Year of Immunity for the Bergdahl Five To Support Terrorism

[Zander]

It would be reasonable for Obama to explain the details of this release. It's one thing when criminals are paroled here and watched. These terrorists should not have been set free because they are still quite dangerous and we don't know who will be keeping an eye on them.

So far, Obama acts like it's no one's business but his own. Someone remind him that he is a public servant who is bound to laws and not a dictator. The Taliban approves of him far more than the American people right now.

His strategy is appeasement. He's the "Sally Field" of Presidents.

 

[kaz]

Aww I see you just got your Fox talking points.

No content, eh? Why am I not surprised.

Seems you're the one with the the White House talking points down though.

 

[kaz]

So as I understand it, the five Taliban are confined to Qatar. Does that not mean that as long as they stay in Qatar, they can freely engage in terrorism support?

When a crime boss is on parole and isn't allowed to leave the city, does that mean they can freely engage in crime support?


You see how idiotic you sound parroting tard talking points?

Once again the MS-NBC shill heard from, thanks for that useless contribution. When a Democrat is in question, you've got their back.

 

[kaz]

I was just thinking we should have a live Fox News stream at the top of the Politics forum to save all their piss drinking rubes the trouble of rushing here to parrot them.

This thread brings the six day Bergdahl topic count up to 87!

make sure you post in each of them!! That'll show those piss drinkers!!

Try to insult all you want. The fact is they literally used the term on the five two minutes before this thread was started.

Sounds like Fox is on the ball, I didn't watch them. It's a great question. The only news I watch is the only one that knows what they're talking about, CNBC.

 

[kaz]

These men are not physical fighters, but lead men, so in my opinion, yes they can carry on just as they did previously. Also there was another taliban released to Qatar, under these same conditions that left, even though he was under orders not to-
"The State Department's concerns about Qatar's supervision of released militants were detailed in a diplomatic cable dated February 2009 by the U.S. embassy in Doha, Qatar's capital, citing the case of Jarallah al-Marri, a former Guantanamo detainee released to Qatar in July 2008.In the cable, the U.S. embassy criticized Qatar for failing to follow through on promises to bar al Marri from leaving Qatar, noting he made two trips to Britain since his release from Guantanamo, and that during his second visit, in early 2009, British authorities arrested him."
Can Qatar Keep Released Guantanamo Inmates From Plotting?

So as I understand it, the five Taliban are confined to Qatar. Does that not mean that as long as they stay in Qatar, they can freely engage in terrorism support? I mean technically that may not be the agreement, but doesn't that work out to be the reality? If they stay in Qatar, is anyone really going to do anything to stop them? Would that not make it look like we are the ones who didn't honor the deal?

This is exactly the point

 

[Katzndogz]

All that has to happen is for one or more of these "generals" plan an attack and obama will be trotted out of the white house in chains.

After all, it's not like Bin Laden came here and personally attacked us. Now there are thousands more islamics here then there were in 2001. Not only from the middle east but from Chechnya and Nigeria as well.

 

[Peach]

Bush released almost every Saudi, years ago. From 10-27% have returned to terror. And the idea these five are the "most dangerous" is nothing but a talking point from certain anti Obama talking heads. On to the news, Iraqi muslim extremists, real al Qaeda, not the Taliban, which have taken the place of al Qaeda in too many minds, are rising in Iraq:

Grisly scene in Iraq: 'See these children?' - CNN.com

 

[kaz]

If they do engage in terrorist activity they will find a drone visiting them..

Obama admit a mistake? I have some swamp ... er ... resort land to sell you in Florida...

 

[depotoo]

Bush released almost every Saudi, years ago. From 10-27% have returned to terror. And the idea these five are the "most dangerous" is nothing but a talking point from certain anti Obama talking heads. On to the news, Iraqi muslim extremists, real al Qaeda, not the Taliban, which have taken the place of al Qaeda in too many minds, are rising in Iraq:

Grisly scene in Iraq: 'See these children?' - CNN.com

Nothing but a talking point? You are either seriously misinformed or delusional. Which is it, peach? I would have loved for that to be the case.

 

[kaz]

All that has to happen is for one or more of these "generals" plan an attack and obama will be trotted out of the white house in chains.

I doubt that. Benghazi, Fast and Furious, the IRS, his lies to get ObamaCare and a myriad of other crimes by his administration were just as great and he hasn't paid any price for that. The left wing media still controls this country despite Fox and the new media getting broader information out.

 

[kaz]

Bush released almost every Saudi, years ago. From 10-27% have returned to terror. And the idea these five are the "most dangerous" is nothing but a talking point from certain anti Obama talking heads. On to the news, Iraqi muslim extremists, real al Qaeda, not the Taliban, which have taken the place of al Qaeda in too many minds, are rising in Iraq:

Grisly scene in Iraq: 'See these children?' - CNN.com

Because of course we can blindly trust the administration talking heads...

 

[Peach]

Bush released almost every Saudi, years ago. From 10-27% have returned to terror. And the idea these five are the "most dangerous" is nothing but a talking point from certain anti Obama talking heads. On to the news, Iraqi muslim extremists, real al Qaeda, not the Taliban, which have taken the place of al Qaeda in too many minds, are rising in Iraq:

Grisly scene in Iraq: 'See these children?' - CNN.com

Because of course we can blindly trust the administration talking heads...

CNN works the Obama administration? Does FOXnews?

Violent attacks in Iraq kill 20 | Fox News

 

[KNB]

Reagan supported terrorism.

 

[kaz]

Bush released almost every Saudi, years ago. From 10-27% have returned to terror. And the idea these five are the "most dangerous" is nothing but a talking point from certain anti Obama talking heads. On to the news, Iraqi muslim extremists, real al Qaeda, not the Taliban, which have taken the place of al Qaeda in too many minds, are rising in Iraq:

Grisly scene in Iraq: 'See these children?' - CNN.com

Because of course we can blindly trust the administration talking heads...

CNN works the Obama administration?

yes

Does FOXnews?

no

Violent attacks in Iraq kill 20 | Fox News[/QUOTE]

how does this support your point that "the idea these five are the 'most dangerous' is nothing but a talking point from certain anti Obama talking heads?"

 

[KNB]

Violent attacks in Iraq wouldn't have happened if these men stayed in prison?

 

[depotoo]

Taliban*Poisoned*School*Girls, Say*AfghanistanOfficials ... When the*Taliban*ruled*Afghanistan,*girls*were banned from going to*school*and women were ...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/06/taliban-poison-school-girls-afghanistan_n_1573325.html
Initiation into the*Taliban*starts early, in this case a 12-year old*boy is being coached in the finer points of*beheading. It takes him a while to saw through the ...
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2009/...t-beheading-warning-extremely-graphic-images/
BBC News - Afghan Taliban 'behead two boys in Kandahar'

Bush released almost every Saudi, years ago. From 10-27% have returned to terror. And the idea these five are the "most dangerous" is nothing but a talking point from certain anti Obama talking heads. On to the news, Iraqi muslim extremists, real al Qaeda, not the Taliban, which have taken the place of al Qaeda in too many minds, are rising in Iraq:

Grisly scene in Iraq: 'See these children?' - CNN.com

Because of course we can blindly trust the administration talking heads...

CNN works the Obama administration? Does FOXnews?

Violent attacks in Iraq kill 20 | Fox News

 

[buckeye45_73]

Reagan supported terrorism.

linK or do you just like to tease my balls?