You are unemployed and want a new job, under a Democratic president you have a better chance of getting one!

[jc456]

You don't "got it", you're an idiot. That's the point. You don't get it.

That's what your ploy is all about son, you could support almost any post you present with figures and no supporting links. Read the forum rules!!!!

 

[Arresmillao]

National debt of the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

COVID-19 pandemic and aftermath​

[edit]
The COVID-19 pandemic in the United States impacted the economy significantly beginning in March 2020, as businesses were shut-down and furloughed or fired personnel. About 16 million persons filed for unemployment insurance in the three weeks ending April 9. It caused the number of unemployed persons to increase significantly, which is expected to reduce tax revenues while increasing automatic stabilizer spending for unemployment insurance and nutritional support. As a result of the adverse economic impact, both state and federal budget deficits will dramatically increase, even before considering any new legislation.[114]

To help address lost income for millions of workers and assist businesses, Congress and President Trump enacted the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) on March 27, 2020. It included loans and grants for businesses, along with direct payments to individuals and additional funding for unemployment insurance. The act carried an estimated $2.3 trillion price tag,

View attachment 1005852
Even after the initial Wuhan relief, the country rebounded strong. BTW, Wuhan was an pandemic and global, sorry for being redundant, but I am discussing with a demfok.


Nothing has improved since creepy and scamala took office, they tank our economy on day 1 of their administration.

Still no tax changes though, hmmmmmmmmm if it was supposedly so bad, why hasn't scamala and creepy fixed it? Well again, since you are a demofk, they know it's good.

Excuses, excuses, nice try mr ultra maga...

 

[jc456]

Excuses, excuses, nice try mr ultra maga...

View attachment 1007506

so no answers to my direct points, interesting, you're afraid of me.

 

[rightwinger]

Bill Clinton stated this evening that since 1989, 51 million new jobs have been created and under the Democrats, of those 51, 49 million were created under Democratic presidents and only 2 million were created under Republican presidents.

Clinton said he had to check it 3 times but that it was confirmed.

Here is a link to one of the articles that confirms that information:

“Since 1989 and a new age of globalization began, 51 million jobs have been created in America. 49 million, 96%, have been created under Democratic presidents.”

This means that more Americans were working under Democratic rule than under Republican presidents. More people working means a better economy, better lives, and better life for all.

This is also something that is true and that has been confirmed 100%

View attachment 999299

Democrats would have created more jobs if they didn’t have to clean up the economic collapses of Bush and Trump

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It's irrelevant for the reasons I stated, but anyway, I'd like to see your evidence for it. Do you have the post #?

Maybe you could use an AI to help you?

It was the post where I smacked you upside the head with real numbers and you're still crying about it.

 

[TruthNotBS]

Maybe you could use an AI to help you?

It was the post where I smacked you upside the head with real numbers and you're still crying about it.

Do you still have a hand? Then you didn't smack me, you're just dreaming. Just provide the link. What are you afraid of?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Do you still have a hand? Then you didn't smack me, you're just dreaming. Just provide the link. What are you afraid of?

It's in the thread.

Use some of your commie intellect to find it.

Unless you can't see clearly enough through all the tears........

 

[TruthNotBS]

It's in the thread.

Use some of your commie intellect to find it.

Unless you can't see clearly enough through all the tears........

Tears from laughter due to how stupid you are.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Tears from laughter due to how stupid you are.

Tell you what, Ivan, you provide the source for your "Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission 20%" claim and I'll be happy to provide the number of the post you're asking about.

Don't run away now!

 

[TruthNotBS]

Tell you what, Ivan, you provide the source for your "Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission 20%" claim and I'll be happy to provide the number of the post you're asking about.

Don't run away now!

You're a lazy analyst Todd. You're failing to make the distinction between Fannie and Freddie's involvement in the overall mortgage market (which was around 50-70% at the time) and their role in the subprime market specifically, which was far less. That's why I want to see what your source is saying. I'm sure you're misinterpreting the data.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You're a lazy analyst Todd. You're failing to make the distinction between Fannie and Freddie's involvement in the overall mortgage market (which was around 50-70% at the time) and their role in the subprime market specifically, which was far less. That's why I want to see what your source is saying. I'm sure you're misinterpreting the data.

You're failing to make the distinction between Fannie and Freddie's involvement in the overall mortgage market (which was around 50-70% at the time)
My source did not fail to make that distinction.

Still looking for the source for your "Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission 20%" claim?

 

[TruthNotBS]

You're failing to make the distinction between Fannie and Freddie's involvement in the overall mortgage market (which was around 50-70% at the time)
My source did not fail to make that distinction.

Still looking for the source for your "Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission 20%" claim?

You're the one bringing this topic up again, claiming that your 70% figure is correct, so let's look at it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You're the one bringing this topic up again, claiming that your 70% figure is correct, so let's look at it.

Just like a commie to make up a fake 20% claim.

 

[TruthNotBS]

Just like a commie to make up a fake 20% claim.

Yours is fake because you're a clumsy, lazy analyst. You're most likely misinterpreting the context of that 70% figure. Let me show you, what are you afraid of?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yours is fake because you're a clumsy, lazy analyst. You're most likely misinterpreting the context of that 70% figure. Let me show you, what are you afraid of?

Lying commie liar.

 

[TruthNotBS]

Lying commie liar.

Easily prove me wrong, just provide the link and I'll read your 70% figure in context. It's that easy for me because practically everything that comes out of your keyboard is ripped out of context and superficial.

 

[jc456]

You're the one bringing this topic up again, claiming that your 70% figure is correct, so let's look at it.

Still waiting for the link to your 20% comment, chicken shit. I see you can’t

 

[TruthNotBS]

Still waiting for the link to your 20% comment, chicken shit. I see you can’t

You see nothing, you're an idiot.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You see nothing, you're an idiot.

No backup for your 20% fake number?

Typical commie liar.

 

[TruthNotBS]

No backup for your 20% fake number?

Typical commie liar.

Thanks for your input. I’ll be sure to give it the attention it deserves from now on.