Yeah, this about sums Trump up

[Dr Grump]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

 

[PredFan]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

 

[g5000]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

Yeah, it's been, what, 44 years since we had a Saturday Night Massacre.

That ended well for the other guy...

 

[g5000]

Speaking of not ending well and the New York Times interview. Trump actually said, "Well, Napoleon finished a little bit bad."

The man is a historical genius!

 

[tinydancer]

What laws has he broken to become a lawless President? Be specific and give a link or this is just another "President Trump has poopy pants thread".

Cripes its like every liberal on this board has turned into rdean. Sheesh.

 

[Lumpy 1]

Well, when Mueller hires Democrat Party political donors and lawyers that worked for Hillary and the leaker Comey is Mueller's best buddy, I can understand why Democrats feel the special council is completely fair and not the least bit corrupt already, it makes perfect sense...

 

[Timmy]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

Obstruction of justice .

 

[jillian]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

 

[PredFan]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

Obstruction of justice .

It isn't, not at all. They are on a fishing expedition with no proof at all. There is no obstruction of justice without a crime.

 

[PredFan]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

No crime, no obstruction. How stupid are you exactly?

 

[PredFan]

What laws has he broken to become a lawless President? Be specific and give a link or this is just another "President Trump has poopy pants thread".

Cripes its like every liberal on this board has turned into rdean. Sheesh.

It's the severe butthurt they got in November. They never had a tight grip on reality to start with.

 

[007]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

So tell us all where the "justice" is in a political witch hunt that's gone on for 11 months now and found nothing, and is veering off in directions that's got nothing to do with COLLUSION?

 

[Lumpy 1]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

Sheesh, you obviously suck as a lawyer but you'd make a great Lewinsky.

mmm. maybe not for Republicans though.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

Nixon refused to release the tapes to Archibald Cox. How well did that work out for President Nixon?

Conspiracy Theory I:

Trump has been in contact with Putin; no one knows what they spoke about. It's possible Trump asked for the best way to neutralize Mr. Mueller, Putin seems to have figured out a way to neutralize his
distractors - does Plutonium ring a bell?
Poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko - Wikipedia

 

[usmbguest5318]

bye-bye Mr Pres.

I have for months now thought Congress should remove Trump from office on general principle alone. After all, it's not as though his successor won't be a Republican.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

there is nothing "fake" about it, idiota...

obstruction of justice is illegal.

high crimes and misdemeanors is a very broad concept...

you were the same freaks who thought Clinton should be impeached for a blow job.

Sheesh, you obviously suck as a lawyer but you'd make a great Lewinsky.

mmm. maybe not for Republicans though.

S.T. F. U.

 

[PredFan]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

Nixon refused to release the tapes to Archibald Cox. How well did that work out for President Nixon?

Conspiracy Theory I:

Trump has been in contact with Putin; no one knows what they spoke about. It's possible Trump asked for the best way to neutralize Mr. Mueller, Putin seems to have figured out a way to neutralize his
distractors - does Plutonium ring a bell?
Poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko - Wikipedia

There was a crime. There is no crime here. How can you leftists be this stupid and still get on the internet?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Conspiracy II:

Trump's family is fed up with the on going investigation and fear they will be found culpable of crimes. They demanded he quit and not be impeached and plotted with him to do every stupid thing he and they could to lay claim that Trump was sick and tired of this witch hunt, and decided to resign to protect his family and his money.

 

[Lewdog]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

Actually Trump can't fire him. He would have to order Rosenstein to do it.

 

[PredFan]

Hope he does fire the special prosecutor. Then definitely bye-bye Mr Pres.

Trump's deeply worrisome New York Times interview reveals a lawless president

Fake news. It's not against the law for Trump to fire him. It's not a crime, it's not a High Crime, it's not a misdemeanor.

Actually Trump can't fire him. He would have to order Rosenstein to do it.

Ok, thanks for the clarification.