You are never gonna find that quote from me.

[Kat]

And I posted another above yours.....or should I say urine..

 

[Kat]

Oops I meant ozone..

 

[bripat9643]

The Republican Candidate Risks a New Nuclear-Arms Race

Trump implies woman who accused him is not pretty enough for him

I can't believe you guys are so stupid you can't remember what Trump said just a few days ago. Is it "determined ignorance". The need to be stupid? That USMB right wingers are fucktards? What is it. How can you not remember what your candidate said just days ago?

I provided the quote in a Washington Post article in another thread. This posts is from April, not just a couple days ago.

According to Donald Trump, the United States should not try so hard to stop nuclear proliferation. On Sunday night, during a Republican town hall hosted by CNN’s Anderson Cooper, Trump declared that proliferation is “going to happen anyway.” And just a week earlier,Trump told the New York Times, “If Japan had that nuclear threat, I’m not sure that would be a bad thing for us.” Nor would it be so bad, he’s said, if South Korea and Saudi Arabia had nuclear weapons, too.

Donald Trump thinks more countries should have nuclear weapons. Here’s what the research says.

Saudi Arabia isn't in quotes, so you don't have evidence that he actually included Saudi Arabia.

You aren't serious? I watched the video... he said it.





Wait is that REALLY Trump? Maybe it's a stand in? Is that your next excuse? At the 2:20 point.

No, after Cooper says "you want Saudi Arabia to have nuclear weapons?" he says "no, not nuclear weapons, but they have to protect themselves."

You lied.

Whatever man, you are going to see it however you WANT to see it. When pressed at the end for sure if he wants Saudi Arabia to have nuclear weapons he says, "What does it matter they are going to get them anyway." He said he wants them to have them to defend themselves whatever way they need to defend themselves, if that means nuclear weapons, then so be it.

No, he didn't say that. I see they way he said it, and he didn't say he wants Saudi Arabia to have nuclear weapons. He also didn't say "whatever way they need to defend themselves."

Just admit you're a douche bag liar like every other leftwinger on this board.

 

[rdean]

The Republican Candidate Risks a New Nuclear-Arms Race

Trump implies woman who accused him is not pretty enough for him

I can't believe you guys are so stupid you can't remember what Trump said just a few days ago. Is it "determined ignorance". The need to be stupid? That USMB right wingers are fucktards? What is it. How can you not remember what your candidate said just days ago?

I provided the quote in a Washington Post article in another thread. This posts is from April, not just a couple days ago.

According to Donald Trump, the United States should not try so hard to stop nuclear proliferation. On Sunday night, during a Republican town hall hosted by CNN’s Anderson Cooper, Trump declared that proliferation is “going to happen anyway.” And just a week earlier,Trump told the New York Times, “If Japan had that nuclear threat, I’m not sure that would be a bad thing for us.” Nor would it be so bad, he’s said, if South Korea and Saudi Arabia had nuclear weapons, too.

Donald Trump thinks more countries should have nuclear weapons. Here’s what the research says.

But the quotes about the woman not being pretty enough was a few days ago. In fact, I think he said it in a rally yesterday.

Still no more links.

And who cares ? Unless, of course, it is your girlfriend.

How many do you need?

Google

Google

Trumpbots could invite Trump over for sunday dinner and he could crap in the middle of the table and they would thank him.

pathetic

And dig in.

 

[rdean]

He said they'd be better off with Nuclear weapons, he never said he wanted to give them nuclear weapons. From every nation's perspective, they'd each be better off with nuclear weapons, for their own protection. Obviously, the US and every other country doesn't want each other to have them, but each would want them because from their own perspective it would make them better off. You start off talking about honesty, and then your original post's claim is inherently dishonest. Here Democrats are, making things up to incriminate a candidate who does it to himself just fine. Does it hurt that much to tell the truth, that you'd rather lie when perfectly good dirt is readily available?

Also, this from someone who's supporting a candidate who was selling Uranium to Russia. Gee, wonder what that was for.

Ahhh, now who is the liar. The Uranium whet through the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Hillary never signed off on it. SOS wasn't needed.

Now, why the Nuclear Regulatory commission? See the word "Uranium"? Ring any bells?

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi...ack-clintons-loved-russia-enough-sell-uranium

Breitbart? Really?

 

[Pumpkin Row]

He said they'd be better off with Nuclear weapons, he never said he wanted to give them nuclear weapons. From every nation's perspective, they'd each be better off with nuclear weapons, for their own protection. Obviously, the US and every other country doesn't want each other to have them, but each would want them because from their own perspective it would make them better off. You start off talking about honesty, and then your original post's claim is inherently dishonest. Here Democrats are, making things up to incriminate a candidate who does it to himself just fine. Does it hurt that much to tell the truth, that you'd rather lie when perfectly good dirt is readily available?

Also, this from someone who's supporting a candidate who was selling Uranium to Russia. Gee, wonder what that was for.

Ahhh, now who is the liar. The Uranium whet through the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Hillary never signed off on it. SOS wasn't needed.

Now, why the Nuclear Regulatory commission? See the word "Uranium"? Ring any bells?

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi...ack-clintons-loved-russia-enough-sell-uranium

Breitbart? Really?

You'll have to excuse me for not choosing something that was proven under the control of a Hillary supporter or takes orders from the DNC, I know you prefer those~

 

[phoenyx]

He said they'd be better off with Nuclear weapons, he never said he wanted to give them nuclear weapons. From every nation's perspective, they'd each be better off with nuclear weapons, for their own protection. Obviously, the US and every other country doesn't want each other to have them, but each would want them because from their own perspective it would make them better off. You start off talking about honesty, and then your original post's claim is inherently dishonest. Here Democrats are, making things up to incriminate a candidate who does it to himself just fine. Does it hurt that much to tell the truth, that you'd rather lie when perfectly good dirt is readily available?

Also, this from someone who's supporting a candidate who was selling Uranium to Russia. Gee, wonder what that was for.

Ahhh, now who is the liar. The Uranium whet through the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Hillary never signed off on it. SOS wasn't needed.

Now, why the Nuclear Regulatory commission? See the word "Uranium"? Ring any bells?

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi...ack-clintons-loved-russia-enough-sell-uranium

Breitbart? Really?

I'm certainly not a fan of Breitbart, but Breitbart isn't the only site that's reported this story...
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal - The New York Times