. It allows the government to take property WITH JUST COMPENSATION.

 

[PoliticalChic]

That's a totally different subject from what you corruptly took out of context.


This is the quote that you lied about.

"Commies can stay in their 3rd world garbage holes."

Not according to the Democrat Party since the Nixon Administration.

No, it's an expansion on your words- that it doesn't fit your narrative is tough-

You are a liar and a dope.
The two are totally different ideas.
You took only part of my sentence to lie.


But.....I will address Nixon in a thread in the near future.

 

[Gdjjr]

You are a liar and a dope.
The two are totally different ideas.
You took only part of my sentence to lie.


But.....I will address Nixon in a thread in the near future.

LOL- I'm a liar? Because you can't dispute the truth? Okee dokee- hahahahahaha-