Yellowstone Volcano A Western Apocalypse

BullKurtz

Gold Member
Sep 13, 2013
7,070
1,236
245
RIGHT BEHIND YOU
When this baby BLOWS we in the western US are in for it....think A-bomb type of damage. :shock:

yellowstone-plumbing-140423.jpg


A giant reservoir of magma and hot rock beneath the Yellowstone supervolcano has been found and imaged. The newly found reservoir lies 12-28 miles below the surface, and is four-and-a-half times larger than the shallower, hot melted rock zone that powers current Yellowstone geysers and caused the caldera's last eruption some 70,000 years ago.

The volume of the newly imaged, deeper reservoir is a whopping 11,000 cubic-miles (46,000 cubic kilometers), which is about the volume of Long Island with 9 miles of hot rock piled on it, or 300 Lake Tahoes. The discovery begins to fill in a gray area about how Yellowstone connects to a far deeper plume of heat rising up from the Earth's mantle.

“It's existence has been suspected for a while,” said University of Utah geophysicist Hsin-Hua Huang of the newly imaged hot reservoir. Huang is the lead author of a paper announcing the discovery in the Thursday issue of the journal ScienceExpress.


Peering Inside Yellowstone s Supervolcano Discovery News

Scientists with the United States Geological Survey, partly to establish “quantitative research in terms of regional ashfall impacts” in the event of a modern-day eruption, and partly, I’d like to imagine, to fuel all of our nightmares, set out to investigate just that. Their results, published in the journal Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, indicate that things would get really bad, really quickly.

To be clear, the researchers caution that it’s very unlikely this will happen any time soon. But if it did? Whoa.

For starters, there’s the ash: computer modeling indicates that a supereruption (as befits a supervolcano) would spew about
240 miles of it into the atmosphere, effectively shutting down electronic communications and air travel throughout the continent as it dispersed in what’s known as an “umbrella” cloud. How it lands depends on wind conditions, but cities closest to the eruption could end up blanketed in up to a meter of ash; those on the East, West and Gulf Coast would get smaller, but still disruptive, ash deposits of their own.

yellowstone-ash-map.jpg



Even in places where the ash layer is only millimeters thick, water supplies and crops would be ruined; it would be hard to drive, and people would develop respiratory problems. And the climate itself would change significantly. While there are no historical examples large enough to draw a comparison, the researchers note that the considerably smaller Tambora eruption of 1815 ”cooled the planet enough to produce the famed ‘year without a summer’ in 1816, during which snow fell in June in eastern North America and crop failures led to the worst famine of the 19th century.” The reality, they add, pales in comparison to some of the theories floating around on the Internet; apparently that’s meant to be reassuring.


Here s how bad it would be if Yellowstone s supervolcano erupted today - Salon.com
 
An 'A bomb' isn't even close. It could change the entire world's climate and cover two thirds of the US in ash.

There are already a lot of ashes in Washington, D.C., and the volcano hasn't even erupted!
 
When this baby BLOWS we in the western US are in for it....think A-bomb type of damage. :shock:

yellowstone-plumbing-140423.jpg


A giant reservoir of magma and hot rock beneath the Yellowstone supervolcano has been found and imaged. The newly found reservoir lies 12-28 miles below the surface, and is four-and-a-half times larger than the shallower, hot melted rock zone that powers current Yellowstone geysers and caused the caldera's last eruption some 70,000 years ago.

The volume of the newly imaged, deeper reservoir is a whopping 11,000 cubic-miles (46,000 cubic kilometers), which is about the volume of Long Island with 9 miles of hot rock piled on it, or 300 Lake Tahoes. The discovery begins to fill in a gray area about how Yellowstone connects to a far deeper plume of heat rising up from the Earth's mantle.

“It's existence has been suspected for a while,” said University of Utah geophysicist Hsin-Hua Huang of the newly imaged hot reservoir. Huang is the lead author of a paper announcing the discovery in the Thursday issue of the journal ScienceExpress.


Peering Inside Yellowstone s Supervolcano Discovery News

Scientists with the United States Geological Survey, partly to establish “quantitative research in terms of regional ashfall impacts” in the event of a modern-day eruption, and partly, I’d like to imagine, to fuel all of our nightmares, set out to investigate just that. Their results, published in the journal Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, indicate that things would get really bad, really quickly.

To be clear, the researchers caution that it’s very unlikely this will happen any time soon. But if it did? Whoa.

For starters, there’s the ash: computer modeling indicates that a supereruption (as befits a supervolcano) would spew about
240 miles of it into the atmosphere, effectively shutting down electronic communications and air travel throughout the continent as it dispersed in what’s known as an “umbrella” cloud. How it lands depends on wind conditions, but cities closest to the eruption could end up blanketed in up to a meter of ash; those on the East, West and Gulf Coast would get smaller, but still disruptive, ash deposits of their own.

yellowstone-ash-map.jpg



Even in places where the ash layer is only millimeters thick, water supplies and crops would be ruined; it would be hard to drive, and people would develop respiratory problems. And the climate itself would change significantly. While there are no historical examples large enough to draw a comparison, the researchers note that the considerably smaller Tambora eruption of 1815 ”cooled the planet enough to produce the famed ‘year without a summer’ in 1816, during which snow fell in June in eastern North America and crop failures led to the worst famine of the 19th century.” The reality, they add, pales in comparison to some of the theories floating around on the Internet; apparently that’s meant to be reassuring.


Here s how bad it would be if Yellowstone s supervolcano erupted today - Salon.com
I remember the 1964 Alaska quake making the water in ponds slosh around in Louisiana.

I can't imagine what a big one at Yellowstone would do.

It would make for interesting times!
 
When this baby BLOWS we in the western US are in for it....think A-bomb type of damage. :shock:

yellowstone-plumbing-140423.jpg


A giant reservoir of magma and hot rock beneath the Yellowstone supervolcano has been found and imaged. The newly found reservoir lies 12-28 miles below the surface, and is four-and-a-half times larger than the shallower, hot melted rock zone that powers current Yellowstone geysers and caused the caldera's last eruption some 70,000 years ago.

The volume of the newly imaged, deeper reservoir is a whopping 11,000 cubic-miles (46,000 cubic kilometers), which is about the volume of Long Island with 9 miles of hot rock piled on it, or 300 Lake Tahoes. The discovery begins to fill in a gray area about how Yellowstone connects to a far deeper plume of heat rising up from the Earth's mantle.

“It's existence has been suspected for a while,” said University of Utah geophysicist Hsin-Hua Huang of the newly imaged hot reservoir. Huang is the lead author of a paper announcing the discovery in the Thursday issue of the journal ScienceExpress.


Peering Inside Yellowstone s Supervolcano Discovery News

Scientists with the United States Geological Survey, partly to establish “quantitative research in terms of regional ashfall impacts” in the event of a modern-day eruption, and partly, I’d like to imagine, to fuel all of our nightmares, set out to investigate just that. Their results, published in the journal Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, indicate that things would get really bad, really quickly.

To be clear, the researchers caution that it’s very unlikely this will happen any time soon. But if it did? Whoa.

For starters, there’s the ash: computer modeling indicates that a supereruption (as befits a supervolcano) would spew about
240 miles of it into the atmosphere, effectively shutting down electronic communications and air travel throughout the continent as it dispersed in what’s known as an “umbrella” cloud. How it lands depends on wind conditions, but cities closest to the eruption could end up blanketed in up to a meter of ash; those on the East, West and Gulf Coast would get smaller, but still disruptive, ash deposits of their own.

yellowstone-ash-map.jpg



Even in places where the ash layer is only millimeters thick, water supplies and crops would be ruined; it would be hard to drive, and people would develop respiratory problems. And the climate itself would change significantly. While there are no historical examples large enough to draw a comparison, the researchers note that the considerably smaller Tambora eruption of 1815 ”cooled the planet enough to produce the famed ‘year without a summer’ in 1816, during which snow fell in June in eastern North America and crop failures led to the worst famine of the 19th century.” The reality, they add, pales in comparison to some of the theories floating around on the Internet; apparently that’s meant to be reassuring.


Here s how bad it would be if Yellowstone s supervolcano erupted today - Salon.com
I remember the 1964 Alaska quake making the water in ponds slosh around in Louisiana.

I can't imagine what a big one at Yellowstone would do.

It would make for interesting times!

I guess interesting would be one way of putting it.....
Instant third world nation conditions and worse.
 
When this baby BLOWS we in the western US are in for it....think A-bomb type of damage. :shock:

yellowstone-plumbing-140423.jpg






A giant reservoir of magma and hot rock beneath the Yellowstone supervolcano has been found and imaged. The newly found reservoir lies 12-28 miles below the surface, and is four-and-a-half times larger than the shallower, hot melted rock zone that powers current Yellowstone geysers and caused the caldera's last eruption some 70,000 years ago.

The volume of the newly imaged, deeper reservoir is a whopping 11,000 cubic-miles (46,000 cubic kilometers), which is about the volume of Long Island with 9 miles of hot rock piled on it, or 300 Lake Tahoes. The discovery begins to fill in a gray area about how Yellowstone connects to a far deeper plume of heat rising up from the Earth's mantle.

“It's existence has been suspected for a while,” said University of Utah geophysicist Hsin-Hua Huang of the newly imaged hot reservoir. Huang is the lead author of a paper announcing the discovery in the Thursday issue of the journal ScienceExpress.


Peering Inside Yellowstone s Supervolcano Discovery News

Scientists with the United States Geological Survey, partly to establish “quantitative research in terms of regional ashfall impacts” in the event of a modern-day eruption, and partly, I’d like to imagine, to fuel all of our nightmares, set out to investigate just that. Their results, published in the journal Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, indicate that things would get really bad, really quickly.

To be clear, the researchers caution that it’s very unlikely this will happen any time soon. But if it did? Whoa.

For starters, there’s the ash: computer modeling indicates that a supereruption (as befits a supervolcano) would spew about
240 miles of it into the atmosphere, effectively shutting down electronic communications and air travel throughout the continent as it dispersed in what’s known as an “umbrella” cloud. How it lands depends on wind conditions, but cities closest to the eruption could end up blanketed in up to a meter of ash; those on the East, West and Gulf Coast would get smaller, but still disruptive, ash deposits of their own.

yellowstone-ash-map.jpg



Even in places where the ash layer is only millimeters thick, water supplies and crops would be ruined; it would be hard to drive, and people would develop respiratory problems. And the climate itself would change significantly. While there are no historical examples large enough to draw a comparison, the researchers note that the considerably smaller Tambora eruption of 1815 ”cooled the planet enough to produce the famed ‘year without a summer’ in 1816, during which snow fell in June in eastern North America and crop failures led to the worst famine of the 19th century.” The reality, they add, pales in comparison to some of the theories floating around on the Internet; apparently that’s meant to be reassuring.


Here s how bad it would be if Yellowstone s supervolcano erupted today - Salon.com
I remember the 1964 Alaska quake making the water in ponds slosh around in Louisiana.

I can't imagine what a big one at Yellowstone would do.

It would make for interesting times!

I guess interesting would be one way of putting it.....
Instant third world nation conditions and worse.


Note to self: Buy more ammo!!!
 
another year or 2 - 3 of years without summer ,sorta like 1816 . --- 1816 The Year Without a Summer Weather --- pretty interesting thought and I believe that much of the USA would be gone . Best place from what I've heard would be on the west coast with surrounding mountains . Course , some of those mountains in northern Cali and Orygun are volcanic .
 
If it happened, it would be pretty chaotic, and there would have to be martial law in large areas of the country. The east would get a big influx of people and cause shortages there for sure.
 
VOLCANIC dust in the air so engines and lungs destroyed or reduced in efficiency , Air travel restricted or reduced . Attacks on the USA from all of Americas enemies . Lack of food and then lack of being able to grow food . Small isolated areas would probably do best at surviving I think !!
 
dust in the air so engines and lungs destroyed or reduced in efficiency , Air travel restricted or reduced . Attacks on the USA from all of Americas enemies . Lack of food and then lack of being able to grow food . Small isolated areas would probably do best at surviving I think !!

You'd have to get out of the ash zone for sure,that shit would get into everything.
 
dust in the air so engines and lungs destroyed or reduced in efficiency , Air travel restricted or reduced . Attacks on the USA from all of Americas enemies . Lack of food and then lack of being able to grow food . Small isolated areas would probably do best at surviving I think !!

You'd have to get out of the ash zone for sure,that shit would get into everything.
They would have to distribute canned and heavily preserved food, and probably even use some of the military rations. Imagine eating that for up to a decade, while the dust clears.
 
dust in the air so engines and lungs destroyed or reduced in efficiency , Air travel restricted or reduced . Attacks on the USA from all of Americas enemies . Lack of food and then lack of being able to grow food . Small isolated areas would probably do best at surviving I think !!

You'd have to get out of the ash zone for sure,that shit would get into everything.
They would have to distribute canned and heavily preserved food, and probably even use some of the military rations. Imagine eating that for up to a decade, while the dust clears.

The only good thing you could say it the population density isnt a heavy in that area.
Just be glad that big bastard isnt on the east coast.
 
Best to be prepared with a little bit of food and supplies stashed but you can't store enough food unless you are a government big wig where taxpayers have done the work of survival for you . There are probably some of Americas ultra rich that have huge stockpiles of stuff on huge land area retreats that have been built for a stab at surviving catastrophes of any type .
 
Best to be prepared with a little bit of food and supplies stashed but you can't store enough food unless you are a government big wig where taxpayers have done the work of survival for you . There are probably some of Americas ultra rich that have huge stockpiles of stuff on huge land area retreats that have been built for a stab at surviving catastrophes of any type .
The ultra rich won't even stay here, rather they will use it to take and live in the least touched places on Earth.
 
If it happened, it would be pretty chaotic, and there would have to be martial law in large areas of the country. The east would get a big influx of people and cause shortages there for sure.






Civilization would utterly collapse after an event like that. The question is for how long. Months? Years? There's no way of knowing till it happens. Suffice to say that well over 10 million would die in fairly short order.
 
If it happened, it would be pretty chaotic, and there would have to be martial law in large areas of the country. The east would get a big influx of people and cause shortages there for sure.






Civilization would utterly collapse after an event like that. The question is for how long. Months? Years? There's no way of knowing till it happens. Suffice to say that well over 10 million would die in fairly short order.
More like 100 million to a billion, depending on the wars and mayhem that results.
 
If it happened, it would be pretty chaotic, and there would have to be martial law in large areas of the country. The east would get a big influx of people and cause shortages there for sure.






Civilization would utterly collapse after an event like that. The question is for how long. Months? Years? There's no way of knowing till it happens. Suffice to say that well over 10 million would die in fairly short order.
More like 100 million to a billion, depending on the wars and mayhem that results.






I was talking about the immediate deaths. Worldwide the toll would be well into the 2 to 3 billion mark. Agriculture would collapse in the northern hemisphere. I don't know how bad it would be in the southern, but it too would be impacted. Global starvation would be a serious problem that might not be able to be mitigated.
 

I wonder if there are any potential methods that could be used to kickstart the volcanic eruption... methods which certain people could take advantage of.

 
Russia has been working on a way to induce the caldera to erupt. Except that if it did the whole world, including Russia would be in darkness for at least three years. Rain worldwide would be acidic and sulphurous. It would be national suicide.

The United States would break in two while the large fault lines along the west coast would rupture. The Santa Monica mountains would be west coast islands. The energy released could well travel along the ring of fire wiping out pacific islands abd most of Japan. So Russia scrapped the idea as being worse for them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top