Yes, The Constitution Allows Indictment of A President

[Viktor]

Yes, the Constitution Allows Indictment of the President

In a recent opinion piece, I argued that the text and structure of the Constitution, a serious commitment to the rule of law, and plain good sense combine to preclude a rigid policy of “delaying any indictment of a president for crimes committed in winning the presidency.” When a scholar I...

www.lawfareblog.com

Let's hear the next BS excuse from the Democrats

 

[BertramN]

What difference does any of it make?

With his henchmen (and now a women) in the USSC, the impeached president trump's second term is assured, regardless of the popular vote, or even the Electoral College vote. The United States Constitution, now, is as easily reinterpreted as a 10 year-old child's poetry.

The RWNJs will be ecstatic November 4th. The United States Supreme Court's decision on trump v The American Voters was written by Chief Justice John Roberts weeks ago. And while it brings joy to the RWNJs knowing the impeached president trump cheated the voters, again, we'll see how long that happiness lasts in führer trump’s Fourth Reich.

We’ll also see if the USSC Justices who made it all possible, survive past 2021. An all-powerful führer trump will be unable to stop himself from purging (executing) anyone he perceives as turning disloyal.


.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Yes, the Constitution Allows Indictment of the President

In a recent opinion piece, I argued that the text and structure of the Constitution, a serious commitment to the rule of law, and plain good sense combine to preclude a rigid policy of “delaying any indictment of a president for crimes committed in winning the presidency.” When a scholar I...

www.lawfareblog.com

Let's hear the next BS excuse from the Democrats

That guy has never read the Constitution.

 

[ReinyDays]

It is DoJ policy that a sitting President cannot be indicted ... the Constitution is silent in such matters ... impeachment and removal from office works fine if enough of us want to see it happen ... The Donald is going to make a good showing in this election no matter who wins ... so there's just not enough people who believe he should be removed ... prosecutors will just have to wait and toll the statute of limitations ...

With the Oval Office tapes in hand ... it was thought impeachment and removal from office was a sure thing in 1973 ... Republicans turned against Richard Nixon ... thus he resigned rather than going through an embarrassing trial in the Senate without hopes of keeping the Presidency ...

 

[justinacolmena]

The RWNJs will be ecstatic November 4th.

Some dude's missing a right testicle, and he's having an operation, or what's that supposed to mean?